User talk:EmDee

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, EmDee!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文(台灣)‎ | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−


Please tag your images

[edit]

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  italiano  lietuvių  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  Tiếng Việt  Ελληνικά  македонски  русский  українська  հայերեն  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  فارسی  +/−


Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

  • Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
  • State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
  • If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
  • Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
  • Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you. — [[Manecke]] 10:29, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, EmDee!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:47, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  italiano  lietuvių  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  Tiếng Việt  Ελληνικά  македонски  русский  українська  հայերեն  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  فارسی  +/−


Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:
  • Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
  • State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
  • If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
  • Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
  • Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, please use the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 07:18, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]



беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  Esperanto  español  eesti  français  italiano  മലയാളം  Nederlands  русский  slovenčina  српски (ћирилица)  srpski (latinica)  svenska  Tagalog  українська  +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear EmDee,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 03:41, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Bruxelles - Fontaine Anspach - 01b.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Didym (talk) 20:51, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please give images good descriptions

[edit]

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  occitan  polski  português  sicilianu  suomi  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  עברית  العربية  +/−


I noticed you've uploaded File:Chapelle Saint-André de Sévanes 01.JPG and I thought I should draw your attention to a common error.
Please give some thought to writing a good description of uploaded images. This ensures that they can be used. It also helps those that review and improve categories do a better job, which also ensures that images will get used in novel and interesting ways. Thanks, and happy editing!

Pymouss Let’s talk - 19:28, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Concours Wiki loves Monuments 2013

[edit]

Bonjour,

La photo Chapelle Saint-André de Sévanes 01.JPG que vous avez téléversée ne semble pas représenter un monument historique. Elle a donc été retirée du concours Wiki loves monuments 2013.

Sincèrement, Pymouss Let’s talk - 19:33, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Image du jour de Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 en France, 14 September 2013

[edit]
Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 Votre photo File:Chapelle Saint-Martin de Saint-Victor-la-Coste 01.JPG a été choisie par les bénévoles de Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 comme image coup de cœur (ou image du jour) du 14 September 2013. Vous avez ainsi remporté un tee-shirt Wiki Loves Monuments. Wikimédia France vous recontactera prochainement pour préparer l'envoi de votre lot.

--Pymouss Let’s talk - 12:02, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Église Saint-Étienne d'Ohain 10.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it. If you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 16:12, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  català  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  eesti  français  galego  magyar  italiano  Nederlands  polski  română  svenska  ไทย  українська  +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear EmDee,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo



العربية | català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | magyar | Nederlands | polski | svenska | ไทย | +/−

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear EmDee,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo
File:Siège de Tractebel 04.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

BrightRaven (talk) 15:34, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maison du Peuple à Jette 1.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 13:26, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maison du Peuple Jette 3.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 13:27, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maison du Peuple Jette 2.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 13:28, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2016

[edit]

Bonjour EmDee,

En 2014, vous avez participé au concours photo Wiki Loves Monuments Belgium & Luxembourg. Nous organisons aussi ce concours de photo en 2016.

Nous organisons aussi 4 balades photo à Gand, Malines, Anvers et Liège. Visite : http://www.wikilovesmonuments.be/w/index.php?title=Photo_tours_September_2016/fr&setlang=fr

Soyez les bienvenus ! Romaine 15:17, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Street art in Louvain-la-Neuve

[edit]

Bonjour,

J'ai l'impression que la catégorie street art in Louvain-la-Neuve contient principalement des photos qui ont leur place dans une categorie public art in Louvain-la-Neuve. Voir la distinction «art urbain» et «art public».

Bien à vous et bonne continuation.

--H2O(talk) 06:42, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

[edit]

Dear EmDee, My name is Sam Donvil and for my organisation PACKED vzw Center of Expertise for Digital Heritage I am co-organising Wiki Loves Heritage 2018. As I've noticed that many of the contributions are yours and since I'm currently writing an article for FARO magazine about the contest, I was wondering if I could briefly call in order to ask you a couple of questions about your motivation to contribute to Wikimedia platforms. You can reach me at sam@packed.be aswell as on +32 (0)2 217 14 05. thank you very much for your time and consideration!

Sam.Donvil (talk) 12:50, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments France 2019

[edit]

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est de retour et ouvert jusqu'à 31 septembre ! Déjà 8310 photos ont été importés cette année, vous aussi rejoignez le concours !

Le concours concerne tous les monuments présents dans la base Mérimée (qu'ils soient classés, inscrits ou simplement classés). De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la chapelle au coin de la rue aux mégalithes en forêt, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Où que vous soyez il y a des monuments autour de chez vous. Enfin, vous pouvez mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments. Pour information, le règlement est disponible sur le site du concours. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international sélectionnera ensuite des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France les années précédentes. Si vous avez déjà ou si ne pouvez pas participer au concours cette année, faites passer le message autour de vous pour que de nouveaux et nouvelles photographes rejoignent l'aventure !

Bonne journée,

Sarah Krichen WMFr et Nicolas Vigneron, pour l'équipe de Wiki Loves Monuments France, 14:50, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Belgique - Louvain-la-Neuve - Gare - Escalier 2 - Eyes-b - 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dereckson (talk) 18:53, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nombreux doublons dans les photos de la Grand-Place de Bruxelles

[edit]

Bonjour GO69 !

Permettez-moi d'abord de vous remercier pour les renommages de photos des maisons baroques de la Grand-Place de Bruxelles.

Permettez-moi ensuite d'attirer votre attention sur un détail bizarre. Après avoir procédé au renommage des fichiers sur Commons, vous détectez leur utilisation dans les articles Wikipédia et vous corrigez ces derniers, mais il semble que la technique de détection que vous utilisez rate chaque fois la photo de l'infobox de l'article, comme par exemple aujourd'hui le fichier "Belgique - Bruxelles - Maison de la Brouette - 01.jpg" (anciennement "Maison de la Brouette 04.JPG") dans l'infobox de l'article "Maison de la Brouette". J'ai remarqué cela à plusieurs reprises ces derniers jours.

Permettez-moi enfin de vous signaler des doublons (ou triplets) dans les catégories "Maison de la Brouette", "Maison du Sac", "Maison du Renard" et "Maison du Roi d'Espagne" : à chaque fois, il y a trois fois la même photo du sommet de la maison (reconnaissables aux initiales "PM" de l'auteur PMRMaeyaert). Exemple de la "Maison de la Brouette" : les photos "BRUSSEL B PM 050714.jpg", "PM 050714 B BRUSSEL.jpg" et "2043-0065-002 Brussel Grote Markt Den Cruywagen PM50714.jpg".

Cordialement,

--EmDee (talk) 15:02, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Bonjour EmDee.

Je vous sais gré pour votre message : il est en effet particulièrement rare que des contributeurs prennent le temps de remercier ceux qui disposent de la possibilité de renommer des fichiers. Bien souvent nous agissons dans l'indifférence la plus totale si ce n'est que nous recevions aussi parfois, mais fort peu, heureusement, des noms d'oiseaux pour les modifications que nous viendrions à refuser. Il est toujours important d'avoir un retour sur les actions que nous conduisons car nous aussi, les renommeurs de fichiers, sommes grandement perfectibles et ne percevons pas forcément les tenants et aboutissants de la réflexion des postulants à la modification des noms des fichiers.

Je risque sans doute de vous décevoir : je ne dispose pas de pouvoirs extraordinaires. Le fait que je valide un changement de nom de fichier proposé modifie en conséquence toutes les pages qui utilisent le dit fichier. De fait, je ne détecte rien : les miracles de l'informatique s'en chargent. Cependant, derrière la machine il y a un concepteur de programme et vous faîtes bien de signaler que les fichiers présents dans les infoboxes passeraient entre les mailles des opérations automatiques consécutives au renommage. Pour autant, mes compétences techniques étant limitées, voire nulles en matière de programmation, je me permets de vous conseiller de prendre l'attache de VIGNERON (talk · contribs) à ce sujet qui sera être à l'écoute et donner suite aux explications que vous lui donnerez bien mieux que je ne saurais les retranscrire.

Concernant les doublons de l'utilisateur PMRMaeyaert je n'ai pas la possibilité de les supprimer et, là encore, VIGNERON pourra vous aider assurément. Cet utilisateur ne m'est pas inconnu car je passe une partie de mon temps sur commons à catégoriser ses fichiers. Je crains que cette personne n'ait pas intégré toutes les composantes requises pour verser des fichiers et que tout un chacun puisse ensuite aisément les retrouver. De fait, ne retrouvant pas des fichiers qu'elle aurait versés et qui ne seraient pas encore catégorisés, il est très possible qu'elle les reverse mais avec des noms différents. En tout état de cause, quand bien même la résolution de ses fichiers n'est malheureusement pas très élevée, cette personne a à cœur de faire partager le patrimoine : le champ de description est correctement rempli tout comme le nom du fichier reste en adéquation avec l'objet ou le site représenté. Nous ne pouvons que nous féliciter de sa contribution à commons même si comme toutes celles des autres contributeurs elle reste perfectible.

Désolé d'avoir été un peu bavard. Grand merci pour votre travail sur le patrimoine : une passion que nous partageons assurément.

Bien cordialement.--GO69 (talk) 17:28, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,
Pour le premier point, il n'y a pas grand chose à faire, passer à l'intérieur des infoboxes, est quelque chose plus compliqué qu'il n'y paraît. De toute façon, lors d'un renommage une redirection permet de continuer à utiliser l'ancien nom sans le moindre problème (le renommage est plus cosmétique qu'autre chose).
Pour les photos en double, c'est effectivement un problème à corriger. Serait-il possible la liste complète pour que je procède au nettoyage ?
Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 17:54, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Replacing photos with your own

[edit]

Hi EmDee,

I noticed you replaced the main picture of fr:Hôtel de ville d'Alost from File:Town hall of Aalst (DSCF0411).jpg to your own File:Aalst - stadhuis - 01.jpg.

Your own picture is not as high quality (it is significant less sharp), and there are many more people covering the foreground. There appears to be no benefit to this change.

While I very much appreciate all the work you provide on Wikipedia articles with your writing and the many illustrations you bring along, it is not right to replace other contributors' work with your own for the sake of being your own work rather than technical or educational merit.

If you are at all unsure whether your pictures are of higher quality than the ones you are replacing, then I highly recommend posting it on Commons:Quality images candidates where the community will be able to assess whether it meets the Commons:Image guidelines, rather than making the call yourself. You may also use Commons:Valued image candidates which is specifically tailored to encyclopedic value rather than technical quality, although the nomination process is more involved so I personally don't use it unless there were ever a conflict to resolve. Most of us tend to have a bias towards our own work, and we have communities in place to make those calls in a fair way.

Best,

--Trougnouf (talk) 17:39, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(ps: feel free to respond in French if you prefer, I speak it as well but I just have an easier time writing in English)

(ps2: I nominated your picture File:Belgique - Ottignies - Château - Orangerie - 01.jpg on Commons:Quality_images_candidates to illustrate the process, I think it's a QI.)

Hi Benoît ! I answered on my Wikipedia discussion page. EmDee (talk) 10:53, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
(link for easier retrieval: fr:Discussion_utilisateur:EmDee#Réponse_à_Trougnouf) --Trougnouf (talk) 12:04, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Belgique - Ottignies - Château - Orangerie - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 21:42, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Belgique - Bruxelles - Schuman - Berlaymont - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Perspective at the left side of the building needs correction (verticals) --Tuxyso 12:15, 22 November 2020 (UTC) ✓ Done EmDee 17:08, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Better, QI now. --Tuxyso 19:55, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Belgique - Louvain-la-Neuve - Chapelle du Blan T'chfau - 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:31, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Belgique - Bruxelles - Withuis - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jmh2o 13:03, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Belgique - Mont-Saint-Guibert - Auguste Lannoye - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jmh2o 13:03, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Plus que quelques jours pour participer à Wiki Loves Monuments France !

[edit]

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est ouvert pour une semaine encore, jusqu'au 30 septembre. Déjà plus de 6 000 photos ont été importées cette année alors vous aussi rejoignez le concours ! Cette campagne de contribution concerne tous les monuments et objets mobiliers présents dans la base Mérimée et dans la base Palissy. De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la verrière décorative au reliquaire, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Vous pouvez dès à présent mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments et objets du patrimoine français. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international constituera ensuite une sélection des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:38, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Belgique - Louvain-la-Neuve - Kosmopolite Art Tour 2012 - Sablon - 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:29, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Heritage Belgium 2021

[edit]

Beste vriend van Wikimedia België, U hebt meegedaan met de fotowedstrijd. Gelieve het juryrapport te lezen. Helaas hebt u niet gewonnen. Toch hartelijk dank voor uw bijdrage; vanaf 1 juli kan u opnieuw deelnemen.

Cher ami de Wikimedia Belgique, Vous avez participé au concours photo. Veuillez lire le rapport du jury. Malheureusement, vous n'avez pas gagné. Cependant, merci beaucoup pour votre contribution; vous pourriez participer à nouveau à partir du 1er juillet.

Dear friend of Wikimedia Belgium, You have participated in the photo contest. Please read the jury report. Unfortunately you did not win. However, thank you very much for your contribution; you can participate again from July 1st. Geert Van Pamel (talk) 12:39, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Belgique - Louvain-la-Neuve - Centre sportif de Blocry - 53.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JopkeB (talk) 16:00, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]