User talk:Jacek Halicki/Archive25

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Polanica-Zdrój, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 49.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 09:12, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Polanica-Zdrój, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 53.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:09, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Polanica-Zdrój, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 54.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:09, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Polanica-Zdrój, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 55.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 09:11, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Polanica-Zdrój, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 56.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:09, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Polanica-Zdrój, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 57.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done--Jacek Halicki 11:33, 27 September 2017 (UTC) Good quality. --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 03:15, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Polanica-Zdrój, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 58.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:53, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Polanica-Zdrój, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 60.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --King of Hearts 04:56, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Polanica-Zdrój, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 19.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 08:59, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Polanica-Zdrój, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 28.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:11, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Polanica-Zdrój, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 32.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Despite of little noise - good quality and composition. --Moahim 09:05, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Polanica-Zdrój, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 37.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 09:21, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polanica Zdrój, dom zdrojowy, 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 12:20, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Polanica-Zdrój, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 59.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:48, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Polanica-Zdrój, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 61.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:48, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

File:2016 Logo Biedronki.jpg

File:2016 Logo Biedronki.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 20:51, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół Matki Boskiej Bolesnej w Nowej Rudzie 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:37, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polanica Zdrój, dom zdrojowy, 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:36, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polanica Zdrój, dom zdrojowy, 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:36, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polanica Zdrój, dom zdrojowy, 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:10, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polanica Zdrój, dom zdrojowy, 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 07:14, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polanica Zdrój, dom zdrojowy, 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:09, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Stara Bystrzyca, ul. Leśna 2 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:29, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Stara Bystrzyca, ul. Leśna 2 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Roof IMO too unsharp for a QI, sorry. --Basotxerri 08:42, 1 October 2017 (UTC) Looks acceptable to me. A bit of sharpening could help, though. --Poco a poco 09:29, 1 October 2017 (UTC)  Support Changed my mind, weak  Support. --Basotxerri 10:16, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Stara Bystrzyca, ul. Leśna 2 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The shadow parts are a bit noisy, perhaps you could try to get that better. OK for me as a QI. --Basotxerri 08:25, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Wapiennik w Mielniku 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:45, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Wapiennik w Mielniku 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 08:25, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Polanica-Zdrój, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments a QI should have more then 1 category but I do like this composition. -- Sixflashphoto 08:27, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Tęcza w Kłodzku.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Wapiennik w Mielniku 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 09:35, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Wapiennik w Mielniku 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:23, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom nr 13 w Wyszkach 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:09, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom nr 13 w Wyszkach 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:23, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom nr 13 w Wyszkach 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:23, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Polanica-Zdrój, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 43.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:43, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom nr 14 w Wyszkach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:50, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dwór barokowy w Długopolu Górnym 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moahim 08:25, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dwór barokowy w Długopolu Górnym 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:50, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dwór barokowy w Długopolu Górnym 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:00, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dawny kościół ewangelicki w Długopolu-Zdroju 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality but it would be nice if it had more then 1 category -- Sixflashphoto 08:28, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dawny kościół ewangelicki w Długopolu-Zdroju 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Again really nice sharp church but categorization should be better -- Sixflashphoto 08:28, 4 October 2017 (UTC)@Sixflashphoto: All the categories you need are here https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Former_protestant_church_in_D%C5%82ugopole-Zdr%C3%B3j.--~~~~ It is a great photo too, Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 13:34, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom nr 36 w Ponikwie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:05, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom nr 36 w Ponikwie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Սարո Հովհաննիսյան 14:13, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom zdrojowy w Długopolu-Zdroju 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:05, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom zdrojowy w Długopolu-Zdroju 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:00, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dworzec kolejowy w Długopolu-Zdroju 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moahim 09:13, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dworzec kolejowy w Długopolu-Zdroju 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:52, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dwór empirowy w Długopolu Górnym 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:00, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dwór empirowy w Długopolu Górnym 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moahim 09:11, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dwór barokowy w Długopolu Górnym 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 21:10, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Polanica-Zdrój, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment sharpness is okay, but the composition doesn't work to me, too many dusturbing elements in front of the church. I'd like to hear a third opinion. --Carschten 10:29, 1 October 2017 (UTC)  Comment * Support If step to the right - we will loose the dome with the cross, it is good view of almost whole church from this point. --Moahim 09:23, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dwór empirowy w Długopolu Górnym 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:37, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dwór empirowy w Długopolu Górnym 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moahim 09:58, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dwór empirowy w Długopolu Górnym 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:17, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dwór empirowy w Długopolu Górnym 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moahim 09:59, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dwór empirowy w Długopolu Górnym 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moahim 09:59, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dwór empirowy w Długopolu Górnym 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:27, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dwór empirowy w Długopolu Górnym 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 09:55, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kamieniołom piaskowca w Długopolu Górnym 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:28, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kamieniołom piaskowca w Długopolu Górnym 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:36, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kamieniołom piaskowca w Długopolu Górnym 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:37, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kamieniołom piaskowca w Długopolu Górnym 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:55, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kaplica cmentarna w Długopolu Górnym 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 10:48, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kaplica cmentarna w Długopolu Górnym 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:22, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kawczak, Trzcińska Góra i Żeleźniak, Góry Bystrzyckie, Sudety.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 10:22, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kościół św. Józefa w Ponikwie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:25, 8 October 2017 (UTC) IMo not a QI This white witout details burns my eyes --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 21:55, 8 October 2017 (UTC)  Comment @Hans-Jürgen Neubert: Please use '<br>' to add additional text instead of pipe and change Promotion to Discuss if you want to move this image to Consensual Review (CR) PtrQs 23:36, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kościół św. Józefa w Ponikwie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:16, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kościół św. Józefa w Ponikwie 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:41, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kościół śś. Piotra i Pawła w Długopolu Górnym 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:57, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kościół śś. Piotra i Pawła w Długopolu Górnym 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 10:05, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kościół śś. Piotra i Pawła w Długopolu Górnym 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 09:28, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kościół śś. Piotra i Pawła w Długopolu Górnym 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 09:55, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Park zdrojowy w Długopolu-Zdroju 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:47, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Park zdrojowy w Długopolu-Zdroju 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:47, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Park zdrojowy w Długopolu-Zdroju 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 09:53, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kościół św. Józefa w Ponikwie 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:48, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Starostwo powiatowe

Hej! Widziałem na QIC Twoje zdjęcia ze Starostwa Powiatowego w Bystrzycy Kłodzkiej. Zdjęcia mają niepoprawną nazwę w języku angielskim i złą kategorię. Town hall to ratusz. Starostwo Powiatowe zaś to Powiat office. Zobacz tutaj: Category:Powiat offices in Poland. --Halavar (talk) 10:05, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Former protestant church in Długopole-Zdrój, exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Spa House in Długopole-Zdrój, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Długopole-Zdrój train station, exposure from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manor in Długopole Górne, exposure from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and Used. Sixflashphoto (talk) 19:01, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manor in Długopole Górne, grille in portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 17:29, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manor in Długopole Górne, window with grille.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 04:31, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hoecker Building, exposure from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 04:33, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hoecker Building, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good image, useful and used. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 21:53, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hoecker Building, main entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 04:32, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sandstone quarry in Długopole Górne.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:13, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hoecker Building, oculi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and Used -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 22:22, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

•  Question - I could spell the word "oculi". Isn't a single one an "oculus"? Shall we correct this? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:33, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment - I've made the spelling correction. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:33, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment Thanks for catching that Sixflashphoto (talk) 15:33, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Saints Peter and Paul in Długopole Górne, cemetery chapel, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and Used. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 22:24, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Góry Bystrzyckie, Kawczak, Trzcińska Góra and Żeleźniak.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 19:23, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Joseph church in Ponikwa, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 22:25, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Saints Peter and Paul in Długopole Górne, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 19:36, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Saints Peter and Paul in Długopole Górne, onion dome.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in Scope IMO -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:25, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Spa Park in Długopole-Zdrój, main alley.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support – Useful and used. Beautiful street. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 21:54, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Spa Park in Długopole-Zdrój, mineral water source.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support No good composition but useful and used. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 06:36, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Spa Park in Długopole-Zdrój, fountain.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support – Nice, useful and used. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 21:52, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fire station in Długopole Górne, exposure from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful Ezarateesteban 01:21, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom nr 5a w Bielicach 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good & nice. --Selbymay 09:06, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom nr 5a w Bielicach 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:24, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 „Chata Cyborga” w Bielicach 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:24, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 „Chata Cyborga” w Bielicach 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:24, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Stacja kolejowa Stronie Śląskie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Would have been better without the cars but good quality. --Selbymay 09:10, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rail tunnel in Długopole-Zdrój, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and Used. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 22:28, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Capricorn4049 (talk) 01:36, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lime kiln in Mielnik.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and Used. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 22:16, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Capricorn4049 (talk) 01:36, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Powiat office in Bystrzyca Kłodzka.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in Scope -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 21:36, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Capricorn4049 (talk) 01:37, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sienkiewicza Street in Bystrzyca Kłodzka, gmina office.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Capricorn4049 (talk) 01:37, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Wojewódzkie Centrum Psychiatrii Długoterminowej w Stroniu Śląskim 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 13:24, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Wojewódzkie Centrum Psychiatrii Długoterminowej w Stroniu Śląskim 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 13:24, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Pałacyk Marianny Orańskiej w Stroniu Śląskim 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 13:24, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Pałacyk Marianny Orańskiej w Stroniu Śląskim 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:42, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Góry Bystrzyckie, Trzcińska Góra, Żeleźniak and Koszela.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, best in scope. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:42, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Przycinanie

Hej. Czy mógłbyś poprawiając fotki, robić to na kopii? Nie jestem specjalnie przywiązany do swoich edycji, ale czasem poprawki są dyskusyjne, jak np. w przypadku Sądejówki (Schronisko Sądejówka - Kletno PL.jpg). Jeżeli jest Ci potrzebny inny format, wstaw go do Commons jako oddzielny plik. Nie utrudnisz wówczas dostępu do oryginału. OK?

-- G. Wysocki — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 89.69.47.122 (talk) 23:22, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Pałacyk Marianny Orańskiej w Stroniu Śląskim 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:16, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Pałacyk Marianny Orańskiej w Stroniu Śląskim 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 08:55, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom przy ul. Kościuszki 20 w Stroniu Śląskim 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:43, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom przy ul. Kościuszki 20 w Stroniu Śląskim 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:43, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Wojewódzkie Centrum Psychiatrii Długoterminowej w Stroniu Śląskim 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:44, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Park zdrojowy w Długopolu-Zdroju 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice, but the right side is a bit bright, think you can tone that down a bit? --W.carter 19:33, 12 October 2017 (UTC)@W.carter:  Done--Jacek Halicki 22:33, 19 October 2017 (UTC) Thanks! Good quality. --W.carter 09:18, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Balneological Centre in Długopole-Zdrój, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Capricorn4049 (talk) 22:04, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Balneological Centre in Długopole-Zdrój, avant-corps.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Capricorn4049 (talk) 22:05, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Marianna Orańska palace in Stronie Śląskie, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Capricorn4049 (talk) 22:06, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom przy ul. Morawka 8 w Stroniu Śląskim.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:43, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Figura św. Jana Nepomucena w Stroniu Śląskim 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 11:17, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Figura św. Jana Nepomucena w Stroniu Śląskim 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 10:13, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Muzeum Minerałów w Stroniu Śląskim 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:46, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Muzeum Minerałów w Stroniu Śląskim 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:53, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 BTS w Starej Morawie 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 09:39, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 BTS w Starej Morawie 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good sharp focus to main object --Michielverbeek 09:24, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Budynki mieszkalne w Ołdrzychowicach Kłodzkich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:33, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Bukówka, Wzgórza Rogówki, Sudety.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:33, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Czernik, Góry Złote, Sudety.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:33, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Trzcińska Góra, Żeleźniak i Koszela, Góry Bystrzyckie, Sudety.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:24, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dawna kopalnia uranu w Kletnie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 13:21, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dawna kopalnia uranu w Kletnie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:24, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dawna kopalnia uranu w Kletnie 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:24, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom nr 13 w Kletnie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:45, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom nr 13 w Kletnie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:49, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom nr 16 w Starej Morawie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:49, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom nr 16 w Starej Morawie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 14:34, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom nr 21 w Starej Morawie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 16:31, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom nr 21 w Starej Morawie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:49, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom nr 22 w Starej Morawie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, better than the other version. --Selbymay 08:57, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom nr 22 w Starej Morawie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:08, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom nr 3c w Nowej Morawie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 09:06, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom nr 3c w Nowej Morawie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 09:08, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom nr 9 w Kletnie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:08, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wzgórza Rogówki, Bukówka, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:44, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Góry Złote, Czernik, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:45, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Former uranium mine in Kletno, entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used, good image, best in scope. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 21:48, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:45, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Krowiarki, Dębowa, exposure from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:45, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Morawka (tributary of Biała Lądecka), in Nowa Morawa.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:45, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Domek Pustelnia w Starej Morawie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good enough. --Peulle 09:32, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Domek Pustelnia w Starej Morawie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:13, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Domki letniskowe w Nowej Morawie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:12, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Domki letniskowe w Nowej Morawie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:14, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Droga szutrowa w Starej Morawie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:02, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kleśnica in Kletno.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:59, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Masyw Śnieżnika, exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:31, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:59, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Quarries in Kletno, Kletno I quarry.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 17:39, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:00, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Quarries in Kletno, Kletno II quarry.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and used --17:39, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:00, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Domek Pustelnia w Starej Morawie 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:09, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Droga szutrowa w Starej Morawie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 09:33, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dębowa, Krowiarki, Sudety 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:09, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Hotelik Orański w Starej Morawie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 09:50, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kamieniołom Kletno I w Kletnie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 09:56, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kamieniołom Kletno I w Kletnie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Selbymay 09:26, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kamieniołom Kletno II w Kletnie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:43, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kamieniołom Kletno II w Kletnie 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:43, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kleśnica w Kletnie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:43, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Pałacyk Marianny Orańskiej w Stroniu Śląskim 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kamieniołom Kletno II w Kletnie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:37, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kamieniołom Kletno II w Kletnie 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 10:11, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kościół św. Marcina w Żelaźnie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:37, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kościół św. Marcina w Żelaźnie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Is it possible to remove the branch near the upper right corner? --Llez 10:13, 29 October 2017 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 10:27, 29 October 2017 (UTC)  Support Good quality --Llez 12:00, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Krzyżnik, Masyw Śnieżnika, Sudety.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:37, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Góry Złote, Kłóbka, exposure from NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mausoleum of von Magnis family in Ołdrzychowice Kłodzkie, exposure from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:48, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stronie Śląskie, muzeum of minerals.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:48, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Museum of Earth in Kletno, building.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:49, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Park in Trzebieszowice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:04, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kłóbka, Góry Złote, Sudety.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 10:43, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Las mieszany na stoku Rudki, Masyw Śnieżnika, Sudety.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 10:43, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Mauzoleum von Magnisów w Ołdrzychowicach Kłodzkich 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 10:23, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Mauzoleum von Magnisów w Ołdrzychowicach Kłodzkich 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, despite the (unavoidable) wire; any chance to remove it? I know, it is a lot of work and i Don't know if it will be successful. --Llez 11:53, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Morawka w Nowej Morawie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 11:50, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palace in Trzebieszowice, exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:41, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sculpture of Francis Xavier in Bolesławów, exposure from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Used and useful. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 23:52, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:41, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Góry Złote, Sowia Kopa, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used. From this exposure, the best in scope. --Basotxerri (talk) 09:51, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:41, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Krowiarki, Wapniarka, exposure from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:00, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:42, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Młodnik brzozowy w Nowej Morawie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 13:26, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Obniżenie Lądka i Stronia, Sudety.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 10:36, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Pałac w Trzebieszowicach 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 13:35, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Park przy pałacu w Trzebieszowicach 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 13:35, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Park przy pałacu w Trzebieszowicach 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 13:35, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Park przy pałacu w Trzebieszowicach 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 10:23, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Park przy pałacu w Trzebieszowicach 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 10:15, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Pałac w Trzebieszowicach 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:02, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Pałac w Trzebieszowicach 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:02, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Pensjonat Emila w Bolesławowie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:02, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ołdrzychowice Kłodzkie (train station), exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:21, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ołdrzychowice Kłodzkie (train station), exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:21, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Góry Bialskie, Suszyca and Sucha Kopa, exposure from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Psychiatric hospital in Stronie Śląskie.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Station building in Stronie Śląskie, exposure from NE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Used and useful though the right part of the building is very bright. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 23:28, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Modular origami, star and single module.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good composition; used and useful. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 23:30, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Pomnik św. Franciszka Ksawerego w Bolesławowie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 13:47, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Pomnik św. Franciszka Ksawerego w Bolesławowie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 13:47, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Pomnik św. Franciszka Ksawerego w Bolesławowie 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 13:47, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Remiza OSP w Ołdrzychowicach Kłodzkich 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 08:10, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Remiza OSP w Ołdrzychowicach Kłodzkich 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The car is a pity. But the quality is good enough for me.--Famberhorst 16:48, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Stacja kolejowa w Ołdrzychowicach Kłodzkich 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:05, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Suszyca i Sucha Kopa, Góry Bialskie, Sudety.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Wonderful scene; Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 01:52, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Szkoła podstawowa i budynki mieszkalne w Ołdrzychowicach Kłodzkich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:10, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Szkoła podstawowa w Ołdrzychowicach Kłodzkich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:10, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Szkoła podstawowa w Żelaźnie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:07, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Remiza OSP w Żelaźnie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:46, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Remiza OSP w Żelaźnie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:11, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Sowia Kopa, Góy Złote, Sudety.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:46, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Stacja kolejowa w Ołdrzychowicach Kłodzkich 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 11:31, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Stacja kolejowa w Ołdrzychowicach Kłodzkich 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:46, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Saint Martin in Żelazno, exposure from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment There is already a VI with exaxt the same scope (see File:2014 Żelazno, Kościół św. Marcina 04.JPG) and one with a very similar scope (see File:2014 Żelazno, kościół św. Marcina o zmierzchu.jpg). You must open a Most Valued Review. --Capricorn4049 (talk) 21:54, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Support, better light so now best in scope. -- DeFacto (talk). 07:29, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
•  Support I think so --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. 2014 Żelazno, Kościół św. Marcina 04.JPG: 0 (current VI within same scope)
2. 2017 Kościół św. Marcina w Żelaźnie 1.jpg: +2 <--
=>
File:2014 Żelazno, Kościół św. Marcina 04.JPG: Declined and demoted to VI-former.
File:2017 Kościół św. Marcina w Żelaźnie 1.jpg: Promoted. <--

---- DeFacto (talk). 20:43, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Szkoła podstawowa w Żelaźnie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:26, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Wapiennik w Starej Morawie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:14, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Wapiennik w Starej Morawie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:26, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Wapniarka i Dębowa, Krowiarki, Sudety.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:14, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Wapniarka, Krowiarki, Sudety 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:26, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Szkoła podstawowa w Żelaźnie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:55, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Słupiec, Krowiarki, Sudety 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:55, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polanica Zdrój, Teatr Zdrojowy, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:34, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polanica Zdrój, Teatr Zdrojowy, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:34, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polanica Zdrój, Teatr Zdrojowy, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:55, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Szkoła podstawowa w Żelaźnie 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:22, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polanica Zdrój, Teatr Zdrojowy, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:22, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polanica Zdrój, Teatr Zdrojowy, 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:05, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polanica Zdrój, Teatr Zdrojowy, 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:05, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polanica Zdrój, Teatr Zdrojowy, 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:22, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polanica Zdrój, Teatr Zdrojowy, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:36, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polanica Zdrój, Teatr Zdrojowy, 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:36, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polanica Zdrój, dom zdrojowy, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:36, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polanica Zdrój, dom zdrojowy, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:36, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polanica Zdrój, dom zdrojowy, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 10:54, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Polish antique radios, Światowid.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Beautiful. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 08:55, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polanica Zdrój, park zdrojowy, 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:43, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polanica Zdrój, park zdrojowy, 16.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:43, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polanica Zdrój, park zdrojowy, 17.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 04:49, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polanica Zdrój, park zdrojowy, 25.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:43, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polanica Zdrój, dom zdrojowy, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:00, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polanica Zdrój, dom zdrojowy, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polanica Zdrój, dom zdrojowy, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:00, 9 November 2017 (UTC) This image is very similar to the next one. Is it worth uploading/nominating both, with only slightly different perspective? I like this one more. --JiriMatejicek 21:42, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polanica Zdrój, dom zdrojowy, 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:18, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polanica Zdrój, park zdrojowy, 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:35, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

File:2017 Szkoła podstawowa w Żelaźnie 2.jpg

Just to let you know, you may have uploaded two Duplicate copies of File:2017 Szkoła podstawowa w Żelaźnie 2.jpg. I didn't touch or tag the two files but I wanted to let you know so you could look into it. It also may have been nominated for QIC twice and that's why it's showing up, I'm not sure, but I'm sure you can sort it out. Best regards -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 21:02, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polanica Zdrój, park zdrojowy, 18.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 02:40, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polanica Zdrój, park zdrojowy, 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:02, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polanica Zdrój, park zdrojowy, 31.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:02, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polanica Zdrój, park zdrojowy, 29.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 03:00, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polanica Zdrój, park zdrojowy, 28.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 00:36, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polanica Zdrój, park zdrojowy, 27.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 14:33, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polanica Zdrój, park zdrojowy, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Also very nice, Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 01:38, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polanica Zdrój, park zdrojowy, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very Nice, Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 01:32, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polanica Zdrój, park zdrojowy, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:06, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polanica Zdrój, park zdrojowy, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:06, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polanica Zdrój, park zdrojowy, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality but I wonder what the man in the center is doing -- Sixflashphoto 01:42, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Nikon D5300.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 12:04, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Nóż sprężynowy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 12:06, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Sfigmomanometr elektroniczny.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 12:06, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Cyfrowy miernik uniwersalny.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:19, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Zszywacz biurowy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Armenak Margarian 13:10, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nikon D5300.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support I say Best in Scope. If someone disagrees for personal opinion that's fine but I don't see what detail you loose and you get a much better perspective of the controls -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 04:43, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:59, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Switchblades, leverletto type.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:59, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Electronic sphygmomanometers, Sanitas.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question - There are many models of electronic blood pressure monitors, so is the scope too broad? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:13, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

You're right,  Done --Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:41, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:27, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:00, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Uni-Trend Limited digital multimeters.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:28, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:00, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polanica Zdrój, park zdrojowy, 20.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 01:55, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polanica Zdrój, park zdrojowy, 21.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:40, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polanica Zdrój, park zdrojowy, 22.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:40, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polanica Zdrój, park zdrojowy, 24.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:40, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polanica Zdrój, park zdrojowy, 23.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:40, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polanica Zdrój, park zdrojowy, 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Can you add geolocation and English description? --Armenak Margarian 12:07, 14 November 2017 (UTC) Done --Jacek Halicki 12:20, 14 November 2017 (UTC) Good quality --Armenak Margarian 13:01, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polanica Zdrój, park zdrojowy, 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:54, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polanica Zdrój, park zdrojowy, 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:14, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polanica Zdrój, park zdrojowy, 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:15, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polanica Zdrój, park zdrojowy, 19.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 10:38, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Staplers, office stapler, STR-2461 Taurus model.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question I think the same issue with Office Staplers is the same with electronic blood pressure monitors, in other words, it's too broad since there are many models of this. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 21:05, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

 Done --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:24, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

•  Support - Seems unique in current scope, useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:19, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Agreed. Looks good now. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 04:46, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 16:43, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polanica Zdrój, park zdrojowy, 30.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:41, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polanica Zdrój, park zdrojowy, 32.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 11:23, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polanica Zdrój, park zdrojowy, 35.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 09:27, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polanica Zdrój, park zdrojowy, 36.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 09:27, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Jana Chrzciciela w Pasterce 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:17, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Radków, kościoł św. Andrzeja Boboli 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 00:53, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Radków, kościoł św. Andrzeja Boboli 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 00:53, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Radków, kościoł św. Andrzeja Boboli 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 00:53, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Radków, kościoł św. Andrzeja Boboli 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:17, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polanica Zdrój, park zdrojowy, 38.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:48, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polanica Zdrój, park zdrojowy, 40.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 15:02, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polanica Zdrój, park zdrojowy, 39.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:48, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polanica Zdrój, park zdrojowy, 41.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Armenak Margarian 13:54, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Gajów, park 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:48, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Radków, kościoł św. Andrzeja Boboli 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- PumpkinSky 00:08, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Radków, kościoł św. Andrzeja Boboli 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 00:21, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Radków, kościoł św. Andrzeja Boboli 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- PumpkinSky 00:08, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Radków, kościoł św. Andrzeja Boboli 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- PumpkinSky 00:08, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Radków, kościoł św. Andrzeja Boboli 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- PumpkinSky 00:08, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Radków, kościoł św. Andrzeja Boboli 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 02:27, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Radków, kościoł św. Andrzeja Boboli 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 00:26, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Radków, kościoł św. Andrzeja Boboli 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice, Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 02:28, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Radków, kościoł św. Doroty 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 00:26, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Radków, kościoł św. Doroty 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 02:31, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Radków, mury obronne 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 00:31, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Radków, mury obronne 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 00:31, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Radków, mury obronne 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 00:31, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Radków, mury obronne 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 00:31, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Radków, mury obronne 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 00:31, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Radków, kościoł św. Doroty 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 13:51, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Radków, kościoł św. Doroty 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 12:25, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Radków, kościoł św. Doroty 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 11:50, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Radków, kościoł św. Doroty 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 13:51, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Radków, kościoł św. Doroty 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 13:51, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Radków, ratusz 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 02:33, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Radków, ratusz 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:18, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Radków, ratusz 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:18, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Radków, ratusz 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:18, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Radków, ul. Grunwaldzka 1 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 00:15, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Radków, ul. Grunwaldzka 1 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:10, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Radków, ul. Kościelna 3 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 02:00, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Radków, Rynek 3 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 02:00, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Radków, Rynek 10 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 03:08, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Radków, Rynek 10 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 02:00, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polanica Zdrój, park zdrojowy, 34.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments it shows a little noise but QI to me --Cvmontuy 15:49, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Zamek w Ratnie Dolnym 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 00:36, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ścinawka Dolna, kościół św. Stanisława Kostki.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 00:36, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół Stanisława Kostki w Ścinawce Dolnej 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 00:36, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół Stanisława Kostki w Ścinawce Dolnej 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 00:36, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Marii Magdaleny w Ścinawce Średniej 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 00:36, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Radków, Rynek 14 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:49, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Radków, Rynek 22 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:32, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Radków, Rynek 22 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:31, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół w Raszkowie 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:49, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Zamek w Ratnie Dolnym 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:49, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Marii Magdaleny w Ścinawce Średniej 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 09:30, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Marii Magdaleny w Ścinawce Średniej 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 10:42, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Marii Magdaleny w Ścinawce Średniej 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 08:57, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Marii Magdaleny w Ścinawce Średniej 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 09:13, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Prepozytura jezuitów w Ścinawce Średniej, dom mieszkalny II 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:52, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Thank you

Just wanted to say thanks. I only just noticed the help you gave me on File:Columbus School for Girls 2.jpg and I wanted to say I really appreciate it. Thank you! -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:49, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Ratno Dolne 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 00:43, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Ratno Dolne 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality -- PumpkinSky 00:50, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Prepozytura jezuitów w Ścinawce Średniej, dom mieszkalny IV 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 01:18, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Dwór w Tłumaczowie, park 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 01:02, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Prepozytura jezuitów w Ścinawce Średniej, pawilon ujęcia wody 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:31, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Prepozytura jezuitów w Ścinawce Średniej, dom mieszkalny II 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:31, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Prepozytura jezuitów w Ścinawce Średniej, dom mieszkalny II 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:59, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Prepozytura jezuitów w Ścinawce Średniej, dom mieszkalny III 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:31, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Józefa w Bolesławowie, 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 00:44, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Józefa w Bolesławowie, 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great Quality -- Sixflashphoto 00:43, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Studzienka Matki Bożej w Wambierzycach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 00:50, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół w Bielicach 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great; Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 00:47, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół w Bielicach 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very Nice; Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 00:40, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Dom nr 5 w Ratnie Dolnym.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments @Ezarate: If you don't see the difference between the sky and the area outside the photo then you have a poorly calibrated monitor. As for your question about Ratno, this photo is geocoded, see OSM.--Jacek Halicki 20:01, 29 November 2017 (UTC) ok Ezarate 22:45, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kosciół Michała Archanioła w Starym Gierałtowie, 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 00:31, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kosciół Michała Archanioła w Starym Gierałtowie, 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 00:41, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kosciół Michała Archanioła w Starym Gierałtowie, 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very Nice, Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 00:34, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kosciół Michała Archanioła w Starym Gierałtowie, 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:59, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kosciół Michała Archanioła w Starym Gierałtowie, 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:59, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Wapiennik w Starej Morawie, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 09:39, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Wapiennik w Starej Morawie, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 09:37, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kosciół Michała Archanioła w Starym Gierałtowie, 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 09:34, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kosciół Michała Archanioła w Starym Gierałtowie, 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 09:32, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kosciół Michała Archanioła w Starym Gierałtowie, 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 09:29, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Szczytna, kościół św. Jana Chrzciciela 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:51, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Zamek Leśna w Szczytnej 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:51, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Szczytna, panorama 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, PumpkinSky 00:10, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bardo ul. Główna 19, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:03, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bardo ul. Główna 19, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, PumpkinSky 02:29, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kaplica przydrożna w Starym Gierałtowie, 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:05, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bardo ul. Główna 19, 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 02:17, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bardo ul. Główna 19, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:17, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bardo ul. Główna 19, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, PumpkinSky 00:47, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bardo, Główna 6, 17.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:17, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bardo, ul. Główna 6, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, PumpkinSky 00:47, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 7 December 2017 (UTC)