User talk:Ibex73

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Ibex73!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 16:17, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Image du jour de Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 en France, 18 September 2015

[edit]
Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 Votre photo « ONERA MEUDON soufflerie S1b.jpg » a été choisie par les bénévoles de Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 comme image coup de cœur (ou image du jour) du 18 September 2015. Vous avez ainsi remporté un tee-shirt Wiki Loves Monuments. Wikimédia France vous recontactera prochainement pour préparer l'envoi de votre lot.

Trizek from FR 13:14, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Maison d'Avout, côté jardin, Annoux.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:20, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Magog the Ogre: Answer : I've modified the licence for all the pictures above. I hope that it's now correct. Sorry, but I'm just a beginner with wikimedias commons ... Best regards,Ibex73 (talk) 08:11, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Ibex73,
Merci d'avoir rajouter une licence mais ce n'est pas exactement la bonne. En effet, PD-self signifierait que tu es l'auteur de la carte postale et que tu la places dans le domaine public (ce qui, sauf erreur de ma part, n'est pas le cas). Dans ton cas, il me semble que PD-anon convient mieux (et même {{PD-anon-1923}} si tout les cartes datent d'avant 1923 ; {{PD-anon-70}} sinon).
J'en ai aussi profité pour affiner les catégories sur File:Maison d'Avout, côté jardin, Annoux.jpg ; il est redondant d'indiquer France, Bourgogne, Yonne sachant que l'on peut retrouver ces catégories via Annoux ; sur Commons, on ne met que les catégories les plus précises.
Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 10:06, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@VIGNERON: :Merci Claude de guider les pas d'un débutant ... J'ai effectué les modifications Ibex73 (talk) 10:59, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Photo challenge/2016 - January - Wheels/Voting

[edit]

Bonjour, tu as voté 2 fois 3 étoiles pour les images 25 et 95, il faut soit supprimer un choix ou le remplacer par une mention 0/3. Merci --Doalex (talk) 17:13, 28 February 2016 (UTC) @Doalex:  : merci, c'est corrigé ![reply]

Si tu ne signes pas aussi le ping ne fonctionne pas.--Doalex (talk) 19:44, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I'm afraid you also voted 3* for 94 and 95. Could you remove one of these ASAP. Thanks. -- Colin (talk) 20:18, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ibex73, if you don't correct your votes, I shall to remove them all. Please can you fix them. Thanks. -- Colin (talk) 18:23, 1 March 2016 (UTC) @Colin: I'm very sorry. Please , cancel my vote for image 94. Thanks a lot. Ibex73 (talk) 19:10, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Photo challenge mars 2016

[edit]

Bonjour, je me permets de te demander si tu as un thème préférentiel (ou plusieurs) pour le mois de mars 2016, en regardant ceci Commons talk:Photo challenge/themes ? --Doalex (talk) 10:59, 29 February 2016 (UTC)@Doalex:  : je ne participe à ces défis que depuis le mois dernier et ai donc un certain nombre de photos en stock ! J'ai proposé "Firefighthers and firetrucks" et "horned animals" ; "hats" est pas mal non plus ; également "birds and birds watching" Ibex73 (talk) 19:14, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merci, mais les thèmes sont maintenant choisis Commons:Photo challenge#Challenges open for submission, et félicitations pour janvier - diagonales. --Doalex (talk) 19:51, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour,autre chose : pour faciliter les échanges il vaut mieux créer ta page utilisateur, elle existe mais vierge et tant que tu n'y mets pas quelques indications ton lien user restera rouge et les tentatives de ping indiqueront que la page de l'utilisateur n'existe pas, c'est bien de savoir au minimum les langues que tu connais en mettant les modèles appropriés voir Commons:Babel ou Commons:Babel/fr et de plus, je crois que tu accèdes à plus d'onglets en haut de ta page et avec le temps tu apprendras à personnaliser en regardant la page des autres utilisateurs et tu pourras affiner encore, je suppose que 73 correspond à la Savoie et tu peux améliorer le Projet Savoie en y apportant des images. --Doalex (talk) 09:24, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Photo Challenge – Second Place
Congratulations!

Your picture Ibex in the French Vanoise National Park.JPG won the 2nd place in the Photo Challenge Diagonals, in January 2016. You can find the results of the challenge here.

Hi Ibex73. For the Mailboxes challenge, you submitted five images. The limit is four. Could you remove one please:

Thanks. -- Colin (talk) 21:33, 1 March 2016 (UTC) @Colin: Sorry again, I begin with wiki challenges and I make some mistakes ... I've canceled File:Poste cite universitaire, Paris.JPG I would be more vigilant in the future Ibex73 (talk) 08:13, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Beffroi de Montrouge.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Storkk (talk) 10:42, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Storkk (talk) 10:46, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Storkk (talk) 10:54, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

thank you

[edit]

Ta for photo. Your photo added to some English Wikipedia articles

Ibex on rocky ridgeline

user: johnscotaus Thank you @Johnscotaus: for your message. FYI, I will enrich the class "Animals in Vanoise National park, France" with my participation in the contest Wiki Loves Earth and you can use new pictures of ibex, chamois, marmots ... Ibex73 (talk) 18:28, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I removed your File:Cigogne dans la Baie de Somme.JPG because it does not meet the requirement for the challenge: "Birds in habitat: The natural environment for the bird should form a significant part of the image". The "sky" doesn't really count as "habitat". -- Colin (talk) 10:53, 5 May 2016 (UTC) Thank you @Colin: . Indeed, the blue sky is not bird habitat! Ibex73 (talk) 18:28, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RNN Saint-Nicolas des Glénans

[edit]

Bonjour, merci pour vos photos de la RNN de Saint-Nicolas-des-Glénans pour WLE 2016. Je vous signale que son périmètre est très réduit (voir par exemple sur cette carte) et que certaines de vos photos sont donc hors périmètre. Cordialement. Pmau (talk) 13:48, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merci @Pmau: pour ces précisions. Je n'avais pas vérfié ... Il ne reste donc que les narcisses des Glénans pour le concours, et les plages pour les baigneurs ! Avec mes excuses Ibex73 (talk) 18:28, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Nul besoin de vous excuser pour cela... ;-) Pmau (talk) 18:36, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
J'en profite aussi pour vous indiquer que quelques-uns de vos clichés sont sous la limite des 2 Mpx de résolution ce qui les élimine du concours. Attention à ne pas trop recadrer donc. Pmau (talk) 19:02, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
c'est noté @Pmau: . Malheureusement, à l'époque de ces chasses photographiques, je ne savais pas encore que je contribuerai un jour à wikimedia commons et participerai à un concours ... Pour les chasses à venir, j'adapterai les tailles des images. J'ai encore d'autres photos qui ne font pas la taille requise une fois recadrée pour le concours (comme une jeune hermine en Vanoise par exemple). Puis-je quand même les verser au titre de ce concours sachant qu'elles valorisent les espaces naturels même si elles n'ont pas la taille requises ?

J'aime les marmottes...

[edit]

Bonjour, j'adore les marmottes mais là ça commence à faire un peu beaucoup... Bien que parfaitement en règle vis à vis du règlement du concours, je vous rappelle que le but de celui-ci vise plutôt à la mise en valeur de paysages et que les espèces sont acceptées (tolérées ?) à partir du moment où elles sont montrées dans un cadre particulier. C'est valable également pour les fleurs...;-) Cordialement. Pmau (talk) 11:32, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Promis, juré @Pmau: , c'était ma dernière marmotte du concours 2016 ! J'ai bien noté vos remarques. Sur la page discussion https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons_talk:Wiki_Loves_Earth_2016_in_France, j'avais lu : "soyons souple dans l'acceptation dans le concours mais strict dans la sélection des gagnants. Du coup, pour moi les photos que tu indiques ainsi que les gros-plans sont acceptés mais ne peuvent pas être primés." C'est pour cette raison que je me suis permis de mettre des gros plans, même si ces photos ne seront pas primées. J'ai encore quelques gros plans de fleurs de Vanoise qui pourrait illustrer des articles, même si on ne voit pas toujours le massif de la Vanoise en arrière plan. Ces photos mettent quand même en valeur l'immense richesse de patrimoine floral du parc de la Vanoise et en ce sens, il me semble que ces photos ont leur place dans ce concours, mais c'est juste mon avis ...Ibex73 (talk) 12:34, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Attention, je n'ai jamais dit que ces photos n'avaient pas d'intérêt. Elles sont évidemment complémentaires des paysages et seront très utiles pour illustrer des articles. Mais il me semble qu'elles sont un peu en dehors de la thématique stricte du concours. Et la quantité fait que l'on se perd... :-) Pmau (talk) 12:45, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Re-bonjour, votre photo du lac Verdet correspond à mon avis plutôt au lac de la Plagne au dessus de Peisey Nancroix. Je voudrais votre confirmation pour renommer. Pmau (talk) 16:51, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Effectivement @Pmau: , c'est une rando que je n'ai fait qu'une fois, en passant par le refuge de Plaisance et retour par le col du Palet. D'après la carte de la Vanoise au 1/50 000, nous n'avons pas pu passer par le lac Verdet. C'est donc bien le lac de la Plagne à une altitude de 2145 m. Un grand merci pour le temps consacrer à ces vérifications.Ibex73 (talk) 18:40, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fleurs en Vanoise...

[edit]

Bonsoir, merci pour toutes ces fleurs :-). Je sèche encore sur la détermination de certaines d'entres elles. J'ai aussi modifié certaines catégories :

Pmau (talk) 17:15, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merci @Pmau: pour votre implication. Je dispose du livre Fleurs de Vanoise Parc National de la Vanoise aux éditions Edisud paru en 1993, mais il n'y a qu'une photo par fleur et ce n'est pas toujours évident ... OK pour la silène acaule. Au passage, je suis preneur de bons conseils de livre pour identifier les fleurs de montagne.
J'utilise la Flora Helvetica, qui marche bien pour les fleurs des Alpes du Nord, et également À la découverte des fleurs des Alpes édité par Glénat pour le PN des Ecrins et qui est très bien fait. Après, c'est aussi l'expérience qui joue... Pmau (talk) 18:10, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Merci @Pmau: , c'est noté. Il va donc falloir que j'investisse un jour dans la bible des fleurs des Alpes d'après les commentaires sur internet, à savoir Flora Helvetica. Le second ouvrage proposé est sans doute voisin de celui que j'ai qui a été fait en collaboration avec le Parc de la Vanoise.
Bonjour, je viens de trouver l'Atlas de la flore rare et protégée de Vanoise en ligne. Ça peux sans doute vous intéresser. Pmau (talk) 13:40, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Super !!! Un grand merci à vous @Pmau: Ibex73 (talk) 18:19, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Chers Amis, je viens de corriger l'identification de pas mal d'autres plantes de la Vanoise, et au passage de quelques autres qui figuraient dans la même catégorie des reserves naturelles de Fance. Amicalement, --Réginald alias Meneerke bloem (To reply) 20:27, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Merci pour votre aide @Meneerke bloem: . La flore est tellement riche en Vanoise qu'il est difficile de s'y retrouver ... Ibex73 (talk) 06:39, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Ibex73 and Pmau: Chers Amis, j'ai posté sur Commons plus de 5.000 photos de plantes. J'ai été entre autres les dix dernières années chaque été en Savoie (Vanoise et environs) et Dauphiné (Grandes Rousses, massif des Ecrins et Queyras). J'y ai photographié et identifié plusieurs centaines de plantes, parmi lesquelles les rares Chamorchis alpina, Androsace alpina, Campanula cenisia, Colchicum alpinum, Valeriana saliunca, Primula marginata et Eritrichium nanum (dont les images de plusieurs figurent notamment sur les pages de la Wikipedia française et allemande). Jadis nous allions en Suisse et en Autriche (je ne photographiais pas encore les plantes à cette époque). Cet été nous retournerons dans les dolomites, où j'avais il y a une quizaine d'années notamment rencontré les typiques Potentilla nitida, Soldanella pusilla, Nigritella rubra, Achillea clavennae et Lilium bulbiferum var. bulbiferum. Amicalement, --Réginald alias Meneerke bloem (To reply) 09:28, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
PS : N'hésitez pas à me contacter si vous avez des difficulties pour identifier des plantes alpines.
Photo Challenge – Second Place
Congratulations!

Your picture Playing with hands.JPG won the 2nd place in the Photo Challenge Children playing, in April 2016. You can find the results of the challenge here.

5e prix Wiki Loves Earth 2016 en France

[edit]
Wiki Loves Earth 2016

Bonjour et toutes nos félicitations,

Le jury français de Wiki Loves Earth 2016 est heureux de vous annoncer que vous avez reçu le 5e prix pour votre photo « Bouquetins au lac long ».

Cordialement, pour le jury de Wiki Loves Earth 2016 en France, Pmau (talk) 08:04, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merci @Pmau: pour cette bonne nouvelle et également pour l'important travail d'identification accompli sur l'identification de la flore de la Vanoise (j'ai depuis investi dans Flora Helvetica sur vos conseils et un garde du parc de la Vanoise m'a dit également que c'était leur bible ...) et de certains lieux. Je suis heureux que les bouquetins de la Vanoise qui sont le symbole du parc soient mis à l'honneur via ce concours !Ibex73 (talk) 19:20, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image du jour de Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 en France, 10 September 2016

[edit]
Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 Votre photo « Forgerons-riveteurs pont Bir Hackeim (1).jpg » a été choisie par les bénévoles de Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 comme image coup de cœur (ou image du jour) du 10 September 2016.

Cordialement, Lundi Novembre (talk) 17:48, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:WKL2015 conciergerie 1.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Thesupermat (talk) 20:49, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Château Buchillot cours.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


File:Château Buchillot façade cour (2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nemesis III (discuter) 18:55, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Photo Challenge – Second Place
Congratulations!

Your picture Gardening in London.jpg won the 2nd place in the Photo Challenge Gardening, in October 2016. You can find the results of the challenge here.

-- Jarekt (talk) 04:45, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Jarekt: for this good news
Photo Challenge – Third Place
Congratulations!

Your picture Old wash house Marmeaux France.jpg won the 3rd place in the Photo Challenge Water Supply Infrastructure, in October 2016. You can find the results of the challenge here.

-- Jarekt (talk) 04:35, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Jarekt: for this second good news in the same month ǃ

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

[edit]
  1. This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

I did it Ibex73 (talk) 19:48, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

[edit]

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Merci à Vanoise

[edit]

Merci de vous féliciter pour le nettoyage des catégories de Parc du Vanoise. Vos photos du parc sont très agréables: merci pour vos contributions! (I don't know Français, from Google Translate) — hike395 (talk) 14:18, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Hike395: It is a pleasure to share pictures of the National Park of the Vanoise. I am not specialist of the categories wikimedia commons. Thank you for your work.Ibex73 (talk) 10:17, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Images by Ibex73

[edit]

Your attempt to create a user category that was incorrectly corrected by Jameslwoodward should work now. --Didym (talk) 13:53, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Didym, I appreciate your helping out here, but I'm not a mind reader -- Ibex73 created a gallery, not a category, so I moved it to the correct place for a user gallery. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:00, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Didym: and @Jameslwoodward: Sorry for my mistake, I'm not a specialist and thanks for your help Ibex73 (talk) 18:44, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No problem -- there is a lot to learn here. Please feel free to ask a question on my talk page anytime. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:14, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Jameslwoodward: . I make a new mistake today : "Editor's summary: Accidental creation: User intended to create user page, but he laready has one". Now, I have too many pictures (see Utilisateur:Ibex73) and I would like to have subpages. Can you tell me how can I create subpages ? Thank you very much. Ibex73 (talk) 21:09, 30 Septembber 2017 (UTC)

Bonjour @VIGNERON: , j'ai vu que tu étais administrateur commons et tu pourrais peut-être m'aider car j'ai essayé à plusieurs reprises de créer des sous-pages sur mon compte commons pour pouvoir visualiser dans différents répertoires "perso" mes centaines de photos importées (sur une seule page, ça met trop de temps à charger et je devrai encore en déposer). A chaque tentative, ça a été l'échec et un utilisateur avisé a supprimé ce que j'avais tenté de créer ! Merci d'avance pour ton aide.Ibex73 (talk) 18:28, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image du jour de Wiki Loves Earth 2017 en France, 8 May 2017

[edit]
Wiki Loves Earth 2017 Votre photo « Ibex in Vanoise National Park, France.jpg » a été choisie par les bénévoles de Wiki Loves Earth 2017 comme image coup de cœur (ou image du jour) du 8 May 2017.

Cordialement, Pmau (talk) 07:23, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

3e prix Wiki Loves Earth 2017 en France

[edit]
Wiki Loves Earth 2017 Bonjour et toutes nos félicitations,

Le jury français de Wiki Loves Earth 2017 est heureux de vous annoncer que vous avez reçu le 3e prix pour votre photo « Col du Soufre(2819m) et lac Blanc(2429m) (15) ».

Cordialement, pour le jury de Wiki Loves Earth 2017 en France, Pmau (talk) 15:16, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merci @Pmau: pour cette bonne nouvelle !

Image coup de cœur de Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 en France, 1 September 2017

[edit]
Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 Votre photo « Chapelle Saint-Aubert du Mont-Saint-Michel (PA00110462) (1).jpg » a été choisie par les bénévoles de Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 comme image coup de cœur (ou image du jour) du 1 September 2017.

Cordialement, -- Marianne Casamance (talk) 05:26, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merci @Marianne Casamance: pour cette bonne nouvelle ! Ibex73 (talk) 05:58, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vitraux de la cathédrale Saint-Dié de Saint-Dié-des-Vosges

[edit]

Merci pour votre participation à l'édition 2017 de Wiki loves monuments en France.

J'ai toutefois dû retirer vos photos File:Stained glass windows of Cathédrale Saint-Dié de Saint-Dié-des-Vosges PA00107275 (1).jpg et File:Stained glass windows of Cathédrale Saint-Dié de Saint-Dié-des-Vosges PA00107275 (2).jpg du concours car elle n'ont pas la dimension minimum de 1600x1200 pixels (article 5.3 du règlement).

En outre ces vitraux sont l’œuvre de Gérald Collot et de Alfred Manessier et ne peuvent être admis sur commons, étant encore soumis au droit d'auteur. Je suis au regret de devoir demander leur suppression.

J'espère que cette déconvenue ne vous dissuadera pas de continuer votre série de contributions à WLM, Jvillafruela (talk) 21:03, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Merci @Jvillafruela: pour votre message d'accompagnement et d'explication pour ces deux demandes de suppression. Ces messages sont assez violents (il faudrait au moins changer leurs couleurs !) et pourraient dissuader plus d'un de continuer à déverser des photos sur commons car ce n'est pas toujours facile de savoir si on peut ou non déposer des photos ...
File:Stained glass windows of Cathédrale Saint-Dié de Saint-Dié-des-Vosges PA00107275 (1).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jvillafruela (talk) 21:12, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stained glass windows of Cathédrale Saint-Dié de Saint-Dié-des-Vosges PA00107275 (2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jvillafruela (talk) 21:15, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Église Saint-Pierre d'Auxerre

[edit]

Bonjour,

Dans le cadre des dernières vérifications de Wiki Loves Monuments, j'ai un doute sur le bonne attribution des deux images File:Église Saint-Pierre d'Auxerre PA00113588 (1).jpg et File:Église Saint-Pierre d'Auxerre PA00113588 (2).jpg. Le style visible sur ces photographies ne semble pas du tout correspondre avec le style des autres photos du même bâtiment (pas à la façade principale tout du moins).

Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 17:05, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merci

Merci @VIGNERON: pour ta vigilance. Il ya a trop d'églises à Auxerre et je m'y perds un peu ! J'ai modifié la description et le n° de base mérimée mais pas le titre car je n'ai pas les droits.

WSC2017 in france

[edit]

Hi, before we start evaluating them, this file and its series, are they also a set of images? they look like a set of images to me. You are in time to change their category. I am still waiting for the Montage tool to open a task for France, that's why is one of the last country.--Alexmar983 (talk) 03:20, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry @Alexmar983: , it's the first time I contribute to this competition and I do not master the different categories  ! Thanks to you, I've jsut change category to " Image sets from Wiki Science Competition 2017 " Ibex73 (talk) 07:28, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You are competing with the cow birth, which is a strong competitor... It's a valued or good quality image already... but in the end if both sets gets nice evaluation from the jurors we can promote both to the main jury. There is no prize for France so if we send both to the international first-level jury, there is no big difference. I'll let you know later.--Alexmar983 (talk) 08:58, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

[edit]
WMF Surveys, 18:22, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey

[edit]
WMF Surveys, 01:20, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

[edit]
WMF Surveys, 00:30, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ibex in the French Vanoise National Park.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MB-one 11:43, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bastille Day 2018 aircraft identification

[edit]

Hi Ibex73, I just corrected the descriptions and categorization of some of your recent uploads from the Bastille Day flypast. As the file names are still misleading, I'd like to point you towards the possibility to rename the files, see Commons:File renaming#How to rename a file. There seem to have been two flights with A400Ms. One was a German A400M accompanied by a French Transall C-160 (two engines) and a French C-130J (four engines), see File:1 C130J 62e escadre de trasnsport, 1 A400 allemand (3).jpg. The other was a French A400M accompanied by two CASA CN-235 (two engines), see File:1 C160 Transall 64e escadre de transport 1 C130J 62e escadre de transport, 1 A400 allemand (1).jpg. Here's a video that shows that the two CASAs flew close to a French A400M. Regards, --Sitacuisses (talk) 00:34, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @Sitacuisses: , I've tried to do my best with comparing my pictures to the program catched on the website http://defense-92.fr/commemoration/retrouvez-le-programme-du-defile-aerien-de-ce-14-juillet-2018-57015, but I've could done some mistakes ... I've done the request to change the file name Ibex73 (talk) 08:09, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the link. It helped me with completing the renaming. I tried to follow your naming scheme and hope that the new names are ok for you. --Sitacuisses (talk) 14:13, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2017 is open!

[edit]

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2017 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in R2.

Dear Ibex73,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2017 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the twelfth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2017) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top 2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2017.

Round 2 will end on 22 July 2018, 23:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 11:33, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Photo Challenge – Second Place
Congratulations!

Your picture Royal game of Ur, Mesopotamia , 2600-2400 BC.jpg won the 2nd place in the Photo Challenge Traditional games, in June 2018. You can find the results of the challenge here.

Photo Challenge Winner
Congratulations!

Your picture Phone of George Clemenceau during World War I.jpg won the 1st place in the Photo Challenge Telephones, in July 2018. You can find the results of the challenge here.

Photo Challenge – Third Place
Congratulations!

Your picture Alarm phone on the platform of a suburban train station (2).jpg won the 3rd place in the Photo Challenge Telephones, in July 2018. You can find the results of the challenge here.

-- Jarekt (talk) 03:49, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WLM 2018 : Château de Vincennes

[edit]

Merci pour votre nouvelle participation à l'édition 2018 de Wiki loves monuments en France.

J'ai toutefois dû retirer du concours votre série de photos sur le château de Vincennes car elle n'ont pas la dimension minimum de 1600x1200 pixels (article 5.3 du règlement). Si vous en avez d'autres versions avec une meilleure définition vous pouvez les envoyer pour remplacer celle ci en utilisant le lien "Importer une nouvelle version de ce fichier" sur la page de la photo (et répondez alors à ce message pour que je puisse les réintégrer dans le concours)

Bonnes contributions, Jvillafruela (talk) 10:28, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @Jvillafruela: pour tes explications car je ne comprenais pas que le Château de Vincennes soit hors concours ! J'ai été trompé par le recadrage ... Bon tri !
Photo Challenge – Second Place
Congratulations!

Your picture Pig in the french alps (2).jpg won the 2nd place in the Photo Challenge Pink, in October 2018. You can find the results of the challenge here.

-- Jarekt (talk) 04:22, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Photo Challenge Winner
Congratulations!

Your picture Ibex skull in Vanoise National Park, France (3).jpg won the 1st place in the Photo Challenge Bones, in November 2018. You can find the results of the challenge here.

-- Jarekt (talk) 03:36, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Identity

[edit]

Hi Ibex73 - the bird in your photo was misnamed; I renamed the file from File:Bergeronnette printanière(Motacilla flava).jpg to File:Turdus merula (juvenile), Napremont, Vanoise NP, France.jpg and added the new name to your Vanoise page. Hope this helps! - MPF (talk) 18:11, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much @MPF: for your help and your explanation. For a moment, I thought I had lost a picture without explanation. I'm reassured Ibex73 (talk) 18:56, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! I spotted the file when I was reviewing Motacilla flava files for subspecies ID :-) MPF (talk) 20:28, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Photo Challenge – Second Place
Congratulations!

Your picture Underwater car, floods in Paris (2).jpg won the 2nd place in the Photo Challenge Extreme weather, in December 2018. You can find the results of the challenge here.

-- Jarekt (talk) 02:56, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Earth France 2019 a commencé !

[edit]

Bonjour ,

J'ai le plaisir de vous annoncer que la cinquième édition du concours Wiki Loves Earth en France est ouverte !

Le concours concernera 368 zones de toute la France, des parcs nationaux jusqu’aux réserves naturelles régionales englobant ainsi des paysages et biotopes variés.

Pendant le mois de mai, n'hésitez pas à mettre en ligne des photos de ces zones que vous auriez sur vos disques durs ou à vous rendre dans une zone concernée près de chez vous (à l'aide de la carte). Le règlement est disponible sur la page du concours.

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé de commonistes, d'acteurs de l'environnement et de photographes professionnels. Un jury international constituera ensuite une sélection des meilleures photographies mondiales. Vous pourrez retrouver toutes les informations détaillées sur le site du concours


P.S. : si vous ne pouvez pas participer au concours cette année, faites passer le message autour de vous pour que de nouveaux et nouvelles photographes rejoignent l'aventure !

Bonne journée, Sarah Krichen WMFr (talk) 08:58, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gardening in London.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
where is this place? The description is incomplete --Ezarate 14:00, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Updated description --Piotr Bart 12:55, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Support
Good quality for me. --Manfred Kuzel 09:39, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Photo Challenge Winner
Congratulations!

Your picture Police woman in London.jpg won the 1st place in the Photo Challenge Working Women, in May 2019. You can find the results of the challenge here.

-- Jarekt (talk) 03:09, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Community Insights Survey

[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 01:12, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

4e prix Wiki Loves Earth 2019 en France

[edit]
Wiki Loves Earth 2019

Le jury français de Wiki Loves Earth 2019 vous a décerné le 4e prix pour votre photo « Bouquetin au lac de la patinoire 2512 m et en arrière plan dômes de la Vanoise ».

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 15:23, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 20:01, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019! Please help with this survey.

[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Ibex73,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 12:09, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Science Competition 2019

[edit]
Logo for Wiki Science Competition
Logo for Wiki Science Competition

Dear uploader of European Science Photo Competition 2015 and Wiki Science Competition 2017, we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2019 has started in the whole world. It is now completed in Russia (active in May), Ukraine and France (active during November), but it's still open in all the other countries.

If you want to take part where WSC2019 is still open, please consult this page. Only some national categories are associated to competitions with local prizes.

If you are an expert user, please consider that images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in their national category even if not uploaded with the main interface.

Please keep in mind that there is a new category this year, i.e. "nature and wildlife".

If you already took part in a country that has completed its upload phase, please consider improving the description in English of your files (click on the edit button), since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate them. World finalists will be finalized after March 2020.

Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.


Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsuscribe from this list


Social media: Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2019 #WikiScience #WikiScience2019


Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery--22:49, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 Participant Survey (Reminder)

[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Ibex73,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 03:20, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Photo Challenge Winner
Congratulations!

Your picture Pendulum clock in Bourvallais Hotel, Paris, France (1).jpg won the 1st place in the Photo Challenge Interior Clocks, in April 2020. You can find the results of the challenge here.

-- Jarekt (talk) 00:42, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Monument historique objet

[edit]

Bonjour,

En vérifiant les soumissions au concours Wiki Loves Monuemnts, j'ai vu passé les photo de la grue Titan à Nantes comme File:Grue Titan Grise, Nantes (1).jpg. Si besoin et si cela peut aider, je précise qu'avec l'intégration des monuments historiques protégé au titre objet, il y a cette année deux formulaires d'import : Campaign:wlm-fr (comme d'habitude, pour les bâtiments) et Campaign:wlm-fr-palissy (pour les objets).

Cordialement, VIGNERON (talk) 07:29, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merci @VIGNERON: pour ce rappel : cela m'évitera de passer par les outils d'aide puis de changer ensuite les références de Mérimée à Palissy Ibex73 (talk) 10:43, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image coup de cœur du 10 septembre 2020 - Wiki Loves Monuments France

[edit]
Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 Votre photo « Château de Sceaux, Hauts-de-Seine (3).jpg » a été choisie par les bénévoles de Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 comme image coup de cœur (ou image du jour) du 10 September 2020.

Maud-Sophie Leccia WMFr (talk) Merci @Maud-Sophie Leccia WMFr: pour cette bonne nouvelle !

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2020! Please help with this survey

[edit]
Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Ibex73,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2020, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 200K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2020.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team, 08:21, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Pendulum clock in Bourvallais Hotel, Paris, France (2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 05:19, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Boloria in Vanoise National Park.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sadarama (talk) 12:11, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Pymouss Let’s talk - 23:15, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A.Savin 23:53, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Monument aux morts Termignon (4).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ArkéoTopia (talk) 15:06, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Science Competition 2021 has started

[edit]
Logo for Wiki Science Competition
Logo for Wiki Science Competition

Dear uploader of European Science Photo Competition 2015 and Wiki Science Competition 2017 and Wiki Science Competition 2019, we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2021 has started in the whole world. It is now completed in Russia (active in May), but it's still open in almost all the other countries.

If you want to take part in WSC2021, please consult this page. Only some national categories are associated to competitions with local prizes.

If you are an expert user, we remind you that images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in their national category even if not uploaded with the main interface.

Please keep in mind that there is a new category this year, that is "astronomy".

If you already took part in a country that has completed its upload phase, please consider improving the description in English of your files (click on the edit button), since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate them. World finalists will be finalized after March 2020.

Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.


Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsubscribe from this list


Social media: Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2021 #WikiScience #WikiScience2021


Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery--20:30, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Milan skyscraper Unicredit.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: This file is an image of a structure with a copyright-protected design, captured in a jurisdiction without the "Commons:Freedom_of_panorama freedom of panorama," and the uploader did not supply a license from the architect.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : MxRox.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 15:12, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Je ne comprends pas, il y a une catégorie commons associée à cette tour, cf. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:UniCredit_Tower_(Milan) Ibex73 (talk) 13:10, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Beware of trapping your hands.jpg

[edit]
العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Beware of trapping your hands.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

— Racconish💬 13:23, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

légende modifiée, est-ce suffisant ? Ibex73 (talk) 13:07, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
File:Lady in Blue, Camille Corot, 1874.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

89.14.52.121 15:39, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 04:14, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 02:36, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Photo Challenge Winner
Congratulations!

Your picture Cabourg beach (2).jpg won the 1st place in the Photo Challenge beach, in September 2023. You can find the results of the challenge here.

Photo Challenge – Second Place
Congratulations!

Your picture Cabourg beach (3).jpg won the 2nd place in the Photo Challenge beach, in September 2023. You can find the results of the challenge here.

-- Jarekt (talk) 04:09, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Science Competition 2023

[edit]
Logo for Wiki Science Competition
Logo for Wiki Science Competition

Dear uploader of European Science Photo Competition 2015 and Wiki Science Competition 2017, Wiki Science Competition 2019 and Wiki Science Competition 2021, we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2023 has started in almost all the countries.

If you want to take part in WSC2023, please consult this page. Only some national categories are associated to competitions with local prizes.

If you are an expert user, we remind you that images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in their national category even if not uploaded with the main interface.

If you already took part in a country that has completed its upload phase (such as Russia), please consider improving the description in English of your files (click on the edit button), since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate them. World finalists will be finalized after March 2024.

Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.


Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsubscribe from this list


Social media: Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2023 #WikiScience #WikiScience2023


Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery--18:17, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Photo Challenge – Second Place
Congratulations!

Your picture Helicopter transport of bicycles, Paralognan-la-Vanoise (1).jpg won the 2nd place in the Photo Challenge Bicycles, in November 2023. You can find the results of the challenge here.

Jarekt (talk) 05:10, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Photo Challenge – Third Place
Congratulations!

Your picture Eriophorum scheuchzeri in Vanoise National Park (2).jpg won the 3rd place in the Photo Challenge Too many to count, in November 2023. You can find the results of the challenge here.

Jarekt (talk) 02:28, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Science Competition

[edit]

Bonjour Ibex73,

Au nom de l'équipe d'organisation de Wiki Science Competition 2023 en France, je tenais à vous remercier de votre participation. En 6 semaines, 838 photos ont été partagées, de 51 personnes, dont beaucoup de nouveaux contributeurs (57 % des comptes créés spécialement pour le concours). En nombre de photo, cela place la France à la 2e place, juste derrière la Macédoine. C'est assez encourageant pour un concours qui n'est habituellement pas organisé en France.

Toutes les photos de l'édition française sont regroupées dans cette catégorie. Et les lauréats sont indiqués sur cette page.

L'équipe d'organisation française en a terminé pour cette édition 2023, le jury international va prendre le relais. Nous vous tiendrons informé s'il y a une édition française en 2024.

Pyb en résidence (talk) 15:10, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Photo Challenge – Third Place
Congratulations!

Your picture Port Saint-Michel in Batz-sur-Mer (1).jpg won the 3rd place in the Photo Challenge Waves, in May 2024. You can find the results of the challenge here.

Jarekt (talk) 01:13, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Olympic rings on the Eiffel Tower 2024 (21).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Useful, nice shot and good quality. --Terragio67 08:08, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Olympic rings on the Eiffel Tower 2024 (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 13:35, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Olympic rings on the Eiffel Tower 2024 (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:54, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Olympic rings on the Eiffel Tower 2024 (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 10:32, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:46, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Milan skyscraper Allianz (1).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 10:17, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Milan skyscraper Allianz (2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 10:17, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Milan Generali Tower (1).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 10:19, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Milan Generali Tower (2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 10:19, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Milan Torre Libeskind (1).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 10:23, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Milan Torre Libeskind (2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 10:24, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]