User talk:Expert19612005/Archive 1
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Tip: Categorizing images
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 10:43, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Hodensack (4).JPG was uncategorized on 3 November 2009 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:43, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Hodensack (5).JPG was uncategorized on 4 November 2009 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:44, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Expert19612005.jpg was uncategorized on 15 November 2009 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:43, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Hodensack-.jpg was uncategorized on 30 November 2009 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:44, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Odrahb`s hodensackinfusion.jpg was uncategorized on 30 November 2009 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:44, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Odrahb`s hodensack.jpg was uncategorized on 30 November 2009 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:44, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Prince Albert Piercings(expert19612005).JPG was uncategorized on 30 November 2009 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:44, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Hodensack-Hodensackinfusion-.JPG was uncategorized on 30 November 2009 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:44, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Odrahb.JPG was uncategorized on 30 November 2009 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:44, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Prince Albert Piercings(expert19612005)..JPG was uncategorized on 30 November 2009 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:44, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Hodensack .JPG was uncategorized on 30 November 2009 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:44, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Hodensackinfusion.jpg was uncategorized on 30 November 2009 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:44, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Hodensack.JPG was uncategorized on 30 November 2009 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:44, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Hodensack(expert19612005).JPG was uncategorized on 30 November 2009 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:44, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Expert19612005 .jpg was uncategorized on 30 November 2009 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:44, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi Expert,
do not overwrite existing image of other users with your own ones, as you did with File:Cats.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 09:05, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Odrahb`penis_mit_prins_albert_piercing_12x12mm.JPG
![]() |
This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Odrahb`penis_mit_prins_albert_piercing_12x12mm.JPG, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Odrahb`penis_mit_prins_albert_piercing_12x12mm.JPG]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
High Contrast (talk) 07:24, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope
High Contrast (talk) 07:24, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
- As I see it this is not ordenary penis images. I see no problem that we have some of these images. --MGA73 (talk) 22:31, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Hodensack_(4).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
expert19612005 22:16, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
Kannst du bitte auffhören massenweise Löschanträge zu stellen?? Die Löschanträge werden auf einem Log eingetragen und von Menschenhand abgearbeitet. Ein Eintrag reicht also. Die vielen 100 Einträge die du auf Commons:Deletion requests/2010/01/05 eingefügt hast (immer wenn man die geschweiften klammern verwendet fügt man den Inhalt eine Seite in eine andere ein) und durch wechselseitiges Einfügen zu einigen Hundert einträgen multipliziert hast wird mich jetzt sicher ne halbe Stunde kosten auseinanderzupflücken um das Tageslogbuch wieder lesbar zu machen. Dafür bin ich nicht dankbar. --Martin H. (talk) 06:51, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
- Aussage: Ein Löschantrag reicht! Wenn der rote Kasten einmal platziert ist ist der Antrag erledigt und wird irgendwann bearbeitet. --Martin H. (talk) 06:52, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
- Ausserdem habe ich mal deine Diskussionsseite hier entleert, die lädt ja kaum noch so viel hast du draufgeschrieben. Die LÖSCHDISKUSSION - so wird das hier nämlich geregelt, in einer Diskussion - findest du auf jeder Bildseite deiner Bilder. Zusätzlich gibt es bereits eine zentrale Diskussion Commons:Deletion requests/Images of User:Expert19612005 auf der du kommentieren kannst. Ferner ist das Entfernen von Metadaten und Lizenzen von Bildbeschreibungsseiten nicht aktzeptabel. --Martin H. (talk) 07:17, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Odrahb`s_hodensackinfusion.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
expert19612005 14:49, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Expert19612005..jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
expert19612005 14:51, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Expert19612005_.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
expert19612005 14:52, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Expert19612005_(4).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
expert19612005 14:53, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Schwanz_(5).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
expert19612005 14:55, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Expert19612005.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
expert19612005 14:56, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Odrahb.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
expert19612005 14:58, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Hodensackinfusion(Hardo.Brinkmann).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
expert19612005 15:00, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Hodensack-.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
expert19612005 15:02, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Warning for repeated vandalism
Martin H. (talk) 15:44, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Zuerst: Das entfernen von Metadaten ({{Information}}) ist Vandalismus, das permanente wiederholte stellen massenweiser Löschanträge ebenso.
Zu deiner Frage: Du hast die Bilder unter einer freien Lizenz hier hochgeladen, die Lizenz ist nicht widerrufbar. Commons ist nicht ein Bildhochladeportal wie zum Beispiel Flickr, eigene Bilder mal schnell löschen zu lassen ist also die absolute Ausnahme. Du hast Löschdiskussionen zu jedem Bild gestartet, die Löschdiskussionen sind auf jeder Bildseite verlinkt. In diesen Löschdiskussionen wird nun die Community entscheiden, ob das jeweilige Bild gelöscht wird oder nicht.
Du hast schon einmal deine Bilder aus persönlichen Gründen löschen lassen, sie dannach aber alle wieder hochgeladen. Commons neigt dazu, dem Wunsch des Uploders zu folgen, siehe Commons:Photographs of identifiable people#Removal at the request of the subject, photographer or uploader, da es das zweite mal ist weiß ich nicht inwieweit das noch ernstzunehmen ist. --Martin H. (talk) 17:04, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Odrahb`s_hodensackinfusion.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
expert19612005 03:28, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Expert19612005..jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
expert19612005 03:28, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Expert19612005_.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
expert19612005 03:29, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Expert19612005_(4).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
expert19612005 03:30, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Expert19612005.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
expert19612005 03:31, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Odrahb.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
expert19612005 03:32, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Hodensackinfusion(Hardo.Brinkmann).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
expert19612005 03:32, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Schwanz_(5).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
expert19612005 03:33, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
You have been blocked for a duration of 1 week
![]() |
You have been blocked from editing Commons for a duration of 1 week for the following reason: Spam.
If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{unblock|(enter your reason here) ~~~~}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. See also the block log. For more information, see Appealing a block.
|
Ich habe keine Lust, alle paar Tage die Löschanträge wieder zu reparieren. Wenn du den "Nominate for deletion" (im deutschen Interface: Löschantrag eröffnen) Button benutzt dann einmal pro Bild und nicht 5+ mal. Es reicht. Wenn du ferner einen Löschantrag stellst dann bitte mit Text und nicht mit irgendwelchen {{speedy}} Konstruktionen. Einen "speedy" Schnelllöschantrag als Löschantragstext zu stellen ist reichlich sinnlos da er bewirkt, dass du einen Schnelllöschantrag auf die Löschdiskussion stellen und ein Chaos verursachen. Die Löschdiskussionen sind gestellt, es gibt also keinen Grund weiter rumzuspamen. --Martin H. (talk) 06:00, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
bitte löscht alle meine bilder und dann das benutzerkonto.Danke
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 16:56, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
Redundant category
Hello. Your adding Category:Nude men to File:Odrahb.JPG is not needed. The image is already in Category:Standing nude men. Category:Standing nude men is already a subcategory of Category:Nude men, so the image is already in that category. Only one nude man is in the image, the one who is standing, so the image is already properly categorized. Adding "Category:Nude men" is therefore redundant and inapporpirate in Commons category system. Hope this helps. Infrogmation (talk) 14:56, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
Attention
Please respect that Commons is not an amateur porn site. Use other web pages for your images. Thanks for understanding. --High Contrast (talk) 07:50, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
Dies sind keine pornographische bilder. Sondern eine Sexuelle neigung.
- Wobei man sich schon fragen darf.. Erst alle hochladen, dann alle lösche, dann wieder hochladen, dann alle wieder löschen in 100ten von Löschanträgen. Nun wieder alle hochladen. Was möchtest du? Mit einem Upload hier gibst du die Kontrolle über das Bild ab, du hast weder ein Recht darauf sie wieder zu löschen noch ein Recht das sie nicht gelöscht werden. Ich hoffe der neuerliche Upload ist nicht der Beginn einer neuen Löschantragswelle die, so ist das in diesem Projekt, die Aufmerksamkeit von Menschen erfordert und menschliche Arbeitskraft auf sich zieht. Es war eine Heidenarbeit deine Seitenlöschungen, Mehrfachanträge etc. aufzuräumen. Nochmal mache ich das nicht, würde mich aber Interessieren warum deine Aussagen (alles löschen) nicht mit deinen Handlungen (wieder hochladen) übereinstimmen. --Martin H. (talk) 12:27, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Expert19612005....JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
abf «Cabale!» 21:02, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope
Please see the COM:SEX guideline for the kinds of sexual images that are in scope and out of scope on Wikimedia Commons. — Tetromino (talk) 12:53, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Hodensack_mit_Kochsalzlösung(1_Liter).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Tabercil (talk) 05:45, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Expert19612005_(3).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
87.123.103.139 11:36, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Expert19612005_(2).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
87.123.103.139 11:37, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Expert19612005_(1).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
87.123.103.139 11:37, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Expert19612005(subincision).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Handcuffed (talk) 04:21, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Expert19612005(teil_Subincision).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
80.187.213.62 15:01, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Subincision_by_expert19612005_(1).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
88.128.88.158 15:11, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Hardo_in_der_Sauna_Activita.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
80.187.102.99 16:42, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Subincision_by_expert19612005_(4).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
80.187.223.38 09:10, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Expert19612005(teil_Subincision).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
80.187.218.82 12:25, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Subincision_by_expert19612005_(4).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
80.187.218.82 12:26, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:Expert19612005..JPG
![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Expert19612005..JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Expert19612005..JPG]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 06:39, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:Standing Nude men.JPG
![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Standing Nude men.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Standing Nude men.JPG]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 06:42, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:Subincision(cumshot).ogg
![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Subincision(cumshot).ogg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Subincision(cumshot).ogg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 06:42, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:Hodensack (5).JPG
![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Hodensack (5).JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Hodensack (5).JPG]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 06:45, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:Tattoo(expert19612005).JPG
![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Tattoo(expert19612005).JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Tattoo(expert19612005).JPG]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 06:46, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:Expert19612005(teil Subincision).jpg
![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Expert19612005(teil Subincision).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Expert19612005(teil Subincision).jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 06:47, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:Scrotal Saline Inflation.jpg
![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Scrotal Saline Inflation.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Scrotal Saline Inflation.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 06:47, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:Subincision.jpg
![]() |
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Subincision.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 06:47, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:Prince Albert Piercings(expert19612005)..JPG
![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Prince Albert Piercings(expert19612005)..JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Prince Albert Piercings(expert19612005)..JPG]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 06:47, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:Saine injection by (expert19612005).JPG
![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Saine injection by (expert19612005).JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Saine injection by (expert19612005).JPG]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 06:47, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:Bifurkation.JPG
![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Bifurkation.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Bifurkation.JPG]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 06:48, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:Schwanz (56).JPG
![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Schwanz (56).JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Schwanz (56).JPG]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 06:48, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:Prince Albert piercings (1).JPG
![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Prince Albert piercings (1).JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Prince Albert piercings (1).JPG]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 06:48, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:Expert19612005(prince albert piercing).JPG
![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Expert19612005(prince albert piercing).JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Expert19612005(prince albert piercing).JPG]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 06:48, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:Hardo (3).JPG
![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Hardo (3).JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Hardo (3).JPG]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 06:48, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:Hardo.JPG
![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Hardo.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Hardo.JPG]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 06:49, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:Subincision by expert19612005 (4).jpg
![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Subincision by expert19612005 (4).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Subincision by expert19612005 (4).jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 06:49, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:Subincision by expert19612005 (3).jpg
![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Subincision by expert19612005 (3).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Subincision by expert19612005 (3).jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 06:49, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:Hardo in der Sauna Activita.JPG
![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Hardo in der Sauna Activita.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Hardo in der Sauna Activita.JPG]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 06:49, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:Hodensack (9).JPG
Template:File permission/layout Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 06:49, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:Prince Albert piercings (2).JPG
Template:Autotranslate Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 06:50, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate 92.149.220.190 00:53, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Fitoschido (talk) 09:24, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Affected:
Yours sincerely, Btmpnr01 ([[User talk:Btmpnr01|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:53, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Affected:
And also:
- File:Saline Balls by Hardo Brinkmann.jpg
- File:Saline Inflation by Hardo Brinkmann.JPG
- File:Scrotal Inflation by Hardo Brinkmann.JPG
- File:Scrotum Split in Body.jpg
- File:Hodensackinfusion.JPG
- File:Scrotal Inflation with help hand.jpg
- File:Hodensackinfusion(1).JPG
- File:Salineinjection.JPG
- File:Prince Albert Piercing(10x10-12x12-15x15 mm).jpg
- File:Mein Prince Albert piercing.jpg
- File:Prince Albert Piercing 15x15.jpg
- File:Undichter Hodensack.JPG
- File:Hodensackinfusion.jpg
- File:Scrotum split.jpg
- File:Saline Ball.jpg
- File:Scrotum Injection.jpg
- File:Mein Scrotum Split.jpg
- File:Scrotum Split.jpg
- File:My Saline Injection.jpg
- File:Meine Saline Infusion.jpg
- File:Meine Hodensackinfusion.jpg
- File:Meine Subincision.jpg
- File:Subincision by expert19612005 with half scrotum split.JPG
- File:Subincision by expert19612005 (2).JPG
- File:Subincision by expert19612005 (1).JPG
- File:Hodensack (21).JPG
- File:Hodensack (20).JPG
- File:Subincision by expert19612005 (4).jpg
- File:Scrotum.JPG
- File:Hoden(expert19612005).JPG
- File:Subincision.jpg
Yours sincerely, -mattbuck (Talk) 10:15, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Affected:
Yours sincerely, Pippobuono ([[User talk:Pippobuono|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:58, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Achim ([[User talk:Achim55|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:33, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Yann ([[User talk:Yann|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:30, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Yann ([[User talk:Yann|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:31, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
User:Deletion Notification Bot/personalNO/headingless
User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Template:Noping.
I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot ([[User talk:Deletion Notification Bot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:42, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate GnocchiFan ([[User talk:GnocchiFan|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:12, 3 January 2024 (UTC)