User talk:Iamozy

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Iamozy!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 19:43, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mary Sears portrait.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Storkk (talk) 15:20, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

More licensing issues

[edit]

Hi Iamozy... concerning File:Forrest Shreve.jpg, what indication can you give that the photographer died over 80 years ago? The book you used as a source was published in 1955, and the Forrest Shreve apparently died in 1950. Storkk (talk) 15:48, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The author didn't die 80 years ago, but the image is in the US Public Domain. I could not find another way to add the Public Domain tag because I don't know the reason why it is in the public domain, only that the work was made available with the specification "Copyright: Public Domain, Google-digitized." --Iamozy (talk) 16:15, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Iamozy, I think you may have been duped by an incorrect license on Google books. If I nominate this for DR, please don't be offended! Cheers, Storkk (talk) 19:39, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
File:Forrest Shreve.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Storkk (talk) 15:15, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG)

[edit]
In other languages (translate this)

Deutsch  English  español  français  hrvatski  italiano  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  日本語  +/−

Please use SVG
Please use SVG
Thank you for uploading some images! Did you know that Wikimedia Commons recommends the SVG (Scalable Vector Graphics) format for certain types of images? Scalable Vector Graphics are designed to look appropriate at any scale, and SVG images are easier to modify and translate, helping Wikimedia to distribute knowledge to all of the world. A lot of modern programs support SVG export. If you encountered problems or have questions, don't hesitate to ask me, a member of the Graphic Lab, or the Graphics village pump. Uploading images in SVG format isn't mandatory, but it would help. (To avoid any misunderstandings, please don't just put raster images into an SVG container as embedded raster.) Thanks, and happy editing!

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cherubism expanded mandible.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

KDS4444 (talk) 03:48, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]