User talk:EugeneZelenko/Archive22

Files by Rolando Patricio Chumpitazi Torres

EugeneZelenko,Texto en negrita Mi información es una fuente fidedigna editada por mi y me gustaría una explicación lógica por que lo a borrado, no con el afán de sobresalir en este medio y sanatisar la información de de buena fe; proporcionarme. y dígame la formula que ustedes desean para una buena edición de fotos seria tan amable por favor. atenta mente. --Rolando Patricio Chumpitazi Torres (talk) 16:09, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I don't know Spanish :-( If you are painter, please send permission to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review and image undeletion. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:02, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rapslogo

Dear EugeneZelenko,

You deleted the above stated image from the Rapatona F.C. page. The recent editing made to the page including the image was done in consultation with the owners of the club. The image was provided along with all the information by the respective club owners and management to update the club page.

We kindly ask that let us before deleting anything uploaded by us as we are currently updating the said page. Thank you for your consideration.

Niuginimuzik On behalf of Rapatona F.C. Management.

Please ask club lawyer to send permission to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review and image undeletion. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:54, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anne Cecile Wald Lasowski.jpg

cual es tu problema Mr zelenco? El archivo es una foto que yo tome, y no entiendo tu frustración ante ello, de alguna manera te afecta? Notificamelo porque nada más no entiendo.

Sorry, I don't know Spanish :-( Is this person really notable? If so, this image should be used in WMF project or at least properly categorized. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:03, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion Request Several Pictures

Files:
Naval Group Special Operations Combat Swimmer.jpg
GEOSOF 3.jpg

Hello EugeneZelenko.

You requested the deletion of the above listed photos as part of TV screenshot deletion list. Those two pictures are not screenshots, they are photos taken during live exercises. It would be nice if they were not deleted. As for the actual media screenshots, those I have unfortunatly mixed up, Standart and NOT Creative Commons-Lizenz. I will accept their deletion.

Yours sincerely
TheMightyGeneral

These photos don't seem to have EXIF. Could you please upload them in original resolution with EXIF to proof your authorship? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am not authorized to share photos that expose identity respectively faces, therefore I had to edit these photos, especialy the latter one with a graphic editor. I will try to find the original ones and cut them out without loosing EXIF information. Okay. TheMightyGeneral (talk) 10:32, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Faces were covered on photos in question. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:01, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lee_Godie_Self_Portrait.JPG

Sent permissions via OTRS. I contacted the representative handling her images and forwarded the email. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:01, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just in case, you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Zdjenkin

Greetings... Would you tell me what more evidence I need to supply you with to prove that I have the soul right to authorize my images those owned by me, as You have marked several photo's of mine for removal?

If you are photographer and/or copyright owner please send permission(s) to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:SffsExec#File:Noah_Cowan.jpg

Hello. I'm not sure why my article has this deletion request. Does it just need more sources? Could you give me more details on what to do to fix the problem? Thank you.

If you are author of photo, please upload original resolution image with EXIF to proof your authorship. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I was confused about the problem. I've edited the photo to add the source which is: Wire Image/Getty for TIFF. Is that enough information to get it accepted? Thank you.

You claimed that this photo was your own work, now you tells that it was taken from Wire Image/Getty. What is true? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's Wire Image/Getty. I uploaded it for an article that was no published yet, so all the info wasn't up to date at the time. It should be updated in the photo info now.

Where statement that this photo was released under free license could be found? See Commons:Licensing. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Radomir Djordjevic 04.jpg

Dear Mr. EugeneZelenko, i hope this message finds you well. i would like to ask you why you deleted photos from the wikipedia page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radomir_%C4%90or%C4%91evi%C4%87 (Radomir Djordjevic, files: Radomir Djordjevic 04.jpg, Radomir Djordjevic 02.jpg, Radomir Djordjevic 03.jpg, Radomir Djordjevic - Uvod u filosofiju fizike.jpg, Radomir Djordjevic - Od intuicije do hipoteze.jpg, Radomir Djordjevic - Covek, vrednosti i istorija.jpg, Radomir Djordjevic - Studije o ruskoj filozofiji 1.jpg, Radomir Djordjevic - Studije o ruskoj filozofiji 2.jpg, Radomir Djordjevic - Studije o ruskoj filozofiji 3.jpg)As the photos werw given and authorised by himself (prof. Radomir Djordjevic). Therefore, if you would be so kind to return the photos to the above mentioned page or wikimedia commons. Thank you in advance, i look forward to hearing from you. Kindest regards MiloradV

Please ask Radomir Djordjevic (if he is sole author or copyrights holder of all images) to send permission(s) to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review and images undeletion. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Stikerkavkazsky.jpg

Добрый день. Почему был удален файл Stikerkavkazsky.jpg? Я как то не так проставил разрешение при загрузке файла? Я являюсь единственным владельцем файла, на нем изображен стикер который я использовал как какндидат в депутаты во время своей предвыборной кампании. Tribunus (talk) 00:07, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Пожалуйста, пошлите подтверждение, что Вы являетесь правообладателем (или автором) в Commons:OTRS (пример: Commons:Email templates). Потом Вы можете попросить помощи на Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard с проверкой разрешения и восстановлением изображения. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Williams_Osuna

- EugeneZelenko (talk What is the problem?

See Commons:Derivative works. What music were used in video? --EugeneZelenko (Discusión) 15:21, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

- EugeneZelenko (talk Disfigure- Blank https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p7ZsBPK656s (no copyright).

Answered on Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Williams Osuna. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

EugeneZelenko (talk I changed the license.

EugeneZelenko (talk Already.

But video is you own work. You should credit only music to https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p7ZsBPK656s. And this page still didn't change terms of use. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:15, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

EugeneZelenko (talk it's okay?.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Radomir_Djordjevic_Biobibliografija.pdf

Hello EugeneZelenko. I don't unerstand what seems to be the problem with this file and why is it nomunated for deletion. This is official Biobibliography of Profesor Radomir Djordjevic authorised by humself and institution he is working for. Best wishes!

If this person is notable, text should be moved to Wikipedia. Photo should be uploaded on Commons if it'll have proper permission. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

SVRouss images deletion

Hi Evgen, You've deleted many images of mine and I don't understand the reason. Please explain it exactly, what do you awaiting for? SVRouss (talk) 03:20, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your images looked like collection of advertisement (see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by SVRouss). If you are author, you could upload original vector images for illustration or original resolution images with EXIF for photos.

Может Вам проще по-русски?

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Однозначно. Это не реклама, все рисунки иллюстрируют принцпиальные моменты технологии и относятся к технологии как таковой. Что касается векторной - в формате cdr можно, с svg уже возникают проблемы - он здорово искажает заливки.

SVRouss (talk) 18:20, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

К сожалению, из векторных форматов поддерживается только SVG.

File:Sahinbas DZO 2007 Glioma study 140 retro.pdf выглядит как реклама или статья в журнале с рекламой.

File:Описание ОТ 111115 opt.pdf — статья или книга. Вы являетесь единственным автором?

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:11, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Допустим, что-то, где SVG не дает искажений, можно конвертировать. А если не получается? Заливки не проходят конверт. Растровые файлы вообще нельзя подгружать, или есть какие-то допуски?

Sahinbas H, Grönemeyer DHW, Böcher E, Szasz A. Retrospective clinical study of adjuvant electro-hyperthermia treatment for advanced brain-gliomas. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Onkologie. 2007;39(4): 154-160. doi:10.1055/s-2007-986020, статья в журнале Deutsche Zeitschrift für Onkologie, который является официальным ограном Немецкого онкологического общества (DGO), издается Georg Thieme Verlag KG.

Файл "Описание ..." - это медицинская технология, утвержденная Минздравом РФ, официальный документ. 4 автора. SVRouss (talk) 22:06, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

А где можно увидеть лицензию на немецкую статью? Не уверен про статус утверждения Минздравом, возможно необходимо разрешение от всех авторов. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Немецкую статью можно убрать, как и технологию. По сути, их выставляли для удобства читателей. Убрали - забыли: кому надо, тот запросит.

Так, с векторными справился, все конвертировал в SVG. Что с растровыми? Что не устроило в OGV? Как быть с pdf SVRouss (talk) 03:14, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ага, а проблема-то не решается. Чистые векторы грузятся без проблем, а если в файле есть хоть квадратный миллиметр растра, пишет ошибка и не грузит. Пробовал трассировать растр абрисом - тот же результат: не грузит, ошибка. Как быть? SVRouss (talk) 04:16, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Лучше всего будет спросить совета на Commons:Graphic Lab/Illustration workshop или w:ru:Проект:Графическая мастерская. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Вопросы: Форматы, отличные от SVG, вообще грузить нельзя? Что не устроило в ::::::::?

Векторные предпочтительнее, да и авторство для иллюстраций очевиднее. Я глянул одно из видео, для меня была та же проблема, что и с иллюстрациями. Думаю, что можно будет восстановить, если Вы загрузите исходные иллюстрации (хотя бы некоторые) в векторном формате. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of possible deletion

Hi there. I have received your notification of possible deletion of the files I have uploaded as Lffs.br. I am confused on what I should do. For instance, how to provide further detailed information on author/date/country of each image created. Except for the file 20130810 Mérito Ewbankense.jpg whose photo of my father was taken by myself on 12Aug2012 in Brazil, all the other files are scanned copies of photos that belong to my father's private photo collection (he is the sole owner of those photos), being all of them taken by an unknown person (author) on an unknown date (between 1940s and 1960s) but certainly all in Brazil. I do not know how to provide the information you have requested for those files. Moreover, for permission and licensing purposes, would it be Ok if the files are tagged Cc-by-sa-3.0-br? For your information, my father wrote to permission.commons@wikipedia.org on 26/01/2015 at 15h07 an email that reads as follows (with the removal of full names here)--Lffs.br (talk) 01:48, 29 January 2015 (UTC): (text removed)[reply]

You need to find out what is term of copyrights protection for anonymous works in Brazil. Only those in public domain could be kept on Commons. You can't apply Creative Commons license to them.

If you father is alive he should send permission to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates) for his photo. If not and your are only heir you should send permission too.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eugene. Amendments have been made to all files you listed for possible deletion. Appropriate Brazilian permission and licensing information as well as author, date, and country information have been included, as per your instruction. Please review them. I believe those files can now be retained by Commons accordingly. As for my father's photo, that was a result of my own work. He is alive (88 y.o.) and he has sent the email above to Commons OTRS. He has authorized me to scan and publish images from his printed photo collection and digital image library. Best, LFFS. Ref. https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:ListFiles/Lffs.br&ilshowall=1

You still need to replace Creative Commons license with proper public domain tag. However {{PD-Brazil-media}} tells about 70 years term. But there other public domain tags related to Brazil law. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Thanks for your remarks. What happens is that that whole lot of uploaded images but one are scanned copies of prints which were produced from the work of unknown photographers (1960s-1990s) who are the ones who actually own their respective copyrights. My father owns the prints but not the copywrights. I guess only file in that lot of old prints can be kept in Commons: File:Curso_de_Auxiliar_de_Comercio,_Jair_em_1941.jpg (first published over 80 years ago and meets the Brazilian copyright law). Moreover, File:20130810_Mérito_Ewbankense.jpg is a scanned copy of my own work. I am the creator and uploader of that image. I own the copyright in this case. So I guess I have the right to have that photo kept in Commons. In so doing, I have edited permission and licensing information and published it under PD-self. Hope everything is clarified now.--Lffs.br (talk) 18:48, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, File:20130810 Mérito Ewbankense.jpg could be under license of your choice. Will be good idea to link author field to your user page to make things clealer. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Many thanks for your time! I have no further queries.--Lffs.br (talk) 21:20, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Permissions for State/Public Emblems

You have posted a message on my talk page, asking for permission information on the emblem File:En Logo of Attica.png File:En Logo of Attica.png which does not need any special permissions for its use in Wikipedia. The Logo of Attica is the emblem of the Periphery of Attica, an administrative region of Greece. The File:En Logo of Attica.png was uploaded on the Greek Wikicommons, but due to display issues on english pages, was re-uploaded under the same licence on the English Wikicommons for planned use in the English versions of the Greek articles which lack the appropriate logo. I hope that helps. --SilentResident (talk) 15:29, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You need to look into Greek copyrights law to find out status of such logo. It's definitely not your own work. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I understand now, you are talking about the Permission Tag in the image's file, right? My apologies for this. Thank you, I appreciate your notice on this issue. The source: https://el.wikipedia.org/wiki/%CE%91%CF%81%CF%87%CE%B5%CE%AF%CE%BF:Logo_of_Attica.png has the proper permission tag, but when I re-uploaded it, missed to update the tag. The proper way to fix it is not by editing the image's Wikicommon Page, but by deleting the image itself from Wikicommons, and then re-uploaded it under the proper Permission Tag, right? Again, thanks for your help.--SilentResident (talk) 18:22, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, if such logo is copyrighted you could upload it to projects which allows fair use content like English Wikipedia. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I will wait and let the current one be deleted, and once it is deleted, I will re-upload it with the proper permission tags. --SilentResident (talk) 16:24, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that you need to re-upload it locally on Greek Wikipedia, not on Commons. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:21, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Again

Hi: Please, check uploads after your message. Thanks in advance. --Fixertool (talk) 03:48, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it seems out of Commons:Project scope. By the word, you could use MediaWiki:VisualFileChange.js to nominate several files for deletion in one request. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of File:Maithripala Sirisena.jpg for deletion

Hi, I noticed that you nominated File:Maithripala Sirisena.jpg for deletion. You stated that image was uploaded by User:Gag0409 while it's not he who uploaded that image. It was uploaded by User:අනුරාධ and it does contain an EXIF file. I guess it was a mistake. Just wanted to let you know.--ChamithN (talk) 13:47, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for notice! I removed file from list. Looks like MediaWiki:VisualFileChange.js bug. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Photos uploaded by Gandydancer

Hi there, I have responded to your edit re the photos that I have uploaded. I work very hard to do things properly but may make mistakes due to my lack of understanding of policies. Any help would be appreciated. Gandydancer (talk) 17:48, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mos likely images in question are in public domain, but proper license tags should be used, not Creative Commons. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I do not know what that means. Is there anyone here that could help me to do it properly? Gandydancer (talk) 23:17, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

For example, File:Harpers Illustration 1cropped.jpg has {{Cc-by-sa-3.0}}, but should be {{PD-US}}. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see that choice. Again, I must stress that my knowledge is very limited.

Photos from here: [1]

Here is their info on use: [2]

Here is the upload page: Which one of those should I use?

This site requires you to provide copyright information for this work, to make sure everyone can legally reuse it. This file is my own work. This file is not my own work. Source Author(s) Now tell us why you are sure you have the right to publish this work: The copyright holder published this work with the right Creative Commons license Not all Creative Commons licenses are good for this site. Make sure the copyright holder used one of these licenses. Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 4.0 (legal code) Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 3.0 (legal code) Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 2.5 (legal code) Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (legal code) Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (legal code) Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 (legal code) Creative Commons CC0 Waiver (release all rights, like public domain: legal code) The copyright holder published their photo or video on Flickr with the right license The copyright has definitely expired in the USA This work was made by the United States government Another reason not mentioned above I found it on the Internet -- I'm not sure

Thanks. Gandydancer (talk) 14:24, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that their license is Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported which is not allowed on Commons. From other side, there is w:en:Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I tried again using a photo from the same set. Is this OK?

Canoeing on Lake San Cristobal, from Resources & Mineral Wealth of Hinsdale County by L.A. Vinton & Co. 1895.

I think {{PD-US}} will be better, if this is photo made in USA. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Photos Deletion Request

Dear Eugene Zelenko

You marked the photos that I'v uploaded as missing proper date/country/author details.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_ISafa

Those photos I have scanned from an official Kuwaiti history book, not all the photos has dates but they are for important places / people such as File:المدرسة القبلية للبنات.jpg was the first school for girls in Kuwait.

Please help me out on what to do to keep the photos online.

Thanks

ISafa (talk · contribs)

Sorry, I don't know Arabic :-( But Creative Commons license seems not correct. Some photos may be in public domain (this why proper author/date/country of creation information is needed), but proper license tag should be used. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Удаление логотипа File:Логотип ГК "Фактор".jpg

Евгений, добрый вечер! Такой вопрос, какова причина удаления логотипа компании? Неправильно был указан источник или тип лицензии при загрузке файла? Теперь нет возможности загрузить логотип снова. Помогите решить вопрос. Спасибо!

Это нетривиальный логотип, который скорее всего охраняется авторскими правами. Вы можете загрузить логотип в русскую Википедию как несвободный. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Удаление фотографий

Почитал правила касаемо производных произведений, согласен с номинацией. Можете прямо сейчас удалить номинируемые изображения:

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Yurluk

Yurluk (talk) 16:20, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Сделано. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's been time.

I gladly see you're still active in this project. I just wanted to say hi. Alhen .::··¨ 23:03, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I hope I'm doing something useful :-) --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

BobChan2 Deletions

MSplen02 deleted MPlen06 deleted MSOnCeil deleted CavitySound03 previously deleted -delete your message CavitySound04 previously deleted -delete your message Figure4 no record of figure - delete your message Jet Screech003 Keep. Published by me in 1971 Scientific American article - author permission MSInPlen Keep. I designed product and photographed it DoorMask Keep I designed product and photographed it. MSLow Keep. I designed product and photographed it.

BobChan2

Could you please upload images in original resolution with EXIF to confirm your authorship? Please make further comments on deletion request page. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WestCoastMusketeer

Hi EugeneZelenko I received message that many of my files were marked for deletion

Affected:

File:Photo 4, From the Spire of St. Johns, Bangalore. Early 1900's (Looking Right - St. Jospeh's Convent and Fraser Town) - Fred Goodwill Collection.jpg

And also:

The photos from the Fred Goodwill Collection at sharehistory.org have a CC licence

File:Photo 4, From the Spire of St. Johns, Bangalore. Early 1900's (Looking Right - St. Jospeh's Convent and Fraser Town) - Fred Goodwill Collection.jpg

Please check this link http://sharehistory.org/janes/uploads/348-townscape At the bottom, it says 'This item has been licensed for reuse under the Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Creative Commons Licence'

Tucks cards, such as

File:A Peep into the Victoria Gardens, Bombay (1930) - Tucks Post Card.jpg

The Tucks Post cards also have CC Licensing, Please see this link http://www.tuckdb.org/faq#data The images on TuckDB Ephemera and TuckDB Postcards are of items / postcards created before 1928 putting them in the public domain. You are free to use them as you see fit. We request that you attribute your use of images on TuckDB but it is not required by law.

The data or information about each card on TuckDB Ephemera and TuckDB Postcards is licensed under cc by-sa and it is required that you attribute your use back to TuckDB.

Pictures by J H Furneaux (1895), such as

File:Holy Trinity Church, Bangalore (around 1895), by J H Furneaux.jpg

Some files such as above are taken from wiki.fibis.org Please see http://wiki.fibis.org/index.php/Main_Page By using this site, you agree we can set and use cookies. For more details of these cookies and how to disable them, see our cookie policy. All images in Fibiwiki are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License unless stated otherwise.

Some files such as

File:European Durbar at the Royal Marriage (1900) -unknown photographer, from the Curzon Collection's 'Souvenir of Mysore Album'.jpg

taken from http://arjunpuriinqatar.blogspot.com.au/2011/11/rare-photographs-of-bangalore-part-i.html Which has http://arjunpuriinqatar.blogspot.com/ by http://arjunpuriinqatar.blogspot.com/ is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. Based on a work at arjunpuriinqatar.blogspot.com.

Kindly do not delete any of the files, as I have individually checked all files satisfy requirements, either they have CC 3.0 or Copyright expired

Please contact me if you have any more queries

"WestCoastMusketeer (talk) 02:25, 12 February 2015 (UTC)"[reply]

Some of this licenses are not accepted by Commons, but think that they apply only to own work (text, modern photos). You should look into Indian copyright law (I assume that all images are created in India) to check when {{PD-India}} or other public domain tag could be applied. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mass deletion of files

All the files you marked for deletion are all images licensed on flickr under cc-by-2.0 or cc-by-sa-2.0, and both are compatible with the license required for Commons. Some of them, also, are cosplay and not toys, and some are derivative from files that were already in Commons for ages, they should have been checked one by one, and not all in block.--Manbemel (talk) 15:53, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See Commons:Derivative works. All of files nominated for deletion fall in same category. There is no point for separate deletion requests. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tov_lenin_ochishchaet.jpg

Hello Eugene, in 2012 you've deleted the File:Tov_lenin_ochishchart.jpg from the Wikimedia, due to copyright violation. But the file is still available in the english Wikipedia, and tt's used in the en:Propaganda in the Soviet Union page. I wonder if you could reupload the image again, so I can use it in the portuguese Wikipedia (same page as english). I tried myself to upload the file but it says I need to verify the deletion log (which I believe I already did) and I don't know what to do anymore.Faltur (talk) 16:45, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

English Wikipedia and some other projects allow non-free files to be uploaded under fair use locally. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Kyonabx

Goodday, Mr. EugeneZelenko. I wanna figure out why you requests delete to pictures and know how to maintain those. These pictures that I uploaded are owned by GNU for advertising university, and I'm one of people who work at GNU.

Thank you.

Please ask university legal department to send permission to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review.

Please note that advertisement doesn't fit Commons:Project scope, so files should have some educational value.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bashkir people.jpg

Здравствуйте. Вы выставили на удаление файл Bashkir people.jpg. Однако, все его составляющие находятся в общественном достоянии. Вот ссылки: Муртаза Рахимов, Заки Валиди, Шайхзада Бабич, Зайнулла Расулев, Загир Исмагилов, Равиль Бикбаев, Шагит Худайбердин, Галимьян Таган, Ирек Зарипов. Проверьте, пожалуйта. --Регион102 (talk) 15:45, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Всё в порядке, шаблон убрал. Спасибо большое за помощь, но, пожалуйста, на забывайте в таких случаях указывать исходные файлы. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Это моё упущение, в следующий раз буду указывать. Не могли бы ещё взглять вот на этот файл. В первой версии были несвободные изображения. Потом я залил новую с изображениями с Викисклада. Все источники указаны. Из всех снимков только памятник Салавату может вызвать сомнения, но как мне сказал участник Dogad75 подтверждение в OTRS получено. Но вот шаблон по каким-то причинам до сих пор не заменили. --Регион102 (talk) 16:10, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

У меня нет доступа к OTRS, ссылки на разрешение в исходом файле нет. Стоило бы уточнить, это разрешение от скульптора или нет, так как без него, скорее всего нарушает w:ru:Википедия:Свобода панорамы. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

У меня разрешение только от автора снимка. Я отправил запросы с просьбой проверки уже к двум участникам с доступом к OTRS, но до сих пор не получил ответов от них. Также обнаружил, что памятник Салавату является объектом кульутрного наследия РФ. Это как-то меняет положение дел в плане использования файла? Получить разрешение скульптора нет никакой возможности, так как его давно нет в живых. --Регион102 (talk) 11:20, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Нет, не меняет. Скорее всего авторские права принадлежат наследникам. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:11, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Что, если попробовать следующий выход из ситуации: использовать вот этот идентичный снимок? В лицензировании указано, что лица, связанные с работой над этим произведением, решили передать данное произведение в общественное достояние. --Регион102 (talk) 15:58, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Проблема в том, что это зависит не только от фотографа, но и от скульптора/наследника/обладателя авторских прав. Файл надо удалять. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Если правила Фонда исходят из того, что при использовании фотографии может быть нарушено законодательство государства, на территории которого сделан снимок, а именно Закон о свободе панорам, то я могу обосновать использование снимка с юридической точки зрения. Статья 1276 Гражданского кодекса РФ позволяет использовать произведения постоянно находящиеся в местах, открытых для свободного посещения. Мы получаем ситуацию, при которой разрешение скульптора/наследника/правообладателя вовсе не требуется. --Регион102 (talk) 05:33, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

В этой же статье: за исключением случаев, если изображение произведения является основным объектом использования или изображение произведения используется в целях извлечения прибыли. Commons:Лицензирование явно говорит, что файлы могут использоваться в любых целях, включая коммерческие. В Commons учитывает законодательство страны происхождения произведения и США. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Верно подмечено. Залил новую версию без памятников. Источники указал. Теперь-то уж точно должно соответствовать требованиям. --Регион102 (talk) 07:03, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Несомненно. Но это заслуга Wikimedia Russia :-) --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why you deleted my files??????

Мистер EugeneZelenko!!!! У вас со мной какой-то проблема есть что, файли которые я загружу вы постоянно удаляете , что вам не прятно?????? Эти файли которые я загрузил нам НужнЫ на викимеди для наш проджекта....... --Ibrahim khashrowdi (talk) 19:06, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Вы можете загрузить фотографии в оригинальном разрешении с EXIF для подтверждения Вашего авторства. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:CRC 3299.jpg

Hi,

I OWN this work. I am Yanis Varoufakis' publisher in France. My company name is : Editions du Cercle SARL. My address is 10 rue de l'Eglise - 92800 PUTEAUX FRANCE.

I own the rights on this picture and I want to share it with the community.

But let me say one thing: someone placed an awful photo of Yanis Varoufakis looking like an idiot. This did not seem to bother you. Don't you dare delete my above mentionned photo.

And next time, be more careful about what people write. I had to correct almost everything about Varoufakis' file. How come people who know nothing about a person can write idiocies and wiki let it happen?

Regards,

Jean-Francois Goulon

Please ask corporate lawyer to send permission to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Images for deletion

Not sure why you nominated all my images, but I hope you conduct a thorough investigation before any further accusations or actions are taken. But would you be able to delete the images File:Terri Poch.jpg, File:Lisa Marie Varon.jpg, File:Kat Winter Waters.jpg? I own and uploaded them, but due to certain circumstances I no longer feel comfortable having images out there where even a small portion of me is visible. Thank you MavsFan28 (talk) 15:29, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You could upload images in original resolution with EXIF to confirm your authorship. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well can you delete those images I mentioned? And I don't know what that means, and I have a new phone which means I don't have them unless I saved them to my computer MavsFan28 (talk) 15:36, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

These images are part of deletion request and will be deleted, if you'll not able to proof your authorship. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This makes no sense, if they weren't mine, how would I have all of them? MavsFan28 (talk) 15:41, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There are cases when Internet is source of "own" images. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:17, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There are also advanced image searching software to see if they were posted anywhere else. I can guarantee you won't find these anywhere else on the internet. When I upload my images, I was never told there was going to be an investigation without a basis to go off of. You should be able to tell by the image quality and where they were taken that these aren't images I lifted off someone. But please, do try to prove these aren't mine.MavsFan28 (talk) 16:30, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I suggested you best bay to proof authorship already. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Again, I'm not an image expert or professional photographer. I took most of these with an iPhone 4, and a few with a Sony digital camera. A long time ago I was questioned for ownership, and it was decided that I did own my images. Its a little silly that you're going back three years to my images. If I had known you were going to do all this and "randomly" accuse me of not owning my own images, I would've had an EXIF or whatever. But as far as I knew, only images could be deleted if they were proven to have been stolen from somewhere else. And you won't be able to find these images anywhere else, guaranteed. MavsFan28 (talk) 21:01, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please provide originals at least for some of photos? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can you look back at the previous deletion request on the older images? It was determined that they are, in fact, mine. I was never told I would have to go through this whole process again. And I'm not sure which pictures I still own after getting a new phone and my laptop crashed. But this just doesn't seem fair. MavsFan28 (talk) 23:59, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I could only recommend to backup data. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Listen, that's great advice in hindsight, but I'm sure you can imagine after losing a lot of my files that I could come up with that solution myself. Not my point. Don't understand this accusation against me, it can't be you just randomly stumbled across my images and decided that they all weren't mine. Like I said, I'll guarantee you can search the web but you won't find them. They're mine. MavsFan28 (talk) 05:35, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I'm not convinced by your arguments. Please continue on deletion request page. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I commented there to no responce. And I'm sure you won't be convinced, but if you're going to delete them, I hope you can prove that I don't own my images and they're someone else's.MavsFan28 (talk) 16:12, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion requests are open to comments. They usually closed by other administrator. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:13, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I had forgotten to follow-up here. As you can see, my images were kept as I own them. In the future, I suggest less assumption and more fact based accusations. It'll go a long way in helping you here. Cheers :) MavsFan28 (talk) 11:38, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Pushing this policy into full effect

Hi Eugene. Was that question directed to me? Other reason will not be affected as that will be there by default. Reh man 15:34, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Per could be part of other reason. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting a movie

Hello EugeneZelenko,

why should we delete my video I posted recently? (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:L%C3%BCneburg_Impression.webm) The music is from a friend - I can proof. Just tell me how. This would help :) And the video files are completely created by myself.

Best regards, Chickenwing88

If you friend composed this piece, please ask him/her to send permission to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aya Saad ELdeen Sayed.jpg

Dear Sir

the egyptian writers aya Saad eldeen Sayed, was sent email today to "permissions-commons@wikimedia.org." to put her permision for the picture [File:Aya Saad ELdeen Sayed.jpg] in wikimedia commons; please remove the notifications --أحمد محمد بسيوني (talk) 21:46, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User talk:SffsExec#File:Noah Cowan.jpg

Foto

O que você tem contra minha foto ? Aquela foto é minha, é o meu rosto naquela foto.--BaySide (talk) 22:02, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I don't know Portuguese :-( See Commons:Project scope. Your photo was not used. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Please, post my photos again in the webpages I have so far edited. Don't be such a rude fellow to remove my photographs by only SUPPOSING they're not under my free license to be published here. Do this for good. I wish you wisdom. Mauro botti (talk) 05:50, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you are copyrights holder, please send permission to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review and images undeletion. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Iglesia ni Cristo

I've noticed that a number of images that are uploaded here are screenshots of INC-produced videos or copied from other sources with their on-image attribution tags cropped off. I've nominated a number of them for CSD, but since I'm not able to watch all the videos frame by frame, how can I get them deleted? --w^L ^{<speak·creatively>} 00:21, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If particular user uploads fit pattern: same resolution/quality/missing EXIF that previously deleted screenshots, sure, you could nominate a rest. Mentioning of previous problems is definitely useful. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Iamsudipto

Hello. I'm not sure why my article has this deletion request. Does it just need more sources? Could you give me more details on what to do to fix the problem? I saw a message that commons is not for personal storage, I have tried to avoid the use, since I have also uploaded photos of Wikipedia conference participation. The pictures uploaded were more for common educational reference and show at various wiki conferences by linking various projects. I have been working on a project fro wiki media, to collaborate different types of images and generate a OCR pattern out of it. It would be helpful if you can help me by removing the deletion request please.

Thank you.

I don't think that personal certificates fit Commons:Project scope. Those with complex designs may violate third parties copyrights. See Commons:Licensing. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Eugene for your response. I see a lot depends here on your perspective and how you want to see my data. Ok no issues , if you are having fun. Thanks for your comments. Just wondering why they were allowed since 2013, and suddenly now objected. Anyway keep up the good work.

Commons definitely needs more human eyes :-) --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:13, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Satellite Collective program image deletion

Hi and thank you for reviewing the Satellite Collective imagery (2012 and 2014 programs); the overall document copyright for the programs is held by Satellite Collective as noted on the programs, and permission for use granted by Satellite Collective Director Kevin Draper; the visual and photographic images in the document are credited to relevant designers and photographers in the document; the usage rights for the photographic and designed imagery are contained in contracts between the parties and Satellite Collective made at time of the original image creations, and model releases are held by Satellite Collective for the images of individuals. Can you advise how I can best provide this information so as to clear up the deletion nomination?

Please ask Kevin Draper to send permission(s) to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eugene, thank you for the advisement - I will reach out to Mr. Draper. This may take a few days...

File:Fastcom 12 login.png

Добрый день. 4 марта вы выставили на удаление давно загруженные мной файлы Notification_about_possible_deletion На момент загрузки для подтверждения свободного распространения этих файлов вполне достаточно было сослаться на страницу в интернете, где на сайте правообладателя было явно высказано разрешение на использование этих файлов для свободного использования целиком или фрагментами. Вот эта страница: http://www.fastcom.fors.ru/web_files/Info/Pictures Что изменилось с тех пор или новые правила имели обратную силу? Если так, то помогите законно получить разрешение. К кому я должен обратиться? Что попросить? TRustRust (talk) 20:37, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Проблеме в использовании. Не ясна возможность создания производных работ. По умолчанию закон позволяет цитировать. Это содержится в разрешении (полностью или частично). Стоило бы попросить авторов использовать одну из лицензий Creative Commons, чтобы снять неоднозначность. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Я так понимаю, это относится к файлу Fastcom_12_login.png, но я не очень понял - почему удалили остальные 10 файлов, давно загруженных 'как есть' с сайта без каких-либо модификаций (собственно, мой вопрос относился больше к ним).

Так как меня пугают последним предупреждением, то я уже дую на воду. Любая новая попытка может стать для меня последней! :(

Не могли бы вы хотя бы вкратце описать последовательность моих шагов. Например

Я отправляю по почте (кому?) шаблон лицензии Creative Commons с просьбой заполнить и (что? - разместить в интернете, отправить по почте мне/не мне (кому?)).
Я загружаю эти файлы снова с указанной лицензией и ссылкой (куда?)
Или я сначала отправляю разрешение (кому?)
Что я должен указать при загрузке, чтобы меня тут же не «линчевали»?

TRustRust (talk) 20:40, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Commons явно требует возможности изменения работ. Смотрите Commons:Лицензирование.

Вам надо попросить создателей программного обеспечения выбрать одну из лицензий Creative Commons. Думаю, что ссылки на соответствующую статью в русской Википедии будет достаточно. После того, как они поменяют условия использования, файлы можно восстановить.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Добрый день. Текст разрешения на странице правообладателя (http://www.fastcom.fors.ru/web_files/Info/Pictures) был изменён. Там теперь присутствует ссылка на лицензию Creative Commons. Прошу восстановить удалённые файлы:
Fastcom_Menu_GC.gif
Fastcom_Objects_IE.gif
Fastcom_Reports_O.gif
Fastcom_Marketing.jpg
Fastcom_Locks.jpg
Fastcom_Balance.jpg
Fastcom_Autoinformator.jpg
Fastcom_Service_Params.jpg
Fastcom_Login_Screen.jpg
Fastcom_12_login.png

TRustRust (talk) 13:59, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Восстановил. Но Вам надо ещё изменить лицензию. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Спасибо. Сделаю скорее всего в понедельник TRustRust (talk) 14:42, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Да, ещё один файл попал под нож: Fastcom logo.jpg. Можно ли его тоже восстановить? TRustRust (talk) 08:27, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Восстановил. Вам надо ещё изменить лицензию. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:02, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

У меня вопрос по лицензии. Если я, руководствуясь лицензией Cc-by-sa, чуть подправил картинку, то какой шаблон в лицензии лучше всего указывать? Кого указать в качестве автора? Что написать в пункте "Права"? Спасибо. TRustRust (talk) 22:15, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Лицензия должна быть та же. Авторы - авторы оригинального изображения и Вы. Права - думаю, что ссылку на оригинальное разрешение. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:56, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:104th US Congress House of Reps.png

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:104th US Congress House of Reps.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:104th US Congress House of Reps.png]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

And also:

File:110th US Congress House of Reps.png

Yours sincerely, 1989 16:52, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@1989: You should address this question to original uploader. I only merged duplicate. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:04, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you are interested

Hi, I hope I am not bothering you. I just want to inform you about a possibilty on meta. After the SUL finalization there is a search for additional meta:Global_renamers.

Maybe you knew already... as I did with other local bureaucrats with knowledge of "minor"/"uncommon" languages, I am contacting you because at the moment in meta:Global_renamers#Users_with_global_rename_access and meta:Stewards#List_of_current_stewards, if I correctly remember, noone is be-N. I think that with your impressive cross-wiki experience and your previous local experience as a bureaucrats you could be very useful.

Please notice that I am not an expert user on meta nor a local bureaucrat, I just care about the "variety" of the meta environment and I though that it was useful to inform some local bureaucrats of the opportunity.--Alexmar983 (talk) 01:46, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for suggesting! I'll think about it but I'm not sure about free time… --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I undestood, it is a very technical role, without great complications. For example, even users who were not local bureocrats or showed poor language skills or limited croos-wiki activity have been proposed (even right now, with noone opposing, they will have the flag). The goal is simply to get as much as possible GRs because every help is needed. I think you would be of help even if you used the flag once a week. I am also trying to contact some users with less experience, and more free time, but it is a little bit complicated: users with great experience but just one flag usually are very centered on one project and they don't show great interest in working on meta. Anyway, I suppose that as soon as many people enter the business, recruitment will become easier.--Alexmar983 (talk) 17:10, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'll think about this. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:10, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:WikiDay2015 - Map.jpg - Source

HI EugeneZelenko -- I updated the source on WikiDay2015 - Map.jpg to explain that the base map came from OpenStreetMap -- I added the red shapes. That is acceptable, I think? This image is being used for a Wikimedia NYC event this Sunday. I would like to use similar types of maps for other events so if you can help me figure out the right source for future uploads I would really appreciate it. Thanks! -- Erika aka BrillLyle (talk) 11:50, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, OpenStreetMap is acceptable source, but please note that it uses Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0. So you need to change license tag accordingly. Please also remove self, since you work is based on other people work. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:08, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Family's Audio

Greetings: Received your notice about the need to document the copyright of audio [[3]], I would like to know exactly how. This is an old audio cassette, recorded handmade by the family of the poet in a poetry reading in the later few dozen copies to friends, who never had copyright or was in any distribution circuit. It's an old copy that belongs to the family memories and heirs (me) and I have digitized handmade and personally in my house. Thank you indeed for your help. - jacobogbg (talk) 18:00, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In many copyrights law copyrights exist becase of fact of creation of work.

Are you only heir? If so, please send confirmation to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review. If not, other heirs should be the same.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Eugene for your reply. I've looked at your links and think I understand as I have to do. Anyway I think I'll let it to be delete and later on, re-upload the recording but better edited. By then I'll do with copyright well done as you have shown me. I think it is best to avoid duplication of files. jacobogbg (talk) 22:30, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, if you want to upload improved version, you could upload new file. But if file will be same, you could request file undeletion when asking for permission assistance. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Map

Hi Eugene, You have added a tag (File source is not properly indicated: File:Karepa.gif) to a map which I uploaded to Wikipedia. What is the problem? The source is indicated and the author is indicated. I am the author of this map and I have the property rights of this map. I am a cartographer and I created this map with the software that I own and doing myself fieldwork on ground. Some base data I purchased from third parties. Any questions?--VillaK (talk) 18:43, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Does third parties allow to redistribute derivative works? Please confirm your authorship and copyrights ownership by sending permission to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:03, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Beyond being a cartographer, I also happen to be an international lawyer. (No kidding here). It looks like you are considering to violate some of my basic rights. When uploading the file I have confirmed that I am the author of this map and that I hold the respective property rights. You seem to raise doubts, suspecting that this may not be the case and ask me to furnish further proof about my authorship. I can understand that you may consider your action as serving a preventive purpose, to prevent any possible violation of property rights of someone else. However, hypothetical and unsubstantiated doubts do not serve as sufficient grounds for reversed burden of proof. If you suspect that I may not be the rightful author and owner, it is your obligation to indicate what are the reasons for such a suspicion. It is for you to indicate grounds and give a justification. We are not operating here under a legal system where someone is considered guilty until proven to be innocent. No, the principle of assumption of innocence applies. Wikipedia has asked for contributions and I have donated a map that I have created to illustrate an article on one village in Estonia, utilising my freedom of expression. Under the Estonian constitution I have the right to freely possess, use, and dispose property.

FYI - the agreement under which some base data from the Estonian Land Board were purchased provides the right to dispose (i.e. to sell or to distribute freely) to third parties any digital products created using the source data. There is a limitation that I have no right to re-sell the source data, but this is obviously not the case here. The map is a digital product and I am the author.

I am curious what actions would Wikimedia take if I would like to donate some cash? Would Wikimedia accept the donation or would you ask potential contributors to furnish documentary evidence that the cash to be donated was earned legally? --VillaK (talk) 21:01, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Maps taken from other sources are quite often uploaded as "own" work. So confirmation of authorship via OTRS is reasonable. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Qudees's Pictures

Hi my friend Eugene.

i'm so bad in English so that i will try to make you understand me :)

Why you put my pictures in delete discussion ?

my internet connection is so slowly so that i decrease the resolution; but all them is my work, please fix that wrong as you can. --Qudees (talk) 22:22, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please reupload couple of photos in original resolution with EXIF to confirm your authorship? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:04, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Missing Filemon.jpg

Hello and good day!

I don't know why it has a deletion request where in fact it's our own photo.

We are in the photograph and the one who took the photo is a crew of our band.

Please confirm your authorship and copyrights ownership by sending permission to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:00, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Company Logo - Valeword

Hi, I would like to upload the logo, beacause I would like to use it in Wikipedia Italian. Is it possible to upload a company logo? If not, how can I proceed? Thanks a lot, Valentina

If Italian Wikipedia allows fair use images, you could upload it locally there. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

SVG (Scalable Vector Graphics)

In other languages ^{(translate this)}
Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ 日本語 ∙ +/−

Please use SVG

Thank you for uploading some images! Did you know that Wikimedia Commons recommends the SVG (Scalable Vector Graphics) format for certain types of images? Scalable Vector Graphics are designed to look appropriate at any scale, and SVG images are easier to modify and translate, helping Wikimedia to distribute knowledge to all of the world. A lot of modern programs support SVG export. If you encountered problems or have questions, don't hesitate to ask me, a member of the Graphic Lab, or the Graphics village pump. Uploading images in SVG format isn't mandatory, but it would help. (To avoid any misunderstandings, please don't just put raster images into an SVG container as embedded raster.) Thanks, and happy editing!

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eugene!

Having applied to the Wikipedia Illustration Lab, I have tried and applied the suggestions i got there.

I need up using Inkscape on .pdf intermediate versions.

Reasonable SVG files came out, but they seem to appear slightly different in Safari and in Chrome.

Please have a look, and give me your comments:

Thanks, --BORGATO Pierandrea (talk) 20:58, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I don't have different browsers installed to test. I think will be reasonable to make default SVG size larger as well as separate plots. You could merge plots in text with <gallery> or wiki-table. Probably captions also belong to wiki-text. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your consideration. I think to svg file for a long time, but i'm not applicate beacause for a moment is a little uncomfortable for me, that i'm using usually the raster grafic. However i consider in the future to devote myself to the graphics and then i learn between short time this method, actually often (but not never) cheaper. Thank you for the message. Good job ;) --Fidia 82 (talk) 09:36, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Many of flags you uploaded have simple and repeating geometry, so it'll be matter of changing colors only to create new flag, even without using graphical editor. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:08, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sherdog permissions

Outlined here: http://www.craveonline.com/termsofuse?site=www.sherdog.com WWE Batman131 (talk) 15:23, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification for deletion

Dear EugeneZelenko (talk · contribs) the following images and their use an explanation as follows:

File:Escudomagdalena.jpg and File:Escudo de arizpe.jpg. This is the PUBLIC seal of the municipality of Magdalena de Kino and the municipality of Arizpe, in Sonora, Mexico. As being a public seal it is nos subject to copyright laws since it is for use to the general population.
File:Colegio economistas.jpg
File:José María Elías González.png, File:Juan Francisco Escalante.jpg, File:Rafael Elías González Romo y de Vivar.png, File:Rafael Elías González.png, File:Manuel maria gandara retrato.jpg All these photographs are more than 100 years old and are allready on Public Domain.
File:Pintura de Fray Bernardo del Espiritu Santo.png I personaly took this picture of a more than a 100 year old painting hanging on the church of Del Carmen y Hermosillo, Mexico. The portrait was made anonymously more than a houndred years ago so its on public domain.

All of the portraits and pictures where uploaded from Flickr.com with the correct commons licenses for Wikipedia Commons.--Sergiozaragoza (talk) 05:53, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I answered on deletion request page. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Will Bashor.jpg

This photo is one taken with my own camera in Paris. I use it on the sleeves of my books. I personally own the picture and it only I can allow it on the Commons. And I do.

Thanks Harold "Will" Bashor

You could upload original photo with EXIF to proof your authorship. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Biglal12.jpg

Dear Eugene,

A letter by the copyright holder was sent to you at our bequest. Two days later, the "no permission" tag is still on. A copy of the letter is attached. Please remove the tag! Thanks, MerkazMagen (talk) 04:38, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The letter:

I hereby affirm that I, Eli Bar-Yahalom, represent the Biglal Literary Fellowship, the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of both the work depicted and the media File:Biglal12.jpg (as stored on Commons presently).

I agree to publish the above-mentioned content under the free license: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International.

I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws.

I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites.

I am aware that I always retain copyright of my work, and retain the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by me.

I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

Eli Bar-Yahalom, Editor, "Biglal" March 31, 2015

Where was permission sent? If to Commons:OTRS please ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review. Otherwise please follow OTRS route. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Фотография нашла статью

Привет, Евгений! Спасибо за давнишнюю загрузку. Фотография была когда-то добавлена мной в английскую статью Dogsled mail, а теперь, благодаря Леониду, она есть и в рувики: Санная почта на собаках. Удачи! --Michael Romanov (talk) 10:10, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Приятно узнать, что труд был не напрасен! --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:02, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gracias

Voy a revisarlo. Saludos Giovany Lara (talk) 20:45, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I don't know Spanish :-( Please read Commons:Licensing. Non-trivial logos could not be uploaded unless they are public domain by age or by copyrights law. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion_requests/Files uploaded by Izikson

Dear EugeneZelenko, as a newcomer, I'm afraid I didn't get the point exactly. I'm sure, from my part, that all of them are clear with copyrights. So could you be so kind to explain the possible problems with my files in more detail? Если это допускается правилами, вероятно, проще будет по-русски. Какие подтверждения правомерности публикации иллюстраций и видеофайла, отмеченных Вами, надо предоставить и кому? Sincerely yours, (talk)

Надо попросить студию/режиссёра послать разрешение в Commons:OTRS (пример: Commons:Email templates). Потом Вы можете попросить помощи на Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard с проверкой разрешения. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Режиссёр разрешение отослал. Однако так как он был в отъезде и материалы уже удалены, то нужно ли будет перезагружать их заново? И если да, то когда? Ожидать ли ему ответа на почту или же подтверждение его разрешения появится в некоем списке? Прошу прощения, если эти ответы можно было бы найти без Вашего участия и я утруждаю Вас попусту. Однако процедурные правила, насколько я смог их понять, настолько разветвлены, что, как новичок, очень опасаюсь сделать что-нибудь неверно. Заранее благодарю за помощь.

Sincerely yours, Izikson (talk)

Файлы можно восстановить. Об этом надо упомянуть в запросе на Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard. Один из участников с доступом к OTRS найдёт письмо, проверит разрешение, и, если оно корректно, восстановит файлы и добавит в их описание шаблоны с ссылкой на разрешение. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Photos Paul Zinsli

Bonjour Eugene, Paul-Erich Zinsli (fils de Paul Zinsli) a envoyé le Datum : 29/03/2015 - 23:01 (GMT)à permissions-commons-fr@wikimedia.org le formulaire avec la licence Creative Commons BY-SA-3.0 pour les trois fichier:DrPaulZinsli1, DrPaulZinsli2, DrPaulZinsliPeint. Ce sont des photos prises de son père par lui-même. Merci d'avance, --Amage9 (talk) 09:10, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I don' know French :-( Please ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Eugene, Paul-Erich Zinsli (son of Paul Zinsli) sent the e-mail on March 23rd, 2015 at 11:01 pm (GMT) to permissions-commons-fr@wikimedia.org with the license Creative Commons BY-SA-3.0 for the three files : DrPaulZinsli1, DrPaulZinsli2, DrPaulZinsliPeint. They are family photos the assignee of which he is. I ask for help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review. Thank you.

--Amage9 (talk) 11:56, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Удаление файлов

ЗДРАВСТВУЙТЕ, УВАЖАЕМАЯ EugeneZelenko!
При загрузке не указана лицензия, так как она есть в источнике, с которого взяты файлы.
А точнее: стандартная лицензия YouTube.
Хотелось бы сохранить загруженные файлы, чтобы в дальнейшем илюстрировать ими новые статьи об этих песнях и дисках.
Помогите пожалуйста исправить мою ошибку, связанную с загрузкой файлов.
С уважением к Вам, --Zwizda (talk) 15:19, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Думаю, что стандартная лицензия YouTube подразумевает сохранение прав за автором. Кроме того, там мало заботятся о соблюдении авторских прав, т. е. файлы могут загружаться отнюдь не правообладателем.

Есть свободное изображение, если его недостаточно, что надо сходить на концерт и сделать фотографии.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files rejection

Hi and thanks for your help! How can I upload my files and be sure that they will be accepted? I read many things about the subject but it is still very vague for me. The podcast is from this website http://www.wpr.org/preserving-comic-books-long-term , do I have to email them to get their permission to use it? The pictures were realised by the project (the one I'm writing about) founder, does he have to write a permission paper too?

Thanks in advance.

Please read Commons:Licensing. It's necessary to know author/date/country of creation for each comics to determine copyrights status of each image. Website is not primary creator of comics. They where published a long time before. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:51, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Auto-block

Hello, Can you block my account indefinitely? I want to be blocked in a pacific way without having to engage in vandalism. Thanks, --Jelly Bean MD (talk) 00:34, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it's possible, but could you please provide a reason? If you doesn't want to continue to contribute, you could just stop contributing. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:48, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

His account was blocked by a steward because it was compromised. Mine has the exact same problem, so can you block it? --BScMScMD (talk) 15:24, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done by Yann. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:04, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Photos Paul Zinsli

Help me I have no answer of Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard. The message to permissions-commons-fr@wikimedia.org was sent well by the assignee (Paul Zinsli's son). I answered you above in english. Merci d'avance, --Amage9 (talk) 06:08, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You could try to find OTRS volunteer who speaks your language here or in French Wikipedia. May be User:Yann? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you but Yann does not answer. I sent him several messages.

As you have put the headband ' This file risks to be deleted ' can you delay at least the deletion while waiting for the answer of Yann.

Thank you in advance,

--Amage9 (talk) 11:33, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I reset date in all files. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:58, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Eugène it's nice. I make a reminder for Yann.

Good evening,

--Amage9 (talk) 20:17, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Удаление некоторых файлов

Здравствуйте Евгений,

Мне необходимо удалить все файлы в истории этого файла File:Lak flag, Lak people (Dagestan), Лакский флаг, Гази-Кумух, Лакия.png и оставить только последний текущий файл. Спасибо. Gazikumukh (talk) 14:26, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Сделано. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Мне еще раз необходимо удалить все файлы в истории этого файла File:Lak flag, Lak people (Dagestan), Лакский флаг, Гази-Кумух, Лакия.png и оставить только последний текущий файл. Спасибо. Gazikumukh (talk) 23:40, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Сделано. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:03, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Мне необходимо удалить все файлы в истории этих двух файлов и оставить только последний текущий файл: 1. File:Lak flag, Lak people (Dagestan), Лакский флаг, Гази-Кумух, Лакия.png 2. File:Lak coat of arms (Dagestan), Лакский герб, Гази-Кумух, Лакия.png. Спасибо. Gazikumukh (talk) 15:59, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Сделано. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Мне вновь необходимо удалить все файлы в истории этих двух файлов и оставить только последний текущий файл: 1. File:Lak flag, Lak people (Dagestan), Лакский флаг, Гази-Кумух, Лакия.png 2. File:Lak coat of arms (Dagestan), Лакский герб, Гази-Кумух, Лакия.png. Думаю это в последний раз. Большое спасибо. Gazikumukh (talk) 20:16, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Сделано. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Мне вновь необходимо удалить все файлы в истории этих двух файлов и оставить только последний текущий файл: 1. File:Lak flag, Lak people (Dagestan), Лакский флаг, Гази-Кумух, Лакия.png 2. File:Lak coat of arms (Dagestan), Лакский герб, Гази-Кумух, Лакия.png. Думаю в последний раз. Большое спасибо. Gazikumukh (talk) 13:03, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Сделано. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:53, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Здравствуйте Евгений,

Мне необходимо полностью удалить эти три файла из википедии: 1. File:Lak flag, Lak people (Dagestan), Лакский флаг, Гази-Кумух, Лакия.png 2. File:Lak coat of arms (Dagestan), Лакский герб, Гази-Кумух, Лакия.png. 3. File:Лакский исламский флаг, Гази-Кумух, Лакия, Lak Islamic flag.png. Большое спасибо. Gazikumukh (talk) 18:55, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Сделано. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:54, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Joram

I reply to your request.

Thanks

Joram (talk) 15:29, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's more suited for Wikibooks. Please also note contradictory license statements in PDFs and file descriptions. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:00, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Junaid Purangor.png Fixed

I used it in my user pages. Thanks --Junaid Purangor (talk) 16:50, 8 April 2015 (UTC)Junaid Purangor[reply]

I closed deletion request, but you still nee to add {{Information}} and license in order to keep image. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Merci pour votre patience. Amage9 (talk) 18:46, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

From [File:Nau Tale Rajai Ko Darbara - Master Mitrasen Thapa Magar.ogg and other

Providing youtube link and the author name...isnt that okay?

Also the singer Mitrasen's death has reached over fifty years. Isn't that enough? I dont understand why the issue tag has been given....

Help it from being deletion...

Learnerktm (talk) 11:58, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You need to provide such information in description of every file. You need to add approximate date of creation/publishing or at least date of author death. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:58, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please kindly review once. Some information has been added. Is that okay? --Learnerktm (talk) 12:06, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's OK now. I removed {{No source since}}. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

На Вас пустили стрелки по удалённым файлам

Прошу прояснить ситуацию по причинам удаления файлов. Подробности в обсуждении: User talk:Ellin Beltz#File about sealants. 83.149.37.27 16:49, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Там уже достаточно подробно ответили, но я добавил свой комментарий. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:02, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Logo Kairos.png

Hi, please can you tell me how can I proceed? The logo is not mine but it is a company logo of Kairos Partners SGR. I would like to learn more about wiki. Please I need your help. Thanks a lot! --Valeword (talk) 15:44, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unless you obtain explicit permission from company, you could only upload non-trivial logos to projects with allow fair use content (for example, English Wikipedia). --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Laure Hériard-Dubreuil.png

This was already emailed to you a while ago yet it is tagged for deletion. --TCTL1S3 (talk) 01:38, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"File:108 Minutes.jpg" photo of garik israelian among others

Didn't mean to acredit it as my own work. Was sent this image by Garik Israelian for the purpose of updating his Wiki page.. Can get whatever proof I need for rights from him/the photographer as I am unable to upload it straight to the page.

You need to ask photographer to send permission to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:56, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can I upload further images with correct attribution or do I need to have him e-mail this completed template for all of the images I use? This has become quote a tacky situation.

I think permission should be sent first. Then you could ask image undeletion and upload other images. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Answer regarding screenshots with (parts of) logos

I sent you an answer to your deletion statement here. --Xeno06 (talk) 19:03, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blanka and svg

Hello EugeneZelenko, you have recently left me two messages on my talk page.

File:Blanka mapa.jpg - what source information are you exactly missing here? it was drawed by me as it is stated in summary
You used some kind of satellite image, so you need to credit original source as well as provide its copyrights status. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
reminder of svg usage - I suppose you left this message because of my changes in File:Russian economy since fall of Soviet Union.PNG. I know that SVG format is better alternative, however in this case, image is distinctively different, contains data beyond SU, even include forecasts, not real data - as it is commented in edit summary, therefore should be used separately.

Jirka.h23 (talk) 07:51, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why deleted???

All permissions have been submitted to Wikipedia/ Wikimedia. Why did you delete my file(s)? Which reason did you have to play? Say it! Explain it to me, as I would be a child of five years. --MattesKoeln (talk) 22:41, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If permission is in Commons:OTRS, please ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with its review and image undeletion. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:ETPColorSquare.png

Can you please provide reasoning as to why this image was deleted?

Epsilont (talk) 15:57, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is non-trivial logo. Permission was not processed at time of second deletion. If organization permission was sent, please ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with its review and image undeletion. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:51, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Catalog for CMS.jpg

This image has been part of the public domain since 1966, with no original owner or copyright in existence. Carlisle as an institution ended in 1977, and again, there is no existing copyright to this image and no appropriate licensing code. If there is a more appropriate licensing coding than what I used, please provide me an example. SandHills (talk) 17:17, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I restored file. You need to provide country of origins/publication information and proper license tag. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:00, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:CMSfounders.jpg

I created this collage from 3 images created prior to 1923. No copyright existed and if it had it would be expired.

I am really dismayed how there is a system on wikipedia where someone nominates images for deletion - AND even when further justification is provided these images are still deleted with no acknowledgement of why, or any further explanation from the person recommending deletion. The ultimate travesty is when help is asked for, none is given. So once again, two of my images are on the "automatic chopping block". If no help is provided I know of no other action I can take to convince otherwise. I am left with the option of "fighting city hall" or trying to reload these images with a code that might be acceptable. But please answer me this...what is the significance of images dating from pre-1923 in terms of copyright status? SandHills (talk) 17:17, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I restored file, but you need to provide proper source and license for it.

You didn't comment of deletion request page and didn't fix source/license information.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:58, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Admin tools?

Доброго времени суток, Евгений!
Есть ли какой-то инструмент для быстрой номинации на массовое удаление? Я знаю только редактирование вручную, но это занимает время. Как Вы делаете подобную номинацию?
С уважением, Георгий --George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:55, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Я использую MediaWiki:VisualFileChange.js. Также полезен Help:Gadget-GlobalUsageUI, особенно для файлов за рамками проекта. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:04, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Спасибо -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:49, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:DiscursodeRenunciaJacoboArbenz1954.ogg

Hi! Hi, look what you 've sent me and requested have not removed the template. please could verify this. Thank you. --GuatExp (talk) 01:09, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Look like this is historical recording. What is term of copyrights protection in your country for recording? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:54, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Mr. EugeneZelenko

Dear Mr. EugeneZelenko, i hope this message finds you well. I am writing to you to request that you do not cancel what I set as the image, which are nominated for deletion. My reasoning is that I am the son who was called artists and all I'm painting. My father Ladislav Gradečak is the author of all of these works. Arbitrary me confirm what I am and I participated. He taught a gift to the Holy Father Pope ..rad my father ..inaće personal gift Cardinal Kuharic 1994g. ..because candlestick spiritual sources of the Croatian people who made my father in 1995, and burned by the President Tudjman. How can one say that it was not my father ??. These works have made history and now it so someone wants to remove. About that there are documented HRT these videos. It's history. And why someone wants to just delete. My father uzradio Divine door to vinici 1994g. . Blessed by Bishop Marko Culej. And it's all documented .. All photos I took I. And all are made with the approval of my father artist Ladislav Gradečak. https://hr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ladislav_Grade%C4%8Dak www.youtube.com/watch?v=8AMuB7KqPTk www.youtube.com/watch?v=DwTjmRML5wQ www.youtube.com/watch?v=KaIso9EAXfs Ladgrad (talk) 05:48, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Is your father alive? If not, are you only his heir? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:52, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Belarus-Minsk-CIS Headquarter-1.jpg

File:Belarus-Minsk-CIS Headquarter-1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

195.50.31.213 20:58, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Belarus-Minsk-CIS Headquarter-2.JPG

File:Belarus-Minsk-CIS Headquarter-2.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

195.50.31.213 20:58, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Claremont McKenna Logo

Dear EugeneZelanko,

I sincerely apologize if I have violated the possible copyrights laws by uploading Claremont McKenna logo on WikiCommons.

That logo was a non-free content that permits the fair use, but I didn't know how to use it to create a page--thinking wikicommons as the only way I could have thought of.

I'm new to wikipedia. Could you teach me how to use non-free content for fair use?

You could upload non-free files to projects which accept them, for example, English Wikipedia. Please note that such images follow special set of rules. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:57, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File Delete Request

Eugene,

I received message that many of my files were marked for deletion

Affected:

File:FPLG Bench from DLR.jpg

And also:

The pictures I used, are freely found on the internet. If you spend 2 minutes to reverse search in google, you can find all the images on News Websites or in the DLR website itself.

And if you have watched the film (DLR - Free-piston linear generator.ogv) until the end, you would see the license.

Sincerely,

Please add links to original file and terms of use in each image description. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

pictures from Aureus

Hi EugeneZelenko You have suggested deletion of several of my recently uploaded pictures. I cannot - as explained on the discussion-page for them - provide any licences, as they all are taken from my family's private albums. Their reason for being uploaded on Wikimedia Commons, (and not on say Flickr), is that these persons have made marked contributions to Norwegian society, as the articles written about them shows.

Please redraw your request for deletion.

Regards Aureus

This photos may be in public domain, but photographer (if known)/date of creation/country information should be provided in each image description.

If photos are not in public domain, you could license them only in case if you only heir. Otherwise you'll need permissions for other heirs.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:00, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, These photographs are in my private possision. My parents, who I legally inherited them from, are both dead many years ago (I am now 52 years old), and I do not have any brothers or sisters. So I am the only heir. Therefore I am entiteled to use them according to my own will. (But as they are quite old, the newest being from about the sixties I think, I do not know which persons that have taken them.) So the pictures are rigtfully out there on the Wikipedia.

I can see now that antother user, called Jianhui67, has deleted the pictures because of your nomination. Your nomination was probaly well-ment but, as I have explained, not fully and correctly informed. I therefore ask you to help restoring the pictures. I am a well educated researcer myself (I have the Norwegian equivalent to a PhD in the History of ideas) that have published texts in 4 different books, and I have also contributed with many different articles on Norwegian Wikipedia. There has never been any problems.

So as a fellow gentleman I ask you help me restore the pictures now, please.

Best regards Aureus

PS: But what extra info I know and can be added, are that all these pictures are taken in the town of Kristiansand of Norway. All of them, except for one, has never been published before. And that one of them (this is the one of Arne Petersen) was once used in a historical report about Norwegian lounge-doctors, but still it is family property.

I restored photos. Please send confirmation of your ownership with explanations of relationships to subjects to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That's good, thanks! I will send them the declaration as you suggest.

Best Aureus

Hello again, I have just now sent them a declaration, as you suggested. It seems they are quite busy so it can take quite a while before they they have the time to respond. So please be patient.

Your work as a supervisor is importaint and I am glad you helped to restore the pictures. But for the future, allow me to suggest that you perhaps should inform the uploader beforehand when you plan to nominate pictures for deletion. The reason for this is that otherwise the uploader perhaps will not feel fully respected. And if we shall be able to build a constructive dialogue and discussion that all can benefit from, of course the contributors must be appreciated for their valuable work. After all: without the contributors there would be no Wikipedia.

Best regards Aureus Aureus (talk) 02:45, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, things may be improved. But one week for deletion request handling seems reasonable term for me. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:04, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have handled the tickets. Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 14:05, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Open access and the humanities - contexts, controversies and the future.pdf

Just leaving a quick note that the book itself says it's open access, licensed under CC-BY-SA 4.0, so I removed the missing permission tag. —Mike moral ♪♫ 09:40, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please specify page with license information in permission field. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:56, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by VTflatlander (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by VTflatlander (talk · contribs)[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

File:Little m child's chair.jpg
File:Little h in birch.jpeg
File:Steel little h covered in red velvet.png

Dear Eugene, This is my first attempt at contributing. These files are scans of photographs taken jointly by the artist, Caroline Schlyter and myself. She is aware of the free licensing agreement and I have her permission to use the images on Wikimedia Commons. I created small on the assumption that I would be using thumnails in the article I am creating but the full size files could be used. There is no EXIF data as the originals were shot on film many years ago. I would certainly appreciate your help in making these images suitable for use here. VTflatlander (talk) 01:55, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please ask Caroline Schlyter to send permission to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Eugene, Caroline Sclyter has replied to Commons:OTRS. Thank you for your assistance. VTflatlander (talk) 13:34, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File uploaded by michaelalfano (talk · contribs)

Hello,

You have deleted a file I uploaded, and graphical log for Mayor Andrew Gillum's Family First Initiative. I work in his Office, and the image is a production of his Office. I'm happy to re-upload and give greater detail about the copyright information mirroring the above facts, but now I cannot re-upload the file. I am new to using wikipedia, and would greatly appreciate any assistance you can offer in regards to this issue.

Here is the message I received: 14:25, 22 May 2015 EugeneZelenko (talk | contribs) deleted page File:Family First Logo.png (Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing: Logo. Not text-only) (global usage; delinker log)

Thanks, michaelalfano

Please ask city legal department to send permission to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review and image undeletion. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion requests/File:Ivan Ceković na dodjeli nagrade Neven ,1967.god..jpg

Dear EugeneZelenko,you have nominated a photo :Ivan Ceković na dodjeli nagrade Neven ,1967.god..jpg for deletion!It is o photo that my sister,daughter ov poet Ivan Cekovic,my uncle,send me by e-mail!I is a photo from her father s archive,which he received after receiving award!The photo I have put in a page https://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivan_Cekovi%C4%87 ,as you may see!So I beg you that this photo remains in wikimedia,and on this page !Thank you!

Sorry, I don't understand situation completely. Is your sister photographer, of she just found photo in family archive? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

.No,she is not photographer,she just found photo in a family archive.-Author of this photo is Petar Otoranov,photo-reporter of "POLITIKA"(Belgrade) newspapers!

It's necessary to ask permission from Petar Otoranov or from his heir(s), if he is not alive. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:01, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

He is not alive!

His heir(s) own copyrights. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I will try to cantact them,if I find them !

File:Exhibition UNDER 35 in Palace of Art Minsk 13.05.2014 Oleg Kostiuchenko Tamara Shelest.JPG

Евгений, здравствуйте! Помогите, пожалуйста, разобраться. У меня удалили файл с фото, на котором нет нарушения свободы панорамы, мало того, на фоне своей картины запечатлён её автор и получено разрешение OTRS на её публикацию. Я написала удалившему, он мне отвечал по-английски. Я не очень-то поняла ответ. Он, вроде, пишет, что я не член команды ОТРС, поэтому не имею права сама добавлять эти метки. Но если именно мне художник даёт разрешение на публикацию произведений, то кто за меня будет добавлять эти метки? Потом написал, что у удалённой фотографии не стояло меток ОТРС. Но если есть разрешение, то почему бы не восстановить фото? Надеюсь на Ваше разъяснение. С уважением, Tatiana Markina 12:29, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Ссылки на разрешение действительно не было. В общем случае их могут добавлять только те, кто имеет доступ к OTRS. Обычные участники должны добавлять {{OTRS pending}}, который служит меткой для последующей проверки. Для восстановления Вам надо написать запрос на Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard с указанием от кого было разрешение, чтобы его было легче найти. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by TRustRust

Hi,

I cleaned up the files that still had a DR-template on them in March and I came across this DR. I was under the impression that they where deleted as copyright violations, that you restored them for a DR, Yann closed the DR but forgot to delete the files. After I took a closer look at the dates I realised that they where restored after Yann closed the DR. The logg was a bit confusing so sorry about that. If you want I can restore the files. Natuur12 (talk) 17:36, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please restore files. License was changed on source site to Creative Commons. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:02, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done, restored the files and left a note at the DR. Natuur12 (talk) 14:29, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Belarus-Minsk-BSU-Entrance into Main Building.jpg

File:Belarus-Minsk-BSU-Entrance into Main Building.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

37.17.113.190 18:55, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Belarus-Vitsebsk-Church of Annunciation of Virgin Mary-1.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:19, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of Marcos Eduardo Elias

The article was just uploaded. Sorry for the timing. http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marcos_Eduardo_Elias

It was deleted again. As far as I understood because of questionable notability. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:53, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Narrabeen_Lagoon_Trail.JPG

Hi Eugene

Thank you for alerting me to the No Commons:Freedom of panorama for 2D works in Australia affecting my image https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Narrabeen_Lagoon_Trail.JPG
I will remove links to it in the article in Wikipedia. I will have to research how to delete it from Wikimedia Commons. Regards Dot

I nominated it for deletion already. You could read Commons:Freedom of panorama about laws in different countries. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:59, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Russia-Moscow-VDNH-Fountain-1.jpg

And also:

File:Russia-Moscow-VDNH-Fountain-2.jpg

Yours sincerely, Andrey Korzun (talk) 07:43, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Russia-Moscow-VDNH-Fountain-3.jpg

Yours sincerely, Andrey Korzun (talk) 08:18, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Russia-Moscow-VDNH-2.jpg

Yours sincerely, Andrey Korzun (talk) 08:48, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	thanks for you Xbaha (talk) 15:27, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	i want to talk with you if you want send it to me Xbaha (talk) 15:30, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Photo copyright

Hi, EugeneZelenko. I apologize for not following the copyright policies, and I would like to make it clear that I did not intend to break these rules on purpose. The image I uploaded was a vectorization of a PNG image currently uploaded to Wikipedia. Would it be okay for me to upload my vector image to Wikipedia instead of Commons? Again, sorry about my mistake. Aus0107 (talk) 15:26, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You could upload non-free images to projects which allow them, for example, English Wikipedia. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:02, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't I understand whyǃ"

Hi Eugene I don't I understand why you have proposed the deletion of these photos, I am the owner of them and I've a release from Mr. Merlone Roberto .... can you help me? what should I do? thanks a lotǃ

This photos seem collection of fun/promo photos. If you are photographer, please upload them in original resolution to proof your authorship. If not please ask photographers to send permission to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permissions review. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:10, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thx Eugene

THX Eugene,I will do as for old files that you see I was license Commons:OTRS so I am looking no reason for cancellation. Best regards--Hahamay (talk) 19:15, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:58, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Portal web USINA.jpg

This file is from argentine goverment (free distribution like any creation of the goverment). ¿why considerate a copyright inflingation? The source is from prezi and here acept derivate works, prease reconsiderate revert this action. Thanks.

--Avpxeneb (talk) 20:47, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I don't see how images and web sites fit {{PD-AR-Gov}}. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:59, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

So you cant restore the image? considerate is very similar this file: file:Screenshot-Intellipedia.png ¿how can i do to publish this image on wikipeida? thanks --Avpxeneb (talk) 23:32, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Screenshot-Intellipedia.png is work of USA government. You could upload non-free files to projects which accept them, for example, English Wikipedia. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:53, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Glifo Ixtacala

Hi. About message left because of the lack of information on the photo: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Glifo_de_Ixtacallan.jpg I mention that already added the missing information. I hope it's correct. Greetings.

Did Gilberto Perez Rico only added text to painting and picture itself is ancient one? If not, what are dates of life of Gilberto Perez Rico?

Please use current talk page, not archive, in future.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:El gen de la codicia (y el final de la explotación humana).pdf

He subido el archivo para incluirlo dentro de una página divulgativa (dentro de Wikipedia) que espero poder crear la próxima semana. El archivo es una novela de ficción, de la que soy autor, tanto del texto como de las imágenes. Los mapas han sido creados por mí sobre mapas de libre difusión. La portada la he compuesto a partir de dos fotografías tomadas por mí en lugares diferentes. En cuanto a la "notoriedad" la novela no la tiene actualmente, ¿pero quién sabe si la tendrá en un futuro próximo? Atentamente. Enrique Hoyos Jiménez (EhSevilla) — Preceding unsigned comment added by EhSevilla (talk • contribs) 19:34, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded the file to be included in an information page (within Wikipedia) I hope to create the next week. The file is a work of fiction, which I authored, both text and images. Maps have been created by me free diffusion maps. The cover've made from two photographs taken by me in different places. As for the "notoriety" the novel not currently have, but who knows if the will in the near future? Best regards. Enrique Hoyos Jimenez (EhSevilla) 20:37, 18 October 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by EhSevilla (talk • contribs) 20:38, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think Wikibooks is better place and wiki-text format is better format for such purposes. Please don't use archived talk next time. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]