User talk:Kürschner/archive/2014

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Revillon Frères

Hello Kürschner : just have a look at the link fr:Revillon Frères, the London Boutique was undoubtedly at Regent Street 190. And there is no number 190 at Paris'rue de Rivoli. Yours, --Spiessens (talk) 21:52, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Kürschner (talk) 22:01, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Stilwerk Düsseldorf 2014 (3).jpg

Hi. Bist Du da sicher? Sieht mir nicht wirklich nach Duplikat aus. --Krd 18:41, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Nein, gering anders. Aber ganz wenig, nur versehentlich hochgeladen. Hat keinen Mehrwert, ab in den Shredder. Aber danke der Nachfrage und schönen Abend heute Abend. -- Kürschner (talk) 20:21, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Kürschner (talk) 22:01, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Fur clothing?

I won't revert your edit here. However, the fact that Blitz was a sideshow performer implies -- to me, at least -- that he did not wear fur clothing, but instead had some sort of affliction that affected his appearance (possibly hypertrichosis). I doubt there's way to know for sure, of course, not after more than a hundred years. DS (talk) 12:26, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Your last statement is certainly correct. I see in the image the typical form of a skin, maybe worn like a pinafore. The joke of the haired freak could be, to wear a second fur over his own (this could be interesting for someone who writes about fur). Maybe. But I may be wrong. I think, sometimes it is better to categorize it in a perhaps wrong category. It makes people like you to think about it, maybe they have more information. Thank you, greetings from a furrier -- Kürschner (talk) 16:31, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Kürschner (talk) 22:01, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Turkish Airlines

Thank you for photographing the office! WhisperToMe (talk) 06:25, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Kürschner (talk) 22:01, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Fingerhut zweier Pelznäherinnen - a thimble of two fur sewers.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Fingerhut zweier Pelznäherinnen - a thimble of two fur sewers.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 12:38, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Done, thank you. -- Kürschner (talk) 12:44, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Kürschner (talk) 22:01, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Happy tuesdaj

File:Jour d'la Libéthâtion Jèrri 9 d'Mai 2012 36.jpg File:Jour d'la Libéthâtion Jèrri 9 d'Mai 2012 23.jpg File:Jour d'la Libéthâtion Jèrri 9 d'Mai 2012 25.jpg File:Jour d'la Libéthâtion Jèrri 9 d'Mai 2012 26.jpg

Carolus (talk) 05:19, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Glad on wednesday! -- Kürschner (talk) 06:12, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
File:François, Claude (dit Frère Luc) - Saint Bonaventure.jpg
Done on Saturday. -- Kürschner (talk) 18:58, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Kürschner (talk) 12:29, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Duplicate requests

In Category:Duplicate you will see your requests for deletion. I am wondering why you have requested the deletion of pdf on one occasion, and jpgs on others. If we are to have the files, I am wondering whether they should be built into a continuous pdf file, or a djvu file if they are part of a book.  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:36, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Hallo billinghurst, the pdf-files are shown wrong in the normally wikimedia size (to long), it is a bug, probably they will fix it next time. Before I got the message, that they will probably fix it, I loaded all pages up in jpg again, also the files I tried in jpg before. So there doubles in jpg and in pdf now. Thank you for asking. -- Kürschner (talk) 11:38, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Kürschner (talk) 12:29, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Philipp Manes manuscript Die Deutsche Pelzindustrie und ihre Verbande

Can you please tell me how I can find a copy of this manuscript. An article about Emil Brass refers to my ancestors who were furriers in Berlin in the 1800's-1900's and mentions Mr. Manes' manuscript as a source. I live in the United States. Any assistance to further my research would be greatly appreciated. Thanks for reading this.

I own a copy of the original manuscript part 1 and 2 and an original carbon copy of part three. All together this are some hundred pages. Maybe I can copy some pages for you, if you write, what I have to look for. Please mail me to my mail account, here on the left. Probably the Jewish Museum in Prague has also copies of the manuscripts? -- Kürschner (talk) 22:20, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Kürschner (talk) 12:29, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Category:Hermann_Philippsberg,_Rauchwarenhändler

Category discussion warning

Hermann Philippsberg, Rauchwarenhändler has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Leyo 01:48, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Kürschner (talk) 15:45, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Chinesisches Pelz-Fachbuch.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Chinesisches Pelz-Fachbuch.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Wcam (talk) 12:50, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Kürschner (talk) 15:45, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Chinesisches Pelz-Fachbuch.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Chinesisches Pelz-Fachbuch.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Wcam (talk) 18:53, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Kürschner (talk) 15:45, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Silly

I changed the category Squirrel (clothing) on File:Hanna Walter (1961).jpg to Fur jackets, and even that is far fetched in a period of time everyone was wearing plastic clothing. I'm sorry, squirrel is really not probable. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 23:57, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

It is definitiv Squirrel fur. No doubt about it (squirrel backs). I see the individuell skins, the problems of working small skins, the character of the naturell fur, and so on. Believe me, it is my job, also in 1961 worked thousends of furriers. But - this was not a new coat. Look the other pictures in the category squirrel (clothing), I do not know whether a non-expert can see it too?. --Kürschner (talk) 07:40, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Kürschner (talk) 06:58, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

category:Fur pictures by photographer

Die Kategorisierung halte ich für übertrieben. Die Konsequenz davon ist, dass man den gesamten(!) Kategorienbaum von Commons duplizieren müsste und mit der Anzahl der Fotografen multiplizieren würde indem man ein "by photographer" dahintersetzt. Bitte für die Bildung solcher Schnittmengen auf Catsca zurückgreifen. --Martin H. (talk) 14:23, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Gleiches gilt für Category:Pictures by Wilhelm von Gloeden with fur‎ . Catscan verwenden. Unterhalb einer Einzelperson nochmal sämtliche Themen-Categorien abzuspulen macht keinen Sinn. --Martin H. (talk) 14:29, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
Ich bin vorerst, nicht nur, technisch gehandicapt (fremdes Laptop ohne Maus...). Werde mich, es dauert allerdings längere Zeit. inhaltlich (ich verstehe es noch nicht so recht - eher garnicht) und mit Catscan auseinandersetzen (ich habe es wohl einmal versuchsweise benutzt, war aber irgendein Problem). Erst mal danke. Anmerkungː Eine gleiche Geschichte ist doch dann Category:Fur in art by artist? -- Kürschner (talk) 14:52, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Kürschner (talk) 06:58, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

HAPPY WEDNESDAY!!

Gent
Nederlands: Bedanktǃ -- Kürschner (talk) 21:08, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

FOR YOU !!!! Carolus (talk) 20:03, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

HAPPY EVENING - thank you!!! -- Kürschner (talk) 20:13, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Unfortunately it is symply white long rabit. And goat back, by specialist advises. I have more pics. grts Carolus (talk) 20:56, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Surprise - well made. I had no idea, that it could be, maybe with a higher solution... But you and your specialist are right (only the goat backs... But the picture is not big enough to see it) -- Kürschner (talk) 21:01, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for the mailed photographs. I am still not sure with the goat backs. It may possible, and when the expert knows... Two years ago I was in Gent, if I had known this... Good night, -- Kürschner (talk) 21:28, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Robe de Cour LACMA M.83.161.29.jpg ??

Done, thank you. --Kürschner (talk) 11:58, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Kürschner (talk) 06:58, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Category:Calf skins

Hi Kürschner. Are you not thinking of Category:Calf fur-skins instead of Category:Calf skins here? HelenOnline 12:54, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Dear Helen, I think, best is to delete one of them. Which one? (nearly all fur categories are named with a hyphen (= fur-skins), but I think, in this case calf skins is the better version?)-- Kürschner (talk) 15:26, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
I am not an expert on the terminology but I think Category:Calf fur-skins would be less confusing than Category:Calf skins which sounds more like Category:Cattle skin. (By the way I only think of a "calf" as a baby cow so I am still confused as to where the cattle fur-skins for older cows would go.) HelenOnline 15:49, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
I wanted to know where to put File:D'Cor Africa animal skins.jpg. HelenOnline 15:52, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
Don't be confused, I did not want to make an extra category for skins of older cows, they are not relevant for clothing (but unfortunately sometimes for furniture and other items). But how old is a calf and when it is a cow...? Or how large must a skin be, till it is grown up? In German I declared it: Because of the low significance for the products of haired cattle hides (...only one category).
File:D'Cor Africa animal skins.jpg - I hope, the zebra is really a zebra and not a print. I think, this are three cow hides, I will give a second category "Calf skins" - and I know, these are no calfs ;-). Maybe we really should make a new category "cattle hides" or "cattle skins" or "cattle fur-skins"...? Yours -- Kürschner (talk) 20:48, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
Thanks, I think I better leave it up to you. I was trying to photographs flags outside the shop which did not come out very well and nearly deleted the picture but then thought somebody might be interested in the skins on the side of the picture. The shop advertises zebra and Nguni cattle skins as their specialty. File:Nguni Cows.jpg shows the cows the calf skins would have come from. HelenOnline 06:20, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
I have uploaded the full picture with a partial shop sign advertising zebra and Nguni skins at File:D'Cor Africa.jpg. HelenOnline 06:29, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Thank you very much. Also for the undeleted pictures. In English Wiki I saw a photo, where I could see the whole zebra tail. You are right, it should really be a zebra. Regards from Germany, hope to meet you again (latest when you have more fur pictures for me ;-) ) -- Kürschner (talk) 06:58, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Kürschner (talk) 06:58, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Bekannte Sticharten (Nähen) im Jahr 1882 - Sewing stitches.jpg


Hallo,
von Dir stammt folgendes Bild (siehe links).
Die einzelnen Sticharten sind nummeriert.
Gibt es hierzu auch eine Liste der Namen
der einzelnen Sticharten zu den Nummern?
Viele Grüße
-- Der Barbar (talk) 07:33, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

--- Tatsächlich, findet sich in dem Heft. Nachgetragen, s. beim Bild. -- Kürschner (talk) 08:19, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Kürschner (talk) 07:37, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

Bild: Karakul lamb men's fur jacket, Germany, 1987.jpg

Hallo - was hat das Bild Karakul lamb men's fur jacket, Germany, 1987.jpg mit der Hochschule Trier zu tun? Nebenbei: es gibt keine Modeschule Trier. Grüße --HelgeRieder (talk) 15:13, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Die angehende Designerin hat das während Studiums anlässlich eines Wettbewerbs an Hochschule entworfen und die Arbeit beim Kürschner begleitet. Könnte es sein, dass der Zweig damals vielleicht doch so hieß? Immerhin muss es sowas gegeben haben, die Zusammenarbeit ging offensichtlich mindestens über drei Jahre. Siehe dazu auch https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fachhochschule_Trier,_Swakara,_Vereinigung_Initiative_Pelzgestaltung_-_Urkunde_1989.jpg Auch auf dem Foto der Jacke ist eine entsprechende Urkunde zu sehen, den Text kann man, wenn man es weiß, erahnen. Grüße zurück -- Kürschner (talk) 16:31, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Heißt jetzt Hochschule Trier, Fachrichtung Modedesign. -- Kürschner (talk) 16:45, 14 November 2014 (UTC) 

:This section was archived on a request by: Kürschner (talk) 07:37, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Karmel-Mayerling 3764.JPG

Hallo Kürschner, die Kategorie ist ein Irrtum, denn es handelt sich um eine Kopfbedckung eines Sargträgers von Kronprinz Rudolf, nur habe ich nach wie vor keine passende Kategorie gefunden, ich habe es nur etwas genauer erklärt. --gruß K@rl (talk) 20:58, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Danke für den Hinweis. Eine Bestatter-Kopfbedeckung mit Pelz (wenn es dann wirklich welcher ist...), das hatte ich noch nicht. Dafür lege ich vorerst  ;-) keine neue Kategorie an. Schönen Abend! -- Kürschner (talk) 21:12, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
Wenn ich es ganz sicher wüsste, könnte ich sie vielleicht hier unterbringen: → Pelzmütze. --Kürschner (talk) 21:17, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
Ich glaube nicht dass es Pelz, sondern wie Webpelz, ähnlich dieser Form gibt es das ganze in AT noch heute --K@rl (talk) 21:34, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
Wenn kein Pelz, sind es vermutlich Wollfäden. Nur meine ich zu erkennen (erahnen), dass die Haare spitz auslaufen. Dann wäre es weder Webpelz noch Wolle, sondern doch Pelz. Ist mir einfach zu weit weg, um mal eben selbst nachzusehen. -- Kürschner (talk) 21:41, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Kürschner (talk) 07:36, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

Separate categories for Rembrandt paintings

Hello Kürschner! I am in the process of creating separate categories for Rembrandt's paintings; most of the time, there is more than one (or even two or three) image(s) of each painting, and this makes linking in Wikidata easier. I am not deleting the categories that you added; just transferring them from the individual images to the painting's own categories. Keep up the good work! Spinster (talk) 21:23, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Thank you. And keep it up tooǃ -- Kürschner (talk) 07:06, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Kürschner (talk) 07:31, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Gruss zum Wochenende

Mit der Bitte um eine Pelz-Kategorie ;-) --Concord (talk) 13:24, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Solche Grüße lob ich mir. Gleichfalls ein schönes Wochenende. -- Kürschner (talk) 16:12, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Kürschner (talk) 07:31, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Furs & Fashion plates

Hello! I have been working on the category for Fashion plates. What do you think about moving all the fur publications (Lanpher, etc.) into a new sub-category just for furs? For example, "Fashion plates depicting furs" under the category "Fashion plates." Then other fashion plates showing furs could be copied to the new category as well, even when the publication is not primarily about furs. Would you mind if I make this change? Thanks! Laura1822 (talk) 21:30, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Why not. My English isn't good, therefore the question: Is a category name possible, with fur in the beginning? It is easier to find, if I want to categorize furs with HotCat. Maybe Fur fashion plates ( I do all Pictures with (a little bit) fur in "Fur garments", that is also not quite correct)? If not, this is also ok. --Kürschner (talk) 21:47, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
:This section was archived on a request by: Kürschner (talk) 08:51, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Fur skins

Hi! I'm sorry but I didn't undestand this subtlety between trade names and scientific names.

I think we have to change name of the categories anyway, to avoid this type of misunderstood. My problem is that in Category:Felidae, we have civets or genets, and for a same species, we have different fur-trade names (for example, Leopardus tigrinus and his different fur-trade names as Mato Grosso cat, Ceara cat)... It's disturbing because we have a lot of materials about furriers (thanks to you :) ), but we can't use it effectively because of categorization.

I propose to improve the categorization :

What do you think about this proposal ? Regards, --Abujoy (talk) 11:58, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

I would prefer the third version (or letting it as it is, with an additional zoologic category). Who, without me, will know the exact (English!) trade names?! When I started describing the different furs in German Wikipodia, zoological writers wished, that I only use the German fur names. I liked it, it makes my work much easier. I think, the zoological terms (categories) should stand beside the fur names, which are most the same names used in popular English for the animal. Regards -- Kürschner (talk) 12:14, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Kürschner (talk) 08:56, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Ausnahmsweise

mal kein Löschantrag von einem hirnamputierten Copyrightparanoiker, sondern eine Frage: Was ist das denn schönes? Und außerdem: frohes neues Jahr! --AndreasPraefcke (talk) 14:52, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

  • größeres File
    größeres File
  • Bergozelot, Peludo, Margaykatze
    Bergozelot, Peludo, Margaykatze
  • südamerik. Wildkatze, Leopardkatze, Tigerkatze, Cearakatze
    südamerik. Wildkatze, Leopardkatze, Tigerkatze, Cearakatze

Hochinteressant. Habe mich erst noch mal schlau gemacht, wann Südamerika entdeckt wurde ;) - könnte Bergozelot sein. Die Abbildung ist ganz offensichtlich nach einem Original verfertigt, die Zusammensetznähte sind deutlich zu sehen. Fehlen tun für ein so akkurates Bild die Aufhellungen in den Längsflecken, die aber in der Verkleinerung der Fellabbildungen auch nicht mehr zu erkennen sind. - Deinen obskuren Löschantrag hatte ich gesehen, vermutete zurecht, das regelt sich von selbst. Ganz großen Dank! --Kürschner (talk) 16:39, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Jetzt kann ich vor allem sehen, wie schwierig es ist, in einem Stich Feinheiten genau darzustellen. Das waren wirklich Künstler. Noch mal danke. --Kürschner (talk) 21:24, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Kleiner Pelzwitz --AndreasPraefcke (talk) 07:53, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Ein Papst aus dem heißen Südamerika ist für Kürschner schwer geschäftsschädigend. Kaltes Polen oder Bayern war echt besser. --Kürschner (talk) 10:11, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Danke mal wieder fürs Nachkategorisieren der Fasnetbilder. "Furs are such a bother" --AndreasPraefcke (talk) 09:58, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Gern geschehen und danke - erinnere mich bitte in 7 Jahren noch mal an den Link. --Kürschner (talk) 13:15, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Über http://www.theparisreview.org/blog/2011/01/04/the-coats-of-edward-gorey/ stolperte ich heute zufällig bei TumblR. --AndreasPraefcke (talk) 20:28, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Oh, was für eine schöne Geschichte, kannte ich noch nicht. Schade, wir hatten bis vor einigen Jahren eine humoristische Fachzeitschrift, "Die Pelzmotte" - das wäre DER Artikel dafür gewesen. Besten großen Dank! --Kürschner (talk) 20:49, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Jetzt mäkeln die Spinner sogar schon an der Fasnet herum: [1] Nur weil eine Katze "süß" ist? Gegen Lederschuhe habe ich solche Aktionen jedenfalls noch nie gehört. --AndreasPraefcke (talk) 09:54, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Ich könnte Bücher darüber schreiben - wenn ich nicht jedes Mal einen dicken Hals dabei bekommen würde. Danke für den Hinweis. --Kürschner (talk) 10:30, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Was ist denn das schönes? File:Porträtbuch Ratsherren Regensburg 007r.jpg --Narrenmarsch (talk) 14:38, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Hochinteressant. Ohne Deinen Hinweis hätte ich das sich gar nicht als Pelz erkannt. Hiesiges Eichhörnchen, Köpfe mit Ohren. Der dritte, mittlere Fleck ist mir unklar. --Kürschner (talk) 15:31, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Kürschner (talk) 07:18, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

File:Ланская худ Макаров 1849.jpg

Hello, Kürschner! Can you help us with this image of Pushkin's wife - what fur is there? Shakko (talk) 17:04, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

No, sorry. Maybe, if you send me the original ;). Maybe. It can be a kind of marten (for example sable), but also something other. I wonder you see, it is fur... Sorry once more, --Kürschner (talk) 18:45, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
alas, no high res. But we have this one File:N.N. Lanskaya by I.Makarov after V.Hau (circa 1880, All-Russian Pushkin museum, SPb).jpg - same person same painter. Maybe same clothing. Shakko (talk) 19:01, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
I would say, squirrel backs again, see the text above. Evan Makarov painted the furs not very detailed. Funny, I am just writing about squirrel fur. Around 1880 squirrel was not very expensive, in Germany they made children's clothing from this. That suggest against my presumption, but Russian squirrel was most of time the fur of the low aristocracy. --Kürschner (talk) 21:40, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
her second husband was quite poor, it match.... Thanks, my dear expert! Did you see, I'm uploading high res files for Category:Romanov Anniversary Ball (1903) - Album (1904, Peterburg)? many "fresh meat" for you. --Shakko (talk) 20:25, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
I am two days not online, trying to tell the hunters at their fair that they must use the red fox furs, not threw them away after shooting, it's a sin. - I saw your uploads the days before, fine. I had categorizes the Romanow Ball under "Sable (clothing)", it is ok for nearly all photos with fur there. And the second uploads are often categorized double in this category before I categorized the whole Ball there. Good night, a little bit tired after the first hunting fair day. --Kürschner (talk) 20:39, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Kürschner (talk) 07:18, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Happy St-Gummarus!

File:Saint Gummarus inter2.JPG

More where they come from! Carolus (talk) 14:01, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Fine picture! -- Kürschner (talk) 09:38, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Kürschner (talk) 07:18, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Kürschner/archive/2014&oldid=535529582"