User talk:JuTa/Archive 02
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Picoides pubescens (Downy Woodpecker), male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Egretta picata (Pied Heron).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Category
Hallo, sind Category:Liste der Panzergrenadierverbände der Bundeswehr und Category:Coats of arms of Panzergrenadiertruppe (Heer of Bundeswehr) zufällig die gleichen Kategorien? Grüße --Brackenheim (talk) 13:19, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry keine Ahnung. Sieht für mich aber nach ein wenig Chaos in den Kats aus. Die deutschsprachige Kategorie Liste der ...' passt IMHo nicht so wirklich in die Commons-Namenskonventionen für Kats, oder? Gruß --Jutta234 (talk) 14:12, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
- Ehrlich gesagt ist mit kein anderer Name eingefallen... Hast Du vielleicht eine Idee? Gruß --Brackenheim (talk) 15:10, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
- Also ich würde sie an Deiner Stelle in die entsprechenden Unterkategorien von Coat of arms ... umsortieren und auf "Deine" Kategorie einen Schnelllöschantrag stellen. Kategorien sind keine Listen außerdem wird hier im Allgemeinen englisch kategorisiert. Gruß --Jutta234 (talk) 17:15, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
- Danke! Ich hoffe, es stimmt jetzt... Grüße --Brackenheim (talk) 18:39, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
Vespula germanica
I thought adding the two in Pending Valued image set candidates, for the two images are promoted. Bien amicalement --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:15, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Phyllomedusa sauvagii.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
File mover
The functionality of the template {{Rename}} has recently changed. You might need to clear your cache to see the changes. If successful you should then be able to use the new "Quick adding" link in the template to instruct CommonsDelinker to replace the old name with the new name in all wikis. Please use that every time you rename a file. If further questions arise, feel free to write on my talk page --DieBuche (talk) 10:00, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:WikiReader_Eishockey.PNG
This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:WikiReader_Eishockey.PNG, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:WikiReader_Eishockey.PNG]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Teofilo (talk) 08:11, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
Please write down the photographer's names and the licences of every individual picture. Teofilo (talk) 08:12, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
- Please ask the origial uploader at de:Benutzer_Diskussion:Vonsoeckchen. regards. --Jutta234 (talk) 08:14, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
- It is your duty to do it. You are the one who is uploading the file on Wikimedia Commons. Teofilo (talk) 09:51, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
- Well, thats true. See now de:Benutzer Diskussion:Vonsoeckchen#WikiReader-BildEishockey.. regards. --Jutta234 (talk) 11:12, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 10:48, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Umaglogo klein (1).jpg was uncategorized on 24 February 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:48, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Klaas Zwart.jpg was uncategorized on 28 May 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:46, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Spiegelfrequenz.png was uncategorized on 10 June 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:52, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Esterelle Signet.jpg was uncategorized on 13 June 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:45, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 07:37, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
- Was just a typo. Is now corrected. --Jutta234 (talk) 07:47, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
File:Tischkante.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
–Tryphon☂ 21:50, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
- I am ashtonished. Left a note on File talk:Tischkante.jpg. --Jutta234 (talk) 22:34, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
File:Tischkante.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
–Tryphon☂ 07:22, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
File:Vigelandpark_skulptur.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Wknight94 talk 12:32, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 10:47, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Limestor Dalkingen WP 12-81 (2).jpg was uncategorized on 4 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:47, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Berliner Ringbahn1885.jpg was uncategorized on 8 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:26, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Vandalenjaeger 01.jpg was uncategorized on 25 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:47, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
File:Perlan-Reykjavík-Iceland-20030526.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--Fingalo (talk) 10:59, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Ich habe die Datei hierhin gerettet. Fingalo (talk) 11:08, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Your recent uploads referring to Category:Canton of Vaud : Categorisation
Hi JuTa, please use useful categories and don't over-categorize your images, i.e. please do not categorize your uploads (an example of your recent activity):
You'll help to save time and capacity on commons by categorizing:
- Category:Faoug (and for example Category:Coats of arms of municipalities of the canton of Vaud)
Please use as far as possible the category of the regarding city/town/village or district (if there's no category) etc., or, a localized better 'fitting' i.e. the 'most fitting"' category(ies). Do not add - in addition - the categories of the "parent category", among them cities, states and countries etc.
For further information on categories please read Commons:Categories referring to an accurate categorisation, simplifying your further uploads and categorisation in general. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the commons:help desk.
Thank you for your assistance, Roland 84.75.160.122 22:29, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Wilhelm_Steinitz2.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Wilhelm_Steinitz2.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Jay32183 (talk) 00:07, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
File:Strato_2C.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Nigel Ish (talk) 19:53, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Mannschaftstransportwagen_4.JPG
This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Mannschaftstransportwagen_4.JPG, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Mannschaftstransportwagen_4.JPG]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
High Contrast (talk) 20:44, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
Hello JuTa,
You mightn't know, but the Postbuses are not and never been vehicles from the Deutsche Post. They all belonged to the Kraftpost, which was part of the Deutsche Bundespost. So the Category:Deutsche Post vehicles is wrong! Apart from the fact, that those buses were already decommissioned, when there was only a Deutsche Post of the GDR. Also, I think, it's COM:OVERCAT as Kraftpost already links higher to the Postal vehicles of Germany. So please leave the Category:Deutsche Post vehicles off the page of Deutsche Bundespost Buses. Joerg, the BajanZindy (talk) 22:43, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- I dont understand the difference between Deutsche Post (a disambig) and Deutsche Bundespost. The reason for my change was that I could find it anwhere in a subcat of Category:Postal vehicles, but I didnt realized that it is a gallery and not a category. What, in your eyes, is the "Deutsche Post"? For me, and acording the :de: disambig any of the german posts west/east/whatever. regards --JuTa (talk) 22:56, 17 October 2010 (UTC) PS: If you are german we can talk in german.
- Hallo JuTa, Die Busflotte der Deutschen Bundespost (Kraftpost) wurde lange vor der Privatisierung der Bundespost außer Dienst gestellt bzw. noch kurzzeitig von der Deutschen Bundesbahn weiterbetrieben. Dies war auch einige Jahre bevor die Deutsche Bundespost durch Zusammenschluß mit der Deutschen Post der DDR zur Deutschen Post wurde. Alleine deswegen ist die Kategorie:Deutsche Post vehicles nicht zutreffend. Also eine zeitliche Einordnung, kein Ost/West-Fall. Die Kategorie Kraftpost verknüpft schon rauf zur Kategorie:Postfahrzeuge von Deutschland, genauso wie die Kategorie:Deutsche Post Fahrzeuge, wäre also doppelt gemoppelt. Sollte der Unterschied auf der disambig-Seite nicht klar erklärt sein, muß ich mir das wohl mal anschauen. Alles kein Drama. Jörg, der BajanZindy (talk) 23:30, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- Naja OK. Mein Hauptptoblem war das ich die "Kategorie" nicht im Kategoriebaum finden konnte und wollte sie besser auffindbar machen. Nur dass es ja gar keine Kategorie ist, sondern eine Galerie. Da kann ich im Kat-Baum lange suchen. Klassischer Denk- bzw. Aufmerksamkeitsfehler. Gruß --JuTa (talk) 23:38, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- Hallo JuTa, Die Busflotte der Deutschen Bundespost (Kraftpost) wurde lange vor der Privatisierung der Bundespost außer Dienst gestellt bzw. noch kurzzeitig von der Deutschen Bundesbahn weiterbetrieben. Dies war auch einige Jahre bevor die Deutsche Bundespost durch Zusammenschluß mit der Deutschen Post der DDR zur Deutschen Post wurde. Alleine deswegen ist die Kategorie:Deutsche Post vehicles nicht zutreffend. Also eine zeitliche Einordnung, kein Ost/West-Fall. Die Kategorie Kraftpost verknüpft schon rauf zur Kategorie:Postfahrzeuge von Deutschland, genauso wie die Kategorie:Deutsche Post Fahrzeuge, wäre also doppelt gemoppelt. Sollte der Unterschied auf der disambig-Seite nicht klar erklärt sein, muß ich mir das wohl mal anschauen. Alles kein Drama. Jörg, der BajanZindy (talk) 23:30, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
File:AMG-Taxi.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Geagea (talk) 03:19, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
Deletion requests/File:Pennaria disticha.jpg
The OTRS tichet of File:Pennaria disticha.jpg should be 2007101410010556 --Esculapio (talk) 23:23, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
- Pls. post this to the DR page including how you figured this out. thx. --JuTa (talk) 23:26, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
Delete template subpages
Howdy. With regards to your edit here, it appears your addition of the subpage parameter was unnecessary. The link on this page to the deletion discussion appears to have worked fine.--Rockfang (talk) 01:21, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
- I know. My intention is to move them to the correct month categories. Adding the subpage I do just "by the way". --JuTa (talk) 04:19, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi. To save yourself some work, just mass-copy Category:Mattbuck's Quality Images to Category:Quality images of the United Kingdom - they're all UK images so far. -mattbuck (Talk) 14:48, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks fo the tip, but I'm going through the complete QI-candidate-history. Currently I'm at September 2008. During this process I will catch every QI and assign it to the relevant country category (if possible - not every image is related to a country like diagrams or missing location/geocode for i.e. flowers or insects). regards --JuTa (talk) 14:53, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
File:Wikicent.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Asclepias (talk) 23:35, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Louise_von_Baden.jpg
This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Louise_von_Baden.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Louise_von_Baden.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Magog the Ogre (talk) 09:19, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
FYI:
Here you reverted the compression optimisations that didn't touch the contents.--Natr (talk) 15:13, 23 January 2011 (UTC)