User talk:Erongoguy

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Erongoguy!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 16:31, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kristalltypen Zeichnungen

[edit]

Hallo, hzast du zufällig von diesen Zeichnungen Vektorversionen? Das wäre hilfreich. --Itu (talk) 10:31, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Erongo Geology.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:49, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Hallo Erongoguy, da durch einen Bot die fehlende Infobox-Vorlage angemahnt wurde, habe ich jetzt entsprechend ergänzt. Es wäre aber schön, wenn Du noch das Erstellungsdatum ergänzen könntest, oder sind Datum der Fertigstellung der Zeichnung und Upload am 2. Sep. 2017 identisch?
Wegen der Löschanträge würde ich mir aber nicht allzuviele Sorgen machen. Wie auf de-WP in der Redaktion Chemie und per Mail bereits geschrieben, halte ich die Löschanträge aus genannten Gründen nicht für berechtigt. Viele Grüße -- Ra'ike T C 17:30, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Struktur Colemanit.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:57, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Erongoguy, bei Reproduktionen bitte nicht deren Erstellungs- oder Upload-Datum angeben, sondern das des Originalwerks (ggf. ungefähr). Hast du die Vorlage gescannt oder abfotografiert? Der korrekte Baustein für die Quellenangabe ist nicht {{Own}}, sondern {{Self-scanned}} bzw. {{Self-photographed}}. Bei dieser Datei fehlt zudem noch die Evidenz, dass das Original nicht mehr Recht des Urhebers unterliegt. Weißt du etwas über den Franz Spenker? --Túrelio (talk) 11:53, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Túrelio, vielen Dank für die Info und die Hinweise. Werde es beim nächsten Mal beherzigen. Zu Franz Spenker sind keine Informationen bekannt, siehe http://www.deutschsuedwester.de/historische-ansichtskarten-aus-deutsch-suedwestafrika/herausgeber-historischer-dswa-postkarten/97.html. Meine AK ist postalisch nicht gelaufen, ich habe aber einen andere mit demselben Motiv als gelaufen 1906 gefunden . Das ist alles, was ich an Infos beitragen kann, leider. --Erongoguy (talk) 17:43, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Ach ja, ich habe die AK selber gescanned. Gruß --Erongoguy (talk) 17:46, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Plumbomicrolite Structure Polyhedra

[edit]

Hallo Erongoguy, wenn Du mal wieder ein Bild von einem Mineral hier hochladen möchtest, dann achte bitte zukünftig darauf diesem Bild auch eine vorhandene Kategorie zuzuordnen. Bei diesem Bild hast Du das nicht getan. Wenn keine Kategorie vorhanden ist, solltest Du eine anlegen. Bitte prüfe mal, ob ich diese Kategorie richtig angelegt habe und korrigiere sie ggf. Viele Grüße -- JoeHard (talk) 20:20, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JoeHard, Danke für den Hinweis, werde ich zukünftig beherzigen. Deine Anlage ist völlig korrekt, danke auch dafür! Beste Grüße -- Erongoguy (talk) 05:12, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo Erongoguy, ich möchte gern noch wissen, was bedeutet eigentlich dieses Zeichen: □ in der chemischen Formel? -- JoeHard (talk) 09:17, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Ratledge , Banghard, Stott Tsumeb Corporation.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Ratledge , Banghard, Stott Tsumeb Corporation.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 22:06, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]