User talk:Gnu1742
TUSC token 876a4e42f37d8e9c5c04798cb1640126
[edit]I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
Thank you for getting back to me and handling the images. Regards, Rjd0060 (talk) 17:04, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Deutschordensschloss Muelheim 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
^
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely russavia (talk) 06:15, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Thomas Poreski MdL BaWue May 2013 gnu1742 1.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Thomas Poreski MdL BaWue May 2013 gnu1742 1.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
JuTa 17:47, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
Please fix user cat
[edit]{{requested edit}}
Category:Commons users who use Flickr should be Category:Commons users with an account on Flickr. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:03, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
- User Gnu1742 has passed away, which is also noted on his user page. What is the reason that a category change is now absolutely necessary? --Mikmaq (talk) 19:14, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
- It's being emptied and renamed. See the category. There's no reason to maintain a defunct category on a user page. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 13:28, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
- Done —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 13:31, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- It's being emptied and renamed. See the category. There's no reason to maintain a defunct category on a user page. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 13:28, 16 August 2022 (UTC)