User talk:Jsamwrites/Archives/2022

Hög tid att ladda upp: Wiki Loves Earth 2022!

Förra årets vinnarbild i Wiki Loves Earth!

Hej,
(For information in English, see Wiki Loves Earth 2022 in Sweden or other participating countries.)

Du får det här meddelandet eftersom du tidigare har bidragit med bilder till de svenska deltävlingarna av Wiki Loves Earth eller Wiki Loves Monuments. Jag hoppas att du vill vara med i år också! Som vanligt ingår naturreservat och nationalparker, biosfärområden och naturminnen i tävlingen! Tävlingen började 1 maj, och pågår under hela maj månad. Om du har varit ute i världen och rest kan du även se om resorna sammanfaller med övriga internationella deltävlingar, och i så fall vara med och tävla även där. Även om fortsatt försiktighet är att rekommendera går det bra att ge sig ut på fotosafari och fotografera naturen i ditt närområde – eller varför inte damma av fotoalbumen och tävla med bilder du har tagit tidigare?

Välkommen till tävlingen, och lycka till! /Axel Pettersson (WMSE) (talk) 13:41, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Exterior of Temple Expiatori del Sagrat Cor 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 17:13, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barfüßerkirche (Erfurt) 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 23:07, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reflection of buildings in Pisa 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 09:51, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buildings, Gdansk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 17:15, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Towers In Stockholm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Perspective correction needed. --Palauenc05  Done Thanks for the review comment. Corrected the perspective. -- Jsamwrites 16:29, 2 August 2022 (UTC)  OK now If you add geocoding, I'll be happy . --Palauenc05 17:50, 2 August 2022 (UTC)  Done -- Jsamwrites 18:44, 2 August 2022 (UTC) --Palauenc05 19:55, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boat on Motława river in Gdańsk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 13:01, 1 August 2022 (UTC) Per COM:QIC, images must be properly categorized with a meaningful description to be useful in Commons going forward. “Boat in Gdansk” is insufficient. There are two replica pirate ships in the Gdansk Harbor – is this the Czarna Perła [Category:Czarna Perła (ship, 1974)] or Galeon Lew [Category:Lew (ship, 1999)]? --GRDN711 14:37, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tower, Clouds and Trees Rothenburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aismallard 01:31, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Statuary group on the main altar and the two choir organs - San Luca in Genoa.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Only half of the high altar can be seen. And I see no pianos but pipe organs. For the rest, the picture with the falling lines does not look good. However, I cannot judge whether the room could be photographed from a more favorable position. -- Spurzem (talk) 11:40, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

• Corrected the description John Samuel (talk) 11:59, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

•  Comment There is a problem. We do not see the high altar, but only the statuary group which is above. This scope : Statuary group on the main altar and the two choir organs - San Luca in Genoa : could be suitable. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

•  Done Fixed. Thanks for your proposed scope description. John Samuel (talk) 06:04, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

•  Support Percet now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:44, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:38, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eglise Saint-Aubin (Toulouse) Arche 20171118.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 11:02, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stained glass window of Virgin Mary in Église Saint-Martin de Saint-Martin-de-Valamas (Mobert, Lyon, 1947).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Perspective correction necessary, incorrect scope, for there exist more windows in this church, too poor decription --Llez (talk) 10:39, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

• Thanks for the review comment. Fixed. Corrected the perspective and updated the scope as well as description to precise the comparison with other photographs of stained glasses in the church. John Samuel (talk) 11:41, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

I tried to correct the perspective even further. Maria's head looked very flat beforehand. -- Spurzem (talk) 12:30, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

•  Support. For me it is good now and useful. We have no better images of these windows in the commons as I see. -- Spurzem (talk) 12:35, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
•  Support OK also for me --Llez (talk) 13:07, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose It is a work with several hands which is nice. On the central stained glass there is the name of the author the place and the date; this information must be given in the caption and also in the scope. A work from 1947 may still be copyrighted... The perspective correction is a bit laborious but the latest version is hardly acceptable because it is a composite with frank errors. It would be better to go back on this point. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:38, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Hello Archaeodontosaurus, do you really think that Maria's flattened head in the original photo looks better? Best regards -- Spurzem (talk) 13:17, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

• All this is not very orthodox but there is a common work which is interesting. The basic version serves as a reference, you then have to program your work according to the round drawings! There are some here at the top and bottom of the 3 stained glass windows. We straighten the perspective and they must be perfectly round at the end. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:02, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

  @Archaeodontosaurus Thanks for the updated version of the image. Updated the caption and the scope with the information on the glass. John Samuel (talk) 14:21, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

Very good now, excellent! -- Spurzem (talk) 14:28, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

•  Support it looks fine. --A1Cafel (talk) 15:40, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

Result: 3 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 07:30, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 10:06, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Houses In Stockholm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 06:44, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jet d'eau, Geneva.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:48, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Door of Church of Santa Cruz (Braga).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:53, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ensemble of main altar, two side altars and two pulpits in Igreja de São João do Souto (Braga).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:40, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:19, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bridge on Duoro River.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Alexander-93 11:15, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Street light, Amsterdam.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 06:53, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reflection of buildings in water.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 18:45, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cistern of the Chaplaincy of the Mont Saint-Michel Abbey 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 07:11, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Issoire - Kostel svatého Austremona - 20130621142521.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments distorted, check verticals --George Chernilevsky 08:45, 18 August 2022 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the feedback. Fixed the verticals --Jsamwrites 08:57, 18 August 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality now --George Chernilevsky 09:06, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fountain in St. Peter's Square 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Strong CA and it requires a perspective correction --Poco a poco 10:18, 17 August 2022 (UTC)  Done Thanks for your feedback. Fixed both. --Jsamwrites 15:17, 17 August 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:27, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Interior of Abbatiale de Mont Saint-Michel 20 (cropped).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 09:59, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Windows of Wartburg Castle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Enough quality for QI. --Vincent Vega 18:42, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Door, Antwerpen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments could be sharper... --Tournasol7 15:28, 19 August 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Velvet 05:35, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Doors and Statues, Bruges.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Windows of City Hall In Copenhagen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 11:42, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Railway station In Helsinki.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It doesn't seem sharp - maybe fixable? --Mike Peel 18:10, 23 August 2022 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the feedback. Sharpened the image. --Jsamwrites 13:08, 24 August 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 17:41, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Exterior of Santo Stefano dei Cavalieri (Pisa) 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Purple CA at the bottom, overall it's a bit bright, maybe fixable? --Mike Peel 18:10, 23 August 2022 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the feedback. Reduced brightness and removed purple CA. --Jsamwrites 13:00, 24 August 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 17:41, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boats In Gdansk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Picture basically ok, but please correct perspective distortion, the edges of the the houses right should be vertikal --Isiwal 15:55, 22 August 2022 (UTC)  Done Thanks for your feedback. Fixed the verticals. --Jsamwrites 16:47, 22 August 2022 (UTC)  Comment please see the notes in the picture--Isiwal 12:16, 23 August 2022 (UTC)  Done Thanks for very much for your detailed notes. Fixed the two verticals. --Jsamwrites 12:30, 23 August 2022 (UTC) Ok for QI... --Isiwal 15:42, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Field in Drôme 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:12, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église de l'Immaculée-Conception d'Haut-Biol 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 04:00, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chiesa di Santa Maria in Aquiro 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Green door, Bruges.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 20:36, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Entrance door and surrounding stone stone wall of Église de l'Immaculée-Conception d'Haut-Biol.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Facade refers to the whole front of the building. I suggest a change of scope to simply "Entrance door of ...". That the image of the door includes some of the surrounding stone wall is an aspect of the specific composition. --Tagooty (talk) 03:08, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
 Done Fixed. Thanks for the feedback. John Samuel (talk) 07:12, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

•  Support Thanks. --Tagooty (talk) 03:36, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église de La Chapelle de la Tour 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Alexander Novikov 21:06, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baltic Sea and Cloud.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Pont-en-Royans 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:01, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Pont-en-Royans 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 06:55, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

Nu startar Wiki Loves Monuments 2022!

Vinnarbilden i Wiki Loves Monuments 2021!

Hej!

(For information in English, see Wiki Loves Monuments 2022 in Sweden or other participating countries.)

Du får det här meddelandet då du tidigare har deltagit i de svenska deltävlingarna av Wiki Loves Monuments eller Wiki Loves Earth!

Den 1 september inleds 2022 års svenska deltävling av Wiki Loves Monuments, där det skulle vara väldigt roligt om du ville vara med och delta! Målet med Wiki Loves Monuments är att fotografera svenska kulturarvsmonument. De kategorier som ingår är byggnadsminnen, fornminnen, kulturmärkta fartyg och fritidsbåtar och arbetslivsmuseer – och du är välkommen att bidra med bilder hela september.

Välkommen till tävlingen, och lycka till! /Axel Pettersson (WMSE) (talk) 10:26, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Main entrance of Église de La Chapelle de la Tour.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment I'll be happy to support this, but you'd better call it "main entrance" or "main portal", as there is also a lateral entrance. --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:25, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
•  Done Thanks for your feedback. You are right. I updated the scope to precise that it's the main entrance. John Samuel (talk) 14:48, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
•  Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 07:29, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:22, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arch of Saint-Trophime Cathedral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice shot and ok for me but the crop above is on the tight side.--Famberhorst 15:40, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buildings in Porto 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:39, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Right-side door on the main facade of Palácio do Raio.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 10:57, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lateral Door of Sé de Braga‎ adorned with leaves.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Is there only one lateral door? If not, indicate which this is. The image needs a geotag. As there are many images of this building, it would be useful to create a sub-category "Category:Doors of Sé de Braga". --Tagooty (talk) 10:30, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
 Done Thanks for the feedback. Not considering the doors on the west end (main facade), there is only one lateral door on the south side. Created a new category for all the doors and updated the scope to restrict the scope to doors. Also geotagged the image. John Samuel (talk) 11:35, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

•  Support Thanks. Best in scope. --Tagooty (talk) 14:44, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 07:24, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chiesa di Santa Chiara (Roma) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 05:12, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Exterior of Sé de Braga 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ezarate 18:49, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Main entrance door of Chiesa di Santa Chiara (Roma).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope But why the bottom cut so tight?--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:35, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aqueduc de Saint-Nazaire-en-Royans 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Palauenc05 07:17, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cloister of Saint Amaro (Sé de Braga) 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 22:04, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mudflat of Mont Saint-Michel 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 14:52, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Main entrance door of Igreja de São Martinho de Cedofeita.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:43, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Guimarães 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 10:00, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Igreja de São Martinho de Cedofeita 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 09:10, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Main entrance door of Santo Stefano dei Cavalieri (Pisa).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arch, Cathédrale Sainte-Marie-Majeure.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --FlocciNivis 10:09, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tanque de Santo António in Praça do Doutor João Mota Prego.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --LexKurochkin (talk) 20:07, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:51, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! South façade of Igreja de São Francisco (Porto).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Stratokumulus 13:32, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eglise Saint-Pierre du Mont Saint-Michel 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality - I would like to recommend a different crop e.g. 1:1 --Virtual-Pano 14:43, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church door in Suomenlinna In Helsinki.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 04:51, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Main facade of Palácio do Raio 02-cropped.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Stratokumulus 20:34, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arch on door of Basilique Saint-Martin d'Ainay (Lyon).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for QI --Isiwal 09:10, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chairs, Stockholm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, but I prefer the cropped version. --F. Riedelio 08:02, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Exterior view of Igreja dos Clérigos 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Barrel distortion, fixable. Otherwise good --George Chernilevsky 20:08, 23 September 2022 (UTC)  Done Thanks very much for the feedback. I have corrected the barrel distortion. --Jsamwrites 08:04, 24 September 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 14:24, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Interior of Igreja de Nossa Senhora da Oliveira 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 07:02, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Main entrance door of Suomenlinna Church.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:32, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 20:38, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chiesa del Gesù e dei Santi Ambrogio e Andrea (Genoa) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mosbatho 20:22, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Armazéns Cunhas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 21:07, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Columns near Sé Catedral de Aveiro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 20:28, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bridge view in Suomenlinna In Helsinki.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments acceptable, maybe slightly over-sharpened, the first version was better --Isiwal 08:52, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Window in Florence 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 05:47, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Porto 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments CA should be removed. --Ermell 18:56, 29 September 2022 (UTC)  Done @Ermell: Thanks for the feedback. I have uploaded a new version after CA removal. --Jsamwrites 20:12, 29 September 2022 (UTC) The distortion should be fixed as well. --Ermell 18:59, 30 September 2022 (UTC)  Done @Ermell: Thanks for pointing the distortion. I have corrected it in the new version. --Jsamwrites 07:10, 1 October 2022 (UTC) The building is still leaning out. --Ermell 22:17, 1 October 2022 (UTC)  Done @Ermell: How about this new version? --Jsamwrites 17:53, 2 October 2022 (UTC) Not bad but the verticals should be correct. --Ermell 21:28, 2 October 2022 (UTC) @Ermell: Thanks for pointing it. Corrected the verticals in the new version. --Jsamwrites 18:14, 3 October 2022 (UTC)  Support Thanks for the patience --Ermell 21:41, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Main Entrance door of Église Saint-Pothin, Lyon.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Building in Genoa 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality - neither a geocode nor a useful catogerization --Virtual-Pano 18:09, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Front view, Église Saint-Pierre du Plantay.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Romainbehar 20:14, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église de Sainte Cécile de Loupian 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 09:57, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canal in Aveiro 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --SHB2000 05:33, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Notre-Dame de la Salette, Sète 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 07:40, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Nowy Sącz 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 11:45, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Obélisque d'Arles 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 18:23, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 30 November 2022 (UTC)