User talk:Evan T Jones
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
Copyright status: File:Two Moons V&A catalogue.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Two Moons V&A catalogue.jpg
![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Two Moons V&A catalogue.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 16:05, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Bristol Perambulation map.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Belbury (talk) 17:56, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for putting this together, but I'm afraid Commons can't accept screenshots of Google Maps, because the underlying map imagery is copyrighted!
- If you were assembling this route map in an image editor, you may able to swap out map with the same area from https://www.openstreetmap.org, which is freely licenced for Commons to use.
- If you're interested in making a more robust interactive map there's also some guidance at en:Wikipedia:Creating route maps from OpenStreetMap data, although I've never tried it myself so can't give any specific advice. Belbury (talk) 18:45, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry, I assumed that since the map in the image is quite low magnification, Google Maps would not query this. It's not as if someone might decide to use my map as an alternative to using Google Maps, thereby undermining their business model. Indeed, since I link to the Google Map, which a user would need to access to follow the route in practice, the map I posted is almost certainly going to increase Google's user base - very, very, slightly!. Given this, I thought my inclusion of the screenshot would count as a 'fair use' derivation of Google's material. Evan T Jones (talk) 19:47, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- That's a fair initial expectation, but Commons is very strict about copyright, and explicitly doesn't allow fair use uploads, since fair use laws can vary from country to country (see Commons:Fair use). The goal of the project here is that all images can be freely used by anyone, anywhere, for any purpose.
- From a look at https://about.google/brand-resource-center/products-and-services/geo-guidelines a publisher would be breaking Google's rules on map use if, having found your map on Commons, they included it in a book about Bristol to illustrate the boundary route. Commons should not be telling that publisher that the map is free to use under a CC-Attribution licence, when this isn't actually the case. Belbury (talk) 20:26, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry, I assumed that since the map in the image is quite low magnification, Google Maps would not query this. It's not as if someone might decide to use my map as an alternative to using Google Maps, thereby undermining their business model. Indeed, since I link to the Google Map, which a user would need to access to follow the route in practice, the map I posted is almost certainly going to increase Google's user base - very, very, slightly!. Given this, I thought my inclusion of the screenshot would count as a 'fair use' derivation of Google's material. Evan T Jones (talk) 19:47, 12 May 2024 (UTC)