User talk:GijsvdL
Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
Since the deletion debate on this image is still open, I've readded the deletion notice tag which you deleted. I did not otherwise make any changes to the image description. Please do not delete the tag again until the debate closes. Thanks. --BrokenSphere 19:53, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
Gemeentewapens
[edit]Hallo Gijs. Voorzover ik kan nagaan had Image:Wapen-Oost-Gelre.png (dat jij hebt genomineerd voor verwijdering) aanvankelijk een gewoon pd-sjabloon en is daar later een ngw-geval van gemaakt. Dat betekent dat we gewoon weer terug kunnen naar de oorspronkelijke situatie (bron: de site van de betreffend gemeente). Sterker nog: dat moet. Ook als ngw wel compatibel was gebleven met de hier toegelaten licenties had de ngw hier nooit als bron mogen worden opgevoerd. Groeten, Fransvannes 11:26, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
- Bedankt voor de notificatie. Dat zal dus per afbeelding moeten worden nagekeken. GijsvdL 12:00, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
- Voilà. Meer werk, minder schade. Ik zie trouwens inmiddels dat de oorspronkelijk geüploade versie (die van de gemeente dus) wel een kleinere was. Ik weet niet of je de eerste versie weer onder de tweede (die denk ik wel van ngw was) vandaan kunt halen, jij? Fransvannes 12:29, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
- Uitgevoerd. GijsvdL 12:43, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
- Voilà. Meer werk, minder schade. Ik zie trouwens inmiddels dat de oorspronkelijk geüploade versie (die van de gemeente dus) wel een kleinere was. Ik weet niet of je de eerste versie weer onder de tweede (die denk ik wel van ngw was) vandaan kunt halen, jij? Fransvannes 12:29, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Waterschappen-public-600.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Sterkebak 18:19, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Ambulance-public-600.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Sterkebak 18:20, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Justitie-public-600.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Sterkebak 18:20, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Politie-public-600.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Sterkebak 18:22, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Veiligheidsregio-public-600.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Sterkebak 18:23, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Provincies-Gemeenten-public-600.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Sterkebak 18:25, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Energie-public-600.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
This is an automated message from DRBot. (Stop bugging me!) 19:45, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Wapen_Heerlijkheid_Wisch.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Wapen_Heerlijkheid_Wisch.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Kameraad Pjotr 19:10, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
TUSC token 008f592475c5df5defb58a2c7b23b19d
[edit]I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
Please stop
[edit]Editwarring with another user, like You did here, many thanks, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| ∇ 13:21, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Familie_Ten_Boom.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Kameraad Pjotr 13:38, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:PortaalMuziek_800px-Gradient_overlay_groot.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:PortaalMuziek_800px-Gradient_overlay_groot.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Multichill 18:07, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:FG-737KLM.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Sterkebaktalk 16:44, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:File_ontwikkeling_in_Nederland.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 10:04, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Cannibal_Holocaust1PDIT.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Multichill (talk) 07:39, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:ZebraAfricaAddioPDIT.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Multichill (talk) 07:40, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Clint_EastwoodPD-IT.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Multichill (talk) 07:43, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Asterix_DeGalliër.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
D-Kuru (talk) 12:05, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:NL-BE_9-3_1934.PNG
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:NL-BE_9-3_1934.PNG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Masur (talk) 11:28, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 13:59, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Logo wikipedia nl belgische kleuren.png was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Wikipedia Belgica.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Zeusmodus-plaats.png was uncategorized on 1 July 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:50, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Zeusmodus-volglijst.png was uncategorized on 1 July 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:50, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Zeusmodus-terugdraaien-bijdragen.png was uncategorized on 1 July 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:50, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Toolbar dubbele hoogte.gif was uncategorized on 1 July 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:50, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Wikinl ad nl 02.gif was uncategorized on 10 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 17:42, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Wikinl ad nl 01.gif was uncategorized on 10 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 17:42, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Grb zenica.jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.
|
--Lokal_Profil 00:39, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
Template:AskedForInfo has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. |
:| TelCoNaSpVe :| 11:43, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
File:Asterix_DeGalliër.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Od1n (talk) 12:07, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, -mattbuck (Talk) 15:26, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
File:Phoenix-bokbier.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Kelly (talk) 10:26, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
—LX (talk, contribs) 18:41, 22 January 2016 (UTC)