User talk:Hans Topo1993
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 11:20, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Zelda wind waker.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Zelda wind waker.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
File:Zelda wind waker.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
File:Zelda the wind waker.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Articseahorse (talk) 03:44, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Arman Manukyan.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Arman Manukyan.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, Green Giant (talk) 15:09, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Arman Manukyan.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Arman Manukyan.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, Green Giant (talk) 23:06, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted content
[edit]
- use in any work, regardless of content
- creation of derivative works
- commercial use
- free distribution
See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.
Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.Yours sincerely, Green Giant (talk) 19:34, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
Muchas gracias
[edit]Hola, me paso por aquí para agradecerte sinceramente tu participación en el debate de mi desbloqueo, incluso si ha sido finalmente infructuoso. Tras más de dos años completamente alejado de la interacción con la Wikipedia en Español, me causa gran tristeza el nuevo fracaso de mi petición. Como ya he comentado en mis peticiones de desbloqueo de las últimas semanas, mi única intención es pasar página y seguir contribuyendo al conocimiento libre. Reconozco la frustración de seguir en el mismo punto en el que estábamos en 2012, cuando ya se arguyeron políticas inexistentes para negar un desbloqueo que, aparentemente, cuenta con un respaldo mayoritario por parte de todos aquellos que han querido pronunciarse sobre el tema.
También te lo agradezco porque, posiblemente, no has apoyado mi desbloqueo por tu simpatía o cercanía hacia mí, sino porque crees que ese precisamente no es un argumento relevante y sí el avance del proyecto. Precisamente porque soy consciente de todo lo ocurrido y de todas las cosas que hice mal es que te doy las gracias por querer darme una oportunidad para demostrar con hechos que lo lamento y que deseo reparar los perjuicios causados. No voy a tirar la toalla y seguiré intentando poder volver a reintegrarme en el proyecto, con los mismos deberes que todos los demás, pero también con los mismos derechos. Hasta que esto ocurra, seguiré con mi labor en Wikiexilio, aquí en Commons y en Wikidata.Gracias finalmente por haber dado la cara en un debate en el que lo más cómodo era simplemente quedarse al margen. Un afectuoso saludo --Discasto talk 15:04, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- Hola, HansTopo, he seguido tu discusión con Mar y tu cierre, desfavorable, de mi petición de desbloqueo. No vengo a cuestionarla, faltaría más (al fin y al cabo te mostraste favorable), pero sí a compartir contigo mi perplejidad. Porque yo ya he hecho todo lo que se me ha pedido: no tengo un títere desde hace más de tres años, he pedido disculpas no una ni dos ni tres veces, he explicado también las circunstancias en que ocurrieron mis errores, he sido paciente y he esperado entre una petición y otra muchos meses o a veces hasta años ... Así que no entiendo muy bien qué queréis de mí.
- En serio, me dejan perplejo las trampas al solitario que os hacéis (como biblios, se entiende). Dices, como argumento para denegar mi petición, una petición que sabes palmariamente que cuenta con el respaldo muy mayoritario de la comunidad, que no hay consenso. El consenso es un proceso de acercamiento, requiere querer llegar a él y no negar cualquier acuerdo y esgrimir que no se puede llegar a ninguno como excusa para no hacerlo. Porque, además, las excusas son cada vez más peregrinas. Un usuario dice que le acoso aquí en Commons. Vale. Aquí tenemos un TAB muy eficiente en el que puede denunciar el presunto acoso. Si lo hiciera, se podría determinar de manera más neutral la existencia o no de tal falta. Pero hasta entonces, no se trata más que de una fantasía en su mente de la que no es correcto que me responsabilicéis a mí (te animo a que le plantees a Taichi que denuncie el "acoso"... en COM:AN/U, ahí no hay amigos ni enemigos de nadie y se podrá dirimir con ecuanimidad); el otro, habla de "casos (en plural) de acoso" (no habiendo uno, va a haber varios); finalmente otra usuaria habla de "comportamientos perniciosos" en varios proyectos (el acabose, vamos). Otro me acusa... de tratar de defenderme (¡!) de una falsa identificación (o errónea, no se pudo determinar, porque no existió investigación independiente). El resto se agarra a esas acusaciones con poco o nulo fundamento y así queda camuflada su negativa.
- ¿Por qué lo hacen? Ni idea, a veces supongo que simplemente es rencor... es comprensible que no todo el mundo haya podido perdonar mis errores; por más sinceras que sean, entiendo también que no todos hayan podido aceptar mis disculpas, pero podrían admitir que se trata de esto en lugar de seguir repitiendo hasta el infinito mis viejas faltas e incriminándome con las más extrañas acusaciones nuevas. ¿Por qué los demás lo permitís? ¿Por qué aceptáis que una minoría pase por encima de la mayoría? ¿Me lo podrías explicar? ¿Me podrías decir qué tengo que hacer? Porque honestamente no lo entiendo. De hecho, lo que implica vuestra repetida decisión es que, si quiero contribuir, mejor creo otro títere porque, haga lo que haga, va a dar igual y nunca vais a permitir mi desbloqueo (no lo haré porque no he creado títeres en más de tres años y porque no quiero hacerlo, pero parece que es la única salida que me ofrecéis). Me gustaría conocer tu opinión. Un saludo y gracias por leer la chapa --Discasto talk 23:53, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
File:Logo UCAM.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--Krdbot 23:00, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Logo UCAM.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Logo UCAM.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Logo UCAM.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, JuTa 13:19, 27 May 2018 (UTC)