User talk:Hen- Nes- Quick red novA trod

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Hen- Nes- Quick red novA trod!

I don't see any symbol of Bahaiism on that flag. Please explain before redoing your edit. AnonMoos (talk) 07:29, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

First off, please don't add comments to other people's talk pages in the wrong place. Second, if you bothered to follow your own link, you would know that the Bahai 5-pointed star is more correctly asymmetrical, and certainly not faceted in the manner of the Druze star. AnonMoos (talk) 00:34, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Categorizations

[edit]

Category:Apple of Discord is now a subcategory of Category:Discordianism, while Category:Discordianism is a subcategory of Category:Apple of Discord. I'm sure that helps classify things! AnonMoos (talk) 19:57, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed category circularity nonsense after a week, since you apparently couldn't be bothered. AnonMoos (talk) 21:01, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop with irrelevancies

[edit]

I really don't understand (or care enough to try to understand) your apparent obsessive-compulsive fascination with proposed symbols for the astronomical body Eris, but please stop intruding it where it's not relevant! Thank you for your consideration in this matter... AnonMoos (talk) 08:38, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@AnonMoos
Everybody has got things who fascinate him. It's not my fault that these are astronomical symbols.
User:Hen- Nes- Quick red novA trod
However, please try to rein in your obsessive fixation so it only manifests itself where it is relevant, not elsewhere. In any case, astronomical symbols (beyond a well-known few) are increasingly irrelevant in the work of the great majority of current-day astronomers...
Also, Category:Discordianism is a subcategory of Category:Apple of Discord, so adding "Category:Apple of Discord" to File:Sacred-Chao.svg would violate COM:OVERCAT... AnonMoos (talk) 21:01, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why o why didn't you capitalize the names "Israel" and "Palestine" when making this category? AnonMoos (talk) 12:30, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Typing error --Hen- Nes- Quick red novA trod (talk) 19:43, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

[edit]

I want to excuse myself to everybody for my behavoir. I think that I took too much care about Commons. That's why I go on holiday indefinitely.

Yours sincerely,

--Hen- Nes- Quick red novA trod (talk) 19:42, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There's no need to ban yourself (at least not where I'm concerned), but if you continue, then it would be good to pay attention to the reasons why so many of your edits were reverted (not just by me). Good luck... AnonMoos (talk) 20:46, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Category discussion warning

Yezidis has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


E4024 (talk) 19:31, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Genderqueer has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Themightyquill (talk) 12:56, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 17:37, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Category:Two-Spirit/Berdache has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Brainy J (talk) 22:37, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]