User talk:Firos ak

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Firos ak!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 15:00, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 10:49, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Moth.jpeg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Moth.jpeg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, JuTa 22:14, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

File:Flora and fauna from Cjinnar WLS Kerala (54).jpg

File:Flora and fauna from Cjinnar WLS Kerala (54).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kulmalukko (talk) 21:38, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Flora and fauna of Chinnar WLS IMG 6777.jpg

File:Flora and fauna of Chinnar WLS IMG 6777.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kulmalukko (talk) 21:40, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plain tiger from Bangalore university.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --PJDespa 14:47, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eurema hecabe Linnaeus, 1758 – Common Grass Yellow.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Fischer.H 17:46, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Asian House Gecko close up from bangalore.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice closeup. If there's no VI of a closeup of the Asian house gecko's head, this would be a good VI nomination, too. -- Ikan Kekek 06:57, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ypthima striata from bangalore.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support - IMO, the butterfly is sharp enough. -- Ikan Kekek 07:00, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eurema hecabe hecabe (common grass yellow), ventral view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment 1) The scope is not properly formatted. The binomial name should be in italics followed by the english common name in parenthesis. 2 ) Must connect the scope to the category that contains the image --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:45, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

 Comment There is already a VI of an African sub-species so you need to be sure of your id and I think it might be helpful to specify dry/wet season for the specific Indian subspecies. Once you've done that then you should compare your image with the many other photos in the gallery to see which is most valuable. Charles (talk) 18:19, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

•  Support Ok now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Unfortunately, with an exisiting VI for a subspecies, we cannot promote an image for the binomial alone. Charles (talk) 15:42, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

 Comment Updated the scope as suggested. Archaeodontosaurus, Charles, please look. Firos ak (talk) 17:31, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

•  Support OK with new scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:02, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Good now. Charles (talk) 22:20, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burara gomata IMG 3970.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Charlesjsharp 14:31, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hemidactylus frenatus (Common House Gecko), head.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support amazing eye. Charles (talk) 15:50, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:21, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Papilio crino Melagiri TN IMG 6325.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 16:38, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pied bush chat Anamudi shola Kerala IMG 1838.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Charlesjsharp 16:47, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nilgir Pipit anamudi shola kerala IMG 2074.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice bird and good quality -- Spurzem 16:04, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anomalous nawab IMG 3614.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:12, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Papilio crino Melagiri TN IMG 6325.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Papilio crino Melagiri TN IMG 6325.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:08, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pale four line blue from siruvani IMG 3930.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. -- Ikan Kekek 08:13, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Many tailed oakblue from siruvani IMG 3853.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I find some of the blurred light areas distracting, but as a photo of the butterfly, it's good. -- Ikan Kekek 08:16, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ypthima striata from kolar IMG 3660.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Olivier LPB 15:04, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lilac silverline IMG 4649.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lilac silverline IMG 4510 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 16:28, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Common emigrant from Parambikulam T R (72).jpg

File:Common emigrant from Parambikulam T R (72).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Poecilotheria36 (talk) 19:20, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

How to create covid-19 map of Assam

How to create a map showing covid-19 cases through colours by districts of a Indian State, as you did for Karnataka, I want to create for Assam in 2020 coronavirus pandemic in Assam Goswami666 (talk) 16:46, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Uploaded an svg.I use inkscape [[1]] for svg editing.-Firos AK 18:40, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Colour the district

I request you to colour the Dhubri district too in Covid-19 map of Assam since South Salmara Mancachar was in Dhubri District, now it is a separate district but since this map is old one, so please colour the Dhubri District Goswami666 (talk) 16:11, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

Done.-Firos AK 17:24, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

Covid-19 map of Assam

Add Hailakandi on map Goswami666 (talk) 21:21, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

Add Covid-19 map of deaths of Assam

Please add another map of Assam reporting covid-19 deaths and add Hailakandi with a different colour Goswami666 (talk) 13:09, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Why don't you try yourself?.Its pretty easy like mspaint. Download inscape here[[2]].Firos AK 14:49, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

I don't have a computer, and it doesn't work in my 1GB ram mobile..... Goswami666 (talk) 16:43, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Ok.I will do it.Firos AK 16:57, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Thank you Goswami666 (talk) 13:39, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Done here Firos AK 14:06, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Covid19 map of Assam

Add Kokrajhar on Covid19 map of Assam Goswami666 (talk) 20:05, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

Kerala Map (Eranakulam Dist) Boundary issue

Ernakulam district boundary have a issue. its rearranged in 2006 and Kuttampuzha panchayath from Idukki merged to Eranalam Dist. The map seems very old and need to fix. File:India Kerala-COVID-19 map.svg. Pls Consider this in next update. --Manoj Karingamadathil (Talk) 16:17, 19 May 2020 (UTC)