User talk:Jugrü
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 11:03, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Kamelkopf.JPG was uncategorized on 14 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:03, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
File:Carotinoide.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Rosenzweig τ 17:35, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
Einspruch! Alle zusammengestellten Bilder entstammen Wikimedia Commons und sind gemeinfrei. Ich habe also ausschließlich gemeinfreie Bilder für diese Collage verwendet. Die Abbildung verstößt daher gegen keine Regeln und sollte nicht gelöscht werden. --Jugrü (talk) 17:47, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
- Hallo Jugrü,
- sorry für die Löschung. Durch das komplette Fehlen von Angaben zu den verwendeten Bildern und die Tatsache, dass ich eines der Bilder im Web gefunden hatte (ohne Hinweis auf die Herkunft von Commons), war ich davon ausgegangen, dass das eine der Collagen ist, die aus irgendwelchen aus dem Web geklaubten Bildern zusammengesetzt wurde. So etwas kommt hier immer mal wieder vor, gerne bei Collagen zu Städten. In diesem Fall lag ich falsch und bitte nochmals um Entschuldigung. Eine Bitte noch: Falls du nochmals so eine Collage machst, gib bitte gleich die verwendeten Bilder an, so wie sie jetzt in der Bildbeschreibung stehen. Das entspricht den Anforderungen von Commons (Commons:Lizenzen#Erforderliche Informationen auf der Beschreibungsseite: “Die folgenden Angaben sollten immer auf der Bildbeschreibungsseite stehen, egal ob die Lizenz sie fordert oder nicht: […] * die Quelle des Materials. Wenn es sich nicht um ein selbst gemachtes Bild handelt, sollte hier ein Weblink oder eine Literaturangabe stehen. […]”), und dann weiß jeder gleich, woran er ist. Gruß --Rosenzweig τ 19:47, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
Hallo Rosenzweig, ich freue mich sehr über die Wiederherstellung der Collage und werde in Zukunft auf die Quellenangaben achten. Viele Grüße --Jugrü (talk) 20:10, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 10:13, 23 January 2023 (UTC)