User talk:Holder
Hallo, könntest du bei Transferieren von Dateien bitte darauf achten, dass du alle notwendigen Informationen, so vor allem die Lizenz mit übernimmst? Vielleicht kann dir der Commonshelper die Arbeit erleichtern. Gruß -- Niteshift (talk) 00:54, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 18:43, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Schubart 1793.jpg was uncategorized on 10 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 18:43, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
File:WdSt-Schafhausen_Zehntscheuer.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Leyo 13:04, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
TUSC token 277ce7d187fbe5c0fa68414189b5cc1a
[edit]I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
![]() |
File:Eglise Rochonvillers.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Bloody-libu (talk) 18:39, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Eglise Semecourt.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Bloody-libu (talk) 18:39, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Nouvelle eglise Roncourt.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Bloody-libu (talk) 18:39, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Teufelskueche-sign.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Teufelskueche-sign.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
JuTa 19:53, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Teufelskueche.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Teufelskueche.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
JuTa 19:55, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
TUSC token 7f415d195182e8c505ee56a9d28b9c26
[edit]I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
Bildanfrage Klosterhof Wippertskirch
[edit]Hallo, das Landesarchiv BW würde für die Seite www.kloester-bw.de gerne Ihr Bild des Klosterhofs Wippertskirch verwenden. Bitte um Rückmeldung an anne.mauch@la-bw.de. Viele Grüße Anne Mauch
- Guten Tag, ich habe Ihnen eine Mail geschrieben. --Holder (talk) 19:45, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement
[edit]Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!
[edit]- ⧼Wikibase-terms/Holder⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, français, magyar, italiano, македонски, 日本語, русский, svenska
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/3f/Merops_apiaster_04.jpg/220px-Merops_apiaster_04.jpg)
Dear Wikimedians,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement
[edit]Picture of the Year 2013 Results
[edit]- In other languages: Deutsch, español, français, 日本語, Nederlands, русский, svenska, Türkçe, українська
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/bc/Gl%C3%BChwendel_brennt_durch.jpg/170px-Gl%C3%BChwendel_brennt_durch.jpg)
Dear Holder,
The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).
- In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
- In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)
We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:
- 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
- In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
- In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.
Click here to view the top images »
We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.
Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
Pälzisch Wikipedia logo
[edit]Hi. While going through wiki logos recently, I noticed that pflwiki's one is lacking a transparent background, and indeed it does look a little silly at pfl:. I saw that you uploaded the original image to commons back in November 2010 as File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-pfl.png, and was wondering if you'd be able to fix that? (or find someone who can?) If so I'll upload the result into the right repository and push it to the servers (these aren't included directly from commons/upload.wm.o any more due to performance issues). Thanks. --Krenair (talk • contribs) 15:17, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
- Hi Krenair, thanks. I know this problem but unfortunately I don't know how to fix it. --Holder (talk) 20:04, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
- That's okay, I figured it out anyway: https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/216595/ --Krenair (talk • contribs) 23:41, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Hubert Baum 3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Abzeronow (talk) 15:54, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
Deine Pragher-Uploads
[edit]Hallo Holder,
schön, dass du Fotos von Willy Pragher hochlädst. Leider lädst du nur die relativ kleinen Vorschaubilder der Deutschen Digitalen Bibliothek hoch. Wenn du dem Link Digitalisat im Angebot des Archivs: klickst, kommst du zum deutlich größeren (höher aufgelösten) Bild des Staatsarchivs Freiburg im Landesarchiv Baden-Württemberg, das die Sammlung Pragher digitalisiert hat.
Könntest du bitte in Zukunft diese größeren Bilder statt der Thumbnails der DDB hochladen? Bei der Angabe der Quelle usw. kannst du dich an File:Faber Gisela Deutsche Weinkoenigin Freiburg Kaufhaussaal Willy Pragher 19771005.jpg, das ich vor einiger Zeit hochgeladen habe. Viele Grüße -- Rosenzweig τ 10:48, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
- Hallo Rosenzweig, vielen Dank für den Hinweis. --Holder (talk) 05:40, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Desiré Lutz 2.jpg
- File:Desiré Lutz 3.jpg
- File:Ehrengäste mit Landesbischof Bender 2.jpg
- File:Ehrengäste mit Landesbischof Bender.jpg
- File:Ernst von Caemmerer und Bernhard Welte.jpg
- File:Eugen Falk-Breitenbach 1.jpg
- File:Eugen Falk-Breitenbach 2.jpg
- File:Gerhard Jung 1.jpg
- File:Gerhard Jung 2.jpg
- File:Gerhard Mitscherlich.jpg
- File:Hedwig Salm 1.jpg
- File:Hedwig Salm 2.jpg
- File:Hermann Landerer 1.jpg
- File:Hermann Landerer 2.jpg
- File:Hermann Landerer und Desiré Lutz.jpg
- File:Hermann Müller und Erzbischof Schäufele.jpg
Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 09:28, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Itzehoe Breitenburger Straße 22 Juni 2022 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|