User talk:Florent Abel

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
(Redirected from User talk:Florent Pécassou)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Page utilisateur Wikipedia Fr
Email

Revert

[edit]

Sorry for reverting, but you archived using an IP so I thought it was vandalism. -mattbuck (Talk) 12:15, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. Florent Pécassou (talk) 20:31, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église d'Artiguemy (Hautes-Pyrénées, France).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good--Jebulon 18:30, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église Saint-Étienne de Tournay (Hautes-Pyrénées, France).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Crop above a bit tight (ça manque d'air tout là-haut !), but QI--Jebulon 18:29, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mairie d'Ibos (Hautes-Pyrénées, France).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Necessity to correct the perspective --Archaeodontosaurus 12:31, 19 February 2012 (UTC) New version... -- Florent Pécassou 16:22, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Good now --Archaeodontosaurus 08:32, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bibliothèque Daniel Pennac (Ibos, Hautes-Pyrénées, France).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Necessity to correct the perspective --Archaeodontosaurus 12:32, 19 February 2012 (UTC) I think, it's done now... Florent Pécassou 16:32, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Good now --Archaeodontosaurus 08:28, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Portail monumental à Azereix (Hautes-Pyrénées, France).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. To improve the composition I would consider chopping off a bit of the foreground at the bottom. --99of9 05:16, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église Saint-Blaise d'Ossun (Hautes-Pyrénées, France).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 05:56, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapelle Saint-Joseph d'Ossun (Hautes-Pyrénées, France).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 05:56, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pont de Nay (Pyrénées-Atlantiques, France).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Lovely; hope he caught something. --Saffron Blaze 21:51, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pont de Coarraze (Pyrénées-Atlantiques, France).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moonik 07:29, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Château de Coarraze (Pyrénées-Atlantiques, France).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 07:46, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Château de Mauvezin (Hautes-Pyrénées, France).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.now. --Cayambe 14:14, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mairie d'Oléac-Dessus (Hautes-Pyrénées, France).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Please add an english file description to the french one. --NorbertNagel 18:13, 24 April 2012 (UTC) ✓ Done --Coyau 10:08, 25 April 2012 (UTC)Tilted--Jebulon 16:24, 26 April 2012 (UTC) New version. --Florent Pécassou 18:52, 3 May 2012 (UTC) OK imo. - A.Savin 23:11, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alfonso the Battler, Calatayud, Aragón, Spain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. -- JLPC 08:19, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église Saint-Martin de Peyrouse (Hautes-Pyrénées, France).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Not very sharp but QI for me. -- A dead pixel (easy to fix) : see note. --JLPC 19:57, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monument aux Morts Rothschild (Lannemezan, France).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
✓ Done ? New file uploaded. --JLPC 17:01, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Better now, thanks--Lmbuga 19:32, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2, 4, 6 Norra Hamngatan, Göterborg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Slottsberget, Göteborg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 05:11, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maisons traditionnelles à Olden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:11, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]