User talk:Ireena

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Ireena!

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kakerdi.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Geocoding and english description would be nice. --Smial 12:48, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kilpjalg.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Looks OK. --A.Savin 06:48, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Eeskujulik pilt

[edit]

Tere, Ireen! Esitasin su suurepärase foto Tarvasjõest Commonsi eeskujulike fotode kandidaadiks ja see osutus valituks. Tulevikus lükkan selle kindlasti ka eestikeelse Vikipeedia nädala pildiks (ning kindlasti saab see peagi Commonis päeva pildiks). Teisi eeskujulikke pilte Eestist näed siit: Category:Featured pictures of Estonia. Kruusamägi (talk) 02:05, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

See foto on 29. detsembril Commonsi päeva pildiks ja osaleb ka Commonsi 2012. aasta parima foto valimisel, mille esimene voor algab 16. jaanuaril. Kruusamägi (talk) 17:11, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tarvasjõgi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI, of course. --JLPC 13:13, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laanemetsa.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Iifar 16:14, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laanemetsa II.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Weak support --Iifar 16:14, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vesisulg.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:05, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

[edit]

I was admiring your picture File:Tarvasjõgi.jpg as "picture of the day" and just wanted to stop by to thank you so much for taking the time not only to capture that beautiful image but also to share it. The colors and texture are absolutely stunning. :) I could look at that all day! --Maggie Dennis (WMF) (talk) 17:29, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tartu kesklinn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:34, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Emajõe jäätumine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Sorry but the pink cast is too strong. WB easely corrigeable. --Moonik 15:15, 1 March 2013 (UTC) ✓ Done Kruusamägi 22:52, 3 March 2013 (UTC) Some artifacts in the sky but good enough for QI. --Moonik 06:24, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jänesvaabik.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:32, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kattekold.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 17:03, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tartu kesklinn.jpg

[edit]

Paistab, et sellel pildil siiski pole lootust eeskujuliku foto märgist külge saada. Aga proovida ikka tasus :) Kruusamägi (talk) 18:07, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

See puudutab pilti File:Tartu Turusild II.jpg. Taivo (talk) 13:04, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Käokannid.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 17:11, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jõhvnööbikud.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:14, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Punaselg-raisamardikad.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:14, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kääveoseline lehikuhallik.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:13, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sanglepp Tarvasjõe ääres.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice. Good quality. --Smial 13:41, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kuldsoverbiell.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:11, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leekmampel.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:11, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vesisule õied.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Shallow DoF, but no other weaknesses. The spider is an intriguing compositional element. --Ram-Man 03:16, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rõngas-tulinutt.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice composition and QI -- Spurzem 21:01, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Händkakk 2014.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Excellent. --Mattbuck 15:58, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kurrel.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 13:18, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tamm Albus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Please can you insert the coordinates? --Steindy 12:31, 30 December 2014 (UTC) ✓ Done Based on the image information I searched out the coordinates and added them to the image. Kruusamägi 16:24, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Põdravärvik.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 04:56, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trichia varia.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 05:58, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pajunahkis.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 12:26, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ajukõhrik.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Hockei 11:31, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
[reply]


This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Jõhvnööbikud.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Jõhvnööbikud.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Õitsev tupp-villpea.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Iifar 06:37, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pajunahkis II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Iifar 06:37, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jalg-jänesepäss.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Iifar 06:44, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Noctilucent Clouds.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pajunahkis III.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trametes ochracea.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me--Holleday 19:55, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lehviknahkis.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me--Holleday 19:55, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roostetorik.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me--Holleday 19:55, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rabamurakad 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}


This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Händkakk 2014.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Händkakk 2014.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Your work is appreciated!

[edit]
Photographic Quality Barnstar
Your uploads are noticed and greatly appreciated. Lotje (talk) 16:41, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Osmussaare pank III.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:08, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tarvasjõe luht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 01:58, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mähu kivid II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 01:58, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mähu kivid.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. Wow. :-) --XRay 16:58, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mähu kivi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality--ArildV 20:39, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pihlakas Osmussaarel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 20:06, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tarvasjõgi nov. 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Beautiful and QI. -- Spurzem 20:04, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hauaneeme.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 15:57, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liivoja V.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 04:40, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sügis Jänijõe ääres.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --King of Hearts 04:05, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jänijõgi III.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 04:43, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laanesõnajalad.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 06:46, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Koprad.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:13, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jänijõgi 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 13:13, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tarvasjõgi dets 2013.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 08:12, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ambla jõgi Albus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 08:12, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kabrani kivi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 13:11, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Albu mõisa park IV.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 10:54, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Albu mõisa park VI.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support--Jebulon 13:30, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liivoja IV.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI imo.--ArildV 09:37, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jänijõgi IV.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI -- Spurzem 22:19, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Hauaneeme laht 2013.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hauaneeme laht 2013.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Tarvasjõgi nov. 2013.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tarvasjõgi nov. 2013.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Mähu kivid II.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mähu kivid II.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that the image Tamm Albus.jpg, which was created or uploaded by you, has been nominated for featured picture status; have a look at the nomination page. Thank you and good luck! -- Christian Ferrer 18:21, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ireena, a user has notified 2 dustspots on your image (see notes), however these dustspots are very difficult to see, it will be great if you can upload a fixed version of the image, thanks. If you have some questions you can use my talk page. -- Christian Ferrer 15:08, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Tamm Albus.jpg, which was nominated by Christian Ferrer at Commons:Featured picture candidates/ has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:24, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that the image Tarvasjõgi dets 2013.JPG, which was created or uploaded by you, has been nominated for featured picture status; have a look at the nomination page. Thank you and good luck! --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:27, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rohukedrik.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:07, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salu-siumari viljadega.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:08, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kihulased.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support - Good quality, IMO. In a photo of a cloud of black flies, I think we should expect a good effect, not that any of the flies has to be sharp. -- Ikan Kekek 08:09, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Harilik laanik.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:01, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Hundipiim.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hundipiim.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Kruusamägi (talk) 14:20, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

[edit]

Hello

I work at Europeana. I thought you might like to know that we used one of your Wikimedia uploads in a recent blog.

It was your photograph of Tartu, and the blog (written in all 24 EU languages) is here:

https://www.europeana.eu/en/blog/european-capitals-of-culture-2024-bad-ischl-bodo-and-tartu

Many many thanks for uploading and sharing your photographs!

Best wishes,

Adrian Acediscovery (talk) 09:47, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]