User talk:Jedudedek/archiv 03

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

source=internet

[edit]

Hallo Jedudedek,
please provide more precise information than source=internet for your images. That is not enough. --Túrelio (talk) 22:58, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I complementary in succesive steps. Jedudedek (talk) 23:13, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That's o.k. Thanks.
However, I strongly recommend for your next upload time to enter source information when uploading. Cheers. --Túrelio (talk) 07:38, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I will try it ;-) Jedudedek (talk) 20:17, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
There are still much work to do, please check the images in your gallery. --Martin H. (talk) 03:13, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]


File:GameCon_2007_in_Pardubice_-_Carcassonne.jpg

[edit]
File deletion warning File:GameCon_2007_in_Pardubice_-_Carcassonne.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Polarlys (talk) 22:54, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wenzel Hollar

[edit]
Heu van Brusel

Hi, you uploaded some ship images made by Hollar. In Dutch wikipedia we learn that Hollar engraved a ship called Heu van Brussel in 1648. Here is the picture. Do you have access to a reproduction of this image as well und could upload it? I would very much like to illustrate the German ahoi article with this ship. thanks, Aalfons --91.37.240.235 02:08, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded ;-) Jedudědek (talk) 13:10, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:Mexica_end_-GameCon_2007.jpg

[edit]
File:Mexica_end_-GameCon_2007.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Polarlys (talk) 21:25, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Deskohraní 08s4 082 - League of Six.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sharp, nice moody lighting --Ianare 01:09, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poděkování

[edit]

Chtěla bych moc poděkovat za sbírku historických obrazů, už jsem další z nich zapojila do příslušných stránek... Jinny

Já děkuji za další kategorizaci ;-) Jedudědek (talk) 19:15, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your advice on my recent uploads. I have submitted the appropriate emails for permission approval. Please let me know if there is anything else I can do in the meantime to keep the photos from being deleted. Best, MrMath1966 (talk) 14:17, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:Bauer, Konstantin - Garbiarska ulica (1928, Kosice).jpg

[edit]
File:Bauer, Konstantin - Garbiarska ulica (1928, Kosice).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

--Infrogmation (talk) 02:28, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File source is not properly indicated: File:Agghazy,_Gyula_-_Alley.jpg

[edit]
العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Agghazy,_Gyula_-_Alley.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

—LX (talk, contribs) 19:04, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File source is not properly indicated: File:Agghazy,_Gyula_-_Landscape_(1878).jpg

[edit]
العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Agghazy,_Gyula_-_Landscape_(1878).jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

—LX (talk, contribs) 19:05, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

[edit]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Jedudedek!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 16:10, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Nové verze stávajících souborů

[edit]

Čau, pokouším se načíst několik nových verí stávajících souborů, a vždycky mi vyskoř¨čí toto:

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Shared_file.JPG

Prosím, nevíš co se děje? --Fredy.00 (talk) 18:09, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Some of categories "by alphabet"

[edit]
Category discussion notification Some of categories "by alphabet" has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

--ŠJů (talk) 22:54, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nevhodná šablona

[edit]

K [1] Šablona {{speedy}} se pro tyto účely nepoužívá. --Dezidor (talk) 12:09, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No používám jí k tomuto účelu již několik let a zatím jsem s tím neměl problém. Pravda nepoužívám jí k tomuto účelu příliš často;-) Jestli víš o nějaké vhodnější, rád si nechám poradit :-) Jedudědek (talk) 20:30, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Na tohle se hodí {{delete}} a pak udělat kroky v ní popsané. Mimo jiné v návrhu zmínit, proč vůbec mazat relativně kvalitní soubor již jednou uvolněný pod svobodnou licencí.
PS: Nemyslím si, že ta druhá fotka je v něčem lepší. Navíc je od autora, který nahrál jen jednu fotku, takže kdo ví, jak je to s autorskými právy. Kdyby byla někdy smazána, bylo by lepší tu mít do rezervy další. --Dezidor (talk) 20:47, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Za prvé neumím anglicky a tudíž těžko budu někomu vysvětlovat, proč tu fotku smazat. No ale asi mi nezbude než to teda zkusit :-(snad se někdo najde, kdo to případně přeloží z JDDen do en;-)
Za druhé, nejedná se o relativně kvalitní fotku, ale o velice mizernou fotku. Nahrával jsem jí s mírným sebezapřením v nějaké slabé chvilce;-) Obvykle nemám problém nahrávat nepříliš kvalitní fotografie co se věcí a míst týká, ale u lidí se snažím tohoto co nejvíce vyvarovat. V tomto případě jsem velice ustřelil a dotyčná osoba dokonce žádala na nástěnce správců zdali by nemohla být z článku o ní odstraněna. Bylo jí odpovězeno, že jinou fotografii bohužel nemáme, načež iniciovala pořízení a nahrání té druhé. S autorskými právy je to u ní v pořádku (v nepořádku to bylo s prvními dvěma pokusy;-) (Probíralo se tuším na Tlusťově diskuzní stránce;-)
Ta druhá fotka je lepší téměř ve všem! Neříkej, že jsi si toho nevšiml, neb ti to nebudu věřit;-) Dotyčná osoba se na ní tváří přirozeně a barvy nejsou zkreslené přímým bleskem, nedostatkem je snad jen neostrost.
nj, jdu smolit delete návrh ;-( Jedudědek (talk) 21:27, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please help replace this outdated license

[edit]

Hello!

Thank you for donating images to the Wikimedia Commons. You have uploaded some images in the past with the license {{PD}}. While this was a license acceptable in the early days of Wikimedia, since January 2006, this license has been deprecated and since October 2008 no new uploads with this license was allowed.

The license on older images should be replaced with a better and more specific license/permissions and you can help by checking the images and adding {{PD-self}} if you are the author or one of the other templates that you can see in the template on the image page.

Thank you for your help. If you need help feel free to ask at Commons talk:Licensing or contact User:Zscout370.

The images we would like you to check are:

BotMultichillT 20:40, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

moro photographs

[edit]

Hello, I think it's extremely likely the "Moro" photographs by Richard Buchta which it appears you posted, for example the one in the wikipedia article "Moro Nuba", are of Moru people in Equatoria and not of Nuba Moro. His other photographs in the Pitt-Rivers collection look to be from Equatoria. Do you have reason to think I'm wrong? —George Gibbard

I guess you're right, I do not understand too ;-) Jedudědek (talk) 09:49, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Deskohraní 08-09-27 207.jpg

[edit]

Hi Jedudedek, did all people in the image agree to being published? --Túrelio (talk) 15:58, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Praha, Smíchov - Janáčkovo nábřeží 885 317.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Cayambe 10:21, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Praha, Smíchov - Preslova 11 (sklo).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment QI IMHO. Fred Hsu 17:01, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Praha, Smíchov - Národní dům 243.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Ikar.us 00:50, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jedudedek/archiv_03&oldid=37122740"