User talk:Irruptive Creditor

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Irruptive Creditor!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 00:03, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:VeraRenczi.jpg

Copyright status: File:VeraRenczi.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:VeraRenczi.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Abzeronow (talk) 16:42, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

File:VeraRenczii.jpg

File:VeraRenczii.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

--Krdbot 03:00, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:DexPropylhexedrineSynth.jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:DexPropylhexedrineSynth.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

DMacks (talk) 21:46, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

What are you talking about? This is my proposed synthesis. This is not a derivative work; it is common sense. From publicly available information, I surmised an enantiopure synthesis of propylhexedrine’s optical isomers. This is not a derivative work. JoeBo82 (talk) 06:06, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

If this is your own idea, it's not a great one. Given you have proposed File:Synthesis of Levopropylhexedrine.jpg, why not just start with the enantiomer of the reactant of that one? All four stereoisomers of ephedrine are commercially available. DMacks (talk) 06:37, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

They’re not the same enantiomer; that is why. The aziridine featured in the synthesis of levopropylhexedrine only leads to levopropylhexedrine upon hydrogenation. JoeBo82 (talk) 06:41, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

Furthermore, the whole point of the Blum-Ittah reaction in the synthesis is to produce the relevant aziridine. JoeBo82 (talk) 06:47, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Synthesis of Levopropylhexedrine.jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Synthesis of Levopropylhexedrine.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

DMacks (talk) 21:46, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

What are you talking about? This is my proposed synthesis. This is not a derivative work; it is common sense. From publicly available information, I surmised an enantiopure synthesis of propylhexedrine’s optical isomers. JoeBo82 (talk) 06:06, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

There is no original to cite since I made this, but since you think I don’t, I’ll let you know how I proposed my synthesis. The first step in the synthesis is the Wenker synthesis. The Wenker synthesis turns a beta-amino alcohol into an aziridine. Again, a simple name reaction. My idea that this simple aziridine could be converted to the amine comes from a post on the Hive. However, as one will note, that picture features methamphetamine. I drew the drawings and I did the research. Please stop tagging all my stuff as derivative works, when no such originals can be found when using a reverse-image search or other tools. JoeBo82 (talk) 06:26, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

It appears to be a cut'n'paste combination of images and text from multiple sources. Did you actually draw each of these images and type all the text yourself? Why is it so terribly blurry and a mixture of different fonts and sizes? DMacks (talk) 06:25, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

Yes I made this myself. The reason the fonts are so bad is because I used the apple mark up tool to add text. Also, when it came to fitting different parts together, I used the imgflip meme generator. I’m sorry, but I’m too much of a peasant for even MS paint. JoeBo82 (talk) 06:28, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

"Fitting different parts together" and "add text". What is the source of those original parts? Did you actually draw every one of those chemical structures yourself? And if this is actually from your mind ("how I think this chemical could be made") rather than a published reference actually making this specific chemical, it is not allowed in the English Wikipedia articles. It doesn't matter how reasonable you think it is; en:WP:OR/en:WP:SYNTH is against policy. DMacks (talk) 06:31, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

Basically, I used an apple sketch app to draw the reactions. I screenshot them. Added the screenshots to imgflip meme generator. I screenshot the combined screenshots I had outlayed on the blank template for imgflip meme generator. I then used the Apple markup tool on IOS to do the rest. JoeBo82 (talk) 06:31, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

If you want to remove the enantiopure syntheses as OR, I’m fine with that. Just don’t claim they’re derivative works. JoeBo82 (talk) 06:33, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:PropylhexedrineAltSynthesis.jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:PropylhexedrineAltSynthesis.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

DMacks (talk) 21:47, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

Delete this. This one is inaccurate. The Leuckart and Aziridine syntheses are correct, however. JoeBo82 (talk) 06:09, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Young-Ger Suh Synthesis.png

File:Young-Ger Suh Synthesis.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DMacks (talk) 21:50, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

You can just delete this one, it’s crappy. I know it’s crap, you know it’s crap, and it isn’t that good. JoeBo82 (talk) 06:51, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Gupta Fentanyl.png

File:Gupta Fentanyl.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DMacks (talk) 21:52, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:CyclohexylacetoneSynth.jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:CyclohexylacetoneSynth.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

DMacks (talk) 21:56, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

This is not a derivative work. This is a simple recreation of Leuckart-style reaction, but for propylhexedrine. This isn’t an “image within an image”. JoeBo82 (talk) 06:08, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

If you want to know what I’m talking about here is an example of that style reaction, but for MDMA. Again, you don’t have to be a genius to understand how this works. Therefore, reacting a proposed synthesis-scheme for propylhexedrine was pretty easy to draw out. JoeBo82 (talk) 06:17, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

Consequently, there is no original to cite since I drew this. JoeBo82 (talk) 06:19, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:FentTotalSynth.png

Copyright status: File:FentTotalSynth.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:FentTotalSynth.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 08:05, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

File:PPX-C2P.jpg

File:PPX-C2P.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DMacks (talk) 01:57, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Saint Ullyot.jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Saint Ullyot.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

DMacks (talk) 18:30, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

I have removed any issues that may be had. Irruptive Creditor (talk) 05:53, 19 April 2024 (UTC)