User talk:Hurricane Clyde

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Hurricane Clyde!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 00:25, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Trouting myself for the August 1st argument

[edit]
Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know you did something silly.

WestVirginiaWX (talk) 05:58, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A request

[edit]

Hey WestVirginiaWX. I would appreciate if you would strike your comment on User talk:Rlandmann about me. I apologized to him (see the section below your comment) and explained my reasoning. You said some stuff about me, which is basically just putting words in my mouth. I wanted to ask you here and not over there as to not start some big issue. I won’t be mad if you choose to not strike it, but since I have explained more or less that my world wasn’t upended, and I’m worried that X or Reddit will invade the discussions if/when a “famous” image is challenged (like Wikipedia had following the release of Greenfield’s 300+ mph winds), that is why I am caution. Either way, I would appreciate it, but it is your choice. Cheers! WeatherWriter (talk) 15:52, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I’ve struck it out; but I would also appreciate that you don’t tell anyone else that they created chaos. Thank you. WestVirginiaWX (talk) 16:17, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RfC: Third-party images published by the National Weather Service

[edit]

I've now reviewed 1,000 images uploaded under the rationales expressed in the {{PD-NWS}} template and requested deletion of several.

The arguments for deletion, and to keep, are now following repetitive, predictable patterns and it would greatly help all involved if we could centralise discussion and obtain some wider community input.

Therefore, I have opened an RfC to gather opinions. Apologies in advance: it's long and detailed, but is frankly nothing compared to the words and time expended by all parties up to this point. Probably the most crucial issue revolves around how we interpret a general disclaimer published at weather.gov (Q.1 in the RfC).

Your advice is greatly appreciated! --Rlandmann (talk) 10:35, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]