User talk:HorsePunchKid

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Image:Wolfe shadow & claw.jpg

[edit]

Hi, you claim that Image:Wolfe shadow & claw.jpg is GFDL, but the document you cite is unreadable for me. I find it highly unlikely that a commercial publishing house would put their artwork under GFDL - this would be the very first time I think. So you're going to need something more convincing than a large but unreadable download, like a letter from the publisher. Stan Shebs 17:02, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Hmmmm... I had intended to use the {{bookcover}} template from w:en, but I see that that does not seem to be valid here (in that it redirects to {{Fairuse}}). Are book covers not considered acceptable on the commons? I can't see any information (or even discussion) to indicate that. For what it's worth, the "unreadable" document is a Fuji "raw" image. It is the most trustworthy document I can provide to indicate that I took the photo, though perhaps this is not the issue. If such a "book cover" fair use argument applies, should I just remove the GFDL? I honestly don't care what license it's under; just that it's acceptable for the Commons. HorsePunchKid 21:38, 2005 Jun 16 (UTC)
Ah, upon further reading, it just appears that the Commons does not accept "fair use" material, whereas w:en does. Should I just move this image over to w:en, then? HorsePunchKid 21:41, 2005 Jun 16 (UTC)
Yes. dbenbenn | talk 21:52, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
I've moved the image[1]. Thanks for setting me straight. I am now slightly more knowledgeable about copyrights, at least. :) If either of you is capable, please delete the Commons version. HorsePunchKid 22:57, 2005 Jun 16 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Andrey Korzun (talk) 09:07, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:HorsePunchKid&oldid=162979531"