User talk:Helmuth Furch
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
File:Staatsopernmuseum Wien, Exhibition for Mimi Coertse.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
FA2010 (talk) 14:58, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
File:Tschechien Feldsberg Ausflug (4).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Quedel (talk) 23:09, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
File:Hofer Bild.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:03, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
File:Poldi 2008 in Himberg.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:04, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Kaisersteinbruch Schule.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Kaisersteinbruch Schule.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Kaisersteinbruch Schule.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, JuTa 20:02, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
File:Königshof Fresko.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Melchior2006 (talk) 15:57, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
File:Mönchhof Fresko.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Melchior2006 (talk) 15:59, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
File:Schurli (3).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Melchior2006 (talk) 16:00, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
File tagging File:Staatsoper Feststiege.JPG
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Staatsoper Feststiege.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Staatsoper Feststiege.JPG]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Martin Sg. (talk) 19:27, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Lagerfriedhof Slowakei Gedenkstein 2000.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Lagerfriedhof Slowakei Gedenkstein 2000.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Lagerfriedhof Slowakei Gedenkstein 2000.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 09:05, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Lagerfriedhof Slowakei -Stein 2000.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Lagerfriedhof Slowakei -Stein 2000.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Lagerfriedhof Slowakei -Stein 2000.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 11:05, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
- Ja ich habe auf die Lizenz "vergessen", das Bild mit anderem Namen hochgeladen. Bitte um Verzeihung. Benutzer:Helmuth Furch Helmuth Furch (talk) 11:13, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Karlskirche Steinmetz.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Karlskirche Steinmetz.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Karlskirche Steinmetz.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 20:07, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
- Habe auf die Lizenz "vergessen", das Bild mit anderem Namen hochgeladen. Bitte um Verzeihung. Benutzer:Helmuth Furch Helmuth Furch (Diskussion) 15. 09.2022 23:45 Helmuth Furch (talk) 21:46, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Kirche nach 1945.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Kirche nach 1945.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Kirche nach 1945.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 17:05, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
File:GuentherZ 2011 Harmannsdorf Rosalienkapelle.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Herzi Pinki (talk) 12:36, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
@Helmuth Furch: , bitte lade nicht so schlechte Ausschnitte hoch. Verwende das CropTool, das macht alles richtig, was du hier bemüht aber dennoch falsch machst. Gleiches auch für File:St. Herzogenburg 1382.jpg. Bitte nie den angezeigten Text kopieren, sondern immer nur den dahinterstehenden Sourcecode (sonst gehen alle Links und alle Marker gnadenlos verloren). lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 12:42, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
File:St. Herzogenburg 1382.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Herzi Pinki (talk) 13:14, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
eine lapidare Bemerkung, Die Pfarre Großweikersdorf genehmigte die Veröffentlichung des Bildes taufbrunnen.jpg ist nicht ausreichend. Du brauchst eine Freigabe an VRTS per mail vom Fotografen des Bildes (vom Copyright-Inhaber) unter einer definierten Lizenz. Der Fotograf fehlt übrigens in der Bildbeschreibung. Siehe bitte Commons:E-Mail-Vorlagen. Ich habe dir das sicher schon öfter geschrieben, ... lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 13:35, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
File:GuentherZ 2011-09-10 0344 Eggenburg Stephanskirche Altar Johannes Nepomuk1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Herzi Pinki (talk) 09:33, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
File:Stift Herzogenburg 13821.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Herzi Pinki (talk) 09:51, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
File:Wien.Stephansdom 1677.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Herzi Pinki (talk) 10:31, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
File:St. Stephan12.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Herzi Pinki (talk) 11:10, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
File:St. Stephan22.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Herzi Pinki (talk) 11:11, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
File:St. Stephan32.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Herzi Pinki (talk) 11:12, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
File:St. Stephan41.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Herzi Pinki (talk) 11:14, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Marxer atelier1.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Marxer atelier1.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Marxer atelier1.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 12:05, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:181114-hugo-marxer 003.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:181114-hugo-marxer 003.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:181114-hugo-marxer 003.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 19:05, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Nendeln Altar2.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Nendeln Altar2.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Nendeln Altar2.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 12:05, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Marxer triesenberg (2).JPG
[edit]Copyright status: File:Marxer triesenberg (2).JPG
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Marxer triesenberg (2).JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 17:05, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Europa-Wand Kaisersteinbruch 18a.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Europa-Wand Kaisersteinbruch 18a.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Europa-Wand Kaisersteinbruch 18a.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 10:06, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Helmuth Furch: ich verstehe nicht, warum du dich nicht bemühst um eine korrekte Beschreibung und Lizenzierung deiner Bilder. Dir liegt doch was an deinen Bildern, dir liegt viel an deinem Lebenswerk, und dann ist es dir komplett wurscht, wenn deine Bilder wieder gelöscht werden? Wegen Formalfehlern um die du dich nicht kümmern magst? Ich nehme mal an (ich sehe das gelöschte Bild nicht), dass du das Bild gemacht hast und dass sich das Objekt im öffentlichen Raum in Österreich befindet. Ein völlig unproblematischer Standardfall. Über Commons:Undeletion requests/de kannst du die Rückabwicklung der Löschung (und ev. weiterer Löschungen) beantragen - in Deutsch. Gib mir eine gute Motivation, mich weiter um deine Bilder zu kümmern. Wenn sie dir wurscht sind, warum mache ich mir dann Gedanken? lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 13:03, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Beratung
[edit]hallo @Helmuth Furch: , du kannst hier alle vorhandenen Bilder in deinen Artikeln verwenden. Du musst keine Kopien oder verkleinerte Versionen davon anlegen. An den Beispielen:
-
(2)
-
(2)
folgendes:
- die Bilder sind Urheberrechtsverletzungen (du hältst dich nicht an die Lizenzvorgaben, beim 1. Bsp ist das CC-by-sa-3.0 und bei dir wird eine völlige Freigabe draus).
- die Beschreibung der Bilder kannst du nicht durch Markieren / Kopieren / Einfügen der gerenderten Darstellung übernehmen, das funktioniert so nicht. Bitte tu das nicht. Du kannst den Quelltext übernehmen (dazu musst du zuerst Bearbeiten und im Bearbeiten-Fenster dann den Code kopieren). Dann ist das zwar technisch ok, aber inhaltlich immer noch nicht richtig. Aber wenn du die Bilder nicht beschneidest, nicht kopierst, sondern die Originale verwendest, dann kann tritt das Problem eh nicht auf.
- die Bilder sind als Bearbeitungen von schlechterer Qualität als die Originale.
- Ausschnitte von Bildern (so sie denn unbedingt notwendig sein sollten) machst du am besten mit dem CropTool, niemals als Screenshot!
- Vielleicht lässt du einfach die Finger von fremden Bildern. Ich kann dir anbieten, dass wir uns persönlich treffen und ich dir das persönlich versuche zu erklären.
- Und bitte mach nicht noch extra Rahmen an die Bilder. Etwaige Rahmen werden nur bei der Einbindung erzeugt, nicht am Bild selbst.
- Ich versuche das für dich in Ordnung zu bringen, ich wünsche mir von dir mehr Engagement für die Formalia.
lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 14:33, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
- Hallo Herzi Pinki, niemand soll in seinen Bildrechten geschmälert werden, ich dachte, das Recht zu haben Bilder zu verändern, einen Ausschnitt zu verwenden. Also werde ich die Originale verwenden. Herzlichen Dank für den ungeheuer großen Aufwand. Helmuth Furch (talk) 15:49, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
- Du hast die Rechte eh, aber nur im Rahmen der vorgegebenen Lizenzbedingungen. Darüber hinaus sind deine Screenshots oft nicht besonders gute Qualität (um es höflich auszudrücken), ... lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 16:03, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
- Nachtrag: Ich vermute, das Grundproblem mit deinen Bildausschnitten ist, dass du Screenshots (tw. in winzigster Größe) machst und dass du beim Hochladen dieser mit den notwendigen Informationen nicht gut zurecht kommst. Daher nochmals der Hinweis: Mache bitte keine Screenshots, sondern verwende CropTool um Bildausschnitte herzustellen, und unterdrücke den Impuls die Ausschnitte nachzuschärfen. Überlege aber bitte davor, ob es den Ausschnitt wirklich braucht, und verwende im Zweifelsfall das Originalbild. An einem Beispiel mag ich das Resultat demonstrieren:
- Du hast die Rechte eh, aber nur im Rahmen der vorgegebenen Lizenzbedingungen. Darüber hinaus sind deine Screenshots oft nicht besonders gute Qualität (um es höflich auszudrücken), ... lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 16:03, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
- Das eingebundene Bild ist immer nur eine Idee, was auf dem Bild zu sehen ist, und wer sich dafür interessiert, soll / muss das Bild in groß aufmachen. Mach das mal bei den beiden Bildern um zu sehen, was du dann siehst. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 09:17, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
File:Pernitz-Bildstock-Sebastian-03.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Herzi Pinki (talk) 14:35, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
File:Ecce Homo 25752 A-7051 Großhöflein.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Herzi Pinki (talk) 14:37, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
File:Schloss Koenigshof Theodor Festorazzo1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Herzi Pinki (talk) 14:40, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
File:Bad Fischau Grab Familie Jaeger1.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Herzi Pinki (talk) 14:44, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
File:Mila 18 Memorial in Warsaw1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |