User talk:Grand-Duc/Archiv/2011/June
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Quality Image Promotion
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Plateumaris sericea GER-Saxony 2011-06-10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Galilée
Bonjour.
Merci pour ton examen de ma photo de la tombe de Galilée.
J'ai suivi tes conseils, avec lesquels je suis d'accord.
Le résultat te convient-il ?
Amicalement depuis Paris,--Jebulon (talk) 20:53, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
- Oui, c'est bien mieux, ainsi. Je supporte la nomination, à présent, comme tu peux voir sur QIC. Salutations de Rostock, Grand-Duc (talk) 21:50, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! University Rostock Department of Anatomy single shot cropped GD.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Male Anas platyrhynchos breeding plumage three-quarter profile.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bellis perennis single Macro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
![]() |
File:Pollau_Ansicht.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Schwäbin (talk) 17:21, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
- Huhu, Grand-Duc, nachdem ich vor einigen Tagen darauf aufmerksam gemacht wurde und das Teil klasse finde, wollte ich es Dir (anscheinend auch von-de.WP-nach-Commons-Rüberschieber) nicht vorenthalten: Dieser äußerst praktische Feudel könnte auch Dein Commonsleben erleichtern. Vor allem für Nachnutzer (die auf den Button Use this file on the web klicken) ist es wichtig, dass der ursprüngliche Autor an richtiger Stelle genannt wird. Das erlädschd das Script unter anderem auch. --Schwäbin (talk) 17:37, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
Near miss ;-)
Knapp daneben: [1] - trotzdem danke. Gruß, --Burkhard (talk) 18:41, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
- Ja, das war mir auch aufgefallen, deswegen hab' ich dann auch gleich bei den hiesigen Adminanfragen um Reparaturhilfe gebeten... ^^ Grüße, Grand-Duc (talk) 21:25, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
Astyanax mexicanus en "Most Valued Review"
Bonjour Grand Duc, Au sujet de tes images candidates pour le label VI, sous le scope Astyanax mexicanus : le label VI n'étant pas attribué indéfiniment, il est tout à fait possible à une image challenger d'essayer de détrôner la VI en cours pour un "scope" donné. Il suffit simplement de ré-ouvir à la discussion la VI courante et de l'ajouter à la Most Valued Review, ce que j'avais fait, cf. Commons:Valued_image_candidates/candidate_list#Astyanax_mexicanus. Pour ce poisson-là, cependant, la VI actuelle reste défendue. J'espère que cela ne te découragera pas ; n'hésite pas à proposer d'autres images au label ! Cordialement, --Myrabella (talk) 19:21, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
File:FNR.RotaremisVehiculum.RomanEmpire.CE390.SvenLittkowski.001.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Coatilex (talk) 12:16, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Neptunwerft - Max-Planck-Institut für Demografie Rostock 2011-06-13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Two port cranes of Stadthafen Rostock upstream 2010-12-28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|