User talk:Gabor~commonswiki
Copyright Tags
[edit]Hi. Could you add copyright tags to the images you uploaded? For now I have tagged your image as "PD" as described in the comments. Thanks for the images -- Chris 73 23:54, 16 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Thanks for the fast reply. Usually, the files get a copyright tag from our list of copyright tags. I.e. to tag an image as public domain, you add {{PD}}, which will give you a nice box with the information, categories, etc. This should be added to the image page, since an article page may contain multiple images with different copyright tags. See for example Image:Literaturnobelpreis.png. Articles are not tagged. Let me know if you have any question -- Chris 73 01:33, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Hello! I've answered your question, see my discussin page for datailes Kneiphof 22:04, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)
you recently moved a load of stuff into this category. Whilst some are clear cut occupations others (photographers for example) are done by many on a non occupation basis. Personally i thing we should do away with that category entirely and put all the entrys directly in Category:People but i would like to see a consensus on the matter first. would you mind joining the discussion i have started on the issue on the commons:village pump? Plugwash 17:27, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- No, I wouldn´t, see my answer there, Gabor 18:02, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Vornamen?
[edit]Hallo Gabor, bin gerade über Deine Vornamensseiten und die entsprechenden redirects gestolpert. Sowas wäre m.E. viel besser in der Wikipedia aufgehoben, da solche Infos i.e.S. doch keine Medien darstellen. Naja und für freie Texte/Quellen gibts auch Wikisource/Wiktionary oder? Was meinst Du, sollen etwa sämtliche internationalen Namenserklärungen/formen hier deponiert werden? Erstaunte Grüße von :Bdk: 22:05, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Hallo Bdk, der eigentliche Grund dafür war der Artikel über Stefan I. von Ungarn (I. István). Ich habe ihn nach seiner ungarischen Schreibweise erstellt, wie es mehr oder weniger "language policy" ist. Nun müsste man eigentlich lauter redirects anlegen wie "Stephen I (Hungary)" etc., ich habe der Einfachheit halber nur auf den Vornamen redirects angelegt, die Seite selbst ist nur als Begriffsklärung gedacht, es gibt ja sehr viele Könige und Päpste, die Stefan heißen. Die ganzen Namensangaben kann man natürlich streichen, wichtig sind nur die Namensträger. Das Ganze soll auch nicht eine Etymologie sein: Zuerst habe ich die Begriffsklärung unter "Stephen" erstellt, dann erst zum Griechischen verschoben, weil das am neutralsten ist. Die griechischen Buchstaben waren vielleicht zuviel des Guten.
- Die Alternative wäre eine Begriffsklärung pro Sprache, also ein Artikel "Stephen", einer "Stephan", einer "Étienne" etc., die alle auf die jeweiligen Namensträger zeigen. Die müsste man dann nur noch ab und zu synchronisieren. Ich finde meine Vorgangsweise nicht so verwunderlich, aber bitte lass mich wissen, wenn dich das nicht überzeugen konnte. Grüße, --Gabor 22:36, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Hm, ja, jetzt versteh ich wenigstens die Absicht dahinter :-) Das Ganze sah halt sehr nach einer aus der WP gewohnten BKL inkl. Wortbedeutung aus ... also erstmal lass ich das so stehen. Mittelfristig wird wahrscheinlich/hoffentlich eine softwareseitige Lösung für diese Sprachproblematik gefunden. Eine andere Möglichkeit ist ja, die unterschiedlichen Namensschreibweisen direkt in den Artikel/die Kategorie zu integrieren, so dass es zumindest über die Suche (aber natürlich nicht über "Artikel") gut gefunden wird, Bsp. Vulpes vulpes. --:Bdk: 04:28, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Hello, Could you add copyright tags to these images? thanks. Anna 00:33, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Added source information. There were 2 of each of these images, obviously the one with the source was deleted, it´s ok again. --Gabor 21:36, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
Hunter
[edit]I've copied the image from en.wikipedia, there seems to be some disagreements with the license ATM, when I copied it there was none. mikko 20:07, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
Kategorien für Bilder
[edit]hallo gabor. kannst du für die zukunft bitte darauf achten, deine personen nicht in die Category:People einzuordnen? da gehören nämlich nur weiterführende kategorien rein. P.S.: was hälst du von commons:Babel für deine benutzerseite? Schaengel89 @me 14:26, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
- Das tue ich an und für sich selten, etwa wenn ich Personen nicht kategorisieren kann - und ich habe sicher mehr Personen aus dieser Kategorie entfernt als reingebracht. Ich werd' mich zumindest bemühen, Grüße --Gabor 00:06, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
grüß dich. ich finde, Joachim Camerarius d. Ä. kann man gewiss besser einordnen als in Category:People. selbst [[Category:People of Germany ist besser. Schaengel89 @me 20:24, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Hello You uploaded the first version of this pic. I somehow cleaned up the noisy gray backround behind the statue. If you don't like what I've done, I still have the version you uploaded, just tell me and I'll restore it. - Ash Crow 03:48, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
- Thanks, it's fine, Gabor 22:24, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
Howard Rheingold
[edit]Hi, Gabor. I redirected the page Howard Rheingold to Category:Howard Rheingold because there are now about six or seven photos. If I goofed please let me know or free free to revert this. Thanks a bunch for starting this out. -Susanlesch 03:45, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Wilhelm_von_Siemens has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. |
FishInWater (talk) 22:01, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
File:Charles Dickens.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
—innotata 14:59, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
Heinrich Christian Schumacher has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. |
Vsop.de (talk) 10:39, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
Richard von Mises has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. |
BertSeghers (talk) 13:41, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Your account will be renamed
[edit]Hello,
The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.
Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Gabor. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Gabor~commonswiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.
Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation
20:58, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
Renamed
[edit]This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)
03:06, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Stanislav Navrátil has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. |
ŠJů (talk) 17:24, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
Engineers has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |