User talk:Huntster/Archive 21

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

DC4HighandMightyTrailerScreenshot1954.jpg - your revert

Your revert:

Please observe Commons:File naming:

"Names should be

  • descriptive, chosen according to what the image displays or contents portray
  • accurate, especially where scientific names, proper nouns, dates, etc. are used".

All this is obviously not the case in this file name. --Uli Elch (talk) 20:56, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

@Uli Elch, precisely how is it not? It contains the aircraft model, the name of the movie, the year of the movie, that it is a screenshot. Filenames do not have to be some kind of sentence, or have pretty spacing. Regardless, you should instead be looking at Commons:File renaming, since that is what you are requesting. This filename meets none of the renaming criteria. — Huntster (t @ c) 22:04, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

Duplicate image

Hello Huntster. Regarding the NASA CV-990 N711NA image that you uploaded recently, there is already an image of the same object I uploaded last year, although the URL source I provided is different than yours. Thanks, Naufal Praw (talk) 23:00, 1 April 2023 (UTC).

@Naufal Praw, thanks for pointing that out. I somehow just didn't see it. I'll merge the data into yours. — Huntster (t @ c) 23:04, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

File:ExoMars Orbiter (transparent).png

File:ExoMars Orbiter (transparent).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

FASTILY 02:16, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

File:Delta II rocket launches with WISE.jpg

Pay attention to licensing
Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content: images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose.

File:Delta II rocket launches with WISE.jpg seems to be free (or it would be proposed for deletion), but it was identified as having a wrong license. Usually, it is because a public domain image is tagged with a free license, or because the stated source or other information is not sufficient to prove the selected tag is correct. Please verify that you applied the correct license tag for this file.

If you believe this file has the correct license, please explain why on the file discussion page.

العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ 日本語 ∙ മലയാളം ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−


The reason given by the user who added this tag is: File by United Launch Alliance

Cryptic-waveform (talk) 17:03, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

@Cryptic-waveform, perhaps do your due diligence next time and validate the statements in the Permissions line. Both NASA and DVIDShub explicitly state its status ("No copyright protection" and "Public Domain"). — Huntster (t @ c) 18:07, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Hi. PD-NASA doesn't apply here as the file was not created solely by NASA. It's a work by United Launch Alliance. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 18:14, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
@Cryptic-waveform, I see. It wasn't clear initially. I've updated the template. — Huntster (t @ c) 18:17, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

May need help with new image

Seems adding a picture to Commons was very easy not too long ago - more recently, trying to straighten out the categories ("Files by UserːDrbogdan" now needs to added manually?) and hidden categories (missing parts?) for a newly uploaded image seems to be a challenge - perhaps some updating to the following image file may need to be corrected in some way? - just not sure at the moment => "Old Man Of The Mountain, New Hampshire, USA - Dr Dennis Bogdan - 1972" - Thanks in advance for your help with this - and - Stay Safe and Healthy !! - Drbogdan (talk) 12:43, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

Drbogdan, the hidden files are nothing you need to be worried about, they're mostly for internal tracking and bot stuff. I don't know that "Files by" categories have ever been automatically added, though. I've added a couple of bits to the image, but otherwise I saw nothing wrong. — Huntster (t @ c) 13:46, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

ESA insignia

hey, thanks for this File:Euclid launch kit cover insignia.png! Maybe you can also remove background of this insignia? Artem.G (talk) 07:06, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

found that this already exists, sorry for bothering! Artem.G (talk) 08:12, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
@Artem.G: It's no worry at all. I'll get that other file structured and categorized properly. In the meantime, would you like me to delete the file you uploaded as redundant? — Huntster (t @ c) 13:24, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
yes, please do, thanks a lot! Artem.G (talk) 14:12, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:27, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

Image ok?

Recently uploaded image File:PIA25726-Jupiter+MoonIo-Juno-20230731.jpg - may be ok but not sure at the moment - maybe check if possible? - iac - Stay Safe and Healthy !! - Drbogdan (talk) 11:06, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

@Drbogdan: see edits here. The CC license was explicit, especially on the Junocam site, so PD template should not have been used. — Huntster (t @ c) 13:43, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
@Huntster: - Excellent - Thank You for your review and efforts with this - it's greatly appreciated - Stay Safe and Healthy ǃǃ - Drbogdan (talk) 14:01, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

Image ok? → File:StarHD110067PlanetarySystem-20231129.jpg

May need help with this recently uploaded image - not sure at the moment → File:StarHD110067PlanetarySystem-20231129.jpg<nowiki> - Thanks in advance for your help with this - iac - Stay Safe and Healthy !! - Drbogdan (talk) 14:55, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

@Drbogdan, if it had a cc-by-nc-sa license, why was it uploaded? NC and ND licenses are never permitted on Commons, at least by themselves. — Huntster (t @ c) 15:36, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

Thank You for your comments - seems the image license was → CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 (and associated seemingly with a NASA website - at https://science.nasa.gov/missions/tess/discovery-alert-watch-the-synchronized-dance-of-a-6-planet-system/) - which I thought was ok - but perhaps not after all - seems some of my understanding of image conditions may be ok - but not others - guess I'm still learning about the various image conditions - iac - Stay Safe and Healthy !! - Drbogdan (talk) 16:22, 30 November 2023 (UTC) -- BRIEF Followup → Is a "Speedy Delete" of the image file indicated? - Stay Safe and Healthy !! - Drbogdan (talk) 16:25, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

@Drbogdan, yes, just being released on a NASA website does not mean an image is public domain. NASA routinely publishes media from ESA, Roscosmos, ISRO, JAXA, commercial and private sources, etc. If the media credit line does not start with "NASA/" then it cannot be assumed to be public domain, and even then there may be restrictions. The author must be a federal government employee or someone directly contracted to NASA under a specific NASA program contract. — Huntster (t @ c) 21:36, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for your comments - and removing the image - it's appreciated - Thanks again - and - Stay Safe and Healthy ǃǃ - Drbogdan (talk) 22:07, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

@Huntster: - BRIEF Followup - hope the related newly uploaded image (ie, File:StarHD110067PlanetarySystem-20231130.jpg for the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HD_110067 article) has an ok cc license (ie, "CC-BY-SA 3.0 IGO") - should be ok at least afaik atm - hope this image is *entirely* ok - iac - Stay Safe and Healthy !! - Drbogdan (talk) 13:54, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

@Drbogdan, yes, it is fine. In fact, I found a higher resolution version on the ESA website. Please see the changes I've made to the file description page, particularly the license template changed and the over-categorization removed. Try to avoid such redundant categories. — Huntster (t @ c) 14:39, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

@Huntster: Thank You very mucḧ for your comments - and efforts with the images - they're ̈all greatlÿ appreciated - Stay Safe and Healthy ǃǃ -Drbogdan (talk)

OK? => File:BaileysBeads-DoubleDiamondRingEclipse-20190702.jpg

Hello - Seems the image ("File:BaileysBeads-DoubleDiamondRingEclipse-20190702.jpg") is ok - but a second-opinion may be worthwhile nonetheless - to be even more sure - Thank You in any regards for your review if possible of course - Stay Safe and Healthy !! - Drbogdan (talk) 19:03, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

@Drbogdan: So, it's always better to upload from the original source. I have done so while keeping the crop. The reason is that the website you found is not licensed under Creative Commons, so copying their text is a copyright violation. I've updated the description page to reflect the NOIRlabs material, which is Creative Commons. Also, try to check that the image in question isn't already uploaded to Commons; in this case, the full version was previously uploaded to File:Baily's beads 2 July 2019 from CTIO (20190702 Perlas Baily DMunizaga HighRes-CC).jpg. — Huntster (t @ c) 20:40, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Thank You ̈*very mucḧ* for your efforts with this - and your explanations and suggestions - seems like a lot more to this than I was thinking at first - Thanks again - and - Stay Safe and Healthy !! - Drbogdan (talk) 21:41, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

Newly processed images of Uranus and Neptune?

@Huntster: (and/or other) - May need help in adding an image[1] re a very recent processing of the planets Uranus and Neptune to Wikipedia, and being currently discussed on the Neptune talk-page - best images for the Uranus and Neptune articles may be crops of the latest processed images of Uranus and Neptune from the available published multi-image presentation[1] I would think - seems to be open-source (and CC-BY 4.0?) and ok but not sure at the moment - Thank You in advance for your help with this if possible - Stay Safe and Healthy !! - Drbogdan (talk) 01:02, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

References

  1. ↑ a b Patrick,G (12 September 2023). "Modelling the seasonal cycle of Uranus’s colour and magnitude, and comparison with Neptune". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 527 (4): 11521-11538. DOI:10.1093/mnras/stad3761. Archived from the original on 7 January 2024. Retrieved on 7 January 2024.

Drbogdan (talk) 01:20, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

@Drbogdan: Article is indeed published under a CC-by-4.0 license, so the images should be fine. I'm unsure what the correct credits should be for https://academic.oup.com/view-large/figure/434837998/stad3761fig8.jpg, though the credits are explicit for https://academic.oup.com/view-large/figure/434837964/stad3761fig2.jpg. — Huntster (t @ c) 04:16, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
@Drbogdan, would you mind if I uploaded higher resolution versions from https://academic.oup.com/view-large/figure/434837998/stad3761fig8.jpg? — Huntster (t @ c) 22:50, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
̪Thank You for your comments - and suggestion - no problem whatsoever - higher resolution images may have recently been added by an editor to the Uranus and Neptune main articles, but not clear about details re the newly added images - in any case - yes - entirely ok with me re your suggestion of course - Stay Safe and Healthy ǃǃ ̴̴ Drbogdan (talk) 23:06, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Raised pavement markings

Hi, I noticed you recently moved several files of mine to this category (2022-06-12 10 59 27 A blue pavement reflector along Mountain View Road in the Mountainview section of Ewing Township, Mercer County, New Jersey.jpg, 2022-06-12 11 00 14 A blue pavement reflector along Mountain View Road in the Mountainview section of Ewing Township, Mercer County, New Jersey.jpg, and 2022-06-12 11 00 20 A blue pavement reflector along Mountain View Road in the Mountainview section of Ewing Township, Mercer County, New Jersey.jpg). Its my understanding that the intent for this category is for RAISED pavement markings (i.e., ones which are intended to create a noticeable bump as well as reflect light), which these are not intended to do (it may be hard to tell, but they are essentially flush with the pavement, a necessity in the snow-prone northeastern United States). Is there a definition of these items which I'm not familiar with which includes those which are flush with the pavement, or was this an error? Famartin (talk) 22:29, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

@Famartin, since you don't believe they fit that category, I have moved them back. Looking at it more closely, I feel like a specific "Raised reflective markers" category should be made, since "Raised pavement markers" can encompass non-reflective markers as well. But, I suppose that's an issue for another time. — Huntster (t @ c) 23:05, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
I notice the Wikipedia article its tagged with has a completely different name, so perhaps some significant reshuffling should be done. Famartin (talk) 23:27, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
@Famartin: Yes, I've fixed the Commons-Wikidata association. — Huntster (t @ c) 02:03, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Huntster/Archive_21&oldid=970917812"