User talk:EgorovaSvetlana

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, EgorovaSvetlana!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 02:52, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Copyright status: File:Patriarch Alexy I.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Patriarch Alexy I.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 00:05, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ras67 (talk) 22:42, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ras67
Hi, I have updated to PD-exempt license, if that appropriate?
Pin collection is my own family collection, as well as my Alma mater University's non official logos created while we were students, also from my own family archive.
Значок Thälmann Pioneers.jpg aslo from my family archive, but I am not sure which license should I use for it?
Regarding NCEI DEM of Newton terrain.jpg and File:Drift supercontinents and ancient oceans from 600 Ma to present at nowadays Newton Massachusetts location.webm I have also created it myself based on website data with link provided, what kind of license should I use? EgorovaSvetlana (talk) 23:58, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
File:Гагарин Юрий значок.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ras67 (talk) 22:50, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ras67
Hi, I have updated to PD-exempt license, if that appropriate?
Pin collection is my own family collection, I saw similar soviet badge in an electronic catalog
EgorovaSvetlana (talk) 00:27, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Ras67
Hi, I have updated to PD-exempt license, if that appropriate?
Pin collection is my own family collection, as well as similar is listed https://www.sovietznak.ru/badge/24333
EgorovaSvetlana (talk) 01:15, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ras67 (talk) 23:00, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ras67, all of aforementioned are mine original grayscale photo of my family archive and I did colorized it with My Heritage, which I have mentioned in tag. If needed I can upload original grayscale images as well. EgorovaSvetlana (talk) 23:59, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
File:Пржевальск 100 значок.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Красный wanna talk? 11:24, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Пржевальску 100 лет значок.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Красный wanna talk? 11:24, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:ICA Boston 2007.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

—‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 03:23, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you for FoP notion, as ICA does allow "Noncommercial photography and video recording is permitted for most works on view; exceptions will be indicated with a no photography icon." For this particular work I can not recall if it had such indication, though on ICA site there is no any picture exists for this Chiho Aoshima's past exhibition and also The Sandra and Gerald Fineberg Art Wall displays murals commissioned annually only temporary, so that is also it is already more as historical photo. EgorovaSvetlana (talk) 14:53, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Незнайка значок.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Незнайка значок.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Alex Spade (talk) 19:35, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Здравствуйте @Alex Spade
это значок советского времени, Незнайка изображен в широкополой шляпе, по идее Лаптева Алексея Михайловича, очень похож на стиль его иллюстраций к книге, в добавок "блондин", в отличие от Незнайки в стиле Генриха Валька "брюнета", на значке ничего не указано, ни авторство, ни производитель, возможно это серия Веселых человечков, поскольку в похожей технике в интернете нашлись значки с другими сюжетами с Незнайкой, не уверена, если можно поставить PD-RU-exempt & PD-UA-exempt, как приемников СССР, книжка выпущена была Детгиз, 1954 году EgorovaSvetlana (talk) 20:17, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Это заведомо не гос.символ. Работы Лаптева будут охраняться АП до 1 янв 2040 года. Персонажи Носова - до 1 янв 2051. Alex Spade (talk) 20:33, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
значок сам по себе - не точная книжная авторская иллюстрация, как я понимаю, а сувенирный продукт, эдакий по следам, полюбившихся книжных человечков, советского производства, у Лаптева, человечки окрашенные, цветные, тут черно-белая графика, стилизованная, кто был технологом и какое предприятие выпускало значок в СССР, мне не известно, но значок из детской семейной домашней коллекции EgorovaSvetlana (talk) 20:56, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Alex Spade нашла похожий в интернете Незнайка значок то бишь производство было массовым EgorovaSvetlana (talk) 21:05, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Даже, чтобы попытаться подтянуть значок хотя бы до анонимного произведения, нужны источники, прямо на это указывающие, и год выпуска. А в целом персонаж охраняется АП до 2051 года. Alex Spade (talk) 21:32, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Alex Spade понятно, спасибо за объяснение EgorovaSvetlana (talk) 22:08, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Alex Spade рассмотрев самые ранние книжки, задумалась, что вполне возможно рисунок для значка самого Лаптева, оказывается в книжках иллюстрации не только акварельные, но и графические выполненные пером, тушью, либо это идеально стилизованный рисунок, практически зеркальный вариант Незнайки из иллюстрации в книге EgorovaSvetlana (talk) 03:59, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
File:Doll The Edward Gorey House 2007.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Doomhope (talk) 03:43, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Boston Gas Port of Cinderella Nick Edmonds.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:24, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Poster "Grannies" Play Svetlana Zemlyakova Stage Director Theater Praktika Moscow Russia.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 06:17, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blurry photographs

[edit]

Hey, Egorova. Avoid uploading blurry photographs like these: [1], [2], [3], etc. They usually are not useful and will likely be deleted if anyone nominates them to deletion. I won't, but someone may find them someday. Thanks, RodRabelo7 (talk) 02:41, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@RodRabelo7 thx for your note, think they are still valuable as documentary pics about past events EgorovaSvetlana (talk) 02:48, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Results of Wiki Loves Folklore 2024 is out!

[edit]

Hi, Greetings

The winners for Wiki Loves Folklore 2024 is announced!

We are happy to share with you winning images for this year's edition. This year saw over 41,038 images from 1921 uploaders represented on Commons in over 140 countries. Kindly see images here.

Our profound gratitude to all the people who participated and organized local contests and photo walks for this project.

We hope to have you contribute to the campaign next year.

Thank you,

Wiki Loves Folklore International Team

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:20, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Объясните, пожалуйста, в какой мере данная категория НЕ дублирует такие уже существующие категории, как Category:Majolica, Category:Tin-glazed maiolica in Russia и др. Спасибо. --A.Savin 21:14, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@A.Savin в собранных примерах не указано какого типа Lead-glazed majolica или Tin-glazed maiolica только для наиболее известных примеров указано, поэтому в этом случае дублируется, для остальных примеров чаще указано майоликовая панель‎‎‎ в описании архитектурных черт зданий и не всегда указана информация, где было произведено, можно было бы конечно по производителю определять, но это тоже не всегда указано, и еще можно собрать майоликовые панно в бывших республиках
Кстати есть категория Izraztsy in architecture причем как подкатегория Stove tiles, которые определены в data как
ceramic tile on a tile stove или керамическая плитка на изразцовую печь
В общем, пока не придумала ничего лучшего чем просто Maiolica Panel EgorovaSvetlana (talk) 22:16, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Но вы поместили эту категорию в материнскую категорию "Ceramics in Russia". Это, по-моему, неверно, так как майоликовые панели необязательно должны встречаться в России. --A.Savin 10:14, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Folklore 2024 Postcard

[edit]

Please help translate to your language

Hello EgorovaSvetlana!

We extend our warmest greetings and gratitude to you for actively taking part in the Wiki Loves Folklore 2024 Commons photography competition. Your valuable contributions have significantly enriched the world's knowledge and cultural heritage.

We are delighted to inform you that your efforts have placed you among the top 100 uploaders during this project. As a token of our appreciation, we would like to send you a special postcard.

To ensure you receive your special postcard postcard, kindly complete this form before August 15, 2024.

Looking ahead, we hope to see you again in February 2025 for the next exciting event.

Thank you once again for your dedication and Wikilove.

Wiki Loves Folklore International Team

-MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:52, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Old Soviet images with wrong coords???

[edit]

While perusing wikishootme.toolforge.org, I noticed four curious files (all uploaded by you), which look mislabeled to me:

All four of them have names and descriptions in Russian, plus {{PD-RU-exempt}} which applies specifically to works originating from Russia. This strongly suggests to me that they originate from Russia. However - and this is the twist! - all of them have coordinates in the vicinity of 42° 18′ 0″ N, 71° 11′ 48″ W, which is also my hometown (Newton, MA, USA - in fact this is how I noticed this!). Can you please-double check the coordinates?

(On a tangential note: Looking further up your talk page as well as at some of the files still around at Special:ListFiles/EgorovaSvetlana suggests something more worrying. Namely, it suggests that you've been quite careless when it comes to uploading files. Some of them have you listed as the author even though they are supposedly historical images. Some of them have been deleted as copyvios and/or wrongly licensed, even though you keep repeatedly claiming Pin collection is my own family collection, as well as my Alma mater University's non official logos created while we were students, also from my own family archive. Next time, please be more careful when uploading images!)

Duckmather (talk) 01:09, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Scans were made recently, from originals of personal invitations in my archive, now in Newton, MA, but they are placed under corresponding location Girstučio baseinas, Kaunas
you can remove coordinates if you think it is confusing EgorovaSvetlana (talk) 01:29, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 04:47, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mural Alien encounter Betty and Barney Hill Lincoln New Hampshire.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:48, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

[edit]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

2022 Picture of the Year: Great Cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo), Little Egret (Egretta garzetta) and Gadwall (Mareca strepera) in Nepal.

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2023 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2022 Picture of the Year contest.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:03, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]