User talk:FauleBirne 007

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, FauleBirne 007!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 16:54, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 14:28, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ich sehe hier kein Problem da das Recht an der Kunst bei der Kirchengemeinde liegt in dessen Auftrag ich diese Bilder getätigt und für einen Wiki Artikel hier auf Commons hochgeladen habe. Ich habe somit, wie die Kirchengemeinde auch, uneingeschränktes Nutzungsrecht, welches mir durch unsere Kirchengemeinde übertragen wurde. Mit dem Künstler wurde dies 2005 sowie 2006 alles geregelt und vertraglich festgehalten. VG FauleBirne 007 (talk) 15:15, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi das Problem ist im algemeinen wohl das Commons ja jeder die möglichkeit gibt, bei einhaltung der Lizenzbedingungen, die Bilder auch kommerziell weiter zu verwerten. Die Urheberrechte bleiben wohl immer beim Künstler. +70Jahre bei Familie. Innenpanorama's in Kirchen usw. fällen nicht automatisch unter die generelle Ausnahme 'Panoramafreiheit im öffentlichen Raum'. Eine Genehmiging müsste deshalb über e-mail belegt werden. Es es ungeheuer schade das mann hier nicht eine bessere Lösung findet. Vorläufig kann mann versuchen die Innenaufnammen zu retten indem man die Kunstwerke stellenweise maskiert. Beide Wege musste ich auch schon mal versuchen und es ist ein abstoßendes Erlebnis wenn mann hier auf einmal nicht mehr der Regel: 'Assume good faith' hantiert, sondern peinlich genau jede kunstpixel entfernen will. nMFr G Peli (talk) 18:25, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sie verstehen das nicht. Nach den Regeln ist es nicht erlaubt. Es ist egal welches Argument du hast. Sie werden die eines Tages entfernen. Die meisten sogenannten Wiki-Patrouillen schätzen deinen Beitrag nicht, weil ihre Aufgabe darin besteht, so viel wie möglich zu löschen. Manchmal demotiviert mich diese Agenda Gologmine (talk) 13:52, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 19:21, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Stadtkirche 1900 NEU.jpg

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Stadtkirche 1900 NEU.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 19:23, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

own work wird ja allenfalls für den scan gelten! 19:36, 30 January 2024 (UTC)Martin Sg. (talk)

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 14:55, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Didym (talk) 21:29, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bei den beiden Bildern Altarraum und Kirchenraum kann ich mir gut vorstellen, dass es an dem Glaskunstwerk liegt. Bei den anderen Bildern sehe ich jedoch keinen Grund für eine Löschung. FauleBirne 007 (talk) 21:45, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Ernst Karl Rößler Portrait.jpg

[edit]
العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Ernst Karl Rößler Portrait.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Didym (talk) 22:00, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 08:54, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]