User talk:Jacquesverlaeken/Quality pictures

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Quality Image Promotion (First!) Dornava

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dornava Mansion 195.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:29, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Quality Image Promotion La Souste

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! LEUK-La Souste 20914.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:11, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion Bad Ems

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20180908 Kurhaus Bad Ems 428.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Though I would prefer more sky and less water. --Dirtsc 10:07, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion Wörrstadt

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wörrstadt Neunröhrenbrunnen 035.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments It needs at least a rotation clockwise. After this I don't know if the perspective is good --Michielverbeek 11:09, 3 November 2019 (UTC) Slight rotation done. Perspective is as is. Jacquesverlaeken 12:05, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support Perspective is for me good enough for QI, but I realize the sky is overexposured and the right crop cannot be well done (less zoom would have been better) --Michielverbeek 17:02, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion Oberhausen

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oberhausen Nahe fromLemberg 20405 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 07:31, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion First Cover

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 1880 Postkarte P22 Rottweil.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 17:06, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]