User talk:Ecelan/Archivo mayo 2010

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Hola.

Al toro éste no lo he subido yo a la wikipedia, sino lo he pasado de la wiki inglesa. En el momento cuando lo subía a Commons, en la wiki inglesa no estaba con ningun tipo de licencia sospechosa. Ahora veo que allí ya está borrada esta foto, así que, no tengo nada contra si lo borráis aquí. Uno supone que en la wiki inglesa todo está según la ley, pero se ve que no. ;) --Maduixa 19:18, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Flag of Spain with Osborne's bull.svg

[edit]

Please see my Appeal against the deletion in the image's talk page. --Oren neu dag 17:52, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Plz see my update. --Oren neu dag 12:56, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Portada - Homosexualidad en los Estados Unidos.png

[edit]
You've uploaded a derivative work We're sorry, but Image:Portada - Homosexualidad en los Estados Unidos.png has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Photographs of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this photo must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a derivative work, please explain why on the image description page.

čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ 日本語 ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

-Denniss (talk) 14:18, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hm, there are no longer any Wikimedia trademarks on it, but Image:Gay Pride at Christopher Street Parade Berlin.jpg is licensed as {{GFDL}}, so you can't put the resulting Image:Portada - Homosexualidad en los Estados Unidos.png under CC-BY-SA-3.0; it must also be GFDL. Lupo 15:24, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That the other image is CC-BY is not a problem, as CC-BY is not viral (like CC-BY-SA is) and does not impose any restrictions on the license of a derivative work. Just make sure that you also properly attribute the authors of the original images used for the title image in the brochure. (Which, BTW, looks very good! Congratulations!)
As to getting permission for the use of the Wikipedia logo: I don't think you'll get that. See the previous deletion comment. Lupo 20:50, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wikiencuentro Zaragoza

[edit]

Si no pones los nombres de los retratados, no nos enteramos. :PPPP --Dodo (talk) 12:04, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Asias, majo. --Dodo (talk) 23:01, 14 October 2008 (UTC) PD: ¿Tú no sales en ninguna? Una amiga común dice que quiere verte. :P[reply]

Fotografías de Belchite

[edit]

Hola, Ecelan. Pásate por aquí. Es un enlace que me han hecho llegar y sospecho que las imágenes son tuyas... Un abrazo, y págate algo o le vendo a Dodo la foto que tengo tuya, que recuerda que yo sí saqué tuyas en el Wikiencuentro, ja, ja, ja... --Manuel Trujillo Berges (talk) 11:14, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Llego tarde, pero deseo que lo pases bien por allá. Yo no podré asistir, malas fechas para recorrer tantos km... --Manuel Trujillo Berges (talk) 17:21, 29 December 2008 (UTC) P.S.: Y un tirón de orejas por no avisar del cambio de nombre para cambiarlo en .an... --Manuel Trujillo Berges (talk) 17:21, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image: Metro de Kiev

[edit]

Hola. Quisiera saber cual es el motivo de la eliminación de las últimas 3 imágenes que he subido. Si bien, es cierto que en el caso de los logos de Eurovisión son marcas registradas, fueron hechas a través de otros programas (así como en el caso de algunos programas que se utilizan para formar los escudos de armas de las ciudades o municipios). Lo mismo en el caso del Metro de Kiev, que era una copia de un mapa extraído de Internet y hecho con un programa muy rudimentario (Paint), por lo que no tendría (según mi parecer) ninguna violación a los derechos de autor. En caso de estar equivocado, me gustaría que me explicaras las razones del porqué de esta situación. Desde ya, gracias--Destok (talk) 17:10, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Layout of the Stonewall Inn 1969-en.svg

[edit]

Hi. I created the PNG form of this image. On the talk page of the Stonewall riots article on English Wikipedia, the PNG and SVG images are next to each other (Talk:Stonewall_riots#Layout_of_the_Stonewall_Inn_image). For some reason, the SVG form of this image is not as professional looking as the PNG. I think it may have to do with the font style in the image. I recall the SVG was added to the article a few months ago and I think I replaced it with the PNG just because it did not look as good. Please see the talk page for the Stonewall riots article; I don't know why an SVG would be preferable over a PNG. Image formattng is not my strong point. However, I am sensitive to what should look as professional as possible. I would like to know your thoughts on this. I am rarely ever logged in to Commons. I spend most of my time at English Wikipedia. Thank you. --Moni3 (talk) 22:24, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

[edit]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Ecelan!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:46, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please help replace this outdated license

[edit]

Hello!

Thank you for donating images to the Wikimedia Commons. You have uploaded some images in the past with the license {{PD}}. While this was a license acceptable in the early days of Wikimedia, since January 2006, this license has been deprecated and since October 2008 no new uploads with this license was allowed.

The license on older images should be replaced with a better and more specific license/permissions and you can help by checking the images and adding {{PD-self}} if you are the author or one of the other templates that you can see in the template on the image page.

Thank you for your help. If you need help feel free to ask at Commons talk:Licensing or contact User:Zscout370.

The images we would like you to check are:

BotMultichillT 20:26, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Scans of old magazines (Graphic Lab/Photography workshop)

[edit]

Hi Ecelan, you request, Scans of old magazines, was taken by me... You may look the result now. I hope you'll like it. Ivan Akira (talk) 03:13, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ecelan, Jbarta have completed your request. So again, please have a look. It's a great job! Ivan Akira (talk) 10:56, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:MAN - Copa - Escena de cortejo homoerótico en el gimnasio.jpg

[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 10:01, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

File:Köln Gay Games VIII GG2010.jpg

[edit]

Hi. I have changed the copyvio to delete, to discuss your request. Have a look in Category:Logos, and you see that the threshold is not as rigid as you might think. ZH2010 (talk) 12:33, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ecelan/Archivo_mayo_2010&oldid=38957646"