User talk:EduardoFP7/Archive 1

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, EduardoFP7!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 03:58, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Vista frontal da antiga igreja.jpeg

Copyright status: File:Vista frontal da antiga igreja.jpeg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Vista frontal da antiga igreja.jpeg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 16:05, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Paróquia Senhora Sant'Ana em Cansanção.jpeg

Copyright status: File:Paróquia Senhora Sant'Ana em Cansanção.jpeg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Paróquia Senhora Sant'Ana em Cansanção.jpeg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ytoyoda (talk) 19:40, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Procissãoemcansancao.jpeg

Copyright status: File:Procissãoemcansancao.jpeg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Procissãoemcansancao.jpeg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 05:06, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Altarprincipal.jpeg

Copyright status: File:Altarprincipal.jpeg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Altarprincipal.jpeg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:Tabernaculo1.jpeg
• File:Vistafrontal.jpeg

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 06:09, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

File tagging File:Pascomcansancao.jpeg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Pascomcansancao.jpeg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Pascomcansancao.jpeg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

And also:

• File:Tabernaculo1.jpeg
• File:Altarprincipal.jpeg
• File:Procissãoemcansancao.jpeg
• File:Vista frontal da antiga igreja.jpeg
• File:Paróquia Senhora Sant'Ana em Cansanção.jpeg

Yours sincerely EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

File:TeatroRef.jpg

File:TeatroRef.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Эlcobbola _talk 20:09, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Copyright violations

---

Hello EduardoFP7. You have uploaded one or more files that are copyright violations. You have done so despite requests from editors not to do so, and despite their instructions. See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter useful. This is your last warning. The next time you upload a file that violates copyright, you will be blocked. Please leave me a message if you have further questions.

Эlcobbola _talk 20:10, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Paróquia Senhora Sant'Ana em Cansanção.jpeg

File:Paróquia Senhora Sant'Ana em Cansanção.jpeg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Эlcobbola _talk 20:11, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Dave-elman-380x249.gif

And also:

• File:PSS1920.jpg

Yours sincerely, Эlcobbola _talk 20:15, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Your account has been blocked

You have been blocked from editing Commons. The reason for the block is available in the block log as is the name of the administrator who blocked you. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{Unblock}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. For more information, see Appealing a block.

Note that the duration is indefinite (which is not the same as infinite) per the following:

• 16 October 2020 - You uploaded File:Paróquia Senhora Sant'Ana em Cansanção.jpeg from here and even stated "Todos direitos autorais reservados ao autor." Accordingly, you explicitly knew this work was not yours and was fully copyrighted;
• 28 October 2020 - The image was deleted as a COM:NETCOPYVIO;
• 29 October 2020 - A new Flickr account is created, named Eduardo Ferreira Pereira (compare to EduardoFP7), whose only upload is a version of the deleted image combined with another copyvio from the same Facebook source you'd previously used. Accordingly, you knew or should have known this work was also not yours and was fully copyrighted;
• 29 October 2020 - You uploaded that image as File:Paróquia Senhora Sant'Ana.jpg, using the Flickr account as a source.

This is unambiguous intentional license laundering and a deliberate attempt to misrepresent the image's license. This is deception above and beyond merely uploading a copyright violation. Note also that apart from Commons policies the WMF terms of use, in Portuguese, prohibit "With the intent to deceive, posting content that is false or inaccurate" and, of course, "infringing copyrights." Further, you've been recreating deleted content and removing deletion templates ([1][2]). Especially in the aggregate, this is a level of misbehaviour requiring a very good explanation, acknowledgement, and commitment to discontinue before you are to resume editing here. Эlcobbola _talk 17:54, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

Obrigado 3lcobbola, graças a você, percebi o tão grave foram os meus atos, eu vou ler todos os termos que você me mandou e estudarei mais sobre a Wikimedia. Desde então perdão por toda a ignorância e persistência.

Sobre o unblock: Eu fui incompetente, igual você mencionou, não deveria ter feito aquele pedido.

Att. EduardoFP7 (talk) 03:11, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

EduardoFP7

Unblock request declined This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without discussion. Request reason: "Eu peço desculpas a qualquer autor das imagens publicadas, pois não valorizei os direitos autorais. Sim, eu fiz várias violações das diretrizes, eu não sabia como publicar um trabalho sem ser meu, assim eu declarava como meu ou mentia com uma licença falsa. Eu reconheço meus erros, eu aprendi com eles, tanto que eu pedi eu mesmo uma exclusão rápida de uma imagem que eu não consegui confirmar os direitos CC0 Essa exclusão foi o motivo do meu bloqueio, eu já tinha sido avisado, mas só fui ver minha discussão depois do pedido da exclusão rápida. Minha intenção no Wikimedia Commons, nunca foi desvalorizar o trabalho de alguém. Realmente algumas imagens que eu postei não eram públicas. Mas teve outras que eram realmente públicas e eu não conseguia comprovar. Peço desculpas por todos autores das imagens que teve seus direitos violados. Aceito meu banimento, mas eu imploro não o faça ser infinito igual está descrito, minhas intenções sempre foram boas Me bloqueiem por 30 ou 60 dias, pois de qualquer forma eu mereci isso. Mas não me bloqueiem para sempre, pois eu crio alguns artigos no Wikipédia e as vezes eu preciso de colocar uma imagem. Quando eu for postar alguma outra imagem seguirei todos os termos e instruções do Wikimedia Commons. * Mais uma vez peço desculpas por qualquer constrangimento aos autores, e a Wikimedia por não ter cumprido seus termos. Vou seguir apartir de hoje seriamente. Não posso demonstrar isso por causa do meu bloqueio permanente. * Agradeço a atenção de algum superior ler isso, essa mensagem é minha única esperança aqui. Obrigado." Decline reason: "The request is quite vague. I am not sure, that you really understood policies of Commons, and I am not sure, that your new uploads do not violate copyright. Your sentence "I was incompetent, just like you mentioned, I shouldn't have made that request" lets me think, that you withdraw the unblock request anyway. Tradução do Google. O pedido é bastante vago. Não tenho certeza se você realmente entendeu as políticas do Commons e não tenho certeza se seus novos uploads não violam direitos autorais. A sua frase "Eu fui incompetente, igual você mencionou, não deveria ter feito aquele pedido" permite-me pensar que retira o pedido de desbloqueio de qualquer maneira. Taivo (talk) 07:56, 5 November 2020 (UTC)" Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.

(Block log) (unblock) (Change local status for a global block) (contribs)

EduardoFP7 (talk) 22:08, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Oppose - As I explicitly explained above, indefinite is not forever. Yet, again demonstrating you've neither read nor comprehended a single one of our policies, you ask for 30 or 60 days as if the earth's revolutions magically impart knowledge. Our criteria require an understanding of the issue and a credible commitment to discontinue. Your conduct has been grossly incompetent and unethical, and you've provided no indication whatsoever that the issue is understood. See also ticket:2020102610000902. User is also attempting to lie through the OTRS system. They purport to have learned from their mistakes ("Eu reconheço meus erros, eu aprendi com eles), but have offered no retraction--this is telling about sincerity/credibility. Эlcobbola _talk 22:39, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

Atenção requerida

@Elcobbola: Sei que minha discussão não é o lugar adequado para eu fazer a denúncia, mas é o único domínio que não estou impossibilitado de editar. Esse IP 2804:14D:5C67:85E0:11F4:FEB3:90F5:D781 vandalizou a Category:ViihTube com palavras difamatórias e que não são verdadeiras (ver o verbete na pt.wiki), esse IP na verdade está vandalizando não só aqui mas também em outros projetos Wikimedia, como na Wikidata e na Wikipédia em português, ninguém ainda o reverteu, por isso analise sua edição na categoria e tire sua própria conclusão.

O motivo da palavra ser difamatória: Falsiih é uma paródia do pseudônimo da biografada "Viih", é a conjunção da palavra "Falso" (em português significa: em que há mentira, fingimento, dolo.) com o pseudônimo Viih. Além de chamar-la de manipuladora. EduardoFP7 (talk) 22:42, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

@Jdx: This user reversed their reversal in Category:ViihTube EduardoFP7 (talk) 01:40, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Unlock request

Unblock request granted This blocked user asked to be unblocked, and one or more administrators has reviewed and granted this request. Request reason: "Olá, eu sou Eduardo. Após passados 6 meses desde o meu bloqueio em 30 de outubro de 2020, venho pedir novamente o desbloqueio. Me arrependo bruscamente do mal feito à Wikimedia Commons anteriormente, nesses últimos meses me dediquei exclusivamente a procurar informações de imagens e direitos de usos (licenças livres). Garanto que não tenho má-fé alguma em desrepeitar qualquer politíca e recomendação da Fundação Wikimedia e seus projetos, e cada dia contribuo ainda mais com os projetos da Wikimedia. Por isso, eu peço de coração desculpas ao projeto e a vocês, e espero que vocês me perdoem. Após demasiado tempo sobre a antiga discussão, venho deixar algumas observações: De forma alguma nesse tempo tentei fazer um contorno de bloqueio. Eu reconheço que o meu bloqueio por tempo indeterminado como legítimo. Eu me arrependo dos atos cometidos quando iniciante e pretendo editar de boa-fé, sem qualquer recusa a acatar politicas, respeitando sempre os direitos autorais de qualquer imagem. Peço que eu possa ter uma segunda chance com a Wikimedia Commons, e estarei aberto para responder qualquer pergunta. Estou disposto também a usar qualquer filtro de edição. Tradução automática [Automatic translation] Hello, I'm Eduardo. After 6 months since my block on October 30, 2020, I am here to ask again for unblocking. I abruptly repent of the harm done to Wikimedia Commons before, in these last months I dedicated myself exclusively to search for information of images and rights of uses (free licenses). I assure you that I have no bad faith in disrespecting any policy and recommendation of the Wikimedia Foundation and its projects, and every day I contribute even more to the Wikimedia projects. So, I heartily apologize to the project and to you, and I hope you will forgive me. After too much time on the old discussion, I come to leave some observations: In no way in that time did I try to make a blocking contour. I recognize my indefinite blockade as legitimate. I regret the acts committed when I was a beginner and intend to edit in good faith, without any refusal to follow policies, always respecting the copyright of any image. I ask that I may get a second chance with Wikimedia Commons, and I will be open to answering any questions. I am also willing to use any editing filters. EduardoFP7 (talk) 02:40, 1 May 2021 (UTC)" Unblock reason: "Per discussion below. User has genuinely acknowledged the issues and demonstrated an understanding of the issue. Эlcobbola talk 02:04, 5 June 2021 (UTC)" This template should be archived normally.

(Block log) (unblock) (Change local status for a global block) (contribs)

Timeline

1. Case of Paróquia Senhora Sant'Ana

On October 16 I created on the pt.wiki the article pt:Paróquia Senhora Sant'Ana, together, I uploaded File:Paróquia Senhora Sant'Ana em Cansanção.jpeg (my first violation, coming from the page @pascom.cansancao. Soon after on the same day, I uploaded another violation, coming from "Blog do Florisvaldo", then on October 17, another violation, which was: File:Procissãoemcansanção.jpeg (@pascom.cansancao), still on the same day, the following were up: File:Altarprincipal.jpeg (gmaps), File:Tabernaculo1.jpeg (gmaps) and File:Vistafrontal.jpeg (gmaps). On October 26 I uploaded another violation: File:ParóquiaSSA.jpg (copyright IBGE).

On October 27, Altarprincipal.jpeg, Procissãoemcansancao.jpeg, Tabernaculo1.jpeg, Vista frontal da antiga igreja.jpeg was erased, on the same day, I restored the Front view of the old church.jpeg titled PSS1920.jpg, with a false license of over 70 years (PD-old). On October 28th Paróquia Senhora Sant'Ana em Cansanção.jpeg was deleted. On October 29 I recreated Paróquia Senhora Sant'Ana em Cansanção.jpeg, but only in a montage with another violation of @pascom.cansancao, I titled it File:Paróquia Senhora Sant'Ana.jpg, this time I used Flickr (a real license wash, since it would be confirmed by FlickrBot), on October 30 it was deleted. File:ParóquiaSSA.jpg and File:PSS1920.jpg, were also deleted on the same day.

These were the images that I got to post, but before I tried to upload, but I was barred by the 156 filter, the name was: File:Igre-2.jpg, File:Igrejasantana.jpg

2. Case of Dave Elman and Teatro Arraial Ariano Suassuna

On October 28, 2021, I uploaded File:Dave-elman-380x249.gif (CBS) with the false PD-old claim, on October 30 it was deleted with File:TeatroRef.jpg (which I don't remember when I uploaded, but it was probably on October 26)

Questions

• Like what did you do that was incorrect?

All the images I posted were copyright violations, as they all had their rights reserved to the author, preventing them from being reposted without permission, contrary to what Wikimedia Commons is, a free image repository. Also, it is illegal to use images without permission, and even more so to give a false license to the image.

• Why did you remove the deletion mark?

I didn't know what vandalism was, I did it so clearly the images wouldn't be deleted.

• Why did you not respond to the warnings and guidelines before the lockout?

It was an act of ignorance, I was new to the platform and didn't really know what the talk page was, much less the warnings (even though they were quite contextualized), in fact, I would get the notifications, but I didn't pay attention. That's when I started to pay more attention, it was already it was late, I had already done countless abuses and would already be blocked. I was incompetent anyway, and even posted a message on their discussion page which I am ashamed of, claiming to have sources that prove File:Dave-elman-380x249.gif's license on October 30, being a false information so that the image would not be deleted, another mistake.

• Why did you lie through the OTRS system?

It was a bad attempt to try to circumvent the deletion, I implied I was the copyright holder through two different emails, in the first one I asked permission to: Paróquia Senhora Sant'Ana em Cansanção.jpeg and Vista frontal da antiga igreja.jpeg. In the second, I also pretended to be the holder of Procissãoemcansancao.jpeg, Tabernaculo1.jpeg, Altarprincipal.jpeg, ParóquiaSSA.jpg.

• Why the deliberate washing of licenses?

It was a method of recreating the images, I lied about the type of license, since they were copyrighted.

• Why did you recreate copyright?

It was a fixation on trying to illustrate Wikipedia articles at any cost without even looking at their kind of license, copyright and consequences. EduardoFP7 (talk) 23:53, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

Talk

 Comment. @Elcobbola: Don't you have anything to comment? Well, it has been a month since I opened the request. EduardoFP7 (talk) 18:56, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

 Note. On May 12, I joined the Portuguese Wikipedia autoreviewer group (see), demonstrating that I am knowledgeable in Wikimedia Foundation policies, and edit in good faith. EduardoFP7 (talk) 18:56, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

• If you really want my comment, I continue to  Oppose. Blocks are preventative not punitive; accordingly, we are not seeking apology in unblock requests ("I abruptly repent of the harm done to Wikimedia Commons before"), but an indication that the issue is understood. The revolution of the earth about the sun ("After 6 months since my block") has nothing whatsoever to do with this understanding. You've not explained how what you did was incorrect; you've not explained why you ignored the numerous warnings and guidance presented to you before the block; and you've not mentioned even once the aforementioned Flickrwashing and attempt to lie through the OTRS system. In both of those cases, you made deliberate misrepresentations. To say only you have "no bad faith" suggests you've not genuinely acknowledged the nature of your misbehaviour, and thus are not credible. Having an autoreviewer flag on pt.wiki, further, has nothing to do with understanding of IP issues; that you seem to think it is relevant here also does not speak well of the issue(s) being understood. Эlcobbola _talk 19:17, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

@Elcobbola: I tried to write that I understood the gravity of my actions and that my blocking was correct, but in no way did I mean to imply that I should be unblocked on account that I have already stayed for 6 months. The fact that I quoted a group from another project is that they all belong to the same Foundation, and if you understand one, you will soon be better off for the others. So I will try next time (since this one will be denied) to create in chronological order my abuses committed with the OTRS system, and the deliberate laundering of licenses. Thank you for your participation. EduardoFP7 (talk) 19:41, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

"I will try next time" - This doesn't parse; there's no need to wait for a decline to supplement a request. Just write what you would below. Address the things I've mentioned--explain what you did, why you did it, why you should not have, and give examples or other demonstration of your new understanding without appealing to time, flags, or regret. I'll unblock you myself if you demonstrate an understanding of the issue and thereby a credible commitment to discontinue. You just simply haven't done that yet. Эlcobbola _talk 20:05, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

@Elcobbola: Okay, I will do that, maybe it will take a while, since it is a long story. EduardoFP7 (talk) 20:13, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

@Elcobbola: In case you saw something wrong, it was a translation error. I don't know what the outcome of this will be, but I already thank you for your time. EduardoFP7 (talk) 23:53, 4 June 2021 (UTC)