User talk:Elcom.stadler
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 21:19, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
Mariengrotte/Lourdesgrotte...
[edit]Hallo !
Sorry I don't speak German but I need you help if you have time...
I saw you've uploaded many pictures of Lourdes grottoes of Germany. I'm very interrested because I'm trying to update the French page in a better way in my sandbox. You can see I started to move some cats to sort all these pictures by town name but I don't really know German Landers and towns. That's why I ask you, if you please, to geolocate your pictures and create good cats (and why not to move some pictures from the de-wiki to Commons) to ease my work and help me letting me know where these grottoes are located exactly. I know it's a long work but it'll be very usefull.
Please let me know if you can help. Thanks by advance. --Llann .\m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 21:07, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
P.S. : What's the real difference between Lourdesgrotte and Mariengrotte ?
A barnstar for you!
[edit]The Photographer's Barnstar | |
Für das Bild der Haindlinger Kirchen! Aarp65 (talk) 02:03, 23 October 2014 (UTC) |
- Hallo Aarp65. Many thanks for the barnstar. In my whole life I never got an award. I'm excited. -- Elcom.stadler (talk) 14:28, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
[edit]Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.[survey 1] The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.[survey 2] The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.
You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.
Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
- ↑ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
- ↑ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.
Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey
[edit](Sorry to write in Engilsh)
Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.
If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.
About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Bildformate
[edit]Hallo ElcomStadler hast du eigentlich schon mal gehört dass man eine Kamera hochkant halten kann um zB Altäre und (schmal aufragende) Häuser in kompletten Umfang ablichten zu können, auch für Heiligenfiguren und Altarblätter ist so eine Ausrichtung von großem Vorteil. Ich muss mich immerwieder über deine Bilder ärgern, wenn du Altäre oder Figuren (komplett) abgeschnitten hochlädst.
@Richard Meyer aus Altusried (im bayrischen Anteil Westallgäus) ist das Selbe in Grün--Ricardalovesmonuments (talk) 14:20, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
File:Hofkirchen Sankt Peter - Hochaltar.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Martin Sg. (talk) 00:27, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
File:Mengkofen-Schönrain-4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Megahit32 (talk) 10:09, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 21:15, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
Allgemeine-Laberzeitung?
[edit]Gibt es diese Zeitung wirklich? Du zitierst diese in File:Ergoldsbach Holzleiten Kienoden Wegkreuz.jpg. -- 77blei (talk) 14:44, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
- Ok, ist wohl tatsächlich kein Witz, auch wenn es danach klingt, nichts für ungut. (de:Mediengruppe Straubinger Tagblatt / Landshuter Zeitung) --77blei (talk) 14:48, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
- Die Allgemeine-Laberzeigung gibt es sehr wohl. Sie gehört zur Mediengruppe idowa (Isar, Donau, Wald) Nachfolgend ein Link:
- https://markt.idowa.de/startseite/kontakt-faq/abteilung/anzeigen-beilagen/printwerbung/tageszeitungen/allgemeine-laber-zeitung.html
- Zu dem beschriebenen Kreuz und der sogenannten "Raubergasse" wurde sogar ein Buch angekündigt, das noch 2023 erscheinen soll. Elcom.stadler (talk) 08:24, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
- Hallo Elcom.stadler der User 77blei hatte wohl den Begriff Laber des Zeitungsnamen aus Unwissenheit nicht mit dem Labertal in der sie gelesen wird, sondern mit plaudern/quatschen in Verbindung gebracht. Ricardalovesmonuments (talk) 10:43, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
- Die Annahme mit plaudern oder quatschen ist im Grunde auch gar nicht so falsch, wenn man sich die Ursprünge der Flußnamen betrachtet.
- Der Name Laber rührt höchstwahrscheinlich von „labara“ her, was in der Sprache der mitteleuropäischen Kelten so viel wie „die Schwatzende, Rauschende“ bedeutete. Eine andere Herkunft des Namens könnte auch auf den bairischen Begriff „lap“ (träge, langsam, faul) zurückgehen, dies in Bezug auf die langsame Strömung des Gewässers. Es gibt zahlreiche weitere Flüsse mit dem Namensbestandteil Laber: z. B. Weiße Laber, Schwarze Laber, Kleine Laber. Für eben diese Flüsse herrschte lange Jahre Uneinigkeit über die Schreibweise Laaber oder Laber, bis sich Sprachwissenschaftler 2002 einigten, den Namen aufgrund des keltischen Ursprungswortes mit nur einem "a" zu schreiben. Die alte Schreibweise findet sich aber noch in Ortsnamen wie Laaber oder Rottenburg an der Laaber.
- Interessant, dass jemand das auffällt. Für uns in der Gegend ist der Name der Flüsse und der damit verbundenen Regionen vertraut.
- https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gro%C3%9Fe_Laber
- https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kleine_Laber Elcom.stadler (talk) 14:56, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
- Hallo Elcom.stadler der User 77blei hatte wohl den Begriff Laber des Zeitungsnamen aus Unwissenheit nicht mit dem Labertal in der sie gelesen wird, sondern mit plaudern/quatschen in Verbindung gebracht. Ricardalovesmonuments (talk) 10:43, 22 May 2023 (UTC)