User talk:Elvaube

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Elvaube!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

BotMultichillT 05:47, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Elvaube!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:47, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image:De-Norderney.ogg is uncategorized since 23 April 2009.
Image:Deutsch sowjetische freundschaft norderney.jpg was uncategorized on 11 October 2009.
Image:Peter norrenberg.png was uncategorized on 11 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:51, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Löschanträge

Hallo Elvaube. Um Löschanträge korrekt und einfach zu stellen, aktivierst du am besten in den Einstellungen das Gadget Quick Delete. --Leyo 16:24, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Das Gebäude wird vom Eigentümer umbenannt. Bitte entfernen Sie den Namen Strandloft — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2003:e8:e70a:9300:4be:88f5:d188:9ae4 (talk) 15:41, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File talk:Postleitzahlen Mönchengladbach.jpg

Erledigt: File talk:Postleitzahlen Mönchengladbach.jpg Ich hoffe mal, dass du die Datei nun auch irgendwo benutzen willst? ;) Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 23:18, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re:File move

Hi Elvaube, I have moved the file as you suggested. Cheers. Oh and your signature seems to have some problem. Was that intentional? --Ben.MQ (talk) 14:27, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings and thank you! And I think, i fixed the wrong formatted signature. Elvaube (talk) 21:38, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hans-Georg Maaßen 02.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 12:01, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Hans-Georg Maaßen 01.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 12:02, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

File tagging File:Schrifersmühle Luftbild.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Schrifersmühle Luftbild.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

INeverCry 19:06, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Schrifersmühle Luftbild.jpg

File:Schrifersmühle Luftbild.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

—Bill william compton^Talk 13:54, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Forum#Lizenzänderung

Hallo Elvaube,
im Forum wird gerade thematisiert was es mit deinen jüngsten Lizenzänderungen auf sich hat und ob diese rechtens waren. Vielleicht magst du dich dort dazu äußern. Viele Grüße --Isderion (talk) 00:53, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Guten Morgen, war mir gar nicht bewusst, dass die Änderungen diskussionswürdig sind. Was ich eigentlich machen wollte ist die Beschreibungsseite der von mir hochgeladenen Bilder zu harmonisieren, die Lizenz hat sich doch nicht geändert - ich erlaube doch weiterhin jedem - unter Nennung der Quelle und des Namens - die Bilder zu verwenden. Oder habe ich den falschen Baustein gewählt? Gruß, Elvaube (talk) 07:33, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Die Änderung von CC-BY auf CC-BY-SA ist schon eine Art Einschränkung, da jemand, der aus einem CC-BY-lizenzierten Werk ein eigenes Werk ("Bearbeitung" bzw. "derivative") erstellt, es nicht ebenfalls unter CC-BY stellen muss, wie das bei CC-BY-SA der Fall ist. Praxistip: Wenn es dir nicht wahnsinnig wichtig ist, dann lass es besser. Wenn doch, dann muss es voll ausdiskutiert werden. --Túrelio (talk) 07:36, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Die Bilder, die ich hier reingestellt habe sind teilweise so alt, dass ich damals einfach gesagt habe, sie seinen Public Domain. Mittlerweile denke ich schon, es sollte zumindest mein Name (Nick) genannt sein, wenn Bilder außerhalb der Wikipedia verwendet werden. Was die neu eingestellten Bilder angeht, so kann ich die CC-BY-SA-Lizenz doch wohl verwenden, oder? Gruß, Elvaube (talk) 07:43, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ähem, irgendwie geht das am Thema vorbei. Es geht darum, dass du z.B. bei File:Norderney Ostbake.jpg knapp 3 Jahre nach dem Hochladen die Lizenz von CC-BY auf CC-BY-SA geändert hast, was eine Einschränkung bedeutet, wie oben erklärt. Das ist nicht o.k. Die von dir jetzt genannten Punkte, sind ein ganz anderes Thema. --Túrelio (talk) 07:53, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also muss der Lizenzbaustein in den älteren hochgeladenen Dateien wieder auf der vorherigen Stand gesetzt werden? Gruß, Elvaube (talk) 07:57, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ich habe mir nur die eine, in dem Forumbeitrag verlinkte Datei angeschaut. Bei der Datei würde es ausreichen, das "sa-" aus dem Lizenzbaustein zu entfernen. Damit würde die ursprüngliche Lizenz bestehen bleiben, gleichzeitig würde aber auch GFDL (eher nutzlos) und CC-BY-SA angezeigt. Im Endeffekt liefe das darauf hinaus, dass du 2 Lizenzen hinzugefügt hast, was völlig in Ordnung ist. --Túrelio (talk) 08:08, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, Danke für den Hinweis, dann mache ich das nachher so. Entschuldige den Wirbel, den diese beiden Buchstaben ausgelöst haben. Gruß, Elvaube (talk) 08:17, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Elvaube, Du als Urheberrechtsinhaber entscheidest beim Hochladen, welche Lizenz Du wählst. Es ist ganz wichtig diese Wahl nicht leichtfertig zu treffen, sonst ärgert man sich im Nachhinein, wenn z.B. ein Nachnutzer die Bilder kommerziell - beispielsweise in Werbung - nutzt und man selbst das Produkt dieser Nutzung nicht benutzen darf und den Nachnutzer nicht zur Unterlassung zwingen kann. Auch wenn das Hochladen und Beschreiben schon kompliziert genug ist; es zahlt sich aus, sich umfassend über Vor- und Nachteile der jeweils gewählten Lizenz zu informieren. Beste Grüße -- Rillke^(q?) 10:35, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Die Änderung meiner Datei File:Hafen Norderney.jpg habe ich rückgängig gemacht und den ursprünglichen Zustand wieder hergestellt. --тнояsтеn ⇔ 12:46, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, ich bin gerade dabei, die Lizenzen meiner Dateien wieder auf Ursprung zu setzen inkl. der Anpassungen der letzten Tage. Elvaube (talk) 13:12, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wobei Deine Datei anfänglich auch nur {{GFDL}} als Lizenz hatte. Gruß, Elvaube (talk) 13:15, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ich hatte mich kurz nach dem Hochladen für eine Doppellizensierung entschieden. Bitte bei Lizenzänderungen sorgfältig vorgehen, bei fremden Bildern noch mehr als bei eigenen. Nichts für ungut, Grüße vom Ex-Norderneyer --тнояsтеn ⇔ 13:43, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ein paar grundsätzliche Hinweise: Hinzufügen von Lizenzen ist immer möglich, Änderung oder Einschränkung einer vorhandenen Lizenz in der Regel ist manchmal bzw gar nicht möglich. Du kannst aus einer cc-by-sa Lizenz ohne Probleme eine cc-by machen, da die weniger Einschränkungen hat als die originale Lizenz, andersrum geht das nicht. Du kannst von einer Version 3 nicht auf eine ältere Version zurückstufen, andersrum sollte das aber möglich sein. Ersatz von cc-by-sa-3.0 auf GFDL + migration auf cc-by-sa-3.0 kann ebenfalls als (kleine) Einschränkung empfunden werden. --Denniss (talk)

Edits von Türnich und Königshoven Wappen

Hallo Elvaube - ich freue mich, dass du dich um die alten Wappen-Dateien kümmerst. Nur wundere ich mich, dass du diesen die Lizenz PD-Coa-Germany zugeordnet hast. Ebenso frage ich mich, warum du - wenn du schon die Dateibeschreibung korrigierst - hier nicht gleich die Vorlage COAInformation verwendest? --Maxxl2 - talk 14:55, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Maxxl, Danke für den Hinweis, die Vorlage kannte ich noch nicht. Wobei PD-Coa-Germany doch noch richtig ist, da es sich doch um ein Gemeindewappen handelt. Gruß, Elvaube ^?! 08:34, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In der Vorlage PD Coa Germany heißt es : Dieses Bild stellt das Wappen einer deutschen Körperschaft des öffentlichen Rechts dar. Nach § 5 Abs. 1 UrhG (Deutschland) sind amtliche Werke wie Wappen gemeinfrei.. Beide Stadtteile sind keine Gemeinden, siehe Körperschaften öffentlichen Rechtes. Sie sind lediglich ein unselbständiger Stadtteil der Stadt Kerpen. Diese historische Wappen sind keine amtliche Hoheitszeichen. Damit trifft die Lizenz nicht zu. --Maxxl2 - talk 09:38, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Frisia VI Heckansicht.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Frisia VI Heckansicht.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 04:20, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning, I made a little which I have corrected in the meanwhile. Regards, Elvaube ^?! 08:07, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Lütjeoog Bugansicht.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Lütjeoog Bugansicht.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Leyo 22:04, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Lütjeoog Heckansicht.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Lütjeoog Heckansicht.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Leyo 22:04, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Norderney

Hallo! Es ist schön zu sehen, wenn sich mal jemand um etwas vernachlässigte Kategorien kümmert. Danke! Wie vielleicht schon vermutet, habe ich eine Kleinigkeit. Auf Norderney mag es passen, im Regelfall jedoch nicht. Du hast die Kategorie Category:Cultural heritage monuments on Norderney Category:Buildings on Norderney mitsamt den Unterkategorien zugeordnet. Das ist so nicht ganz richtig. Die Gebäude/Bauwerke sollten direkt in Category:Buildings on Norderney sein. Der Grund ist der, dass Denkmäler mitnichten nur Gebäude sind. Dazu gehören auch Skulpturen (wie das Category:Kaiser-Wilhelm-Denkmal (Norderney)), Parks und Gartenanlagen oder bewegliche Denkmäler wie Lokomotiven, Bücher oder Münzen. Um hier nicht in die Irre zu führen, sollte man Category:Cultural heritage monuments on Norderney und Category:Buildings on Norderney getrennt sehen. Mein Vorschlag: Ordne den Gebäuden wieder Category:Buildings on Norderney zu und entferne diese Kategorie bei Category:Cultural heritage monuments on Norderney. Danke. --XRay ^talk 06:30, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hab's mal erledigt. --XRay ^talk 20:10, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Danke! Gruß, — Elvaube ^?! 21:54, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mönchengladbach Schriefersmühle um 1910.jpg

File:Mönchengladbach Schriefersmühle um 1910.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

--Krdbot 01:01, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mönchengladbach Schriefersmühle, Tankstelle.jpg

File:Mönchengladbach Schriefersmühle, Tankstelle.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

--Krdbot 01:01, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Schriefersmühle

Hallo Elvaube, so leid es mir bei diesen historischen Fotos auch tut ...

Dass File:Mönchengladbach Schriefersmühle, Tankstelle.jpg so ohne jegliche Lizenzandeutung hier nicht überleben kann, sollte dir als Oldy eigentlich klar sein. Da das Foto auch auf der Website schriefersmuehle.de steht, könntest du ggf. dort einmal nachfragen, ob etwas über den Urheber bekannt ist (z.B. auf der Rückseite des Fotoprints). Findet sich auch bei gründlicher Recherche kein Urheber, könntest du es mit der Vorlage {{PD-anon-70-EU}} versuchen.
Dasselbe gilt für File:Mönchengladbach Schriefersmühle um 1910.jpg. Wenn sich nach gründlicher Recherche hierfür kein Autor ermitteln lässt, könntest du es auf :de mit dem Baustein {{Bild-PD-alt-100}} hochladen.

--Túrelio (talk) 08:50, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Túrelio: Hier wird leider schneller gelöscht als dass man reagieren kann. Eine Anfrage zur Verwendung der Bilder habe ich am Wochenende beim Förderverein der Mühle gestellt. Grüße, — Elvaube ^?! 08:24, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Túrelio: Mittlerweile habe ich eine Antwort vom Stadtarchiv Mönchengladbach erhalten. Sie lautet: Der Verein Schriefersmühle e.V. hat Ihre Anfrage an das Stadtarchiv Mönchengladbach weitergeleitet. Die Fotos wurden dem Verein zwar vom Stadtarchiv zur Verfügung gestellt, hier liegen beide Fotos jedoch nur als Reproduktion vor. Für das ältere Foto der Mühle findet sich in unseren Verzeichnissen der Nachweis, dass es ursprünglich aus einem Album der Pfarrgemeinde Rheindahlen stammt. Die erste mir bekannte Veröffentlichung datiert aus dem Jahr 1971. Das zweite Foto (das Tankstellenfoto) wurde dem Stadtarchiv 1988 von Paul Heinen als Reproduktion übergeben. Herr Heinen ist bereits vor Jahren verstorben. Es handelt sich also meines Erachtens um verwaiste Werke. Das Stadtarchiv wird für diese Reproduktionen keine Lizensierung vornehmen. Das Risiko mit Urheberrechtsansprüchen konfrontiert zu werden, liegt beim jeweiligen Publizisten.

Was wäre nun zu tun? Gruß, — Elvaube ^?! 20:59, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Norderney, die Zweite

Hallo! Ich sehe immer wieder deine fleißige Sortiererei auch meiner Fotos in der Kategorie "Norderney". Danke dafür! Wenn ich das richtig gesehen habe, nutzt du Hot-cat als Helferlein. Falls du es nicht kennen solltest, schau doch mal nach Cat-a-lot als Helferlein. Das Tool geht recht fix vonstatten. Ich nutze es immer für größere Verschieberereien in den Kategorien und Hot-cat nur für Einzelfälle. --XRay ^talk 09:27, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Dietmar, danke für den Tipp. Das Tool macht eigentlich genau das, was ich schon länger gesucht habe. Da die Kategorien "Norderney" und "Buildings on Norderney" derzeit komplett überfrachtet sind, ist das Werkzeug genau das richtige für mich. Vielen Dank sagt — Elvaube ^?! 13:42, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Seesandbake

Hallo, ich hatte dort die Category:Daymarks in Amrum mit Begründung augetauscht, du hast sie nun wieder eingefügt. Seesand war nie Teil von Amrum, die Kategorisierung passt so nicht. --тнояsтеn ⇔ 07:41, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Guten Morgen, das habe ich gar nicht mitbekommen. Ich hatte nur die leere Kategorie gesehen. Dann bitte ich meinen Fehler zu entschuldigen. Danke für die Überprüfung. Gruß, — Elvaube ^?! 09:13, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hatte mich schon gewundert, alles klar.

Deine Signatur hat übrigens zwei öffnende, aber nur ein schließendes "tt"-Tag, solltest du ändern: <tt>...<tt>...</tt> --тнояsтеn ⇔ 16:16, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bedankt! Auf weiterhin gute Zusammenarbeit! — Elvaube ^?! 21:48, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Elvaube,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 01:13, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Elvaube,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:23, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Elvaube,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Elvaube

Contents

Tip: Categorizing images

Löschanträge

File talk:Postleitzahlen Mönchengladbach.jpg

Re:File move

File:Hans-Georg Maaßen 02.jpg

File:Hans-Georg Maaßen 01.jpg

File tagging File:Schrifersmühle Luftbild.jpg

File:Schrifersmühle Luftbild.jpg

Commons:Forum#Lizenzänderung

Edits von Türnich und Königshoven Wappen

Copyright status: File:Frisia VI Heckansicht.jpg

File source is not properly indicated: File:Lütjeoog Bugansicht.jpg

File source is not properly indicated: File:Lütjeoog Heckansicht.jpg

Norderney

File:Mönchengladbach Schriefersmühle um 1910.jpg

File:Mönchengladbach Schriefersmühle, Tankstelle.jpg

Schriefersmühle

Norderney, die Zweite

Category:Seesandbake

Community Insights Survey

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Navigation menu

User talk:Elvaube

Tip: Categorizing images

Löschanträge

File talk:Postleitzahlen Mönchengladbach.jpg

Re:File move

File:Hans-Georg Maaßen 02.jpg

File:Hans-Georg Maaßen 01.jpg

File tagging File:Schrifersmühle Luftbild.jpg

File:Schrifersmühle Luftbild.jpg

Commons:Forum#Lizenzänderung

Edits von Türnich und Königshoven Wappen

Copyright status: File:Frisia VI Heckansicht.jpg

File source is not properly indicated: File:Lütjeoog Bugansicht.jpg

File source is not properly indicated: File:Lütjeoog Heckansicht.jpg

Norderney

File:Mönchengladbach Schriefersmühle um 1910.jpg

File:Mönchengladbach Schriefersmühle, Tankstelle.jpg

Schriefersmühle

Norderney, die Zweite

Category:Seesandbake

Community Insights Survey

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Navigation menu

Search