User talk:Jacek Halicki/Archive2

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Starówka w Kłodzku.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --XRay 08:30, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013 Kanał Młynówka w Kłodzku.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --XRay 08:30, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Subaru Impreza WRC 2001 a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --GMLSX 16:08, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kłodzko, most, panorama, 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 17:50, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Mgły nad Woliborzem.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Done Denoise.--
Halicki 22:28, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Beautiful. Mattbuck 23:01, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Modding komputera 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments CA around the grey bit of the feet. Mattbuck 23:01, 13 January 2014 (UTC) Done CA removed Halicki 18:58, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Better. Mattbuck 22:12, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Modding komputera 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments CA around the grey bit of the feet. Mattbuck 23:01, 13 January 2014 (UTC) Done CA removed Halicki 18:58, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Better. Mattbuck 22:12, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Modding komputera 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments CA around the grey bit of the feet. Mattbuck 23:01, 13 January 2014 (UTC) Done CA removed Halicki 18:58, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Still there. Mattbuck 22:12, 16 January 2014 (UTC) Done CA removed Halicki 22:52, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Better. Mattbuck 23:53, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Origami modułowe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 23:13, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Origami modułowe 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 23:09, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Origami modułowe 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Background should be cleaned --A.Savin 13:34, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Done Jacek Halicki 15:58, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support ok --A.Savin 17:02, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wyspa Piasek w Kłodzku.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Nice and good quality--Lmbuga 11:17, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Polanica Zdrój, park zdrojowy, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --XRay 09:40, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, Wojska Polskiego 11, 50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:46, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kłodzko, Wojska Polskiego 11, 49.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:46, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, Wojska Polskiego 11, 48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:46, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

⧼Wikibase-terms/Archive2⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Kłodzko, dzieje miasta.JPG

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Kłodzko, dzieje miasta.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Jarekt (talk) 03:15, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:2014 Katalog wystawy.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:2014 Katalog wystawy.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Jarekt (talk) 03:16, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Zobacz Commons:Bar --Jarekt (talk) 03:21, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zieleniec, kościół św. Anny 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Zieleniec, kościół św. Anny 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Zieleniec, kościół św. Anny 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Zieleniec, kościół św. Anny 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Zieleniec, kościół św. Anny 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kłodzko, brama, 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Question See note: What is this? Shadow? If it's a shadow, too much digital manipulation IMO. -Lmbuga 02:23, 1 March 2014 (UTC) You're right, see new version DoneJacek Halicki 10:57, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support --Lmbuga 11:37, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zieleniec, kościół św. Anny 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Excellent. --Mattbuck 12:26, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kanał Młynówka i mury miejskie w Kłodzku.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality --Lmbuga 23:46, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, most św. Jana.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 22:42, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Kłodzko, Armii Krajowej 5 9.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Kłodzko, Armii Krajowej 5 9.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Denniss (talk) 16:18, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ratusz i kolumna wotywna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality --Halavar 22:41, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Kłodzko, Armii Krajowej 5 9.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Kłodzko, Armii Krajowej 5 9.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 14:03, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

	Hello, Jacek Halicki. You have new messages at Jarekt#File:K.C5.82odzko.2C_Armii_Krajowej_5_9.jpg's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

--Jarekt (talk) 17:35, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Bożków, pałac 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality --Halavar 10:36, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Katalog wystawy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 16:47, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kłodzko, kościół Matki Bożej Różańcowej.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI for me--Lmbuga 22:55, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Żelazno, kościół św. Marcina.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI for me --Halavar 20:00, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko Jurandów.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality --Halavar 22:45, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ratusz w Kłodzku, schody.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Coyau 23:57, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

Dear Jacek Halicki,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Zieleniec, kościół św. Anny 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Blurred Lines 14:28, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Dyplom.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments ok. --Blurred Lines 14:28, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kanał Jodłownika w Kłodzku.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 12:49, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013 Kłodzko, Stare Miasto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Coyau 16:25, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kłodzko, most, 21.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality --Halavar 22:26, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kłodzko, most, 22.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:33, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kłodzko, most, 20.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Better, overexposed area could have been managed better, but overall QI to me --Poco a poco 07:51, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kłodzko, most, 19.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Myrabella 22:11, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kłodzko, most, 23.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok.--ArildV 10:27, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paczków, ratusz, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment Sky needs denoising. Also dust spot that should be removed. --Halavar 20:28, 7 April 2014 (UTC) Done Jacek Halicki 21:11, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good now. --Halavar 21:54, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paczków, ratusz, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 21:44, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paczków, ratusz, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 21:44, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paczków, ratusz, 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality --Halavar 20:56, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paczków, ratusz, 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality --Halavar 20:56, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paczków, ratusz, 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality --Halavar 15:49, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paczków, ratusz, 16.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 18:45, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paczków, ratusz, 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Malchen53 15:12, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paczków, ratusz, 21.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:11, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paczków, ratusz, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment Sky needs denoising. --Halavar 20:28, 7 April 2014 (UTC) DoneJacek Halicki 21:11, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Good, but now image needs perspective correction. --Halavar 21:54, 7 April 2014 (UTC) DoneJacek Halicki 11:57, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good now. --Halavar 15:44, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Otmuchów, rynek.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality --Halavar 22:17, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Sigma 10-20mm F4-5,6 EX DC.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality --Halavar 21:53, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Dyplom i zdjęcie w antyramach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support OK --Halavar 22:25, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lądek Zdrój, ratusz, 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality --Halavar 18:13, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, Kościół Matki Bożej Różańcowej.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Fine enough for QI, IMO.--Jebulon 15:54, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Self-portrait.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI for me --Halavar 16:26, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, staw.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very atmospheric --Uoaei1 07:18, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paczków, ratusz, 22.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Needs yet a perspective correction, denoising of sky and removal of two blurry bird spots; one left and one right of the chimney. --Cccefalon 14:47, 12 April 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 15:34, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
ok for me --Cccefalon 08:18, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paczków, ratusz, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 11:18, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:2014 Kłodzko, podziemna trasa turystyczna.jpg

File:2014 Kłodzko, podziemna trasa turystyczna.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

-mattbuck (Talk) 22:57, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

For future reference, that file was kept since the copyright to the picture visible on the projector screen is also held by Jacek Halicki. odder (talk) 11:43, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Przy okazji, Jacku, czy to zdjęcie widoczne na projektorze znajduje się na Commons? Jeśli tak, to dobrze byłoby je zalinkować w polu other_versions, dla jasności licencji. odder (talk) 16:02, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Self-portrait 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --ArildV 11:25, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, most św. Jana01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 12:00, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Wentylator komputerowy Enermax.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:14, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ratusz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Unsharp. --Mattbuck 20:13, 30 April 2014 (UTC) Done See now, I loaded another file --Jacek Halicki 22:54, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Much better. Mattbuck 21:35, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ziębice, ratusz, 18.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:58, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ziębice, ratusz, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment Tilted a little bit. (Potrzeba lekkiej rotacji przeciwnie do ruchów wskazówek zegara, czyli CCW). --Halavar 13:58, 3 May 2014 (UTC) Done Jacek Halicki 21:41, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good now. QI. --Halavar 21:36, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ziębice, ratusz, 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment Tilted a little bit. (Potrzeba lekkiej rotacji przeciwnie do ruchów wskazówek zegara, czyli CCW). --Halavar 13:58, 3 May 2014 (UTC) Done Jacek Halicki 21:41, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good now. QI. --Halavar 21:36, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Latawiec 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality --Halavar 22:18, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Latawiec 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality --Halavar 22:49, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kamienica, kościół św. Jerzego, mur.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:42, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Zapora na Jeziorze Paczkowskim, w Kozielnie 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, but it needs removal of one dustspot (little bit over the railing) and several blurry birds. --Cccefalon 12:23, 4 May 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 15:31, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hmmm, I don't know where you found another dust spot, but the one I found is still there. To avoid misunderstanding, I made an annotattion. --Cccefalon 16:45, 4 May 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 18:04, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Now we got an unserstanding of the same dust spot :) QI now. --Cccefalon 07:08, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kłodzko, ratusz, 38.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Mattbuck 18:18, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Most św. Jana i kościół MBR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 13:12, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kamienica, kościół św. Jerzego.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Heuschrecke 17:34, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ziębice, ratusz, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Dirtsc 19:40, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ziębice, ratusz, 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Dirtsc 19:40, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Ścinawka Dolna, kościół św. Jakuba 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Heuschrecke 18:30, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Ścinawka Dolna, kościół św. Jakuba 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Heuschrecke 18:30, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Ścinawka Dolna, kościół św. Jakuba 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --DXR 18:12, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Ścinawka Dolna, kościół św. Jakuba 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:53, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Ścinawka Dolna, kościół św. Jakuba 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. Please add geo location. --XRay 12:34, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Ścinawka Dolna, kościół św. Jakuba, kaplica 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support --A.Savin 12:53, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Ścinawka Dolna, kościół św. Jakuba 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:21, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Ścinawka Dolna, kościół św. Jakuba 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:01, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Ścinawka Dolna, dom opieki Caritas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 14:12, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Ścinawka Dolna, kościół św. Jakuba 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Heuschrecke 19:06, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Międzygórze, kościół Krzyża Świętego.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality --Halavar 21:13, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kłodzko, kościół Jerzego i Wojciecha, 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:36, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, kaplica św. Ignacego 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Myrabella 12:39, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, kaplica św. Ignacego.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:52, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Wolany, kapliczka.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. WOW --Moroder 05:30, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ziębice, ratusz, 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Needs vertical untilting. Should be no problem as there is space left at top. --Cccefalon 14:32, 3 May 2014 (UTC) Done Jacek Halicki 21:18, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Could you sharpen it please? Mattbuck 22:38, 9 May 2014 (UTC) Done --Jacek Halicki 23:43, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Nice. Mattbuck 11:17, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Bożków, pomnik Heinricha Bendera 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, assuming that the tilt is for real --Poco a poco 12:47, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Bożków, pomnik Heinricha Bendera 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Malchen53 16:01, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:44, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kłodzko, kościół Jerzego i Wojciecha, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment Sky needs denoising. --Halavar 10:45, 11 May 2014 (UTC) Done Jacek Halicki 19:20, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good now. --Halavar 20:53, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Nowa Ruda, ul. Podjazdowa 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK --JLPC 16:59, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Nowa Ruda, ul. Podjazdowa 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:53, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, szalet na starówce.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment CA on the left. I left an annotation. --Halavar 19:06, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good now, after crop. --Halavar 18:02, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Nowa Ruda, ratusz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support --A.Savin 14:49, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Nowa Ruda, ratusz, herb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:09, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Nowa Ruda, ratusz..jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality --Halavar 18:36, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Wilkanów, kościół św. Jerzego.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:14, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Nowa Ruda, ul. Podjazdowa 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 07:05, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Nowa Ruda, ul. Podjazdowa 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A mild magenta shione on the chimney and rain gutter top right. Improvable but not against QI promo. Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:12, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, kaplica cmentarna 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 17:32, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, kaplica cmentarna 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK --The Photographer 17:36, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, kaplica cmentarna 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:47, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Nysa Kłodzka w Kłodzku.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:30, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Filtr powietrza DEMCiflex.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, though hard lighting is not optimal. --Smial 10:54, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, kaplica cmentarna 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:44, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kłodzko, kościół Jerzego i Wojciecha, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sky noisy on the verge to bear artefacts. Magenta CA. Some blurry sports. Sharpness disputable. I'm not sure, if all this can be fixed properly, but at least you can try. --Cccefalon 16:42, 10 May 2014 (UTC) Done See the new version. Where is CA because I can not see?--Jacek Halicki 18:16, 10 May 2014 (UTC) Done Jacek Halicki 22:23, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Can pass as QI IMO. --Cccefalon 04:18, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Ścinawka Dolna, kościół św. Jakuba, kaplica 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 18:56, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Zapora na Jeziorze Paczkowskim, w Kozielnie 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments )
Sorry, I'm not sure this is QI, but can't see an obvious reason for decline. I will leave this as Neutral. Mattbuck 20:41, 13 May 2014 (UTC) Support acceptable IMO --Christian Ferrer 11:04, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Polanica Zdrój, dom zdrojowy, 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 08:04, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Złoty Stok, panorama.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 06:03, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kasety magnetofonowe.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality --Halavar 22:48, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Ścinawka Dolna, kościół św. Jakuba 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Much better. --Mattbuck 19:54, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Nóż sprężynowy 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Nóż sprężynowy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Nowa Ruda, ratusz, okno.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments DoneJacek Halicki 11:15, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Better. Mattbuck 22:18, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, Czeska 30.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 13:44, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Szalejów Dolny, wodospad 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 20:01, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Szalejów Dolny, wodospad 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 20:01, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

File:2014 Jaszkowa Dolna, kaplica cmentarna.JPG

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Jaszkowa Dolna, kaplica cmentarna.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Proper categories needed. --A.Savin 12:03, 21 May 2014 (UTC) DoneJacek Halicki 18:22, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
OK. Mattbuck 20:46, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, galeria handlowa "Twierdza Kłodzko" 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --DXR 18:27, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ratusz, żyrandol.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:38, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, fontanna przy pijalni wód mineralnych.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. Bright lights and a little bit noise, but IMO it's QI. (BTW: Please add the geo location.) --XRay 13:00, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Różanka, dom nr 54.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Mattbuck 21:53, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, pręgierz.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Mattbuck 21:44, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, galeria handlowa "Twierdza Kłodzko" 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Mattbuck 20:28, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, galeria handlowa "Twierdza Kłodzko" 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments DoneJacek Halicki 09:35, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
OK. Mattbuck 20:28, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Nimbostratus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Done Specially placed in the frame edge of the roof and the tops of the trees - to show the scale of size and point of view. Jacek Halicki 23:19, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
OK. Mattbuck 20:17, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko,Kłodzko, kościół Podwyższenia Krzyża Św. 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:29, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Łużycka.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 21:10, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Exlibris.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 23:56, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Grunwaldzka 4, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 16:42, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Grunwaldzka 4.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --XRay 16:40, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Grunwaldzka 4, 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 16:44, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Woda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quallity--ArildV 12:23, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko,Kłodzko, kościół Podwyższenia Krzyża Św. 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support ok --Christian Ferrer 17:38, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, Gimnazjum nr 1, sala gimnastyczna 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 11:35, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, Gimnazjum nr 1, sala gimnastyczna 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. but shouldn't we blur her name ? --Pleclown 11:35, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to take part in the categorization of QI

Dear Jacek Halicki! Your images were reviewed and have been promoted to Quality Image status. Congratulations! I invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. All new images with this status are automatically placed to the page Commons:Quality_images/Recently_promoted. They have to be manually tagged with relevant categories using the QI categorization tool (see link at the top of the page, the author of this tool is User:Dschwen). Very few users do this job now, so a large number of uncategorizated photos accumulates on this page time to time… --Bff (talk) 09:33, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, most.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Bielice, stary dom 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 06:10, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Stronie Śląskie, dworzec PKP 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:43, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Stronie Śląskie, dworzec PKP 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. Please add english description. --XRay 07:02, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko,Kłodzko, kościół Podwyższenia Krzyża Św. 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment Large dust spot visible at the lower end of the clouds at right. --Pitke 23:39, 31 May 2014 (UTC) DoneJacek Halicki 14:41, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
OK. Mattbuck 21:01, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Praga, Hradczany, odprawa warty.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The blurry leaves in the foreground are disturbing and dominant. However, as they are overlapping the soldier on the right side, I would at least try to reduce their dominace by another crop. I proposed one, that additionally will get rid of two disturbing persons on the left. --Cccefalon 05:15, 11 June 2014 (UTC) DoneJacek Halicki 12:10, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Fine improvement! Good quality. --Cccefalon 12:26, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Praga, drogowskaz.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 06:50, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Praga, katedra św. Wita 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 06:27, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Praga, katedra św. Wita 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support OK --A.Savin 10:30, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Zdjęcia

Chesz mieć zdjęcie ratusza to wykonaj sam lepsze, obcięte po bokach. Możesz równiesz wykonać swoje poprawki i załadować jako nowe. Toje poprawki załadowane jako kolejna wersja mi nie odpowiadają. Bartek444 (talk) 19:20, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014, Praga, Most Karola.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:48, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Praga, Hradczany.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:27, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014, Praga, Hradczany.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 05:51, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Praga, Vełtawa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 14:47, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Praga, katedra św. Wita 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment Please add english description and geo location.--XRay 16:38, 12 June 2014 (UTC) DoneDescription added, but I do not know how to add geo location Jacek Halicki 11:37, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment For geocoding please have a look to Geocoding.--XRay 13:31, 13 June 2014 (UTC) Done Geolocation added[reply]
Support Good quality. The bottom is not optimal, but IMO it's QI. --XRay 15:23, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Bielice, kościół 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Bielice, kościół 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kwiat róży.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 14:47, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 MSI GTX 770 Lightning.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:01, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Mierzyn, ulica 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support OK --A.Savin 09:42, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Mierzyn, wiatrak.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments ok --Cccefalon 06:24, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Mierzyn, pawilon handlowy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 18:22, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Praga, katedra św. Wita 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Mattbuck 22:02, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Praga, katedra św. Wita.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Done--Jacek Halicki 09:42, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
OK. Mattbuck 12:20, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Ścinawka Dolna, kościół św. Jakuba 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:11, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Mak polny 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:37, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Mak polny 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 16:26, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, cmentarz komunalny, kaplica 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 21:00, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, cmentarz komunalny, kaplica 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 21:00, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, cmentarz komunalny, kapliczka 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 21:44, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, cmentarz komunalny, kapliczka 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 21:44, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Bystrzyca Kłodzka, kaplica św. Floriana.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:08, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Nysa Kłodzka w Kłodzku 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 11:30, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Bystrzyca Kłodzka, kościół św. Jana Nepomucena.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 16:33, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Bystrzyca Kłodzka, posąg św. Jana Nepomucena 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality --Halavar 11:08, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Bystrzyca Kłodzka, posąg św. Jana Nepomucena 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality --Halavar 11:08, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Bystrzyca Kłodzka, pręgierz 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 08:58, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Bystrzyca Kłodzka, wójtostwo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK for me. --Bgag 18:27, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Ścibórz.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 15:36, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Jezioro Otmuchowskie w Ściborzu.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 15:36, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, cmentarz komunalny, wejście.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 15:36, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, cmentarz komunalny, kapliczka 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 15:36, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]