User talk:HistoVG
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 15:13, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
SVG (Scalable Vector Graphics)
[edit]In other languages (translate this) |
---|
|
![]() |
![]() Thank you for uploading some images!
Did you know that Wikimedia Commons recommends the SVG (Scalable Vector Graphics) format for certain types of images? Scalable Vector Graphics are designed to look appropriate at any scale, and SVG images are easier to modify and translate, helping Wikimedia to distribute knowledge to all of the world. A lot of modern programs support SVG export. If you encountered problems or have questions, don't hesitate to ask me, a member of the Graphic Lab, or the Graphics village pump. Uploading images in SVG format isn't mandatory, but it would help. (To avoid any misunderstandings, please don't just put raster images into an SVG container as embedded raster.) Thanks, and happy editing!
|
--EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:François Le Danois de Joffreville.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:François Le Danois de Joffreville.jpg
![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:François Le Danois de Joffreville.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, JuTa 01:24, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:François Le Danois de Joffreville.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:François Le Danois de Joffreville.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
JuTa 18:09, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Blanc d'oeuf liquide pasteurisé.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:29, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Arrestation. Dessin de J. Pruvost dans L'Oeuvre.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
QuickQuokka [talk • contribs] 18:12, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Bonjour @QuickQuokka,
- Vous avez supprimé cette image sans me laisser le temps de répondre, contrairement à ce qui est écrit dans le message ci-dessus. C'est pour le moins ... cavalier !
- Sur le fond, ce fichier est issu de Gallica, qui met en ligne les documents sans demander de droits, à la condition de citer la provenance. Je cite :
- Les contenus accessibles sur le site Gallica sont pour la plupart des reproductions numériques d'œuvres tombées dans le domaine public provenant des collections de la BnF.
- Ces contenus sont considérés, en vertu du code des relations entre le public et l’administration, comme étant des informations publiques et leur réutilisation s'inscrit dans le cadre des dispositions prévues aux articles L. 321-1 à L. 327-1 de ce code.
- Dès lors :
- - La réutilisation non commerciale de ces contenus est libre et gratuite dans le respect de la législation en vigueur et notamment du maintien de la mention de source des contenus telle que précisée ci-après : « Source gallica.bnf.fr / Bibliothèque nationale de France » ou « Source gallica.bnf.fr / BnF ».
- Votre suppression n'est donc pas justifiée.
- Bien à vous,
- HistoVG (talk) 07:07, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
- @HistoVG: Excusez-moi si mon français est bizarre, j'utilise Google Translate.
- Selon @Yann, l'auteur est décédé en 1984, il ne sera donc dans le domaine public qu'en 2054, donc si vous avez un argument pour restaurer le fichier, vous pouvez faire valoir votre point de vue sur Commons: Undeletion requests QuickQuokka [talk • contribs] 16:23, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
- @QuickQuokka
- Votre français n'est pas du tout bizarre, merci de cet effort.
- J'ai effectivement un argument à faire valoir : ainsi que je l'ai écrit, le journal où est publié ce dessin est sur Gallica, qui permet la réutilisation non commerciale des contenus à condition de citer la source (ce que j'ai fait), comme indiqué ci-dessus.
- Je suis incapable de faire valoir mon point de vue sur Commons: Undeletion requests, je ne sais pas ce qu'il faudrait faire.
- Bien à vous, HistoVG (talk) 19:16, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
- @HistoVG: Pour faire une demande de restauration, allez sur Commons: Demandes de restauration susmentionné (désolé pour le lien vers la version anglaise avant), tapez le nom du fichier dans la case, et cliquez sur « demander la restauration ».
- Ensuite, vous présentez votre argument et le publiez.
- En passant, le journal lui-même est dans le domaine public, mais je ne sais pas si la bande dessinée en question est protégée par le droit d'auteur ou non. Je ne suis pas un expert en droits d'auteur, cela dépend des administrateurs de Commons:Demandes de restauration. QuickQuokka [talk • contribs] 19:28, 12 September 2023 (UTC)