User talk:Estormiz/Archive 2006-2017
|
Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
Yann 16:41, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Elektrobit_Oulunsalo_2006_05_06.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
RistoKohonen 12:59, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
Hei! Osaatko sanoa tarkemmin, missä/millä tiellä em. kuva on otettu? --Apalsola t • c 21:27, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
- Tie on kantatie 81 ennen Pentikin tehtaanmyymälää Kuusamosta päin tultaessa (kuvien ajoista päätelleen 5-10 minuuttia ennen, koska ensimmäiset kuvat tehtaanmyymälästä on 11 minuuttia porojen jälkeen)--Estormiz 19:39, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Witch's broom / mistletoe
[edit]Hi Estormiz- I saw Image:Witch_Broom_Oulu_2006_11_06.JPG and I think it looks much more like mistletoe. Do you agree that it might be that instead of witch's broom? --Eric my en.wp talk page 15:18, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
- Mistletoe is not native for Northern Finland (maybe not for all of Finland). But I am no botanist so I cannot be so sure of what it is. --Estormiz (talk) 18:18, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- I'm no expert on either, but I'm sure that is not witch's broom in the picture. I've seen a lot of mistletoe, and it looks exactly like mistletoe. I found one website that talks about mistletoe growing in city parks outside its natural range. Maybe that's what's happening in Oulu? --Eric my en.wp talk page 03:04, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
- Finnish wikipedia says that "verifiably there is one mistletoe growing in a garden in Parainen in Finland". The species of mistletoe in Parainen is Viscum album or in Finnish misteli. Parainen is in the south western part of Finland. Oulu is about 600 km up north from Parainen and only about 200 km from Arctic circle. So definitely it is not mistletoe. Witch's broom, especially Taphrina betulina, (btw in Finnish it is called tuulenpesä i.e. "Wind's nest") however is very common in Finland. --Estormiz (talk) 14:28, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
- Well, I've learned something new. Those growths in the tree in Oulu just didn't look to me to be part of the tree--they seemed at first to be hanging. But I found another picture of a birch here with many growths, just like yours. I didn't realize there could be so many in one tree! Thanks for the info. I hope your days aren't too short up there now! --Eric my en.wp talk page 16:00, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
- We are approaching the polar night. Of course we never get there, but we get really close. I'm sure you can imagine the amount of Seasonal affective disorders going around here ;) --Estormiz (talk) 08:53, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
- Well, I've learned something new. Those growths in the tree in Oulu just didn't look to me to be part of the tree--they seemed at first to be hanging. But I found another picture of a birch here with many growths, just like yours. I didn't realize there could be so many in one tree! Thanks for the info. I hope your days aren't too short up there now! --Eric my en.wp talk page 16:00, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
- Finnish wikipedia says that "verifiably there is one mistletoe growing in a garden in Parainen in Finland". The species of mistletoe in Parainen is Viscum album or in Finnish misteli. Parainen is in the south western part of Finland. Oulu is about 600 km up north from Parainen and only about 200 km from Arctic circle. So definitely it is not mistletoe. Witch's broom, especially Taphrina betulina, (btw in Finnish it is called tuulenpesä i.e. "Wind's nest") however is very common in Finland. --Estormiz (talk) 14:28, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
- I'm no expert on either, but I'm sure that is not witch's broom in the picture. I've seen a lot of mistletoe, and it looks exactly like mistletoe. I found one website that talks about mistletoe growing in city parks outside its natural range. Maybe that's what's happening in Oulu? --Eric my en.wp talk page 03:04, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
You've uploaded a derivative work | We're sorry, but Image:Netscape Navigator 2.JPG has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Photographs of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this photo must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a derivative work, please explain why on the image description page.
|
AVRS (talk) 23:14, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
Category discussion notification | Category:Brig (ship) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. |
And I am no expert in historical sailing ships, so it is possible that I make a mistake by this suggestion. Please help. --Stunteltje (talk) 19:26, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
- Can't help. I am not expert on ships either. Plus I might make a mistake just because I am not native english speaker. --Estormiz (talk) 14:45, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
- OK We'll wait and see what happens. Best regards. --Stunteltje (talk) 16:26, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
The renovated industrial building in Toppila
[edit]Thanks for uploading this: File:Toppila Former Pulpmill.jpg
Looks exciting. =) Not being an Oulu native, I've only seen the building in its current, renovated condition. Quite a change.
Got any other old photos from that same area? Uploading some photos taken from the harbour of Toppila when it actually still had some activity going on would also be great. --Methem (talk) 16:20, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- At the time (before digicameras) when all of the photographs had to be printed, I did not take many landscape pictures - at least not many without family or friends on the foreground :) Toppila harbour has not been in full use for so long that I have to say that I do not remember it as a real busy harbour. I've only got a faint memory of some ships in that harbour. Sorry. I will look through my old photo prints when I have more time, I might still have some pictures from Toppila and other places in 1980's or 1990's. -Estormiz (talk) 16:47, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- Ok. And yep, I guess it would require going like 30 years (or more?) back in time to see the harbour real busy.
- I have seen some of the old photos taken by the late photographer Uuno Laukka, and they are pretty interesting (such as this one). I should take time to browse all of his Oulu photos in his online collection some day... --Methem (talk) 17:41, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pikisaari 20060402.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
![]() |
File:Linnukkapatsas_Liminka_2006_07_26.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Apalsola t • c 21:41, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Evert_Aarnio_Goat_statue_Oulu_1920.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A333 (talk) 20:06, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rantakatu 2 Oulu 20100207.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rantakatu 2 Oulu 20100207.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Siberian Jay Kittila 20100312b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Hi Estormiz - I can confirm, this is a Temminck's Stint - MPF (talk) 09:25, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you! --Estormiz (talk) 10:43, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Anoplodera Virens 20100717.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Barnstar granted
[edit]![]() |
The Original Barnstar | |
For contributing a lot of photos related to the city of Oulu – both new and old media (including scans of interesting historical photos). --Methem (talk) 12:34, 13 February 2011 (UTC) |
Hopefully I got that right. I guess it could've been a more specific barnstar, but I wasn't sure what to use. =) --Methem (talk) 12:34, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you Methem! --Estormiz (talk) 16:39, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Carduelis chloris Oulu 20110305.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
File:Oulu Stora Enso 2006 01 15.JPG
[edit]We wanted to let you know that we've used one of your pictures in a project of ours: http://litpics.tumblr.com/post/14374429662/lit-critical-miscellanies-vol-3-of-3-by-john
We created a computer program to generate random pairings of sentences from public domain texts and public domain / creative commons images. Some of the pictures we've selected come from the Wikipedia Commons. All the pictures we select ourselves, but the pairings and the text are random. Of these pairings that are generated, we only post the most interesting combinations.
We welcome any feedback about our site.
Thanks for sharing your pictures,
Samantha and Patrick
blog: http://litpics.tumblr.com/
email: litpicsbloggmail.com
twitter: http://twitter.com/litpics
Litpics (talk) 23:19, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you for letting me know. I am always pleased to know that my pictures have been used. Good luck for your project, it sounds interesting. Estormiz (talk) 13:23, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Virpiniemi coast guard station 20120408b.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Larus fuscus Reykjavik 20120623 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Rehuraisio demolition
[edit]You probably already know this, but in case you don't: The demolition of the Rehuraisio feed plant seems to have started - in fact, is well under way. Definitely a good target for some ... interesting photoshoots. --Methem (talk) 08:45, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks! I did not know. Might be visiting the demolition site already tonight. --Estormiz (talk) 10:18, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
- (Menköön nyt välillä suomeksi.) En olisi itsekään kai noita purkutöitä huomannut hetkeen, ellen olisi tänä aamuna Itellan hommissa salmen toisella puolella Toppilansaaressa autoillessani ihmetellyt, miksi tästä harjakattoisesta rakennelmasta näytti kaukaa katsottuna puuttuvan puolet. =) (Purkuhommissa olleita kaivinkoneita ei rakennelman takaa näkynyt.) --Methem (talk) 13:54, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
- Parit kuvat ehdin napata ennen kuin alkoi sataa -> Demolition of the Rehuraisio Feed Plant (Oulu). Taas yksi syy vierailla Toppilan satamassa. Estormiz (talk) 16:28, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
- (Menköön nyt välillä suomeksi.) En olisi itsekään kai noita purkutöitä huomannut hetkeen, ellen olisi tänä aamuna Itellan hommissa salmen toisella puolella Toppilansaaressa autoillessani ihmetellyt, miksi tästä harjakattoisesta rakennelmasta näytti kaukaa katsottuna puuttuvan puolet. =) (Purkuhommissa olleita kaivinkoneita ei rakennelman takaa näkynyt.) --Methem (talk) 13:54, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Aarnintie 1 Rantsila 20120715.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Warehouse Restaurants Oulu 20130323.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
![]() |
File:August Maximilian Myhrberg Raahe 20130511.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A333 (talk) 16:16, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
More demolitions in Oulu
[edit]Not sure if you already knew this, but the demolition of Koskitie 39 in Tuira was started recently. --130.231.156.69 05:52, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
- No I did not know, I guess I have to pay a visit to the demolition site. Thank you for information. Estormiz (talk) 15:43, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement
[edit]Photo Challenge 2nd Place
[edit]Photo Challenge Winner ![]() | ||
Congratulations! Your picture File:Boats Tuira Oulu 20140119.JPG won the 2nd place in the Photo Challenge January, in January 2014. You can find the results of the challenge here. |
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Boat Pikisaari Oulu 20131124.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rivinletto Light Haukipudas Oulu 20140406.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Nallikari tower Oulu 20140427.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Rullalautailuaiheisia Oulu-kuvia?
[edit]Tervehdys.
Löytyisikö kuva-arkistosi Oulu-otosten joukosta mitään rullalautailuun "liittyvää"? Esimerkiksi katukuvia, joissa näkyy jokin kaupungissa olleista rullalautailurampeista tai muista vastaavista laitteista? Olen jostain ymmärtänyt, että Heinäpäässä ollut iso ramppi olisi aikaisemmin ollut muun muassa Raksilassa ja myös Pateniemessä, ja minua kiinnostaisivat esim. sen vaiheet.
Tämä viesti liittyy lähinnä henkilökohtaisiin intresseihini, mutta onhan tuollainen materiaali yhtä lailla tervetullutta myös Commonsiin (Skateboarding in Finland -luokan alle). Kiitos jo etukäteen, jos moisia kuvia löytyy.
--Methem (talk) 09:32, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
- Patelassa ja Raksilassa olen käynyt vain harvakseltaan kuvailemassa. Pikaisesti katsottuna ei ole osunut tuota ko. ramppia edes yleiskuviin Raksilan liikuntakeskuksesta. Pidän kuitenkin rampit mielessä kun selailen kuvia. Jos rampit on olleet graffitein koristeltuja niin uskoisin että olen voinut kuvan ottaakin. --Estormiz (talk) 15:43, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Oulu Railyard 20141108 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pikikatu 3 Oulu 20131124.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Categories Built in Germany in yyyy
[edit]Hello Estormiz, stop add Category:Built in Europe in yyyy to Category:Built in Germany in yyyy. Category:Built in Europe is in Template already. Thank you. Regards --Jean11 (talk) 13:19, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
- Hello Jean11, I do it because the "Built in Germany" -template does not add "Built in Europe" -category if that category does not exist and remove it afterwards. Estormiz (talk) 13:49, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
- I edited the GerArc template to include Built in Europe always --Estormiz (talk) 14:44, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
I don't understand
[edit]1277 in Europe -- (now) --> {{Europeyear|127|7}} but 1977 ----> {{Europeyear|197|7|1969|1970}}?--Threecharlie (talk) 01:57, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
- in the template Template:Europeyear there must have been parameters 3 and 4 in the past, but after changes it only needs (and uses) two parameters - the first is the decade eg. 177 and the second is the year eg. 7. Parameters 1969 (the 3rd parameter) and 1970 (the 4th parameter) are ignored. --Estormiz (talk) 09:28, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks :-)--Threecharlie (talk) 09:30, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi Estormiz, could you please provide author and source information for all images in this collage. If the single images are already on Commons, you might simply link to them in the source-entry. --Túrelio (talk) 11:42, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
- I am the author for all of the images and the source is thus own as stated in the infobox. --Estormiz (talk) 11:54, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Merisilta Oulu 20141231.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rantakatu Oulu 20150405.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Data to be catergorized
[edit]fi:Keskustelu_Wikipediasta:Wikiprojekti_Historialliset_kartat#Senaatin_kartasto_ladattu_Wikimedia_Commonsiin. This was what I was going to do, but it seems to remain up to tomorrow.--Urjanhai (talk) 22:40, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
- I am not so familiar with the area covered by the maps, but I try to categorize maps into year categories 1907 maps and 1907 in Finland, in case they do have got the map date set. Estormiz (talk) 16:44, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
Templates by year
[edit]Hi Estormiz. Thank you so much for all your work on templates, and generally on categories by year. And a special Tank You! for your correction of the template related to "Category:Continents by year". I tried there to make the best, but finally the result was worse. I asked to some admins to correct this template, but nobody did it. Really, what I have seen in so many categories, the most of the template by year doesn't work correctly. I.e. if the years are in the tousands, all it's ok; but if there are years of hundreds or of tens too, then the templates doesn't work correctly: the list of the years became a mess, where after the year 1599 comes year 1, and then 123, and then 14, and then 152, and... and.. and finally year 1600 and 1601. If there are also years before Christ, then the chaos is total! Some times I made order using the sortkey, but now I know that the correct way is to correct the template. If in the future I find templates that are defective, can I ask your help? Best regards, --DenghiùComm (talk) 19:14, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
- Hi DenghiùComm, I've been bothered by the same thing with the sorting of the categories. I am glad you have paid attention to the year categories also. If you find defective templates please do ask for help and I will try to fix them if I can. Best regards, --Estormiz (talk) 19:23, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you very much again! Best regards, --DenghiùComm (talk) 20:06, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
- P.S.: Just at this moment in Category:Buildings in Italy by year of completion I find the last 4 subcats not at your place. The template is correct. Why they are at the end of the list? Cheers, --DenghiùComm (talk) 20:13, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
- Actually the 4 subcats were the only ones in the correct place, the other subcats have not been "refreshed" on the the new template. Saving the subcat without making any changes moves the sybcat in the right position. It seems to me that sometimes this is done by an automatic job but sometimes it won't happen without manual "touching" of the subcats. Estormiz (talk) 16:54, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
Template help
[edit]Hi Estormiz. Here I am...! ;-)) Can you heelp me in some templates?
- Category:Decades by month and Category:Establishments in Iran by year needs a template that finally all theyr subcats are connected between them, and are categorized in theyr flat list too.
- In Category:Months in Tunisia the template doesn't work correctly, see each subcat. The categories are translated automatically, so they became red. Really wrong!
Thank you very much if you can correct these situations. Of course only if you have time and if you feel like it...! Best regards, --DenghiùComm (talk) 14:36, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
- I corrected the Tunisia template by adding parameter lang=en in the date subtemplate, I also made the Template:iranestablishmentyear, but did not make the template for the Decades by month, maybe later. --Estormiz (talk) 15:31, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
- You are
Great! Thank you soo much! Cheers, --DenghiùComm (talk) 16:25, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
- You are
P.S.: do you know the existence of Category:Template repair needed ? Cheers, --DenghiùComm (talk) 16:30, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
- No I din't, thank you for letting me know --Estormiz (talk) 16:32, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Template help reprise
[edit]Hi, thanks for all your templates work. Can you help me (and, naturally, Commons) for find a good solution for a correct sequence of Category:30s plaques referencing years and Category:70s plaques referencing years in Category:Plaques referencing years by decade. :-)--Threecharlie (talk) 10:20, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
- Hi, I changed the template so that if the first parameter is 0 (zero), the first parameter from the category names will be removed. Also I added sorting for Category:Plaques referencing years by decade --Estormiz (talk) 11:55, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks :-)--Threecharlie (talk) 12:19, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
Christianity by year
[edit]Hi, we have the same probleem with Category:Christianity by year.--Threecharlie (talk) 12:39, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
- I corrected sorting of the category. Also there is no need to add third and forth parameters, eg. {{Christianityyear|145|6|
1449|1460}}, since they are not used anymore. --Estormiz (talk) 16:50, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
I don't understand...
[edit]Category:547 by topic vs Category:549 by topic... the same "mother category" type but the first is full and the other not...--Threecharlie (talk) 22:26, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
- I saved the "Category:549 in religion" (without making any changes) and the save populated the topic category. I think this should have been done by an automatic job but I have noticed that some times the only way to get things right is to save the category-page again. --Estormiz (talk) 10:03, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi Estormiz. Do you know that in Category:Months in Europe works two different templates? E.g. Category:January 1862 in Europe and Category:January 1924 in Europe. I had a discussion with user Apalsola, and he told me that one of these template (the most used in this category) is a deprecated template. I think that deprecate template must be cancelled. What do you think? Best regards, --DenghiùComm (talk) 22:30, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
- Hi DenghiùComm. There are many places that have got two or even more templates doing the same thing. It is much work to go through the pages using the deprecated templates and change the template used without ability to use external tools like Autowikibrowser or such. But I guess unused template could be asked to be removed when all the pages have been changed to the correct template. --Estormiz (talk) 08:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
- Ok. Thank you for your answer. Cheers, --DenghiùComm (talk) 08:08, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
Category:Built_in_Algeria_in_1660 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Zoupan (talk) 03:46, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
Category:Built_in_Algeria_in_1612 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Zoupan (talk) 21:41, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
Category:Built_in_Algeria_in_1097 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Zoupan (talk) 21:41, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ämmänväylä Bridge Oulu 20151211.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Puistikkokatu Oulu 20160116.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Church templates for Canada
[edit]Hi... I now create the {{CanadaChurchArc}} for the standard {{CanadaChurchArc|189|9}} but I cannot known the existence of "out-of-standard" {{CanadaYear|churches|190|8}} (the standard is {{CanadaChurchArc|190|8}}). Can you help me? Regards :-)--Threecharlie (talk) 19:36, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
- Seems like the CanadaYear -template is quite sophisticated and it has been quite recently updated. It is also used in more categories than the new template not in quite many though. You might want to contact Skeezix1000 who is the creator of the CanadaYear -template, if you would like to have changes in the CanadaYear -template. --Estormiz (talk) 20:01, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
- Skeezix1000 isn't an active user... I don't know if he can reed a "mine" POV. I stay in hopes.--Threecharlie (talk) 19:05, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
- The CanadaYear template is protected so if you would like to have changes in the template you will have to make an "Edit request" in the Talkpage of the template. I guess the main difference between the two templates is that the CanadaYear-template does not add a decade-category in the year category. Estormiz (talk) 19:18, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
- Skeezix1000 isn't an active user... I don't know if he can reed a "mine" POV. I stay in hopes.--Threecharlie (talk) 19:05, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Larus canus Oulu 20150712 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
I use some of your photos
[edit]Hello Estormiz!
I have used some photos of Corvus frugilegus in my free software educational proyect "Animalandia" (http://animalandia.educa.madrid.org)
You can see directly in the follow links and clic over "Siguiente" ("Next") several times:
http://animalandia.educa.madrid.org/imagen.php?id=45449
http://animalandia.educa.madrid.org/imagen.php?id=45452
If you wish (and I hope yes), you can send me (via fernando.lison@educa.madrid.org) some letters or/and a photo for your "contributor profile" in Animalandia:
http://animalandia.educa.madrid.org/autor.php?nombre=Estormiz
I want show to my students (and so everybody) that Animalandia is make for "real person", and I can tell them about "generosity", "share" and other similar words that we use very few at this time...
This is my "contributor profile" and others, for example:
http://animalandia.educa.madrid.org/autor.php?nombre=Fernando%20Lis%F3n%20Mart%EDn
http://animalandia.educa.madrid.org/autor.php?nombre=Carmen%20Jim%E9nez
http://animalandia.educa.madrid.org/autor.php?nombre=David%20P%E9rez
http://animalandia.educa.madrid.org/autor.php?nombre=Steve%20Garvie%20%28Rainbirder%29
In the future, I use more of your photos, I sure!
Thank you for the licence and, of course, for your splendid photos!!
Regards!
Fernando Lisón, from Spain --Fernando.lison (talk) 16:51, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you for letting me know and all the best with your project, it seems interesting. Estormiz (talk) 17:03, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
4 cats
[edit]No problem. I though that you assumed that this category is not a proper subcategory and I can agree with this, so maybe now it is better. BartekChom (talk) 18:54, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleting Category:Night by city|Rome
[edit]Hello Estormiz! You deleted the "Category:Night by city|Rome" from "Category:Night in Rome". But it is not a redundant category, it is a parallel category. If you follow "Category:Night in Lazio", it will lead you to "Category:Night by country" and not "Category:Night by city". Greetings,--Hiddenhauser (talk) 11:09, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
- But Category:Night in Rome also belongs to Category:Night in Italy by city --Estormiz (talk) 11:14, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
Purkutyö Kaijonharjussa
[edit]Näyttävät purkavan Kaijonharjussa Tokmannin liepeillä seisovaa kellertävää tiilirakennusta, jossa taisi aiemmin toimia jokin suunnittelutoimisto (?). Ei mikään suuri menetys arkkitehtuurin saralla, mutta ajattelin kuitenkin ilmoittaa asiasta, sinä kun olet tuota muuttuvaa kaupunkikuvaa paljon dokumentoinut. -Methem (talk) 08:11, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
- OK, kiitos. Purkutöitä ja rakennustöitä onkin nyt käynnissä melko hyvästi. --Estormiz (talk) 13:05, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Varsasaari Oulu 20170307.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
Reminder: Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2016 is open!
[edit]![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d4/POTY_barnstar.svg/140px-POTY_barnstar.svg.png)
You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2016 Picture of the Year contest.
Dear Estormiz,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2016 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eleventh edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2016) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category.
In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 2 will end on 20 April 2017, 23:59:59 UTC.
Thanks,
--Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 08:42, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cygnus cygnus Oulu 20170417 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Fence Pursitie Oulu 20170305.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|