User talk:Jane023/Archive 12
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Edith Greindl, Marie-Louise Hairs, Michel Kervyn de Meerendre, Margret Klinge, Bénédicte Schifflers, Yvonne Thiery - De Gouden Eeuw van de Vlaamse Schilderkunst, 1990.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 20:06, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Logo mediamonks.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Trade (talk) 13:51, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
Koekplanken has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
JopkeB (talk) 03:41, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
Bol?
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/49/Self_portrait_of_Ferdinand_Bol_-_Benaki_museum_-_Athens.jpg/220px-Self_portrait_of_Ferdinand_Bol_-_Benaki_museum_-_Athens.jpg)
Hi Jane, in het Benaki museum voor Griekse cultuur in Athene kwam ik dit schilderij tegen, het viel me nogal op tussen alle Griekse cultuur. Het bijschrift stelde "zelfportret van Ferdinand Bol", maar dat kan ik mij bijna niet voorstellen... Het was in slechte staat, met plooien, en het hing gewoon in de hal bij de ingang... Het Rijksmuseum heeft dit totaal andere portret met palet. Wat vind jij ervan? Met groet, Ellywa (talk) 17:48, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- Ik ben met je eens, maar de museum is leading. Wellicht is het een stuk uit zijn jonge jaren? Het is beslist 17e eeuws, al is het wel gerimpeld (zal wel komen door het klimaat aldaar). Wel een wikidata item waard, hoor! Jane023 (talk) 18:08, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- Ja dat het oud is, dat geloof ik meteen. Ik kan er verder niks over vinden, dus dat is wel vreemd. Google image search, Bing en TinEye leveren ook niks op. Ellywa (talk) 20:46, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- dat is heel vaak zo met NL werken in verre oorden- over tijd zal dat veranderen, dankzij uploaden, dus bedankt! Je zou nog even kunnen zoeken op artnet, maar dat werkt alleen voor stukken verkocht in de laatste 10 jaar ofzo. Dit zal wel een leen-object zijn want niks vermeld op hun website. Misschien is het opgenomen in een bol catalogus, maar die heb ik niet. Het is zeker niet in de RKD. Gr, Jane023 (talk) 07:17, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- Volgens het bijschrift (niet gefotogafeerd) een gift van iemand aan het museum. Ellywa (talk) 11:49, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- Belangrijke les voor schilderij fans: altijd de bijschrift fotograferen - zelfs als er niks meer vermeld is dan het naam van het kunstenaar. Maar goed, als het museum zegt dat het zo is, dan is het zo (althans het is in de collectie zo gekomen, en is dus geaccepteerd door iemand als door Bol). Voor ons op Commons, is het dus ook door Bol (tot de RKD of Bol historicus het afwijst). Ik doe dit ook voor plaatjes uit oude catalogi, en pas als ik zie dat zij afgewezen worden, zet ik het bij in een sub-categorie als "works after Ferdinand Bol" of ergens anders. Jane023 (talk) 12:29, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- Volgens het bijschrift (niet gefotogafeerd) een gift van iemand aan het museum. Ellywa (talk) 11:49, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- dat is heel vaak zo met NL werken in verre oorden- over tijd zal dat veranderen, dankzij uploaden, dus bedankt! Je zou nog even kunnen zoeken op artnet, maar dat werkt alleen voor stukken verkocht in de laatste 10 jaar ofzo. Dit zal wel een leen-object zijn want niks vermeld op hun website. Misschien is het opgenomen in een bol catalogus, maar die heb ik niet. Het is zeker niet in de RKD. Gr, Jane023 (talk) 07:17, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- Ja dat het oud is, dat geloof ik meteen. Ik kan er verder niks over vinden, dus dat is wel vreemd. Google image search, Bing en TinEye leveren ook niks op. Ellywa (talk) 20:46, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Hallo Jan023, wil je eens kijken naar deze category? Mag ik veronderstellen dat het hier een typo betreft, Wibout/Bibout ? Thanks Lotje (talk) 17:18, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
- Ha inderdaad, dat lijkt op een typo! Kennelijk is de Rijksmuseum stuk het enige op Commons op naam van deze kunstenaar. Jane023 (talk) 09:29, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
- Dankjewel Jane023, ik voegde het bestand toe aan de Category. Weet niet of een rename aan de orde is. Cheers. Lotje (talk) 09:57, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
- IK heb net de juiste record gevonden in het Rijksmuseum en beiden helften zijn ontstaan een halve eeuw na elkaar en in verschillende plaatsen. Gelukkig heb ik mijn foto van de 2021 exhibitie bewaard, want ik was even de kluts kwijt. De Madonna is niet van deze kunstenaar en de afebeelde man is wie de stukken aan elkaar liet monteren voor persoonlijke devotie. Pff Jane023 (talk) 10:12, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
- Sjonge Jane023. Bedankt. Lotje (talk) 10:15, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
- IK heb net de juiste record gevonden in het Rijksmuseum en beiden helften zijn ontstaan een halve eeuw na elkaar en in verschillende plaatsen. Gelukkig heb ik mijn foto van de 2021 exhibitie bewaard, want ik was even de kluts kwijt. De Madonna is niet van deze kunstenaar en de afebeelde man is wie de stukken aan elkaar liet monteren voor persoonlijke devotie. Pff Jane023 (talk) 10:12, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
- Dankjewel Jane023, ik voegde het bestand toe aan de Category. Weet niet of een rename aan de orde is. Cheers. Lotje (talk) 09:57, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Gregorio Cruzada Villaamil - Catálogo provisional historial y razonado del Museo Nacional de pinturas catlogoprovisio00villgoog 0008.jpg
Copyright status: File:Gregorio Cruzada Villaamil - Catálogo provisional historial y razonado del Museo Nacional de pinturas catlogoprovisio00villgoog 0008.jpg
![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Gregorio Cruzada Villaamil - Catálogo provisional historial y razonado del Museo Nacional de pinturas catlogoprovisio00villgoog 0008.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 12:05, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
- PD Templates added. Ellywa (talk) 13:22, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks! I see I am out of the habit of uploading titlepages. Jane023 (talk) 14:11, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Jean-Baptiste Descamps - selfportrait.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Okutu Sirkeep.
I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 03:43, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Galerie Oldenbourg 1924.jpg
Copyright status: File:Galerie Oldenbourg 1924.jpg
![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Galerie Oldenbourg 1924.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 15:05, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Marie-Adélaïde Baubry-Vaillant - Portrait of Prince Vinh Thuy in 1926 - T199HK0473 SS-REF2 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Le Petit Chat (talk) 16:10, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Sacramento Daily Union, Volume 23, Number 3531, 23 July 1862, A Visit to the Burnt District of Troy, New York.jpg
Copyright status: File:Sacramento Daily Union, Volume 23, Number 3531, 23 July 1862, A Visit to the Burnt District of Troy, New York.jpg
![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Sacramento Daily Union, Volume 23, Number 3531, 23 July 1862, A Visit to the Burnt District of Troy, New York.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 15:05, 18 May 2024 (UTC)