User talk:Irønie
Image:Ruines sur rocher Galline.jpg
[edit]Bonjour,
Je travaille en ce moment sur le hameau de la Nerthe, où se trouvent la chapelle de la Galline et le château. Et donc sur la category:Notre-Dame de la Galline.
J'ai vu ton commentaire sous ta photo des ruines. Il n'y a pas d'ambiguïté sur le château. La suite du texte de l'inventaire, que tu cites, est claire sur ce point : château de l'Air ou de la Nerthe, il n'y en a qu'un. J'ai aussi vérifié sur le terrain.
Là où il y a problème, pour moi, c'est que le texte donne des indications géographiques que je trouve erronées, notamment des indications "nord" ou "ouest" qui ne correspondent pas au terrain. Sans doute une mauvaise lecture de la photo aérienne jointe au texte, orientée vers l'ouest..
Je m'apprête à créer une catégorie pour des photos des ruines que j'ai prises (ce sera probablement "Category:Château de l'Air").
Cordialement, --Fr.Latreille (talk) 17:22, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
- Oui, ok. --Irønie (talk) 12:51, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
File:Enfantavecpoussette.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 04:10, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Le Monde illustré bpt6k6248727b 16.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Le Monde illustré bpt6k6248727b 16.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Le Monde illustré bpt6k6248727b 16.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, JuTa 10:57, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:SNM pavillon.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:SNM pavillon.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 14:59, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- source={{own}} + {{self|cc-by-3.0}}
- not enough ?! --Irønie (talk) 16:28, 28 July 2024 (UTC)