User talk:Harke/Archiv2013

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Hello Harke, I would like to have some informations about some of your picture of Mein erstes Marchenbuch. I am a french publisher and i would like to know how i can use your images or from where come these pictures. My email adress is : lesvieuxtiroirs@gmail.com I hope you will see this message and answer to me Thank you so much Damien Locussol Lesvieuxtiroirs (talk) 12:01, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schafhaus Hemmingen Rohrsperg 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for QI --NorbertNagel 16:39, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fachwerkhaus Hemmingen Lindenstr 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality IMO--Lmbuga 20:56, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heimerdingen Gasthaus Zum Ochsen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. -- Felix Koenig 20:29, 27 July 2013 (UTC) {{o}} Vertical lines (see notes) aren't straight, see notes, sorry--Lmbuga 00:37, 29 July 2013 (UTC) The line it's not stright but I think that it's tilted in the reality, sorry--Lmbuga 00:41, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fachwerkhaus Hemmingen Lindenstr 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me--Lmbuga 23:58, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altes Rathaus Hemmingen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 18:50, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Orangerie Schloss Favorite Rastatt (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality (...and perfect perspective correction)--Lmbuga 14:40, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Westansicht Schloss Favorite Rastatt 2013 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:26, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Residenzschloss Rastatt Eingang zum Ehrenhof.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:31, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kinzig in Loßburg (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 18:58, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stausee Kleine Kinzig.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 18:58, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heimerdingen Katholische Kirche (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schiltach Rathaus 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for QI --NorbertNagel 21:31, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Favorite Rastatt Detail Fassade (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me--Lmbuga 15:19, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Residenzschloss Rastatt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 15:13, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruine Schenkenburg (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 16:11, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stadtkirche Schiltach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 13:10, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schiltach Marktplatz (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 13:10, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schiltach Spitalstrasse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 06:30, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schenkenzell Kirche St. Ulrich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 19:37, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vogteiturm Loßburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The branches on the right are a bit distracting, but good quality overall. Heuschrecke 20:11, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heimerdingen Hotel Jägerheim.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Simprechtshausen Kirche (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:37, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jagstbrücke Hohebach 2013 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I still know the old bridge (before restoration). The photo is OK, but sharpness, especially at the farer part of the bridge could be better (focus point, aperture?) --Tuxyso 20:17, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Infotafel am Geburtshaus Carl Julius Cranz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 21:26, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ölmühle Dörzbach (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice but slightly oversharpened. There are remarkable sharpening artefacts on the leaves at the top left. --Tuxyso 19:58, 12 August 2013 (UTC) New version uploaded. Better now? --Harke 18:28, 13 August 2013 (UTC) Yes, is think so. IMHO QI now. --Tuxyso 20:02, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landschloss Korntal (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 20:00, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alter Schulplatz Hemmingen (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quite tight at the bottom, I think too much sky. Mattbuck 19:33, 6 August 2013 (UTC) I agree with Mattbuck but OTOH it’s perfectly sharp and well-detailed. QI for me. --Kreuzschnabel 18:28, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ölmühle Dörzbach (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments --Xicotencatl 02:42, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schwenninger Moos (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --AleXXw 06:46, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Chorfenster Johanneskirche Korntal.jpg

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 00:03, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dörzbach Dreifaltigkeitskirche Wappen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 20:49, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Synagoge Hohebach 2013 Hinweistafel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 06:10, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Laibach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Xicotencatl 15:18, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Laibach Innenhof (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. --Mattbuck 21:40, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hohebach Jakobuskirche (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schwenninger Moos Bohlenweg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support A bit overexposed (clouds) but ok --Christian Ferrer 21:00, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rathaus Meßbach (Dörzbach).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:11, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dreifaltigkeitskirche Meßbach (Dörzbach).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landschloss Korntal (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Dust spots need fixing. Mattbuck 20:14, 22 August 2013 (UTC) New version uploaded. OK now? --Harke 15:30, 27 August 2013 (UTC) Better. Mattbuck 21:20, 29 August 2013 (UTC)