User talk:JoshuaW56
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 20:02, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
File tagging File:FoxrockRailwayStation.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:FoxrockRailwayStation.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:FoxrockRailwayStation.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Johnj1995 (talk) 00:47, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Foxrock railway station.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Foxrock railway station.jpg
![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Foxrock railway station.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 13:05, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Foxrock railway station.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Foxrock railway station.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
--Kwekubo (talk) 02:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Drumm battery train D.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Drumm battery train D.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
--Kwekubo (talk) 02:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
- Hi @JoshuaW56. Regarding these two photographs. When you uploaded the image of Foxrock railway station, your edit summary stated that "This picture was taken from the book LUAS - Harcourt Street Memories. The photograph is in the Irish National Archives, but is free to use." This clearly means that you are not the creator of the image. Given that the Drumm battery train was scrapped 60 years ago, you presumably did not create the second image either. Thank you for trying to help with these pictures, but it is very important that everything on Wikimedia Commons is either free of copyright or available under an open licence, so that any user can use any image here for any desired purpose with confidence and without fear of subsequent legal complaints. Could you provide evidence that the image is either without copyright, or that the copyright holder of the image has given permission for its use under terms compatible with Wikimedia Commons? --Kwekubo (talk) 17:30, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
- I never claimed to have taken the pictures. They’re free to use, as you said. I don’t know how I’m supposed to provide evidence when they’re in a book and free to use. I’m sure the national archive wouldn’t mind them being on here, especially since they’ve loads of pictures that have been uploaded to Wikipedia in a similar manner. JoshuaW56 (talk) 10:43, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
- Hi @JoshuaW56. When you uploaded both these images, you added copyright tags asserting that you were in fact the copyright holder of both images, and that you hereby licensed them under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike licence. You then changed this to say that, as the author of the photos, you were additionally releasing them into the public domain. If you are not the author and they were taken from a book, does the book mention the copyright status of the images? Was the permission from the National Archives for a specific purpose (such as inclusion in that book only), or for any purpose including unrestricted commercial use? Please do note that fair use doesn't apply in any way at Wikimedia Commons - this website is strictly for media with no copyright restrictions, including unrestricted commercial use. That is the point of Commons. The requirements for Wikipedia are different and fair use of copyrighted images is acceptable under certain circumstances - but you still need to declare that copyright restrictions apply and explain why that situation qualifies as fair use. Here is an explanation about that. Thanks. --Kwekubo (talk) 22:13, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
- Well I suppose I wasn’t as familiar with the site’s copyright system as I am now. I think they could be fair use, as long as the origin is credited. The pictures are likely in the National Archives but would be okay to use on Wikipedia if they’re readily available in other places. JoshuaW56 (talk) 00:48, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
- Hi @JoshuaW56. When you uploaded both these images, you added copyright tags asserting that you were in fact the copyright holder of both images, and that you hereby licensed them under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike licence. You then changed this to say that, as the author of the photos, you were additionally releasing them into the public domain. If you are not the author and they were taken from a book, does the book mention the copyright status of the images? Was the permission from the National Archives for a specific purpose (such as inclusion in that book only), or for any purpose including unrestricted commercial use? Please do note that fair use doesn't apply in any way at Wikimedia Commons - this website is strictly for media with no copyright restrictions, including unrestricted commercial use. That is the point of Commons. The requirements for Wikipedia are different and fair use of copyrighted images is acceptable under certain circumstances - but you still need to declare that copyright restrictions apply and explain why that situation qualifies as fair use. Here is an explanation about that. Thanks. --Kwekubo (talk) 22:13, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
- I never claimed to have taken the pictures. They’re free to use, as you said. I don’t know how I’m supposed to provide evidence when they’re in a book and free to use. I’m sure the national archive wouldn’t mind them being on here, especially since they’ve loads of pictures that have been uploaded to Wikipedia in a similar manner. JoshuaW56 (talk) 10:43, 30 November 2023 (UTC)