User talk:Historiadormundo/archive

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Historiadormundo!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 19:35, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Gira por Europa Ballet 1971 - Eugenio Cruz Vargas.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Gira por Europa Ballet 1971 - Eugenio Cruz Vargas.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

And also:

Yours sincerely EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Biblioteca Para Chile.PNG

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Biblioteca Para Chile.PNG, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Biblioteca Para Chile.PNG]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

And also:

Yours sincerely EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Retrato..gif. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, JuTa 18:57, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Eugenio Cruz.jpg

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Eugenio Cruz.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Eugenio Cruz.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

And also:

Yours sincerely EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Don Pedro Nolasco Cruz Vergara.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:54, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eugenio Cruz.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:55, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pedro Nolasco Cruz Vergara..JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:58, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pedro Nolasco Cruz Vergara con su Familia.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:59, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pedro Nolasco Cruz Vergara en 1877.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:00, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pedro Nolasco Cruz Vergara.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:00, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Caratula exposición 2008.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:24, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ignaguracion en Paseo Estación.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:47, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Own work"

[edit]

Please understand that making a simple copy or photograph of a photograph, drawing, painting, or poster, does not give you any rights -- there is no copyright in a photograph of a flat work of art. Therefore all of the licenses you have been putting on your uploads are incorrect, because you have nothing to license.

If the photograph, drawing, painting, or poster is, for some reason, in the public domain, then the uploads are OK, but you must simply say that the work is PD and not try to put your own license on it. In all other cases, in order to upload a photograph of a work, we must have a license from the creator of that work, such as the heirs of Eugenio Cruz Vargas, Romero, or the photographer (or his heirs) of the photographs you have uploaded.

You should not claim "own work" for copies. The author is the actual creator of the work -- the photographer or artist -- and must be named as such.

Also note that it is a serious violation Commons rules to upload something a second time after it has been deleted. You have done for several images, uploading them two and three times. If you think that a deletion is incorrect, you may go to the talk page of the Administrator who deleted the image, and ask him or her to reconsider. If he or she refuses, you may go to Commons:Undeletion requests and ask the community to reconsider. You may not simply upload the image again -- that just wastes our time.

If you violate Commons rules again, or continue to upload images which are not PD without permission, you will be blocked from working on Commons.

If you have questions, you may ask them at the Village Pump in any of 42 languages or on my talk page. I will also watch for questions here on your talk page for at least a week. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:07, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I will translate him this message because he has gone onto do the same.. again. Este es el mensaje de Jameslwoodward en español:
Por favor entiende que hacer una simple copia o fotografía de una foto, dibujo, pintura o poster, no te da ningún derecho - no hay derechos de autor (que te puedas atribuír) en una fotografía de una obra plana de arte. Por lo tanto todas las licencias que has estado poniendo en tus subidas están incorrectas, porque no tienes nada que licenciar.
Si la fotografía, dibujo, pintura, o poster está, por alguna razón, en el dominio público, entonces las subidas están bien, pero debes simplemente decir que el trabajo es Dominio público y no intentes colocar tu propia licencia en éste. En todos los otros casos, para subir una fotografía de una obra, debemos tener una licencia del creador de esa obra, como de los herederos de Eugenio Cruz Vargas, Romero, o el fotógrafo (o sus herederos) de las fotografías que has subido.
No debes llamar "trabajo propio" a copias (del trabajo de otros). El autor es el creador real de la obra -- el fotógrafo o el artista -- y debe ser llamado como tal.
También, debes saber que es una seria violación de las reglas de Commons subir algo una segunda vez tras su borrado. Lo has hecho con varias imagenes, subiéndolas dos o tres veces. Si crees que un borrado es incorrecto, debes ir a la página de discusión del administrador que la borró, y consultarle que lo reconsidere. Si se niega, debes ir a Commons:Undeletion requests y pedirle a la comunidad que lo reconsidere. No debes simplemente subir la imagen de nuevo -- eso solo desperdicia nuestro tiempo.
Si violas las reglas de Commons de nuevo, o sigues subiendo imagenes que no son dominio público sin permiso, serás bloqueado de trabajar en Commons.
Te pongo esta traducción porque no podría haberlo dicho mejor por mi cuenta. Debes ser cuidadoso con los derechos de autor de otras personas. Has subido incluso imagenes de El Mercurio, que no pueden ser incluidas aquí. Si no pescas, te bloquearán. küñall (nütramyen) 04:50, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
File:Fernando Errazuriz Aldunate 1923.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

küñall (nütramyen) 04:34, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Publication diaries El Mercurio de Santiago.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

küñall (nütramyen) 04:37, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Retrato Fernando Errázuriz Aldunate.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

küñall (nütramyen) 04:38, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Retrato de Fernando Errázuriz Aldúnate.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

küñall (nütramyen) 04:38, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Eugenio Cruz Vargas . Pintor - Poeta.pdf has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

küñall (nütramyen) 04:39, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Firma de Eugenio Cruz Vargas.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

küñall (nütramyen) 04:39, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Firma de Eugenio Cruz Vargas.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

~ Nahid Talk 07:19, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Biblioteca Para Chile.PNG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

küñall (nütramyen) 19:43, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Retrato de Eugenio Cruz Vargas.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

küñall (nütramyen) 19:43, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Paisaje Mítico.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

küñall (nütramyen) 19:43, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:De lo Terrenal a lo Espacial.PNG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

küñall (nütramyen) 19:44, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

[edit]

I'm sorry, but because you keep uploading files which you don't own the copyright for, I have had to block you. This can be a short temporary measure, until you demonstrate that you know what the problem is. Nick (talk) 19:55, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Traducción: "Lo siento, pero debido a que sigues subiendo archivos de los cuales no posees los derechos de autor, debí bloquearte. Esta puede ser una medida corta, temporal, hasta que demuestres que sabes cual es el problema". küñall (nütramyen) 20:37, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, the user believes that, because I requested the deletion of some of his (copyvio) uploads, he was blocked (unfairly). "It is because of attitudes like yours that freedom is seems disallowed, and you are not collaborating at all with my work, you are only wasting the time of a professional person". [1] The user seems to not understand the reason of his block, and so I urge admins to deny any eventual unblock request unless the user gets to understand that he has misused his rights to upload files. --küñall (nütramyen) 01:23, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. I repeatedly explained the rules here, on various DRs, and on my talk page, and Historiador1923 has repeatedly ignored the rules and my warning above. While it is apparent that Historiador1923 is not a native English speaker, he has made various comments in good English and küñall translated my last warning above. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:36, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Nick and (Jameslwoodward)

Estimado Bibliotecarios, les escribo en castellano o Español para explicarme mejor: Las fotografias que he subido de distintos personajes de tiene mas de 70 años de antiguedad, tienen de acuerdo a la legislacion chilena la libertad total de autor. La autoria de los retratos subidos le puse la expliacion en ingles por ustedes dicha, lo caratula y sus folletos eso si entendi que tiene derechos de autor de acuerdo al Café que participe. Si ustedes ven lo que subi ultimo son retratos de mi autoria por lo que explique en cada occasion. Por lo anterior solicito a ustedes si me pueden explicar en forma simple y practica como subir archivos sin tener conflictos como los anteriores, ademas son de mi creacion los retratos y fotografias. Para subirlas tiene que ser a traves de una Foto o scanner. Ademas debo mencionar que dichas fotos de distintos personajes son de origen familiar, por lo que su aporte a wiki son muy valiosos , sobre todo que estas fotos no estan en la WEB y su aporte a los distintos personajes a los diferentes articulos los hacer realmente interesante.

Disculpen por decirlo en Castellano o en español, pero para explicarlo correctamente no tengo otro metodo.

Muchas Gracias y espero su respuesta --Historiador1923 (talk) 21:36, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Library , I am writing in Castilian or Spanish to explain better : The pictures I uploaded of different characters has more than 70 years old, have according to Chilean legislation total freedom of author . The authorship of uploaded pictures put my expliacion in English for you said , what cover art and booklets that if understanding that is copyrighted according to Coffee participate . If you can see what last subi are portraits of my authorship so that explains every occasion . Therefore I request you if I can explain in a simple and practical way how to upload files without conflicts as above, are also creating my portraits and photographs . To upload has to be through a Photo or scanner. Also should mention that these photos of different characters are familial , so their contribution to wiki are very valuable , especially as these photos are not on the web and their contribution to the different characters of the different items do really interesting .

Sorry to say it in Spanish or Castilian , but to explain it properly I have no other method .

Thank you and I hope your answer
translator: Google
For works that were previously published elsewhere and there is no obvious, publicly available evidence that they are Public Domain, you should follow the COM:OTRS page. Ankry (talk) 22:09, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Your understanding of Chilean law is incorrect. Seventy years is not old in copyright law. In most countries, works remain under copyright for seventy years after the death of the creator. In Chile the period can be even longer under some circumstances. So, unless the author died in the year the work was created, the copyright will be in effect for longer than 70 years, perhaps much longer.
Fundamentally, as I have explained to you at least three times, there is no way to do what you have been repeatedly trying to do unless you can get explicit written permission -- a license -- from the heirs of the authors. Without a license, such works are forbidden. Note that the fact that they are family works does not help -- the family does not own the copyright to works it may own. The copyright is owned by the heirs of the actual author, that is, the photographer in the case of photographs.
You have been blocked because you have repeatedly ignored our instructions and shown that you are not interested in following Commons rules. I see nothing in your comment above that shows a willingness to follow the rules here. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:32, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not really sure Historiador knows how OTRS operates. He even previously posted the permission email on the OTRS noticeboard. It's unlikely he will ever get permission from these artists' heirs to release their work even for commercial use. They'd be 'losing' precious money from their work. I doubt they will. And he can request permission even blocked. küñall (nütramyen) 14:20, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
PS. "ademas son de mi creacion los retratos y fotografias. Para subirlas tiene que ser a traves de una Foto o scanner." (Also, they -the images- are my creations, the portraits and photographs. (I had) to take a photo or use a scanner to upload them). That comment, and subsequent ones from Historiador prove he still does not recognize his error. Historians (I am one) should know it is a real crime (academically speaking) to steal other's work and claim it like theirs. Chilean law does not only request people who use the material to properly credit the real author of the work (not the uploader or the one who obtained a copy, took a photo of it and posted it on the Internet). Historiador has failed to do that and has uploaded obvious copyvios (like El Mercurio newspaper pages from recent years). His comment below "At the time when you find the right path" could even make us assume he thinks everything he did was alright. küñall (nütramyen) 14:28, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Dear Librarians Nick and (Jameslwoodward)

This is not Mr. Kunal Historian, showing his diploma. As it will be a crime has to be propietarior Pictures has over 70 years in my possession? As one might think that these are a family fotogrefias Robo?

Mr. Kulla may think lom it deems appropriate. Your comment demonstrates the what is.

Say I'm looking for the way to do the Right things for a teacher or a professional is to recognize that the road use is wrong and you're looking for the right way in a process that does not know. I do not understand how bad it can be. Well I hope you answer my previous comment that has nothing negative as it does appear Mr. Kuñall

Thank you and I hope your answer --Historiador1923 (talk) 15:19, 29 May 2014 (UTC) --Historiador1923 (talk) 15:18, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Come on, somebody block his talk page access. He's not here to contribute positively. küñall (nütramyen) 15:34, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Nick and (Jameslwoodward)

I'm not asking you unlock me , because I do not want to unlock yet. At the time when you find the right path.

In bottom line is:

The photo has more than 70 years and its authors are killed in the same years at least, For example to analyze a case : First: The Fotogrefias Pedro Nolasco Cruz Vergara which are 1877, 1912 and 1925 that I have in my possession the original photograph taken and nothing comes out who is the author or anything, I should do in these photographs that are accepted by you . Today some grandchildren and great-grandchildren survive , I must get an authorization where ? Notary ? Sworn statement or Simple ? or nothing?

Second: The Photographs of Vicente Correa Albano , Diego Vergara Vergara Correa Albano and Diego have all more than 110 years. I have the origuinales , but I do not have copyright . Today there are a few hot flashes and grandchildren , I must get an authorization where ? Notary ? Sworn statement or Simple ? or nothing? .

Third: The Photographs if a sack liblo 1925 and another from 1940 and I have ls original books , or the books have more than 70 years, and the printing of these books no longer exist, as the copyright sack ?


Fourth: In case of the Portrait of the Poet Painter 1972 is signed by Romero, Romero is a fictitious name and me, and I have the original. I need to do to comply, as the sack derehos copyright?

Therefore if I get copyright in each case, as in Chile where you take them out and

Waiting for your valuable help and thanking your answer, cordially greets

--Historiador1923 (talk) 13:15, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry, but I have reached the end of my patience with you. I have explained the law, linked to articles in both English and Spanish, and answered the same questions four or five times. I see no point in doing more. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:31, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sock master

[edit]

Historiador is the master of a sockpuppet named User:Hortencia1, which has been blocked indefinitely for evading this block. Diego Grez return fire 00:22, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Unlocking

[edit]

Dear Nick and (Jameslwoodward)

Please I ask you another chance, I Might you unlock. has been a while since my punishment, I've already studied enough to avoid making past mistakes. They can also check multiples contributions that I have made. These contributions have been both in English and Spanish. I hope your answer to collaborate on Commons Best Regard --Historiador1923 (talk) 21:56, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't agree, Historiador has even used socks during his block time to upload more copyvios. His behaviour is far from being acceptable to get himself unblocked. --Diego Grez return fire 04:55, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Nick and (Jameslwoodward)

You can see my contributions in both English and Spanish, you can see my evolution in Wikipedia and evaluated. For this reason and so I studied to work correctly on commons I ask for your release Thanks a lot and best regard --Historiador1923 (talk) 14:26, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Nick and (Jameslwoodward) Please, allegeations made BY user: Diego Grez aré totally false. Please Check with your systems Best regard Historiador1923 (talk) 20:03, 4 November 2014 (UTC)Historiador1923 (talk) 20:07, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User: Diego Grez

[edit]

Dear Nick and (Jameslwoodward)

Yesterday and today I received this [[2]] , commons and this [[3]]

Please see that because he attacked me. I hope if you can help me --Historiador1923 (talk) 20:57, 4 November 2014 (UTC)--Historiador1923 (talk) 00:09, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not attacking you, I'm just showing proof that you haven't changed a single bit since you were blocked for uploading deliberate copyright violations. I hope that you get to understand what is this all about, because your badly translated statements are sometimes incoherent. --Diego Grez return fire 23:50, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Nick and (Jameslwoodward)

I didn't upload any photo, please stop making this a confusion

Thanks for your understanding

--Historiador1923 (talk) 00:15, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Dear Nick and (Jameslwoodward)

Please, you can see this accusation [[4]] It is totally unfounded

Thanks --Historiador1923 (talk) 01:29, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

--Historiador1923 (talk) 01:29, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please strictly limit your user talk page to matters directly related to Commons. Whine about the fact you don't like maintenance template on the English Wikipedia isn't really something positive to add to your Commons case in hope of an unblock.
I strongly suggest you don't even reply to this message but leave this page alone some months and consider in 6 moths to make a more educated request. --Dereckson (talk) 01:31, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have run a CU on Historiador1923 and Alcona2 (note that it is Alcona2, not Alcona1). Although it is entirely possible that Alcona2 is a meatpuppet, I see no evidence that Alcona2 is editing using the same computer or even the same ISP as Historiador1923. I have, therefore, removed the {{Sockpuppet}} tag from Alcona2 and unblocked him.

I have also reopened Commons:Deletion requests/File:Eugenio Cruz Vargas.jpeg.

I think that Historiador1923 is at best, a nuisance, and at worst, a vandal, and fully deserves the block here. I also think that any proven socks should be dealt with rapidly. With that said, though, I think that there has been hasty action with respect to Alcona2 and his upload which is unwarranted. We have processes for a reason, folks. .    Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:36, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As I said on Commons:Deletion requests/File:Eugenio Cruz Vargas.jpeg‎, the upload is a copyright violation, and have asked for another check on the Spanish wiki. --Diego Grez return fire 13:32, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Nick and (Jameslwoodward)

Thanks James I have not done anything wrong

In the past I've made mistakes and I have asked the apology in his time

This accusation of now, has proven to be totally false. this accusation is [[5]]

Thanks and Regards --Historiador1923 (talk) 12:35, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Dear Nick and (Jameslwoodward)

You can see here what I put librarians in Spanish [[6]] All allegations made are false.

Thank --Historiador1923 (talk) 16:03, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Enough is enough. I have changed the block to include this page. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:50, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I came here to do the same. 5 notifications over 48 hours isn't acceptable Historiador1923. Nick (talk) 20:48, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

He's back as User:Landreaf2. That account (which was created on the same day his block included talk page access denial) has uploaded tons of copyvios, which I nommed for deletion. Could anybody of you, Nick, James, please delete them all and block him? --Diego Grez return fire 18:06, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Desbloqueo: 2ª y última oportunidad

[edit]

Hola,

Tras el estudio que realicé junto a varios checkusers que ya conoces y tras haber pasado un largo periodo desde el bloqueo, he procedido a desbloquearte en Commons.

Debo indicar que se trata de una segunda y última oportunidad y espero que la utilices bien y seas un usuario modelo.

No me caracterizo por ser un administrador severo pero no me gustaría tener que retractarme de esta decisión que acabo de tomar de forma personal ya que el bloqueo si sería para siempre y de ello me encargaría.

Aprovecha esta nueva oportunidad y colabora con el proyecto.


@Nick and Jameslwoodward: FYI This is a 2nd and last chance, if he creates any problem; indefinite holidays without hesitation.


Un saludo. Alan (talk) 00:51, 30 September 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Historiadormundo (talk • contribs) 17:15, 09 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]