User talk:Васин Юрий
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 10:45, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Moodle.png was uncategorized on 4 April 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:45, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Viktor marochko.jpg was uncategorized on 16 April 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:43, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
- Image:NetBeans tapestry.jpg was uncategorized on 15 June 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:46, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Tapestry Components.jpg was uncategorized on 15 June 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:46, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Tapestry components.jpg was uncategorized on 16 June 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:43, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Turb wells.gif was uncategorized on 5 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 15:36, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
File:Phpdocumentor.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Angus McLellan (Talk) 11:39, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
File:Konabikeslogo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Sphilbrick (talk) 00:27, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
The factual accuracy of the chemical structure File:Isoniazid 3d.png is disputed
[edit]Dispute notification | The chemical structure File:Isoniazid 3d.png you uploaded has been tagged as disputed and is now listed in Category:Disputed chemical diagrams. Files in this category are deleted after one month if there is no upload of a corrected version and if there is no objection from the uploader or other users. Please discuss on the file talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload a corrected version or simply allow the file to be deleted.
In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --Ed (Edgar181) 14:38, 5 May 2011 (UTC) |
- There is also a similar problem with File:Iso2.pdb.gif. Ed (Edgar181) 16:58, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
File:Konabikeslogo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
This, that and the other (talk) 07:58, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
В файле допущена ошибка - кольцо капролактама должно быть на один метиленовый радикал длиннее.Suvorow (talk) 07:50, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
- Изображение взято из АИ, проверю, спасибо. Ink (talk) 11:47, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
Dubious licenses
[edit]Вот не везет с изображениями и все, не буду больше заливать изображения с спорной или сомнительной лицензией :( Ink (talk) 03:34, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
File tagging File:Hand chain saw.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Hand chain saw.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Hand chain saw.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Smooth_O (talk) 14:27, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
File:Hydroxymethylfurfural.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ed (Edgar181) 16:23, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2018 is open!
[edit]Dear Васин Юрий,
You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in R1 of the 2018 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2018) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked.
In the final (and current) round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2018.
Round 2 will end 17 March 2019, 23:59:59.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 18:05, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!
[edit]Read this message in your language
Dear Wikimedian,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 1 will end on UTC.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:16, 20 April 2023 (UTC)