User talk:George Chernilevsky/Archive/Archive 2011 3

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Lacerta agilis male 2011 G2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lacerta agilis male 2011 G2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 20:59, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! YuMZ-6KL tractor 2011 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI and Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 20:19, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! YuMZ-6KL tractor 2011 G3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI and Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 20:19, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lacerta agilis (Sand Lizard), male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Scope very rich. But this one is complete and well detailed --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:51, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:13, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Paeonia rockii (Rock's tree peony), flower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Structure of the petals very good visible --Llez (talk) 17:45, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:14, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry

George, I was puzzled by your complaint of users attacking you and making insinuations. I went carefully through all comments in the AN/U thread and saw no clear insinuations pointing to you (though some venom is certainly there). It never crossed my mind that you might be involved in those actions. Cheers, Alvesgaspar (talk) 12:31, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

George closed many of the nominations. Because of this Niabot specifically named him as suspicious and requested a checkuser [1]. The thing is, it's very common for one admin to close a whole bunch of related DRs, since if they're genuinely similar, you only really have to evaluate the issues once. But it sounds like FAP was actually a sockpuppet account, and had also been voting on the nom under the real username. --99of9 (talk) 12:55, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

OK. Thanks, friends. -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:28, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

In case you missed it, Niabot has apologised to you on that thread. --99of9 (talk) 01:44, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Просьба

Пожалуйста, не могли бы вы кратко перевести на английский ответ: User_talk:Vizu? Спасибо! --Vizu (talk) 18:51, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

 Done -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:37, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Toy balloons 2011 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tomer T 03:36, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lacerta agilis male 2011 G3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tomer T 03:36, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! YuMZ-6KL tractor 2011 G4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good to me--Lmbuga 22:01, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! YuMZ-6KL tractor 2011 G5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I like it. Good. QI--Lmbuga 22:02, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! YuMZ-6KL tractor 2011 G6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Cayambe 04:38, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

The Barnstar of Biology

Hello Mr. Chernilevsky, thank you very very very much for the award! That make me very happy! Many greetings H. Krisp (talk) 12:37, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

bitte! George -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:59, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boletus luridus 2011 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice--Holleday 05:00, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boletus luridus 2010 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice--Holleday 05:00, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Edible fungi in bucket 2011 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments You were lucky !--Jebulon 21:36, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lupinus polyphyllus UA 2011 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me.--Jebulon 21:37, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lupinus polyphyllus UA 2011 G3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me.--Lmbuga 21:45, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

333

Golofa claviger MHNT.ZOO.2004.0.457.jpg

Thank you for your proposal, to put my insect in "FP". But it has some defects and above all I was a bit traumatized from my last passage by FP. I need a bit of time to heal this wound. You make party of people who keep me and motivates me to continue. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:58, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Russian description

Hi George,
Could you please help here? Regards, Alvesgaspar (talk) 09:38, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

 Done -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:14, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lupinus polyphyllus UA 2011 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me--Lmbuga 14:15, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

Bravo

Bravo Georges pour l'image du jour! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:37, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

Merci, mon ami! -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:33, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laetiporus sulphureus 2011 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good and interesting--Lmbuga 19:41, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Boletus luridus (Lurid bolete).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support The excellent image quality makes the difference --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:31, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:03, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

70

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Suillus luteus 2010 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I think this picture isn't too informative but, anyhow, a QI for the details of the mushroom top. --Ximonic 19:52, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Felicitation!

The month of June is full of images of the day for you. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:38, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Merci, mon ami! -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:18, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

problem

Hello George, I have a problem with this picture : Commons:Valued image candidates/Chiesa di S.Marziale Facciata.JPG that was promoted but the BOT did not work. What to do? Thank you for your opinion. Merci bien amicalement. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:51, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

 Done. Fixed manually. -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:43, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Merci Georges tu es le meilleur ! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:45, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

L'image du jour

C'est toujours un plaisir de te voir à l'honneur. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:52, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

Merci! Aujourd'hui l'anniversaire de mon fils cadet (l'âge de 15 années). Lui aussi un jeune biologiste. Il libérait cette araignée devant la caméra. -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:01, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

Bon Anniversaire à ton fils. 15 ans! Nous allons bientôt voir ces premiers travaux sur COMMONS! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:32, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

:) -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:35, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

Je m'associe. Aux félicitations du jour pour l'image et l'anniversaire !--Jebulon (talk) 14:04, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

Merci ! -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:57, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

The lion of Egyptian revolution (Qasr al-Nil Bridge).jpg

Now that the results are confirmed (8 support, 6 oppose, 1 neutral), What happens next? The image is still not featured even tho it has more support than oppose. Could be kind enough to explain seeing how this is the picture I nominated to be a featured picture. Thanks -- The Egyptian Liberal (talk) 17:12, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Agaricus augustus 2011 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Lmbuga 22:15, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Попытка

Прошу вас, гляньте в Category:Алексино (Переславского района) и подскажите мне: среди трёх этих фотографий есть такие, которые могут иметь шансы на QI? Или всё ерунда? Спасибо.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 14:34, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

Я отсутствовал несколько дней, поэтому только сейчас отвечаю. Возможный кандидат - только фото с крестом. -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:54, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

Ворота — выгорело небо, так? А чем плоха табличка?--PereslavlFoto (talk) 11:37, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

Лично мне не нравится объект. Выглядит как-то не интересно. Хотя это не технический аспект, а вопрос сюжета. Впрочем, мое мнение - всего лишь личное мнение, а не решение высокой инстанции. -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:49, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Agaricus augustus, (the prince).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support I think it is important to add the Taxonavigation (what is done). Too bad there have not the size in the caption of the image. The photograph illustrates very well the specie. For the future should it be provided to mount the bottom consistently, or reduce the scope to "top side". --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:50, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:49, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Locomotive ChS4-080 2011 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me--Lmbuga 22:33, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Locomotive ChS8-016 2011 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good!--Jebulon 21:54, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Locomotive ChS8-016 2011 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good! -- MJJR 21:02, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Locomotive ChS8-030 2011 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me--Lmbuga 22:35, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Locomotive ChS8-030 2011 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good! -- MJJR 21:02, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

pl:Wikipedia:Ilustracja na medal - propozycje/CzS8

Hi! It crossed my mind that you might be interested in the progress of the nomination linked above. Cheers! Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 21:43, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Dziękuję, Łukasz! -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:33, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Kamal Abbas.jpg

Now that the results are confirmed (6 support), What happens next? The image is still not featured even tho it has only supports. Could be kind enough to explain to me seeing how the picture was not opposed by anyone. Thanks PS:Someone took it of the main "Featured picture candidates" list and I had to add it few days later when I noticed that It was taken off -- The Egyptian Liberal (talk) 23:24, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Please, read rules. At least 7 support votes needed, but we have only 6.

With best regards, -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:12, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Locomotive ChS4-080 2011 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 09:37, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

"per nom" votes

In Commons:Deletion requests/File:Anal 3.jpg I expressed my concern over the multiple, identical, "per nom" opinions one contributor left on a whole series of nominations made by another contributor.

In that discussion I said that I thought administrators should discourage "per nom" or "per xxx" opinions, and only consider the opinions of individuals whose response suggested they had actually read the discussion and understood the issues. The nominator asserted that lots of people voice "per nom" opinions.

Should I assume you skipped over that part of the discussion? It is hard to imagine you would have left a "per nom" opinion if you had read the discussion over whether closing administrators should discount "per nom" opinions.

Would you agree that administrators have an obligation to set a good example for less experienced contributors? If you agree that administrators have an example to set a good example, can I ask you to reconsider whether it is wise for you to ever offer a "per nom" opinion? Geo Swan (talk) 00:44, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oryctes nasicornis male 2011 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 05:48, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

Совет

Прошу вашего совета. [2] Мне надо что-нибудь делать?--PereslavlFoto (talk) 22:22, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

Пока подождите. Я свое мнение сообщил на странице участника. Надеюсь на мирное решение конфликта. -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:46, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

Fomes fomentarius

Georges, J'ai visité l'habitat du champignon dont nous avions discuté en septembre de l'année passée. Je n'ai pu toutefois retrouver le spécimen photographié et il m'a donc été impossible d'étudier à nouveau ses spores. Aussi, après avoir constaté la présence de champignons du même type sur des arbres morts présents sur le site et débattu du sujet avec d'autres passionnés de mycologie j'en suis arrivé à la même conclusion que toi et j'ai donc décidé d'insérer le fichier suivant. Amicalement.

Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 11:54, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

Salut Jean-Pol!

Très bien, la vérité est établie maintenant.

Très amical, Georges -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:01, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

Très bien. Merci. --Walter Siegmund (talk) 20:00, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Macrolepiota procera 2011 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me--Lmbuga 23:28, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Xerocomus subtomentosus 2011 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 05:52, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ganoderma applanatum 2011 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 04:55, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris quadrifolia 2011 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 01:20, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris quadrifolia 2011 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good and useful --Mbdortmund 01:21, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris quadrifolia 2011 G4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 04:57, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

350

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amanita rubescens 2011 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI, although with a crop at top it would be better --Carschten 20:28, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boletus pulverulentus 2011 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 14:12, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris quadrifolia 2011 G3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me--Lmbuga 03:58, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Question concerning MVR

Hallo George, I have a question concerning the rules of MRV. There exists a VI of Murex trapa [3], which is partly unsharp and shows not many details. Is it possible to open a Most Valued Review with this current VI and my picture [4]? I didn't find this case (an existing VI against an other picture) in the rules, there is only dealt with two competiting pictures not being already VI. I do not intend to compete with your VIs or the VIs of Archaedontosaurus in a MVR, for they have an excellent quality, but in this case, I think, the quality is really not optimal. If it is possible, can I open the review as autor of one of the pictures, or must someone other do this? Glad to hear your opinion. --Llez (talk) 16:56, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

Hi!

You can open MVR with current VI and new Your candidate. This is correct way, and I saw such MVR before few times.

With best regards, -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:04, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

Thank you very much! --Llez (talk) 17:42, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Paris quadrifolia (Herb Paris, True-lover's Knot).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:39, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:27, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Orthodox church Vinnitsa S Bug 2011 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good.--Jebulon 21:24, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Orthodox church Vinnitsa S Bug 2011 G2.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Orthodox church Vinnitsa S Bug 2011 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good for me. I like the light of the sunset--Lmbuga 22:13, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

Barnstar!

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		I present this Barnstar to George Chernilevsky for tirelessly sorting Quality Images. Jovian Eye storm 02:30, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Many thanks! -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:50, 21 August 2011 (UTC)