User talk:IbRas

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Hej Ib. Jeg kan se på dine billeder fra Garnisons Kirke (med røde kategori-links Category:Diocese of Copenhagen), at du ikke har opdaget kategorien Category:Diocese of København - bare lige et obs! her, så du ikke kommer til at oprette en parallel kategori. Jeg har sat de kirkeartikler, du oprettede igår, i kategorier. M.v.h. --Brams 08:54, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Has been nominated for Commons:Quality Images ... Gnangarra 02:38, 16 July 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Garnisons Kirke Copenhagen headstone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

...Definately a Quality image thank you for the contribution Gnangarra 15:28, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nordens Kirker

[edit]

Jeg har bemærket, at du som en af de få virkelig arbejder for kirkerne i Danmark. I den forbindelse kan det måske interessere dig, at vi har fået tilladelse fra Hideko Bonnesen/Nordens Kirker til at anvende billeder under cc-by-sa-2.5 og teksten under GFDL.

For billeder anvend {{Www.nordenskirker.dk}}. For tekst skal du jo sådan set bare give et link til siden du sakser fra. Billederne er ikke super gode - men de er udmærkede. Desuden kan vi jo med stor fordel anvende teksten til de noget tekstfattige artikler. --|EPO| da: 11:10, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Strandmarkskirken Hvidovre Denmark sculpture.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Strandmarkskirken Hvidovre Denmark sculpture.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Hej Ib! Denne fil er desværre ikke acceptabel her, da kunstværket er beskyttet af ophavsret. Filen vil derfor blive slettet hvis der ikke kan skaffes en tilladelse fra kunsterens arving(er). Skriv til mig, hvis du har spørgsmål. Nillerdk (talk) 20:27, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Duane_Hanson_Drug_Addict_Louisiana_1975.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eusebius (talk) 20:09, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File:Roedovre Kirke Denmark gravestone.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

heb [T C E] 10:51, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Koebenhavns Raadhus Copenhagen raadhushaven fountain.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 09:34, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rigshospitalets Kirke Copenhagen altar.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fnielsen (talk) 22:55, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:14, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]