User talk:Ermanno Zuccarini

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Ermanno Zuccarini!

-- 07:14, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Omphalographer (talk) 18:29, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

These are transcriptions of and historic manuscript written in 1727 by Lorenzo Gigli. The transcription of 2002 by Armeno Fontana, edited by Accademia Lo Scoltenna does not imply a copyright on the contents. Ermanno Zuccarini (talk) 15:33, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
How could I insert correctly plain text on wikimedia commons? Ermanno Zuccarini (talk) 15:39, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I found Wikisource as the tool fit for me. I agree that the texts of Gigli in Wikimedia Commons have to be deleted. Ermanno Zuccarini (talk) 17:09, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also: