User talk:Escapedtowisconsin

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Escapedtowisconsin!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文(台灣)‎ | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−

Hi, i guess you are the Flickruser and you are the author of the image, so thank you very much for contributing to Wikimedia Commons. To source the images to Flickr is a small problem: You licenced this image on Flickr with cc-by-nd, nd is not accepted here - only free images are accepted that every one can use for every purpose. So probably you will get some notes because of copyright violations on this talk page. You can prevent this by changing the Flickr licence (what will be also build confidence) or you can "re-source" your image here at Commons with source = own work instead of the flickrlink. If there are any questions please ask, i will try to answer (even with a bad english). --Martin H. (talk) 02:16, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, i forgot, the blimp image will be also affected because it is also sourced to flickr where it is "all rights reserved", only cc-by and cc-by-sa are accepted here, but there are also a various number of different licences aviable: {{GFDL}}, {{Copyrighted Free Use}}, {{Cc-by-3.0}} and {{Cc-by-sa-3.0}}, a lot of different cc licences including some mixtures for commercial and private use (like {{Cc-by-nc-sa-2.0-dual}}) and many more, see Commons:Copyright tags
  • NOTE: Flickr images can only be placed on WikiCommons if they are licensed on flickr through either "Attribution Creative Commons" (cc by 2.0) or "Attribution-ShareAlike-Creative Commons." (cc by sa 2.0) The image here and that of Terry Anderson is licensed on flickr as "Attribution-NoDerivs Creative Commons" which is Not considered free enough for use on Commons. So, you should change the license to one of the 2 options above. I hope this helps. --Leoboudv (talk) 06:26, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • This is a flickr image [1] which was licensed simply as 'Attribution Creative Commons' for this Commons picture: Image:Vase of Tutankhamun1.jpg Your uploaded flickr images all have a non-derivate use license restriction which means they can't be used on Commons until you change the flickr license. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 10:38, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image deletion warning Image:BLIMPS AKRON.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

It cames like i said: the image was nominated for speedy deletion because the flickrreviw failed, i recreated it and started the regualr deletion request (this is a thing i must do to clarify the situation). --Martin H. (talk) 18:34, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image deletion warning Image:KKK.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

Sterkebaktalk 20:00, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image deletion warning Image:KKK_Gun.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

Sterkebaktalk 20:02, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested undeletion, Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#Image:KKK Gun.JPG. --Martin H. (talk) 20:48, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image deletion warning Image:KKK_CROSS_BURN.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

-Nard the Bard 04:22, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

if you are the author of this image, i have sent you an email, asking for re licensing this image under a creative commons license accepted by Wikimedia Commons policy.--Lilyu (talk) 04:24, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, i found your other image, Image:KKK.JPG which is the same (i think), but with a license which is ok for Commons (cc-by-sa-2.0). The problem with Image:KKK_CROSS_BURN.JPG is that the source was licensed cc-by-no derivative. I propose we keep the correct licensed one, and delete the duplicate, is it ok wih you ? (in such a case, please ignore my email, sorry ). Lilyu (talk) 04:46, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just to informe you, problem solved  : we keep Image:KKK.JPG which is licensed cc-by-sa-2.0 both on commons and flickr.

I'm really sorry for my mail ^^ please ignore it, as everything is ok now. By the way, thank you for your contributions to wikipedia, i have add your image on a french article lol. Sorry for all the messages about the licenses, we really try to protect author's rights in our projects. --Lilyu (talk) 06:46, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

skunk love

[edit]
skunk
a skunk for you!!!!!!!! ~skunk43 Skunk43 (talk) 20:25, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
File:Billy Graham Cleveland.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:03, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]