User talk:Five-toed-sloth

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Five-toed-sloth!

Deprecated License

[edit]

Deutsch | English | Italiano | മലയാളം | Português | +/−


It has been found that Image:Gustave Le Rouge.jpg has a deprecated license tag. Please choose a new free license tag which describes the rights of the image correctly otherwise it will be deleted!Thanks for your consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 01:55, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

(en)Thank you for your information. The reason I used {{PD}}(not {{PD-old}}) is written in "Description". ...I change {{PD}} for approximate license tag {{PD-because}}. Is this O.K.? Or is this still violation?
(ja)どうも。既存のライセンスタグのどれにも該当しないようなので{{PD}}を付けた(事情は「解説」に書きました)のですが、それが自動的に削除の要件を満たすのであれば、一番近いと思われる{{PD-because}}に貼り替えます(ました)。これでOKでしょうか、それともこれでも問題があるでしょうか。
--Five-toed-sloth (talk) 02:20, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
(en)...{{PD-because}} is better? I rechanged.
(ja)…{{PD-because}}のほうが妥当でしょうか?再変更してみました。
--Five-toed-sloth (talk) 02:30, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:Amazing0647.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Schlurcher (talk) 20:37, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

(ja)お知らせ有難うございます。しかし私にとって英語で議論を行なうことは困難であり、またコモンズの慣習への理解が今のところ不充分であるため敢えて述べるほどの意見はありません。勝手ながら今回は、事情に明るい方々にお任せして自分は静観させて頂きたく思います。迷惑をかけてすみませんでした。
(en)It is kind of you to inform me about it. But it is difficult for me to discuss in English. And I have no opinion to declare, because I am not yet familiar with policy of Commons. This time, I hope to entrust the problem to veteran users. I apologize for my act.
--Five-toed-sloth (talk) 09:00, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:Schmid_1942_Ornithopter.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin H. (talk) 02:50, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • (ja)言われてみれば1942年の写真がパブリック・ドメインというのは不審です。アップロード前にそこを検討すべきでした。削除に異議はありません。議論に参加できずにすみませんでした。
  • (en)As you point out, "1942 photo = public domain" is suspicious. I should have examined the point before uploading. I have no objection to delete. I am sorry to be late.

--Five-toed-sloth (talk) 06:17, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:Lagari.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

----by Màñü飆¹5 talk 19:51, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File:Paterson Katherine 7.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

···日本穣Talk to Nihonjoe 01:13, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Authentic cover banners.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:47, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]