User talk:HeimatfreundeBienen
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
Hi,
What's the source of this picture you've writed coming from Flickr, The Commons? I can't found it there. --Dereckson (talk) 12:51, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Bienen.JPG
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Bienen.JPG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
High Contrast (talk) 06:23, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 11:58, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Kirche evangelisch 2.jpg was uncategorized on 8 February 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:58, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Bienen Druckvorlage Aufkleber.JPG was uncategorized on 15 February 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:48, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot Sollte jetzt komplett sein. --Thomas
File:Empel Schloss 3.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--Túrelio (talk) 15:28, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
Hallo Turelio, Löschung akzeptiert. Habe eine neue Version hochgeladen. Dieses Foto habe ich auf dem Fest der Heimatfreunde Millingen-Empel am 16.08.2009 gemacht. Bei dem Fest wurde für den Erhalt der noch vorhandenen Bausubstanz geworden. 10:40, 11 April 2011 Thomas Winkler
- Ähem, auf Panoramio was es bereits im Jahr 2008 von einer Marina Frintrop hochgeladen worden und als (C) markiert. (Falls du das selbst bist, brauchst du das hier nicht offenzulegen. Du solltest dann aber eine Genehmigung an OTRS schicken.) --Túrelio (talk) 08:54, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
Ich habe unter "Empel Schloss 3a ein neues Foto geladen. Dieses Foto zeigt das Schloss Empel anders als das von Marina Frintrop. Bitte Info wieso ich von Marina Frintrop ein OK brauche für ein Foto von mir? 11:05, 11 April 2011 Thomas Winkler
- Wir haben aneinander vorbeigeschrieben. Ich bezog mich auf das gelöschte Foto, bei dem du auch geschrieben hattest "Foto selbst gemacht bei Besichtigung, Thomas Winkler". Ich muss mich nun wieder wundern, warum du das neue Foto in einer praktisch wertlosen 100-Pixel-Auflösung hochlädst. Ehrlich gesagt, solche Auflösungen sind hier generell URV-verdächtig. --Túrelio (talk) 09:28, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
Hatte eigentlich bisher immer platzsparend gearbeitet. Werde auch hier versuchen, ein anderes Foto zu machen so das Gelände mal wieder öffentlich zu gänglich ist. 11:32, 11 april 2011 Thomas Winkler
- "platzsparend" - das Argument hab ich noch nie gehört. Für die Wikimedia-Server ist es völlig belanglos, ob die Datei 4 kB oder 4 MB groß ist. Für die Verwendbarkeit des Bildes ist dieser Unterschied aber hoch relevant. --Túrelio (talk) 09:36, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
Hallo HeimatfreundeBienen,
kannst du File:Kirche evangelisch 2.jpg nicht in etwas höherer Auflösung hochladen? Die jetzige ist praktisch wertlos. Auch bei File:Wegekreuz in empel.jpg frage ich mich, warum du das in einer dermaßen geringen Auflösung hochgeladen hast. --Túrelio (talk) 15:05, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
- Hallo Turelio, werde mit meiner neuen Kamera von diesen Stellen ein Foto machen. So bald ich dieses gemacht habe, werde ich diese Austauschen. Kann aber etwas dauern. 10:41, 11 April 2011 Thomas Winkler
Wann ist denn dieses Foto File:Kleinbahn-Rees-Empel.jpg aufgenommen worden? --Túrelio (talk) 09:46, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
- Habe ca. 1965 ergänzt und das ich das Foto von meinem Vater habe. Ich habe das Foto eingescannt. 11:50, 11 April 2011 Thomas Winkler
- "Foto von meinem Vater habe" - bedeutet das, dass dein Vater das Foto aufgenommen hat oder nicht? Im ersteren Fall gehört der Name deines Vaters in das Urheber-Feld, nicht der deine. Durch Scannen erwirbt man kein eigenes Urheberrecht. --Túrelio (talk) 10:38, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
geändert 12:44, 11 April 2011 Thomas Winkler
- Ja, aber an der falschen Stelle. Wenn dein Vater das Foto selbst aufgenommen hat, ist er der Urheber. Das erstere annehmend habe ich es jetzt selbst korrigiert. --Túrelio (talk) 11:49, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Empel Schloss 2A.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Empel Schloss 2A.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
JuTa 17:58, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
Hallo, die AK ist in meinem Besitz. Habe das Bild eingestellt. Der Urheber in unbekannt, habe dieses jetzt für das Bild so drin stehen. Hoffe das Bild kann drin bleiben. Heimatfreunde Bienen Thomas Winkler 21:16, 01 September 2013 (UTC)